- Conference Session
- Teaching and Learning in Online Environments
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Prabodh Panindre, New York University; Richard S. Thorsen, New York University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
levels at the beginning of the proposed experiment. The instructors ensured that the subject matter covered in both learning methods was identical. The online and classroom section of all courses had the same syllabus, textbook, instructor, homework assignments, exams and week by week schedule. Online learning modules for each chapter were made available to the students in-sync with the weekly material prescribed in the syllabus for each course. In the onsite version of each course, the instructor assured keeping pace with the syllabus. The pre-recorded online lectures were not made available to the students in the on-site sections of the courses. Thus the students had the same amount of time to work on homework and
- Conference Session
- Works in Progress: Learning and Engagement
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, Tuskegee University; John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
“Tailored Instruction and EngineeringDelivery Using PROTOCOLs” (TIED UP). In ‘tailored instruction’, the course syllabus will bere-organized into an integrated modular concept format where complex engineering conceptswill be presented as networked sub concepts in a web interface, creating a virtual neural space.Each of these networked concepts and sub-concepts will be further linked to several learningtools such as animations, short concept lecture videos (4-6 minute duration) and mandatedstudent activities that are designed leveraging latest insights from established theories of neuroand cognitive science with the help of a number of PROTOCOLs. PROTOCOLs are systematicbrain based learning principles to be followed while delivering a new concept
- Conference Session
- Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education
- Collection
- 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Sara Willner-Giwerc, Tufts University; Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University; Chris Buergin Rogers, Tufts University; Ethan E. Danahy, Tufts University; Isabella Stuopis, Tufts University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
Computing in Engineering is a course required for all 200 engineering students ata research university in Massachusetts. In the last few years, the course underwent a transitionfrom a large, lecture-based course taught by one professor to several smaller sections taught bydifferent professors, each using their own instructional technique. In the spring of 2019, fourprofessors taught the Introduction to Computing Course using three different instructionalmethods. All courses had the same syllabus goals, outlined in Table 1 below. Table 1. Course Goals (as defined in the 2019 syllabi) Overall Goal Key ComponentsFluency in a Master basic Know common Use good code Plan
- Conference Session
- Student Success I: Interventions and Programs
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Joanna Perry Weaver, University of Louisville; Marci S. Decaro, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville; Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
in this course section could beconsidered at high-risk of dropping out of the major, having received grades of D, F, or W fromeither ENGR 101 or 190 previously. A minority of students were joining the major late in theirfirst year and had missed the fall calculus class or were non-engineering majors. The syllabus contained a consent statement, notifying students of the study and offeringthem an opportunity to opt out of having their course materials used for research purposes.Students were included for analysis if they completed both a pre- and post-survey and earned afinal grade in the class (N = 18). Completion of the survey was voluntary; no rewards or credittowards grades were offered as incentives. Of the original 35 students
- Conference Session
- Instrument Development
- Collection
- 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Allison Godwin, Purdue University; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
experiments and assignments. This sample and the teamingenvironment reflected several similarities to the first-year engineering programs for which thisinstrument was intended. An email introducing and containing a link to the online survey wassent to all students during the final days of the course. Response rates were extremely low (≈7%) due to the timing of the survey and lack of in-class announcements. However, the fewresults that were obtained demonstrated that students would identify others outside of their teamsand even their sections, through use of the free-response questions.The final version of the survey consisted of a cover letter describing the purpose of the researchand data collection, a prompt asking the students to indicate all
- Conference Session
- Broadening Participation in Engineering
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Marie Anne L Mundy, Texas A&M Kingsville; Sel Ozcelik, Texas A&M University Kingsville; Mohamed Abdelrahman, Texas A&M University-Kingsville; David Ramirez, Texas A&M University-Kingsville
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
learning.CASCADE utilizes design exercises and experiences along with cascaded peer-mentoring. TheCASCADE objectives include infusion of the design process for freshman through senior; anincrease of retention of engineering undergraduate students; and an increase in the 6-yearengineering undergraduate graduation rate. Strategies to achieve these objectives includeincorporation of design experience into targeted engineering courses at all levels; creation of aninnovative cascaded mentoring program; and linkage to the TAMUK Javelina InnovationLaboratory (JIL). This paper provides demographic data, retention and graduation rates.Preliminary numbers showing growth in retention and graduation rates are provided. The resultsdemonstrated that the design
- Conference Session
- ERM Technical Session 3: Working in Teams
- Collection
- 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Bankole Kolawole Fasanya, Purdue University Northwest; Masoud Fathizadeh P.E., Purdue University Northwest
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
activity. One weekprior to the start of the process, a topic was created and made available on Blackboard for studentsto study before the class. Likewise, the course syllabus was posted on Blackboard at the same time.An announcement was also created to prompt student’s attention about the activities posted onBlackboard and particularly, the grading policy for the course. In the grading policy, 50% of theentire semester grade was allocated to class project assessment, this includes; student presentation,discussion session, write-up, PowerPoint, and project defense. Through a weekly announcement,the professor provided pre-knowledge on what to be discussed in the sub-sequent classes on theBlackboard.Step II: Form the GroupStudents were given the
- Conference Session
- Efforts to Understand and Support Students' Socioemotional Factors
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Madasamy Arockiasamy, Florida Atlantic University; Sudhagar Nagarajan, Florida Atlantic University; Hassan Mahfuz, Florida Atlantic University; Michael R. Maniaci, Florida Atlantic University; Ishwarya Srikanth, Florida Atlantic University; Stephen Michael Castillo; Reinaldo L. Dos Santos, Florida Atlantic University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
projects an 8% increase for employmentin STEM occupations from 2019 to 2029 (BLS, 2020). The educators and the community need tomake sure that the education system is keeping students ahead of the curve and providingemployers access to a world-class workforce.The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of STEM Engagement (NASA -OSTEM) strives to increase K-12 involvement in NASA projects, enhance higher education,support underrepresented and underserved communities, strengthen online education, and boostNASA’s contribution to informal education. In an effort to increase K-12 involvement andawareness about NASA STEM topics, a NASA-sponsored project was carried out at FloridaAtlantic University (FAU) to bring NASA-STEM contents to
- Conference Session
- Research on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Kristen Moore, University at Buffalo; Nathan R. Johnson, University of South Florida; Fernando Sánchez, University of St. Thomas; Walter R. Hargrove
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Educational Research and Methods
they’re drawing on3. Further,knowing how scholarly articles are crafted helps, too: multi-citers might use intersectionality as acentral component of their arguments and papers, whereas one off-ers mention the term as a briefreferential frame or add the citation after peer review.These, of course, are just hypotheses that need to be explored in a close reading, but it raisesquestions about how and if all concepts can or should be integrated into texts as “one-off”citations.Third, the uptake of intersectionality as a concept forged by women of color lies in a handful ofscholars. This is best illustrated in Figure 7. As you can see, the scholars who cite hooks or HillCollins overlap a good deal—and they often cite Crenshaw (sometimes twice as well