Paper ID #37458Criteria Conundrum: Engineering Students’ Beliefs about the Role ofCompeting Criteria in Process Safety JudgementsCayla Ritz, Rowan University Cayla, originally from Freeland, Maryland, has attended Rowan University for all undergraduate and graduate-level degrees. She graduated in Spring 2020 with her BS in Mechanical Engineering with a con- centration in Honors Studies. She also has her MSc in Mechanical Engineering with a COGS in Holocaust and Genocide Studies, and is pursuing a PhD in Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Educa- tion. Specifically, her research interests are focused on
engineering can change to be better aligned with students’values and interests and how intentional curriculum design can change the culture in engineering.With these motivations, experiences, and prior literature in mind, we came to this studyexpecting to find some students’ interests in engineering not aligned with the messaging theyreceive in their coursework. Because of the technical focus of many engineering courses, weexpected some students to seek out skills and knowledge beyond what courses emphasized,while other students would have a strong sense of alignment with their engineering curriculum.3.2 Research questionsThe aim of this study was to understand what curricular messaging engineering students receivedabout engineering practice within
, Clarkson University Jan DeWaters is an Associate Professor in the Institute for STEM Education at Clarkson University, in Potsdam, New York. She teaches in the School of Engineering and her research area is engineering and STEM education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Sociotechnical EngineeringAbstractThis research paper describes the development and initial validation of a questionnaire to assessstudents’ attitudes toward engineering and their appreciation of the sociotechnical nature ofengineering. The questionnaire was developed in light of the increasing need for a
Paper ID #38700Studying the Development of Design Thinking of Undergraduate Engineer-ingStudents in Singapore: Qualitative Reflection Analysis (Research)Dr. Eileen Fong, Nanyang Technological University Eileen Fong, PhD, is a Senior Lecturer at School of Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. She is also currently the Associate Chair (Students) at MSE, responsible for student matters and admissions. She teaches third-year MSE undergraduates, and have received several teaching awards including the prestigious Nanyang Education Award for School (2019) and College (2021
is around events or situations and you can't demonstrate that, live anyway. They give you a case study and for philosophy, again, it's like ideas in the mind. It doesn't really matter whether it's in person or online, and those ones I preferred online because the quality was the same as I would expect in person. (ST12) If it's just a course where you sit down and take notes on probably some math heavy subject or something like ECE [Electrical and Computer Engineering] or physics related, it's probably okay because you're pretty much just translating the lecture into just video format. But if it's a course like Praxis [a design course] that we took in EngSci [Engineering Science] that has a lot more
mental health and help-seeking by race/ethnicity: Findings from the national healthy minds study, 2013–2021,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 306, pp. 138–147, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.038. 3. C. Son, S. Hegde, A. Smith, X. Wang, and F. Sasangohar, “Effects of COVID-19 on college students’ mental health in the united states: Interview survey study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1–14, Sep. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/21279. 4. B. Coley and M. Jennings, “The price of persistence: Investigating the impact of pursuing engineering on undergraduate student mental health,” presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Covington, KY, USA
that our work will contribute to the body of literature regarding broadeningparticipation and the role of women in advancing diversity in engineering. As participants andresearchers in our study, we hope to propagate our findings in a way that maintains the integrityof our panel and demonstrates the usefulness of our methodology. We recognize that both panelsand publications have limited impact, and hope to reimagine both and open doors for more realcommunication and impact on critical topics. We believe that the implementation of ourmethodology is most impactful when used with the end in mind: to amplify the voices ofhistorically marginalized populations in engineering and create systemic change.AcknowledgmentsWe first want to acknowledge
oftheir students. They perceived engineering undergraduate studies to be tough and stressful withmany students suffering from mental health problems. For example, a study participant had thefollowing views. “A lot of students are stressed a lot of the time, so any opportunities, they have to help students remember to be mindful. Mental and emotional support is needed. Reminding students to drink water during the class could be really helpful.” (Student 2).Simple steps taken by the institution to help remind students to be mindful could prove vital topositively influence the MHW of engineering undergraduates. For example, as stated by the studyparticipant above, reminding students in the class to take it easy and just have a glass of water
Paper ID #38420Work in Progress: A Systematic Literature Review of Person-CenteredApproaches and Data-Driven Methods in Engineering Education ResearchMr. Jiafu Niu, University of Cincinnati Jiafu Niu is a M.S. Student in Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati. He holds a B.S. in Applied Statistics and Actuarial Science from Purdue University.Dr. David Reeping, University of Cincinnati Dr. David Reeping is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and was a National Science
economics.Dr. Kaela M Martin, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott Kaela Martin is an Associate Professor and Associate Department Chair of Aerospace Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Campus. She graduated from Purdue University with a PhD in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering. Her research interests in engineering education in- clude developing classroom interventions that improve student learning, designing experiences to further the development of students from novices to experts, and creating engaging classroom experiences.Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical
: Barriers and opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. Research paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL.[15] Leydens, J. A., Johnson, K., Claussen, S., Blacklock, J., Moskal, B. M., & Cordova, O. (2018). Measuring change over time in sociotechnical thinking: A survey/validation model for sociotechnical habits of mind. Research paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
Paper ID #38789Stigma of mental health conditions within engineering culture and itsrelation to help-seeking attitudes: Insights from the first year of alongitudinal study ˜ University at Buffalo, The State University of New YorkMatilde Luz S´anchez-Pena, Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on the development of cultures of care and wellbeing in engineering education spaces
Paper ID #37181A Narrative Literature Review: The Interplay of Motivational Theory andCognition in STEM EducationMr. Alexander V. Struck Jannini, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alexander is a third-year PhD Student in the Engineering Education Department at Purdue University. His main research focus is on applying motivational theories within STEM education, and is looking towards developing a motivational theory that accounts for student cognition and cultural backgrounds.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette Muhsin Menekse is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School
expected.”Participants intended to apply what they had learned from the conference in many ways. Specificcontent from individual sessions was referenced in comments, such as K-12 outreach: “WISE hasK-12 outreach programs.”; student identity: “Group work dynamics based on culture was veryuseful. Student identity, ways to develop it and the importance of that longterm for students.Those are the top of my mind now, but there was more that I incorporated after I came back.”;engineering storytelling: “Storytelling in engineering curricula is exciting, useful, andapproachable”, and artificial intelligence: “How to be more open-minded with new generations,how to use AI and other technologies” and competency-based learning. Other participants wrotehow
. This work is implemented in an equity-minded frame to ensure thatwe support the learning and experience of all students. Students in first-year engineering designcourses often ineffectively deploy design process phases and activities, which can limit theirlearning and negatively impact the quality of their deliverables. To further encourage students tointentionally engage in the appropriate design process phases and activities, we supplement ourcurrent instruction with a new activity that includes a modified time diary and a structuredreflection activity. This work-in-progress paper begins analyzing our data to understand the roleplayed by these activities in student learning.We analyze students’ self-assessments of learning and engineering
Paper ID #41107Board 75: Can Small Changes in Course Structure in Early EngineeringCoursework Have a Big Impact on Retention?Dr. Laine Schrewe Ph.D., Otterbein University Dr. Laine Schrewe is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering, Computer Science, and Physics at Otterbein University. Before transitioning to this role, Laine designed engines for Honda Research and Development for 9 years and then transitioned to education to develop a high school engineering program that she taught for 8 years. She is passionate about improving the educational experience of diverse populations in engineering programs and
Paper ID #44335Shifting Views in Changing Times: Towards a Mixed Methods Study ExaminingFaculty and Student Perceptions on Engineering EthicsProf. Bradley J. Sottile, The Pennsylvania State University Brad Sottile is Assistant Teaching Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering in The Pennsylvania State University’s College of Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Shifting Views in Changing Times: Towards A Mixed Methods Study Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions on Engineering
engineeringeducation emerges from my own lived experiences and cultural background. I recognize that thecurrent educational system underserves many students, in particular marginalized individuals, andthat change is needed. I believe educators have the potential to be socio-political change agents,and that engineering faculty are important gatekeepers to stimulate improvements towardapproaching DEIB on a larger scale. Mindful of these beliefs and the resulting positionality, I willseek to avoid biases during the coding and reporting of the data.Survey Design and DevelopmentThis study seeks to develop a more robust approach to understanding faculty DEIB learning andevaluating faculty DEIB practices in graduate engineering research group/lab settings
Paper ID #43356Working Towards GenAI Literacy: Assessing First-Year Engineering Students’Attitudes towards, Trust in, and Ethical Opinions of ChatGPTDr. Campbell R. Bego, University of Louisville Campbell Rightmyer Bego, PhD, PE, studies learning and retention in undergraduate engineering programs in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville’s Speed School of Engineering. She obtained a BS from Columbia University in Mechanical Engineering, a PE license in Mechanical Engineering from the state of New York, and an MS and PhD in Cognitive Science from the University of Louisville. Her current
arts, what links to engineering come to mind? In other words, whatexamples can you think of that engineering and the arts connect? ________________________________________________________________Q4 Have you ever collaborated with another faculty member from the College of Arts andArchitecture (or similar college at another university)? • Yes (1) • No (2)Q4.1 Please briefly describe the collaboration between you and a faculty member from theCollege of Arts and Architecture (or similar college at another university)? ________________________________________________________________Q5 Have you ever collaborated with a company/business on a project that involved the arts? • Yes (1) • No (2)Q6 Please briefly describe the
Paper ID #44482Work in Progress: Stigma of Mental Health Conditions and its Relationshipto Conditions’ Knowledge and Resource Awareness among Engineering StudentsMatilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on developing cultures of care and well-being in engineering education spaces, assessing gains in institutional efforts
qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate the processes and mech- anisms of learning in naturalistic settings. He has partnered with numerous educational and community organizations across the country to support learning for diverse communities.Smirla Ramos-Montanez˜Viviana L´opez BurgosDr. Gina Navoa Svarovsky, University of Notre Dame Gina Navoa Svarovsky is an Associate Professor of Practice at the University of Notre Dame’s Center for STEM Education and the College of Engineering. She has studied how young people learn engineering for over two decades.Catherine Wagner, University of Notre Dame Catherine Wagner is a research staff member at the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame. She
Paper ID #41534Eye-Tracking Analysis of Problem-Solving Behavior in Design Tasks in UndergraduateEngineering: A Comparison of High and Low Spatial VisualizersDr. Muhammad Asghar, University of Cincinnati Muhammad Asghar is a Postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati (UC). Before coming to UC, he earned a Ph.D. in engineering education, a master’s degree in clinical psychology, a master’s degree in educational psychology, and a bachelor’s degree in computer information systems engineering. Muhammad’s research interests currently focus on students’ mental
Paper ID #44078Engineering Learning among Black and Latinx/e/a/o Students: ConsideringLanguage and Culture to Reengineer Learning EnvironmentsDr. Greses Perez, Tufts University Greses P´ rez is the McDonnell Family Assistant Professor in Engineering Education in the Civil and e Environmental Engineering Department at Tufts University with secondary appointments in Mechanical Engineering and Education. She received her Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design with a focus on Engineering Education from Stanford University. As an Afro-Latina engineer and learning scientist, she has dedicated her career
highlightedthese ethical concerns related to the use of GenAI in engineering education. Plagiarism, forexample, has become a significant concern for engineering instructors and universities (Rudolph,et al., 2023): ‘Students still, they are grade oriented. So, they only care about, oh, I need to pass, I need to score this, I need to score that. Not the, oh, I need to understand this… students will not have faced any difficulty or face any kind of stress from using this kind of tool that, in their mind, it doesn't make sense to avoid it.’ (Clint)This statement by Clint has sadly revealed the fact that some students inside our engineeringfaculties are studying engineering simply for a degree instead of getting a deeper understandingof
explicitly were. Althoughprevious research suggests that engineering doctoral students are motivated by and mindful of theircareer goals [35], we found that three of the four participants were not actively thinking about theircareer goals. In further discussions, the participants explained that their careers seemed so distantin the future that it did not make sense for them to seriously consider career goals as first-yearstudents. Although the participants were not hyper-focused on their career goals throughout theinterviews, they did experience changes in these goals. As they became more socialized inacademia, they experienced academic disenchantment [16], [17]. Mark Lankenau and Tashadisagreed with some of the mainstream teaching and
Paper ID #41670The Success and Retention of Students Using Multiple-Attempt Testing inFundamental Engineering Courses: Dynamics and ThermodynamicsDr. Marino Nader, University of Central Florida Marino Nader is an Associate lecturer in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Central Florida and has been working on digitizing courses and exams, creating different course modalities. Dr. Nader obtained his B.Eng., M.Eng. and Ph.D. from McGill University. His Ph.D. was done in conjunction with the Canadian Space Agency where he spent two years doing research and experiments. Upon completion of
.” Lastly, the code Meeting need of customer / criteriacontains 6.8% of the responses and include examples such as: “producing a product or servicewithin a client’s parameters” and “identifying a thorough list of needs and requirements anddesigning with those in mind.”Questions 2 and 3 asked about challenging and straightforward aspects of engineering design.Because of the similarities in the responses, the same coding framework was used for bothquestions. Question 2 asked students to identify what they deemed up to two aspects of engineeringdesign that they found challenging. The responses were much more distributed among the variousthematic codes than question 1, with the top choices all being under 20%. The highest percentageof responses, 18.2
/tej2022221121.[10] J. L. Hess, J. Beever, C. B. Zoltowski, L. Kisselburgh, and A. O. Brightman, “Enhancing engineering students’ ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 82–102, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20249.[11] P. Murphy, “Teaching applied ethics to the righteous mind,” J. Moral Educ., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 413–428, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/03057240.2014.963036.[12] E. L. Black, F. G. Burton, and J. K. Cieslewicz, “Improving Ethics: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Include Moral Disengagement,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 945–978, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04896-z.[13] J. Haidt, “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social
journal of engineering education, 19(5), 657-662.13. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123-138.14. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.15. Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Wiley, E. W. (2005). Windows into the mind. Higher education, 49(4), 413-430.16. Graham, R. (2018). The global state of the art in engineering education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) New Engineering Education Transformation Initiative Report. Retrieved from http://neet.mit.edu.17. Wadsworth, Barry J. Piaget's Theory of