facilitate teaching and learning by providing opportunities for interactivediscussions, sharing resources, and fostering engagement among students, the use of SMP ineducation also raises concerns about its potential adverse effects, such as distraction, privacyissues, and cyberbullying [15]. This research paper aims to examine the current state of socialmedia use in engineering education, including the benefits, challenges, and potential risksassociated with its use. It will also address the primary research question, "What are the currenttrends of social media platforms usage in engineering education?" The paper uses several sub-research questions listed below to explore and classify the articles being reviewed. This studywill also explore the ways
for first-year studentsinfluence the cultivation of teamwork skills. According to the survey results, 94% of theparticipants found team projects with other in-class collaborative activities to be the mostbeneficial in developing teamwork skills and a significant number of students attributed theirteam success to how effectively they distributed the tasks among team members.Therefore, this study aims to contribute to the broader research on teamwork assessments byproviding an understanding of team dynamics and interdisciplinary learning in the context ofteam-based computational modeling projects. The study explores how BiomedicalEngineering graduate students utilize their model-based reasoning skills through effectivecollaboration and social
Paper ID #39571An Exploration of Black Engineering Students’ Aspirational Capitalwithin Community Cultural Wealth and Ecological Systems TheoryMs. Jessica Allison Manning, Clemson University Jessica Manning is a graduate student in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clem- son University. She is also a Graduate Administrative Assistant for the Bioengineering Department and assists with advising students throughout their academic careers.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in
Paper ID #37099A Theoretical Review: The Role of Knowledge-Based Symmetry inEngineering Student CollaborationMr. Jack Elliott, Utah State University Jack Elliott is a concurrent M.S. (Mechanical Engineering) and Ph.D. (Engineering Education) graduate student at Utah State University. His M.S. research is in experimental fluid dynamics, his Ph.D. work ex- amines student social support networks in engineering education, and his other research activities include developing low-cost technology-based tools for improving fluid dynamics education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
James Madison University. Dr. Nagel, a mechanical engineer by training, performs research on engineering student learning and engagement with a focus on interventions, pedagogies, and design methodologies. Through his research, he seeks to gain applicable knowledge for increasing student engagement and re- ducing barriers in engineering, design, and making. At James Madison University, Dr. Nagel has been KEEN Leader, sophomore design coordinator, and Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineer- ing Education. At Carthage College, Dr. Nagel is leading development of two new degree programs: a Bachelor of Arts in Engineering and a Bachelor of Science in Engineering. ©American Society
. Thisfull paper explores the impact of self-paced and online Portable intercultural modules (PIMs) onthe intercultural learning goals of the students enrolled in a junior-level system thinking course.The PIM used in the class aims to improve learners’ teamwork and communication skills. ThePIM contains five activities, including watching videos about cultural diversity and empathy,survey, quizzes, and exercise that applies learning towards intercultural collaboration. The studentsin the system thinking course were asked to complete the PIM and a reflection assignment. Theresearch questions that we intend to answer for this study are: RQ1: What domains of interculturalcompetence, as defined by the AAC&U IKC Value rubric, are represented through
researches structures that contribute to underrepresentation in STEM majors and is currently a Graduate Assistant for the UBelong Collaborative.Dr. Allison Godwin, Cornell University Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and
education by addressinglanguage barriers and enhancing accessibility to educational materials. By breaking downlanguage barriers, ChatGPT can make learning resources more readily available to studentsworldwide, regardless of their native language. Additionally, the mention of cross-culturalunderstanding and collaboration suggests that ChatGPT may play a role in fosteringcommunication and cooperation among students from diverse cultural backgrounds. Thecollaborative learning experiences facilitated by ChatGPT can transcend linguistic differences,promoting a more inclusive and interconnected global educational landscape. “AI can improve accessibility for students with disabilities. It can provide text-to-speech, speech-to-text, and other
various aspects such asstudent recruitment, funding allocation, and public perception [3]. It is crucial for a university toinvestigate retention to understand the reasons behind student departures. Retention rates amongcollege students are frequently employed as a metric for gauging institutional accountability andsuccess. Moreover, these rates are increasingly utilized as a basis for allocating resources.Gaining insights into the factors that influence college student retention has become imperativefor institutions of higher education. The ongoing issue of low graduation rates among students inengineering programs remains a significant cause for concern within the higher educationlandscape. Many students drop out early in their undergraduate
analysis of these data was two-fold: (a) to validate the themes and sub-themes that had beengenerated from the focus group data; and (b) to identify more teaching practice that facilitatedstudents’ effectiveness in learning. We have included illustrating quotes from these survey datato complement the findings from the focus group data in the Findings section.FindingsWe have synthesized the subthemes from our analysis into three emergent themes to addresseach of our three research questions. In the following section, we have provided examples thatspeak to each question. Student names have been replaced with a numbering system (e.g., ST1)for ethical/privacy reasons. Please note that while participants mostly shared their experienceswith engineering
workforce.ConclusionThe study concludes that TPB-based interventions can effectively enhance student participationin team projects within STEM education. These interventions offer a promising avenue foreducators seeking to improve teamwork and collaboration among students. However, the studyalso acknowledges limitations, such as the potential variability in intervention effectivenessbased on individual student differences and the broader applicability across different STEMdisciplines.Future research should explore the long-term impacts of these interventions on students'teamwork skills and their transition to professional environments. Additionally, further studiescould investigate the scalability of the interventions and their adaptability to diverse
Paper ID #41440Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Experiences of Faculty RecognitionDr. Kelsey Scalaro, University of Nevada, Reno Kelsey is a recent PhD graduate from the Engineering Education program at the University of Nevada, Reno. She has a BS and MS in mechanical engineering and worked in the aerospace industry for four years before returning to academia to complete her doctoral degree. Her research focusses are in undergraduate engineering identity and is interested in exploring how it can be equitably supported through pedagogical practices.Dr. Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno Dr. Chatterjee has
disagree.Literature ReviewEstablishing the link between EI and teamwork is crucial for several reasons. Teamwork skill isstressed by ABET but unevenly distributed among engineering graduates according to employersurveys (Marra et al. 2016). When students with varying skill levels work together in teams, theirinteractions and perceptions of themselves and others can influence their EI formation.Underrepresented minority (URM) students may be particularly affected. Studies have shownthat female students who asked questions during teamwork were perceived as less competent inSTEM (Hoehn et al. 2020), and racial minority students suffered from low self-esteem for fear ofbeing viewed as diversity “tokens” (Ong et al. 2020). Weatherton et al. (2017) found
development [18-20].Research on student engagement has been rooted in a well-established field of inquiry on howpostsecondary students’ experiences affect their learning and development [21-24]. The generalconclusion of this body of literature is correlational, that is, the greater the students’ engagementin curricular and co-curricular activities on campus, the greater their level of cognitive andpsychosocial development. For this reason, student engagement has been well recognized as apredictor of student learning and an important factor of student success [5, 25, 26]. The positivecorrelation between student engagement and learning outcomes has been reported extensively inhigher education literature. For example, a study that used multi
Engineers (SWE) at SFSU. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Evaluating ChatGPT's Efficacy in Qualitative Analysis of Engineering Education ResearchAbstractThis study explores the potential of ChatGPT, a leading-edge language model-based chatbot, incrafting analytic research memos (ARMs) from student interview transcripts for use inqualitative data analysis. With a rising interest in harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) forqualitative research, our study aims to explore ChatGPT's capability to streamline and enhancethis process.The research is part of a mixed-methods project examining the relationships between engineeringstudents' team experiences, team disagreements, and
repair and upgrading to keep engineering professionals engaged and contributing in theworkplace.” Universities must create and maintain environments where students can experiencepositive affect, and train students to be aware of their affect, including developing theiremotional intelligence to assist their future peers with their affect [4].2.2 Self-efficacy in WIL contextsTo date, most of the research on the benefits of WIL programs for engineering students havefocused on outcomes rather than experiences [3]. For example, Blair and colleagues [9]investigated the impact cooperative education had on engineering graduates across threedimensions, GPA, duration of time in school and starting salary. Their findings indicate thatstudents who
data skills will offer insightsfor preparing the next generation of engineers to thrive in this era.Research underscores the importance of a strong engineering identity for student retention andsuccess [4]. Motivation is influenced by an individual's perceived value, expected outcomes, andpotential costs of fulfilling educational requirements [5]. The growing emphasis on data skillswithin engineering curricula makes exploring the relationship between data proficiency,engineering identity, and motivation crucial for maintaining a competitive workforce. This is thefocus of our ongoing research, seeking to bridge the gap between data skills and engineeringidentity development.Researchers have investigated how competencies like problem-solving
, Texas A&M University Blaine is currently a graduate student earning his Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Research, Measurement, and Statistics at Texas A&M. His research is primarily focused on issues of equity in STEM education.Camille S. Burnett, Prairie View A&M University Camille S. Burnett, Ph.D., ACUE, is Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education and Director of the SMaRTS (Science, Mathematics, Reading, Technology, and Social Studies) Curriculum Resource Lab in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Prairie View A&M University. She has almost 20 years of combined experience in the K-12 and higher education settings. She is also the principal investigator for
overabundance of low-quality homework canresult in student disengagement from school and exacerbate mental health issues, leading to itsrejection [50].Research objectiveThe main objective of this research is to understand and explore the effects of frequentunannounced evaluations on university students’ performance. Moreover, this research aims toexamine the pedagogical approach associated with frequent unannounced evaluations todetermine its effectiveness in fostering habits of academic integrity among students. Thisinvolves promoting positive study habits for genuine learning, as opposed to extended periodswithout learning that could potentially lead to temptations for cheating and other problemsassociated. The article presents the findings derived
Paper ID #43928Promoting Equity and Cognitive Growth: The Influence of an AuthenticLearning Assignment on Engineering Problem-Solving SkillsDr. Boni Frances Yraguen, Vanderbilt University Boni Yraguen is an Instructional Consultant with the Vanderbilt Center for Teaching. Boni is passionate about engineering education. She has led and participated in various educational studies on the impact of student reflections, authentic learning assignments, the use of technology in the classroom, and graduate education.Elisa Koolman, University of Texas at Austin Elisa is a Ph. D. student at the University of Texas at Austin. They
conceptually discordant gestures alignedwith course-specific speech; developing their understanding of the formalisms taught in theirMechanics of Materials course. Thus, there is reason to suspect that collaborative interactionsbetween students are beneficial when mechanically reasoning in developing students’ scientificreasoning. In this discussion, we look to broaden the perspective of our findings by offeringpractical implications for improving engineering education learning and assessment practices. Although beyond the scope of our initial research question, the moderate correlations ofCC to nM during both argumentation and negotiation as well as with common ground suggeststhat: (1) students less frequently produced conceptually misaligned
Paper ID #43149Identifying Curriculum Factors that Facilitate Lifelong Learning in AlumniCareer Trajectories: Stage 3 of a Sequential Mixed-Methods StudyNikita Dawe, University of Toronto PhD student in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto, Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education.Amy Bilton, University of TorontoMs. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching and Associate Director, ISTEP (Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice) at the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on
stating such commitment. Forexample, informed by the typology of student resistance and work on intersectionality,Rodriguez et al. [6] explored how Latina undergraduate students critiqued racist, sexist, andclassist structures of their STEM undergraduate education and how they engaged in communitytransformation and healing. Supporting women and other minorities' participation in STEM hasimplications for social justice. Similarly, valuing the lived experience of Black women in STEMdemonstrates our commitment to move beyond the rhetoric of resting the responsibility of copingand adaptation solely on the individual levels [14]. Still, research that explicitly has a CriticalFeminism commitment is wanting. Our work aims to fill such gaps, disrupt the