correlation towards engineering education.The Need for ExplorationThe usage of AI has picked up widespread popularity, causing an uproar in the tech industry in thepast decade. The need for exploration of AI in racing games stems from the potential challenges,development, and education implications associated with its integration [1]. Racing games andsimulators serve as a reliable learning environment for researchers to gather vast amounts of data.This data-driven approach can be used to optimize designs, algorithms, and frameworks that canrelate to the real world, aiding in the development of electric vehicles (EVs) and other AI-relatedprograms [10-13]. Racing games offer a controlled yet dynamic environment for refiningalgorithms. This simulation
’ cognitive load when engaging in middle school engineering tasks. Thiswork will shed light upon the dynamic development of engineering curriculum and pedagogicalstrategies in response to students’ experiences and challenges.Background The present study examined instructional decision making in a summer informal programthat integrated physical science principles and electrical engineering skills and design. It isimportant to understand potential challenges that have been identified in the research that relateto engineering knowledge acquisition, the potential for modeling STEM integration in informalsetting, and how an understanding of cognitive processes may influence how instructors respondto students’ learning difficulties with engineering
necessary academic training to completechallenging design tasks, but they may not have developed sufficient resilience in their priorexperiences to prepare them for the challenges of the work environment. The students describedexperiencing challenging emotions like frustration and feelings of inadequacy in the workenvironment; and they may need help overcoming these feelings to continue working at thelevels that they are capable of.7 References[1] M. T. B. Drysdale, M. L. McBeath, K. Johanseen, S. Dressler and E. Zaitseva, “Psychological attributes and work-integrated learning: an international study,” Higher Education, Skills and Work- Based Learning, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 20-34, 2016.[2] CEWIL Canada, “What is Work-Integrated Learning
-design courses with instructor-centered approaches. This suggests a disconnectbetween planned, enacted, and experienced elements of curriculum and lifelong learningoutcomes [7]. More research is needed to understand how or why current and recent students’perceptions of the effectiveness of their programs and courses sometimes contradict purportedbest practices, and the implications for lifelong learning motivations and strategies.Marra et al. [30] also explored how the nature of an undergraduate engineering programimpacted alumni lifelong learning, focusing on the program’s emphasis on metacognition andreflection often facilitated through team projects. The researchers interviewed 15 recentgraduates (3-4 years post-graduation) in the United
Engineering Education, 2023 Identifying curriculum factors that facilitate lifelong learning in alumni career trajectories: Stage 2 of a sequential mixed-methods studyAbstractThis research paper presents results from the second stage of a sequential mixed-methods studyexploring the impact of undergraduate curriculum on lifelong learning orientations in the contextof varying alumni career trajectories. Lifelong learning mindsets and skillsets are essential forgraduates of engineering programs as they grapple with an array of sociotechnical challenges andunpredictable career paths.Previously, we used interview findings, in combination with a literature review, to develop aconceptual framework and alumni survey that address several related
Paper ID #37979Understanding Expert Perceptions of PBL Integration in IntroductoryAerospace Engineering Courses: Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups withPBL and Aerospace Engineering InstructorsDr. Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Andrew Olewnik is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the Univer- sity at Buffalo. His research includes undergraduate engineering education with focus on engineering design, problem-based learning, co-curricular involvement and its impact on professional formation, and the role of reflection practices in supporting engineering
, Computer Science is drastic [3]. Furthermore, girls andwomen did not retain their STEM majors [1], [4]. The effort of promoting STEM and roboticseducation should start with early childhood education (ECE) for many reasons: reducingnegative gender stereotypes [5], encouraging women and other marginalized groups'participation in STEM, achieving social justice purposes [6], etc. In this paper, we examinepreservice teachers' perception of STEM and robotics integration in ECE. The authors’epistemological, theoretical, and methodological foundation of this research was informed by theCritical Feminism. Literature ReviewCritical Feminist TheoryCritical Feminism is an ever-evolving and malleable theoretical framework
Material into Engineering Courses and CurriculaThis mixed-methods Work-In-Progress (WIP) paper is designed to capture engineering faculty andstudents’ perceptions of the integration of the arts and engineering into engineering courses andcurricula. There is a lack of prior investigation into the subject of faculty and student perceptionand curriculum development concerning the integration of the arts and engineering. This studyintends to create a baseline understanding of how engineering faculty and students perceive theintegration of the arts and engineering and measure the interest around courses and curriculumdevelopment concerning the arts and engineering.Literature ReviewThe integration of arts into STEM education has been fairly common in
, therebyenhancing student motivation and engagement. This finding suggests that incorporating agilemethodologies like Scrum in educational settings can create an environment conducive toactive learning and student empowerment.6.5 Recommendations for Educators and Curriculum DesignersBased on these findings, educators and curriculum designers are encouraged to explore theintegration of agile methodologies like Scrum in their teaching practices. This could involveprofessional development workshops to train educators in Scrum and other agile frameworks,as well as the redesign of course structures to incorporate these methodologies. Moreover, thestudy suggests the need for educational institutions to rethink traditional feedback mechanismsand embrace more
Paper ID #39300The Effects of a Spatial Thinking Curriculum on Low-Income SophomoreSummer ScholarsDr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University.Ms. Lauren Fogg, Louisiana Tech University Lauren Fogg is a 3rd-year Ph.D. student in Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education at Louisiana Tech University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering. Her research interests are diversity, gender equity
manuscript introduces a lesson design in engineeringeducation to analyze and improve educational strategies, reflective practices, and instructionalmaterials.Assessment methods: This study outlines a lesson design utilizing the ArgumentationFramework to support first-year engineering students in overcoming conceptual challenges whiledeveloping engineering projects. This approach was implemented in an Engineering Technologyundergraduate course at a Midwestern university, whose curriculum covered foundational topicsin Energy Science. The task involved designing a zero-energy home using Aladdin software, asan integrated CAD/CAE platform for design and simulation. Students documented their analysis,inferences, and decisions in a design journal with
their intended degree program altogether. However,ECE 301 has pre-requisite relationships to several later courses in the EE curriculum because thematerial in this course prepares students for more advanced topics. The breadth of the course andthe need to integrate many knowledge bases—including physics, geometry, calculus, andcircuits—can contribute to an inherently challenging experience. ECE 301 instructors share acommitment to wanting to support students through this course. Nonetheless, the course hasdeveloped a reputation among students as a “weed-out.” Engineering education researchers havedocumented how gateway courses can have negative effects on students’ perceptions of theirbelongingness and their ability to succeed within the
. Realff has disseminated this program to other institutions. She directs an NSF sponsored grant in innovation in graduate education which draws on best practices in team work to develop leaders in engineering practice. She has revamped the MSE UG lab experience and MSE curriculum with an emphasis on integrating assessment and including post-doc and graduate student development. Dr. Realff is a dedicated educator who listens to and advocates for students and has been honored for her teaching and mentoring at Georgia Tech. Her leadership and teaching excellence have been recognized through the Undergraduate Research Mentor Award, Atlanta Partners for Education Business School Partnership Award, CETL/AMOCO Junior
Paper ID #44411Enhancing Knowledge Surveys with an Intellectual Humility ScaleDr. Kyle Luthy, Wake Forest University Dr. Kyle Luthy is an Assistant Professor and founding faculty member in the Department of Engineering at Wake Forest University. Kyle has taught across the engineering curriculum and placed intentional focus on the virtue of humility. Kyle holds a Ph.D. and a MS in Computer Engineering from North Carolina State University, as well as BS degrees in Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, and Computer Science from Louisiana State University. As an educator, he brings professional experience as an engineer
motivations with broader societal challenges, as well as reflect upon the potentialimpact of AI technologies. We show that one activity like the PRA we designed may not besufficient to have an effect on students' sense of purpose. Therefore, more research is requiredto understand what types of activities can be introduced in an engineering curriculum toeffectively develop students' sense of purpose.Introduction Engineering is a discipline mainly concerned with the betterment of society. To getengineering students to gain awareness about their potential contribution to society, educatorsmay encourage them to reflect on which societal issues are aligned with their skills, talents,and desires. Development of such an awareness may result in
holistically formulate solutions [4].This multidisciplinary approach is particularly useful to solve the multidimensionalchallenges of our planet which requires an integration of curricula from the Arts andHumanities with STEM as opposed to a general curriculum. Scholars argue that the presentplanetary grand challenges cut across various dimensions of human experience—social,economic, environmental, political as well as moral [5]. For instance, the shift to a lesscarbon-dependent economy in the face of climate change is as much a technological problemas it is a socio-economic one since rapid, dependable, and affordable access to energy hasbeen ingrained in social life's routines and conventions. If we try to solve these issues with anarrow conception
strategies allow students to form connectionsbetween information and allow information to be stored in longer-term memory, which helpsdevelop better engineering undergraduates [20]. Having an integrated curriculum could improvetheir motivation to pursue engineering, as demonstrated by Everett et al. [2], due to the emphasisplaced on intrinsic goals and task value. Furthermore, the growth of online learning platforms,especially because of distance learning due to the necessity of the COVID-19 pandemic, surveys,and performance identifiers in a flipped classroom, could be greatly beneficial in encouraginguniversity students to self-regulate their learning and generate ‘self-efficacy’ [8].Understanding the students' learning strategies could benefit
prepare students with the necessary skill sets to be self-reliant and ready for real-world and industry challenges. Therefore, extensive solutions tobridging this gap are vital to creating a holistic engineering curriculum in which students caneffectively acquire the skills that the industry demands.Professional Formation in Engineering (PFE) CoursesAcknowledging these necessities, the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University ofSouth Florida designed a series of three courses called Professional Formation in Engineering(PFE), 1 credit hour each, to support students in learning and integrating professionalcompetencies and efficiently achieving their personal goals. These courses are designedsequentially, so elements from PFE 1 will
,self-worth) [6].Sense of community is defined as “the perception of similarity to others, an acknowledgedinterdependence with others, a willingness to maintain this interdependence by giving to or doingfor others what one expects from them, and the feeling that one is part of a larger dependable andstable structure [7].” It is comprised of the following sub-factors [8], [9], [10]: 1. Membership: feeling that one has invested part of oneself. 2. Influence: sense of opportunity to affect outcomes. 3. Needs fulfillment: both individual and community needs are met reciprocally. 4. Emotional connection: shared history, personal investment, and quality interaction.Commuter students face additional challenges in integrating into
expertise for the future.Pre-college education has been putting effort into improving STEM attitudes in STEM fields[18] and designing various learning approaches and interventions in STEM [19] to sparkstudents’ positive attitudes. Studies exploring elementary students’ STEM attitudes found thatSTEM integrated robotics curriculum resulted in students’ positive attitudes toward math [19]and positive STEM attitudes relating to computational thinking skills [20].Engineering education positively motivates students to learn STEM and develop an interest inSTEM careers [21]; [22]. Although exposure to engineering concepts in STEM should start at anearly age, a limited number of studies have examined the degree of impact engineering educationhas in
and experience in larger engineering projects is important tocontinuously develop CPS competency.Figure 1. An integrated model of developing complex problem-solving competency in differentphases and different courses* The courses are classified according to the categories in the training programsFactors that affect teachers’ engagement in cultivating and evaluating students’CPS in classAccording to the interviews, teachers’ current attention and engagement in CPScompetency are highly based on their individual interests and self-motivation, insteadof on official, organizational initiations. Below are some quotes from the data: “No one asked me to evaluate this ability...we have the motivation to evaluate our curriculum objectives, but
Paper ID #44329Appreciative Inquiry as an Intervention for Equity-Centered EngineeringEducation Research and PraxisAnn Shivers-McNair, University of Arizona Ann Shivers-McNair is associate professor and director of professional and technical writing in the Department of English and affiliated faculty in the School of Information at the University of Arizona, on the lands of the Tohono O’odham and Pascua Yaqui.Gimantha N. Perera, North Carolina State University Gimantha Perera is a Sri Lankan born researcher and educator from NC State University. He was inspired to be an engineer by his maternal grandfather Anil, who
upper division structural engineering courses.For example, an instructor may assume that a student can apply fundamental principles ofmechanics such as equilibrium, compatibility, and state of stress to practical engineeringproblems such as bridge design. Acknowledging that this assumption is faulty has led us toexplore an anchored civil engineering curriculum in which these fundamental principles aresituated (or anchored) in a specific practical engineering context. The goal of this broaderinvestigation is to demonstrate that the process of anchoring will lead to better prepared bridgeengineers and may lead to a positive shift in attitudes about careers in bridge engineering. Thiswould, in turn, help address the need for more practice-ready
the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received her B.Sc. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and her M.Sc. in Aerospace Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her research interests are focused on teaching and assessment for conceptual understanding, curriculum development for the middle years, and student cultural competencies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to create an Observation Protocol for Introductory Engineering CoursesIntroductionQualitative research often relies on observational data to understand complex phenomena withintheir natural contexts. Observation
Paper ID #38355Fostering Educational Equity in EngineeringMiss Katrina Marie RobertsonHadi Ali, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Hadi Ali is an Assistant Professor of Aerospace Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He studies the influence of the future of work on curricular innovation, with a focus on exploring the relationships between and among adaptability, risk taking and value making. In an effort to characterize engineering education as an (eco)system, his approach integrates analytical methods of data science to address changes in systems and society. More broadly, he is interested in
-structuredness. The integration of ethics is also an ill-structured aspect of the problem, especiallysince meeting the 20% weight reduction is a stretch goal, which the instructor is aware of but thestudents are not. In resolving ill-structured aspects present and emergent in the problem, studentsnecessarily participate in actions that constitute problem framing.Like the previous problem, resolving complexity is reflected in actions of decomposing the pedal-crank system into individual components that can be analyzed as part of the redesign process.Eventually, complexity is further resolved in synthesizing changes to individual components tounderstand the impact at the system level. Procedural and structural knowledge are necessarilydeveloped and
Paper ID #43635WIP: Traditional Engineering Assessments Challenged by ChatGPT: An Evaluationof its Performance on a Fundamental Competencies ExamTrini Balart, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Trinidad Balart is a PhD student at Texas A&M University. She completed her Bachelors of Science in Computer Science engineering from Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. She is currently pursuing her PhD in Multidisciplinary Engineering with a focus in engineering education and the impact of AI on education. Her main research interests include Improving engineering students’ learning, innovative ways of
Paper ID #43555FIE 2023: An Aggregate and Statistical Analysis of the Results and Feedbackof the ASEE ERM Premier International Conference on Engineering EducationHillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University College of EngineeringAnna Stepanova, Texas A&M University Dr. Anna Stepanova is a researcher at the Sketch Recognition Lab at Texas A&M University. She holds a Ph.D., Master’s and Bachelor’s in geology. Anna’s research interests are in geosciences, micropaleontology and education.Dr. Saira Anwar, Texas A&M University Saira Anwar is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Multidisciplinary Engineering
are currently researching interactions in makerspaces, efficacy of a teaching software in an engineering design course, and disability in STEM. Elisa is passionate about continuing efforts to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM.Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innoDr. Katherine Fu, University of Wisconsin Dr. Kate Fu is the Jay and Cynthia Ihlenfeld Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. From
Paper ID #37119Work in Progress: A Systematic Literature Review of EngineeringEducation in Middle School ClassroomsMrs. Natasha Lagoudas Wilkerson, Texas A&M University Natasha Wilkerson is a Ph.D. student in Curriculum & Instruction with an emphasis in engineering edu- cation at Texas A&M University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering and her M.S. in Cur- riculum & Instruction from Texas A&M University. She is the President of the Cosmic Leap Foundation, Director of Space Club, and Co-Founder of Vivify, LLC.Dr. Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez, Texas A&M University Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez is an