is the trustee of the Temple University Amateur Radio Club (K3TU, www.temple.edu/k3tu), which he has integrated into the undergraduate communications curriculum and capstone senior design projects. Dr. Silage is a past chair of the Middle Atlantic Section of the ASEE and now the Secretary/Treasurer of the ECE Division of ASEE. Page 11.1206.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Teaching Digital Communications in a Wireless World: Who Needs Equations?AbstractDigital communication is traditionally taught by examining the temporal and spectralresponse and the
Singapore, in Singapore. He has also done biomedical research during post doctorate research positions at the Uni- versity of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI), Tohoku University (Sendai, Japan), and Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). He has taught classes for and been an advisor on capstone senior design projects for Wentworth students in the programs of electrical engineering, computer engineering, electromechanical engineering, and biomedical engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Using Telecommunication Instructional Modelling System (TIMS) in Communications Systems CourseAbstract:Conventional courses in communications systems use lecture and readings to explain
. Page 26.57.3Course Structure Before and After Changing to a Hybrid Flipped-ClassroomPrior to changing from a traditional lecture and lab course, the circuits course had three lecturesper week; homework assigned weekly, graded and returned a week later; three exams and a finalexam; laboratory work mixed between a three week project, seven labs with brief write-ups,three recitations, and a lab practical exam. After the course was changed, the lectures weremixed between 70% traditional and 41% video. Some of the video lectures were redundant withthe traditional lecture content. The homework method was changed to utilize a weeklyhomework assignment that was delivered with a detailed solution. Approximately a week later,students took a quiz that
document that describes the essential contentof the course (i.e. syllabus, learning objectives, outcomes, projects, sample exams, sample notes,etc.), assessment data and rubrics, and recommended changes. This EOCR package can then beused to (a) give the next instructor a suitable starting point for when they teach the course, (b)provide assessment information for program reviews and curriculum revisions, (c) provideassessment data to serve as a reference point for when the next time the outcomes are assessed,and (d) provide necessary and objective information to the person writing the accreditation self-study document. This latter point is especially important since in the case of ABET accreditedprograms, the EOCR contributes to a well-documented
Bala Maheswaran, ASEE Conference Proceeding, AC 2009-1851. 6. A Study of Physics-Based Problem Solving Approaches in the Freshmen Engineering Course, Bala Maheswaran, ASEE Conference Proceeding, AC 2011–292. 7. Summer Bridge: An Engineering Diversity College Industry Partnership initiative between NUPRIME and Raytheon-IDS, Richard Harris, BalaMaheswaran, Rachelle Reisberg and Chester Boncek, ASEE Conference Proceedings AC 2012-4713. 8. How much Physics the First Year Engineering Students really need: A Study and Survey, Bala Maheswaran, ASEE Conference Proceeding, AC 2012-3390. 9. Impact of a Design Project on Engineering Physics: Does motor design project motivate students? Bala Maheswaran, ASEE
in differentscenarios, or what may be wrong with a circuit if it is not working.This study is part of a larger project to determine hands on ability. Previousstudies have concentrated only on final lab grade and a lab practical score2 .While the data on the electrical aptitude test was collected, the test itself has notbeen validated. In this project, each of the questions on the electrical aptitude testwere themselves analyzed to determine if any one of them had a particularrelationship to a particular prior experience, grades in the lab or on a lab practical,or an attitude. If the electrical aptitude test score was highly correlated with aknown hands on ability measure, this could help validate the test constructed bythe researchers
AC 2011-1479: AN ACTIVE POWER FACTOR CORRECTION LABORA-TORY EXPERIMENT FOR POWER ELECTRONICS COURSEDale S.L. Dolan, California Polytechnic State University Dale S.L. Dolan is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at Cal Poly with experience in renew- able energy projects, education, power electronics and advanced motor drives. He received his BSc in Zoology in 1995 and BEd in 1997 from the University of Western Ontario. He received the BASc in Elec- trical Engineering in 2003, MASc. in Electrical Engineering in 2005 and PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2009 all from the University of Toronto. He is past chair of Windy Hills Caledon Renewable Energy, past chair of the OSEA (Ontario Sustainable Energy
Paper ID #6190Using a Virtual Platform for Teaching Electrical Machines and Power Sys-tems CoursesDr. Radian G Belu, Drexel University (Tech.) Dr. Radian Belu is Assistant Professor within the Engineering Technology (ET) program - Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He is holding the second position as Research Assistant Professor at Desert Research Institute – Renewable Energy Center, Reno, Nevada. Before joining to the Drexel University Dr. Belu hold faculty and research positions at universities and research institutes in Romania, Canada and United States. He also worked for several years in industry as a project
September 4, 1999 Version 2c: Mountaineering, The Freedom of the Hills, 6th Edition, 1997 Q3: AC Power: Fundamental Electrical Quantities: Charge and Energy Conceptual Physics, Paul G. Hewitt, 9th Edition, 2002. Addison Wesley Q4: Fundamental Electrical Quantities: Charge and EnergyParticipantsThe data used for this study extend from a larger project conducted at Purdue University with thegoal to investigate engineering students’ misconceptions on scientific concepts [9], [12]. Juniorand senior electrical engineering students who had taken at least two electrical circuit
interface. This configuration providesfor future flexibility in using the accelerometer to further introduce motion sensing andcontrol algorithms, either as abstract function calls to the ARM processor or directly inuser code written for the ATmega324P.Some of the circuitry, such as the RF transceiver and FPGA are not strictly necessarythough they do enable interesting laboratories and projects not directly related to controltheory, as well as provide the option of using this robot for other courses. It is entirelypossible, for example, to control the robot without an MW2 board and use the ARMprocessor for all functions, thus making this robot suitable for our senior-level course onmicrocontroller applications.PID ControlOur students employ PID
of real, modern hardware to a curriculum. The ability to add student-created customhardware to an existing modular platform provides many options for a satisfying undergraduatefinal project or graduate level lab or research project.Software Development ToolsThere are several options when it comes to choosing software development tools to supportdevelopment on a Tower platform. The basic need is a compiler and debugger or an integrateddevelopment environment (IDE). CodeWarrior® Development Studio7 is a good option for anIDE. It supports most of the Freescale MCU and MPU architectures and offers a Special Editionversion that has some restrictions on object code size but is complimentary. Having freeprofessional tools available to outfit all
systems), Computer Networks, and Operating Systems. Page 14.738.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Innovative Network Security Course DevelopmentAbstractNetwork security courses become increasingly popular in colleges (including communitycolleges) and universities. This paper discusses about developing the novel course of networksecurity using laboratory activities. It elaborates innovative projects that are suitable forlaboratory work in network security curriculum. It explores both hardware and softwarecomponents that are now being used for practical exercises in network security courses. Mostoften these
addition to engineering education, his research interests include simulation and software engineering.Christa Chewar, United States Military Academy Dr. Christa Chewar is an Army Major and an Assistant Professor in the computer science program of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the United States Military Academy, currently serving as an engineer on a major software project in Virginia. Her research interests include human-computer interfaces in addition to engineering and computer science education.Jean Blair, United States Military Academy Dr. Jean Blair is a Professor of Computer Science and director of the computer science program of the Department
on different real-worldcontrol configurations. This adjustment to incorporate the more practical format into theclassroom has taken different forms throughout the academic world. In the TechnischeUniversiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands, the modeling of control systems is an important part oftheir Bachelor’s in mechanical engineering degree curriculum3. There is a gradual introduction toreal world systems that begins with a lower level course where the students are introduced tomathematical concepts and A/D conversion and ends with a final year project that incorporatesthe manipulation of various feedback controllers to accomplish a specific task. In this way thestudents are transported from the theoretical understanding to actual
whoare enrolled in these classes. Based on the results from these pilot studies, a multi-year studywas implemented to investigate the use of online quizzing and incremental feedback to promotestudent self-directed learning and improve student confidence. This approach is not areplacement for, but instead a supplement to traditional assignments and projects.This paper describes the results of that multi-year study implemented in different types ofelectrical engineering courses. The purpose of the project and student outcomes aresummarized. The implementation differences and limitations for the different types of electricalengineering courses (theoretical, mathematical, laboratory) are discussed. The results of studentsurvey data clearly show that
application of their previous coursework. All found the research-nature of theindividual projects to be very rewarding, especially after conducting several in-class projectstogether. Many of these in-class projects served as components for their more ill-definedindividual projects. Some wished they had taken this course prior to their senior year, beforetaking DSP and communications. However, one student praised the ill-defined nature of theindividual projects, while commenting that juniors would struggle more with the less-prescribednature, since they would not yet have taken DSP and communications. One studentrecommended blending this SDR course into the communications-theory course, and splitting thetheoretical/applied combination into two
engineering curriculum has long been recognized.However, students often do not complete a hands-on, comprehensive design project until theirsenior year capstone design course. While this is obviously a very valuable and appropriatelearning experience, students benefit from and desire earlier and more frequent real-world designexperiences12. One reason design experiences are often delayed is that students do not have thetechnical breadth early in their academic careers necessary to complete a comprehensive designproject. While students in the first-year course, Fundamentals of ECE, do not have the breadthand depth to successfully carry out a completely open-ended design project with a level ofsophistication expected from senior students, they do have
11.664.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Gender Perspectives on the Optimization of the Interdisciplinary Course Curriculum “Introduction to Electrical Engineering for Non-Majors”AbstractThis paper is the outcome of a project that evaluates and improves the curriculum and teachingapproach to the interdisciplinary course “Introduction to Electrical Engineering (EE) for non-EEmajors” that is taught as a service course at Michigan Technological University, and hasequivalents in almost all engineering schools nationally. In order to specify the general andspecial needs of all non-EE majors and form a curriculum, a comprehensive survey was designedand distributed to universities and
are held by all instructors on bothHW and lab material.Over the 14-week semester, every student completes 8 lab projects, each including pre-lab, in-lab, and post-lab parts. Labs begin on the 3rd week of classes, to ensure that students learnenough theory before applying it; there are no labs on midterm exam weeks and on the last weekof classes.Two midterm exams and the final exam are in multiple-choice format; sets of practice problems(taken from exams of previous semesters) are given before each exam. Exam problems coverhomework and lab material; each exam includes qualitative questions and numerical/algebraiccalculations.Literature reviewMotivation is a concept with a wide variety of definitions across many different fields. Ryan andDeci2
include motivating students to study and learn new materialoutside of class and before encountering it in the classroom; motivating them to engageappropriately in the specified group work process; and motivating them to engage in theformative/summative assessment examination processes used. The paper describes progressmade over three semesters in overcoming these challenges.IntroductionEducational research has shown that student-centered active learning can produce much deeperconceptual learning than can traditional lecturing1, and that when active learning is conducted inan extensively group-based learning environment, such as problem-based learning, project-basedlearning2, or team-based learning3, students also develop various professional
can be directly integrated into math and sciencecourses.1. IntroductionThe iMPaCT (Media Propelled Computational Thinking) project[4,5,6,7,8,12] is an increasingly broad effortto enhance engagement with and success in STEM disciplines for a wide demographic of students --including those with inadequate mathematics backgrounds. The difficulties in such an endeavor are wellknown, and the societal benefits well understood.As a consequence, many projects have been designed with the intention of enhancing interest in STEMstudies. iMPaCT addresses the complementary challenge of providing under-prepared students with thereflective understandings of mathematical relationships needed to succeed in engineering programs andother core STEM subjects. In
performed, procedures,analysis, report writing requirements and references.II.1 The Virtual InterfacesAs the project outlined in this paper demonstrates, with suitable resources a virtual laboratorycan aid students in their preparation for carrying out the experimental work. The virtualinterface planned to be developed involves creating simulations of the machine experimentson a website. Students log in, configure parameters and then “perform” the experiment.Simulations return results consistent with the machines in the laboratory. It is envisaged thatin this way all students will be able to perform all parts of all experiments in their own time.Students will still attend “hands-on” laboratory sessions to conduct selected parts of theexperiments as
applicationsand older devices, which are no longer supported by their manufacturers or contain obsoletecomponents [4]. In [4], the University of Redding, U.K. retrofitted a Puma 560 robot with anenhanced monitoring and torque control system. The project presents an excellent example ofhow a mechanically sound robot can be revitalized on a modern software platform forexperimental research in a classroom. Page 15.122.2When selecting a software platform for building interface and user interaction to hardwaresystems, two programs have been widely used in control system and analysis applications [5].Many control systems have tested and implemented their
engineering topics and projects consisting of designproblems. For elementary grades, the LEGO engineering program was developed by the TuftsCenter for Engineering Educational Outreach and had a design focus. For middle and highschool, there were programs like those offered by Project Lead the Way, the Infinity Project, andthe modular Vanderbilt Instruction in Biomedical Engineering for Secondary Science, whichbased its curriculum on an iterative learning process [2]. Many institutions like ASEE haddeveloped guidelines for engineering curriculum, but not until 2013 were there any nationalstandards for engineering. Currently, twenty states have adopted NGSS and twenty-four haveadopted standards based on the National Research Council Framework for K-12
CS II, may alsoend up taking the same higher-level courses as students that have taken CS I and CS II.We study student performance in the two courses CS I and CS II to investigate the relationshipbetween grades in these two courses and advanced courses such as Object-oriented ProblemSolving, Data Structures, and Capstone Software Engineering course. The analysis of student datahelps us answer the research questions.Software Engineering is an advanced course that utilizes concepts learned in foundation coursesas well as 200- and 300-level courses. Students take up a term project and go through all phasesof software development i.e., Requirement gathering, Design, Development, Testing andDeployment. It is for this reason that we consider
], this growth will not abate anytime soon. In fact, an evidence of this isthe fact that DSP education, as a course, is now part of the undergraduate electives in mostuniversities [11-12]. It is likely to be part of the undergraduate core courses in the next fewyears. As the growth continues, some universities have made a course in Digital SignalProcessing (DSP) the first course taken by undergraduates instead of the traditional AnalogElectric Circuits course [5].We also note that DSP education is beginning to trickle down to the high-school level as well asevidenced by the Infinity project [14]. As more of the theory of DSP course percolates down tothe junior and sophomore levels, there is a need to include advanced courses in some kind
Page 14.780.2instruction delivery and assessment3-5 and one with more elements of intentional learning, arecompared. Besides regular course assessments and student feedback, we also conduct smallgroup analyses and present results that compare the various aspects of the teaching and learningexperience such as teaching effectiveness and student experience.Design of ExperimentDuring this study, as common to other Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) projects,the students are the human subject of the study. Accordingly, we have applied for and securedthe approval from the Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB). During the IRBreview process, we also secured the signed student informed consent statements close to the endof the
students with implementation capability. Courses can be offered from level L3 under the 4 different categories with an option to include courses left out from the previous level L2. Additionally, the first part of the capstone project can be started. We have considered a 2 year capstone project work. The objective of the courses at Level3 is to emphasize on “implementation” of various components in a computer system. Though computer languages will be necessary, we hope that in the near future there will necessary tools that will provide the code once the appropriate design is provided at high level. For example, in a course (L2 level) on OOAD, if we capture the design (functionality
the first author. Some of the signalsincluded in the database are AM and FM radio, high definition AM and FM radio, analog anddigital TV, Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS, WWV time signal, garage door opener, remote control for toycars, wireless thermometers, and a wireless serial cable replacement system. The recordings,which were made with a Tektronix RSA3408A Real Time Spectrum Analyzer, can be used toillustrate several important concepts such as various modulation methods, frequency divisionmultiplexing, frequency hopping, direct sequence spread spectrum, and noise. The signals canalso be used in assignments and projects such as having the students identify the parameters ofthe signals (such as the bandwidth, type of modulation, baud rate, etc.), or
offset, timing correction, and frame synchronization. Oncethese basic practical design considerations have been addressed, the course continues with theimplementation of various modulation (e.g., ASK, PSK, FSK) and coding (e.g., BCH) schemes,with the objective of successfully transmitting ”hello world” and other messages wirelesslyover-the-air within a classroom environment. Finally, several advanced topics such as multipathpropagation, equalization, and multicarrier modulation are covered. Throughout the course, thestudents will be working in groups on a comprehensive course design project that synthesizesmany of the concepts taught in class. Although this educational paradigm can use any SDRplatform capable of handling complex-valued samples