method of assessment of problem-solving skills that may beextended to assist with the process of assessment planning and quantification for accreditation ofundergraduate degree programs in engineering. Accreditation of undergraduate degree programsin engineering, such as by ABET, currently requires programs to demonstrate students’ ability to“identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles ofengineering, science, and mathematics”[1]. Traditional assessment data can lack reliablegranularity [2] to measure problem-solving skills. Reliable granularity is the reliability (oragreement) of assessment across instructors while quantifying problem-solving processes withaccurate granularity. We propose a new method using
gradedassessments. This requires approval by curriculum and department leadership as it affects gradedassessments. The intent is to reduce student workload by incorporating PLTL with existingassessments vice requiring additional assignments. The authors plan to scale this work beyondthe three previously identified courses.ConclusionThe results so far have been encouraging and show the peer support intervention has positiveeffects on student grades. The course averages indicate that students involved with PLTLactivities have higher course averages an indicator of academic success that has potential to leadto persistence in engineering pathways compared to those students not involved with PLTLactivities. This preliminary data appears to support the overall
evaluations contribute to academic integrity? - Better planning - Clear homework deadlines Greater organization and responsibility - Unanounced evaluations - Need for constant review - Continuous class attendance Development of new study techniques - More study frequency - Opportunity to clarify doubts Reduction in copy rate - Study frequency - Different types of evaluationsGreater organization and responsibilityEnhancing organization and
activities online, number of assignment and/or quiz submission, total time spent on theLMS, etc. For instance, the study by Kizilcec et al. (2013) [19] used the students’ interactionpatterns on their course LMS data to predict their engagement in the course. Additionally, studentLMS interaction data was used to predict their retention in online courses [20].With that background knowledge, it is evident that teaching online courses requires significantlymore planning, more effort and time investment compared to in-person face-to-face courses. Wewould like to acknowledge that we are not looking down upon teaching courses in-person andneither are we hinting at it is easy to teach in-person face-to-face courses. Additionally, we alsoacknowledge that
task is encapsulated by ABET Criterion 5 which states that an effective team includes“members [who] together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment,establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” (2023). For the most part, this education inpractice consists of combining students into groups and letting them explore teamwork dynamicsthrough self-determination (i.e., figuring it out as they go). This sort of situational, experientialeducation mimics to some extent what happens in the engineering workplace, where individualswith unique skill sets are tasked with working together to achieve a common goal. However, theoutcomes of this educational approach can be highly variable, resulting in students who have
44 undergraduate students from CS,computer engineering, and mechanical engineering enrolled in the course in Spring 2024.Research Foundation for New Drone-Centric CurriculumWe designed this course based on recent CS research on drones, specifically leveraging drones toprotect users from privacy invasion and information leakage [4], [5]. Each drone is treated as anautonomous object, designed to preserve its own privacy through pre-programmed movementsand control via a remote user’s smartphone. Multiple cameras and sensors can be embedded intothe smartphone for enhanced portability and usability. Here, SoPT facilitates planned operationswhile safeguarding privacy- and security-sensitive information from adversaries, whether inexisting or
concentratedpresentation. This raises important questions about how publication venues might need to evolve toaccommodate different types of RtD work.The contrast between Shroyer's planned RtD approach and Coppola and Turns’ retrospectiveapplication demonstrates RtD's versatility. While Shroyer explicitly embraced RtD during her designefforts, Coppola and Turns retrospectively applied RtD frameworks to understand existing practice.This suggests RtD's value not just for new design work but for making sense of establishededucational practices. Despite these different approaches, both studies culminated in frameworks -Shroyer's framework for configuring a seeing-across-projects experience and Coppola's temporalframework - showing a specific way that RtD can create
impatient. 27 It seems as if little is being accomplished with the project’s goals. 29 Although we are not fully sure of the project’s goals, we are excited and proud to be on the team. Items for the Storming Stage: 2 We are quick to get on with the task on hand and do not spend too much time in the planning stage. 7 The team leader tries to keep order and contributes to the task at hand. 9 We have lots of ideas but don’t use many as we don’t listen but reject before understanding them. 16 Many team members have their own ideas about the process and personal agendas are rampant. 20 The tasks are very different from what we imagined and seem very difficult to accomplish
Professor of Clarkson University, application engineer of General Electric Energy Management, and research engineer of IBM Research Lab. Her research lies in the planning, operation, and control of power systems, with particular interests in the modeling and optimization of large-scale electricity transmission and distribution systems with a deeper penetration of distributed energy resources, flexible demand-side assets, electric vehicle charging stations, and micro- grids. She is also an advocator for enhancing power engineering education for the Nation’s smart grid mission. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Power Engineering Education and Learning for Next-generation
. Students in the program take three courses before the beginning of their secondyear. One of these three courses is the Professional Planning with Spatial Visualization coursewhich implements the Sorby’s Developing Spatial Thinking curriculum. This paper addresses thequestion: What are the effects of the spatial thinking curriculum on the spatial abilities of low-income sophomore summer scholars?Students take the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R) and theRevised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test (RMPFBT) as a pre- and post-assessment for thisprogram. The PSVT:R is traditionally administered as a pre/post assessment of spatialvisualization in engineering majors. In this work, it was chosen to assess knowledge
sequence ofsteps to solve a problem. Problem decomposition is breaking down a problem into smaller andmore manageable segments. Pattern recognition involves finding generalizable features acrossdifferent problems and the potential for cross-applicability. Lastly, debugging is testing for errorsand correcting them. While abstraction and decomposition are terms consistently appearingacross studies, the other components used to define CT may vary [7]. However, the central ideamaintained is that CT equips individuals with a framework for solving problems in a structuredand systematic way, regardless of the domain in which the problem arises. CT is closely relatedto engineering principles in planning and assessing complicated systems meant to
networking, wikis, and alternate reality worlds have grown significantly. Some instructorsshare their course materials and teaching ideas broadly, which expands learning and educationequity. Online content such as open educational resources (OERs) have been developed to supporthigher education students. Open educational resources are teaching, learning, and researchmaterials, commonly in the digital medium and public domain; an open educational resource maybe released under an open license [1]. In other words, an OER allows others to access, use, adaptand redistribute the materials at no cost. An OER may include complete courses, individual courseunits or modules, textbooks, lesson plans, syllabi, lectures, assignments, game-based learningprograms
collectively to gain ameaningful understanding of sociocultural phenomena reflected in their autobiographical data”[32, p. 23-4]. In our case, the autobiographical materials are our past experiences as women inengineering as well as the panel discussion transcript. The sociocultural phenomena we arestudying is the panel topic, the role of women in building diversity, equity, and inclusion inengineering.We plan to follow the iterative process outlined by Chang et al. [32] for conducting acollaborative autoethnography: data collection through both individual writing and reflection andgroup sharing (i.e., our panel discussion and subsequent meetings); and individual data review,coding, group meaning-making and theme search. Specifically, we plan to
examinedfour cohorts of students for three semesters: (a) fall 2018 sophomore students, (b) fall 2019sophomore students, (c) fall 2018 junior students, and (d) fall 2019 junior students. Thesophomore and junior students’ persistence was tracked over a period of three semesters— thusthe pre-COVID-19 cohorts (i.e., fall 2018 cohorts) did not have their education disrupted overthis time frame (fall 2018 to fall 2019) by COVID-19 while the COVID-19 cohorts (i.e., fall2019 cohorts) did have their education disrupted in spring 2020. Next, due to our large sample,we were able to break down and examine student persistence rate by student demographic groups(i.e., gender, financial need, first generation status, and race/ethnicity).Plan of Analysis We
] advocated that a scoping review can adequately inform othersabout existing research questions within a field. However, there is no standard methodology forscoping reviews and continued debate and discussion about optimizing protocols to improvetheir usefulness and rigor are encouraged [17-19]. In this paper, we adopt the six-stageframework outlined by [20] in conducting systematic reviews: scoping, planning, searching,abstract screening, full-text sifting, extracting, and synthesizing information.Scoping: The scoping stage is pivotal in stating the research questions, considering the widespread use of Concept inventory in Engineering. Given the novelty of this research, as no priorreview of CIs in engineering education exists and considering the
increasing students' course grades and motivatingthem to continue studying biology.Another subtheme from the EVT review was a focus on differences in expectancy-value beliefsin students based on biological sex. An excellent example of this focus within engineeringeducation comes from a study by Jones et al. [47]. The researchers were interested in first-yearengineering differences in self-efficacy expectations, engineering success expectations,engineering identity, engineering values, achievement, and career plans between male andfemale students. An interesting finding was that males had higher expectancy beliefs, includingthose related to self-efficacy than females, but both populations saw losses in their expectancyand value beliefs over the first
. Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno Derrick Satterfield is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on engineering graduate students’ experiences and motivation centered on career planning and preparation.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of studenDr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University
high school students who attended biology orchemistry classes in six different complex learning tasks. The findings align with the themeas they showcase the adaptability of goal setting based on task complexity. The resultsshowed that students could tell the difference between simple and complex tasks as theymade changes to their goals or plans. They dug deeper to analyze the complex tasks incomparison to easy tasks in which they used shallow plans for the analysis. This is alsoendorsed by Dupeyrat and Mariné [31], performance goals are usually associated withshallow−processing strategies such as rote learning. This shows that students adopt a masterygoal toward complex tasks by analyzing the task deeply instead of showing avoidance.Similarly
complicating their ability to engagemeaningfully. Item MCQ5, “I develop action plans before interacting with people from adifferent culture in my research group,” was the most contentious in the metacognitive CQ, oftensparking confusion. P11 described item 5 as “too formal and ambiguous.” This situationhighlights the overlooked issue of assuming that all participants would inherently understandthese terms. Clear definitions or primers are essential to ensure comprehension, emphasizing theneed to either introduce key terms upfront or incorporate explanatory elements within the survey.Another recurring issue was the specificity of questions. For instance, P15 initially struggled tointerpret the question about preparing for intercultural interactions but
researchers to the field—for example, in National ScienceFoundation Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (RIEF) grants, and CAREER BroaderImpacts and Educational Plan activities—which require traditionally-trained faculty to developengineering education research skills. Reflecting this shift, the number of qualitative researcharticles in engineering education reflects the increase in interest in qualitative methods and theneed for introductory material for pivoting researchers. It has been the norm for engineeringeducation researchers to partner with emergent and pivoting engineering faculty members tomentor them through this transition, but the process is often time- and resource-intensive. To meetthis need, we have developed this primer on
strategies to overcome them. The study is overall encouraging forengineering instructors to integrate the concepts of intercultural learning into their curriculum, butthe study does have some limitations: 1) the results of the study are based on the student reflections,and no student interviews were conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the studentintercultural competence. 2) the data was collected through written reflections; validated surveyswere not used to assess the intercultural competence development of the students. As a part offuture work, we plan to conduct in-depth interviews to understand the intercultural competencedevelopment of the students and use validated instruments such as Intercultural DevelopmentInventory (IDI) to assess
implementation and real impact. Topics include design thinking, product and service design, rapidprototype engineering and testing, business modelling, social entrepreneurship, team dynamics, impactmeasurement, operations planning and ethics. Possibility to travel overseas during spring break. Previous projectsinclude [example companies and products]. Periodic design reviews; Final course presentation and expo; industryand adviser interaction. Limited enrollment via application. Must sign up for [Course 402 A] and [Course 402 B].[Course 3 B].: Design for Extreme AffordabilitySame course descriptionEngineering [10]: Intro to Solid MechanicsIntroduction to engineering analysis using the principles of engineering solid mechanics. Builds on the math
attend and participate.Aerospace engineering faculty experts. The planned transition to a PBL environment beingimplemented by the authors occurred within an introductory aerospace engineering course.Instructors of a similar class at ABET-accredited universities were identified from class offeringslisted online. Aerospace faculty within the authors’ networks who had demonstrated interest inpedagogical practice in aerospace engineering were also identified. Like the PBL experts, thesefaculty were contacted by email and asked (1) to participate in the study, and (2) to recommendany other faculty they think would add value to the study. Seven experts agreed to participate inthe study, and after a date was set, two participants were unable to attend
launched somenew engineering learning programs. In China, similar reforms and transformations have also been* Correspondence E-mail: wangliang9170@zju.edu.cn 1implemented by governments in the field of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM),like New Engineering Education Plan implemented by the MOE of China [11], [12]. Almost all reform andtransformation of engineering education mentioned above has shown common characteristics: shorten thedistance between professional engineering knowledge and the real-world by emphasizing the important roleof authentic engineering environments in engineers’ training process, which can be generalized as“authentic engineering learning”.In
with any element of attention focusing) SSAC Learning analysis and Self-monitoring, self- Self-reflection phase self-evaluation judgment Motivation No similarity of thematic Forethought phase (comprising area with any element of self-motivation/beliefs and SSAC values) Autonomy Self-judgment, learning Forethought phase targets (comprising goal setting, strategic planning)Table 1: Similarity of thematic areas with student self-assessment cycle by McMillan and Hearn[8], and self-regulation
modeling and simulation of emergent behavior in air transportation,” Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1186/2194-3206-1-15/FIGURES/10.[7] E. Z. Berglund and M. Asce, “Using Agent-Based Modeling for Water Resources Planning and Management,” J Water Resour Plan Manag, vol. 141, no. 11, p. 04015025, May 2015, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000544.[8] Q. Huang, D. C. Parker, T. Filatova, and S. Sun, “A review of urban residential choice models using agent-based modeling,” vol. 41, pp. 661–689, 2014, doi: 10.1068/b120043p.[9] M. W. Macy and R. Willer, “FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling,” Annu. Rev. Sociol, vol. 28, pp. 143–66, 2002
recommending it to the cohort participants is an example of instrumentalsocial capital. When asked about how the program had helped Pam during her first semester, sheresponded by highlighting how the different people behind the program helped her: [My faculty mentor]encouraged me and Kelly to join SWE and go on their trip to New Orleans. So that's a super fun future plan. [Graduate Student], I love talking to you about how you did industry, came back, and got your Masters, because that’s always something that was in my head. So just hearing different people’s… what they did, what their journey was, and trying to relate that to what I want to do. So the connections are just something that is amazing that not
intention to leave the program, indicating that the items areperforming well to accurately capture attrition decisions.The group who graduated with a Ph.D. during the course of the year-long survey indicated higherlevels of stress than than the other three groups over the course of the year. We assumed that stressfactor is highly likely to affect people’s mental health and quality of life and work [37], which canresult in negative perceptions regarding their program and experiences. However, this group showsthe highest mean in Q1 (Persistence) and the lowest in Q9 (Intention to leave). For students in thefinal stages of their program, in which they are preparing a doctoral dissertation defense andnavigating future work plans influences these items