students understand the importance ofexploring and using current and emerging tools as part of their lifelong education. The specifictools can vary a lot depending on individual classroom learning goals, resulting in a wide rangeof student-authored tutorials. Some examples from the author’s classes include: Setting up ChatGPT to help write code in Jupyter notebooks. Building and deploying your own Shiny App. Accessing the US census API in Python. Downloading and installing Seaborn to make more robust figures.Students are tasked with creating in-depth tutorials designed to help their peers learn to use thesoftware tools effectively. Creating successful tutorials requires that student authors bothunderstand the tools and
provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment,establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives." Therefore, engineering schools must preparestudents with teamwork skills and incorporate teamwork as a significant part of their engineeringcurricula (ABET, 2021).Team participation is typically evaluated through peer evaluations or through instructorobservation of individual team members. Several tools have been developed to assess individualperformance, such as the Team Effectiveness Questionnaire (TEQ) or the ComprehensiveAssessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME). These assessment tools are based onself-reflections or peer evaluations. However, the efficacy of these tools has been questioned.At the University of
delivery oftechnical content.5. Major AssignmentsTechnical Summary: Each week the students are required to write up a technical summary. Thesummary should be 1-2 short paragraphs that describe a technical topic in the news that week.Students choose a topic that is aligned with their technical background. This exercise mimicssharing information over email with a manager or their peers about something the studentrecently read. The summary should use a common language, not techno-speak jargon, andhighlight what is novel about the topic in a concise and compelling manner.1-minute Challenge: Every two weeks the student is asked to stand in front of the class anddiscuss their technical summary from that week. Notes and slides are not permitted for
of student performance and enables earlierintervention. Where possible, it is advantageous to have more than one assessment instrument toenable triangulation, i.e., to make more reliable observations and evaluations. In most of ourassessments we use rubrics which were described at the program level in [2]. Current versions ofthose discussed in this paper are given in the Appendix. We also make use of evaluations byScrum Leaders which are done for every sprint, i.e., every two weeks. Students also get to doself- and peer-evaluation of teamwork, based on the CATME framework [8].Our rubrics are based on a 4-level performance scale: Beginning (1), Developing (2), Proficient(3), and Exemplary (4). In most cases, we allow intermediate levels, such
problem-solving process – from ideasformation to solutions – with their peers. To evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented lab strategies, students in theparticipating courses were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. Bothassignment grades and students' feedback via surveys were used to evaluate students' learning.Participants in the control group were learning in labs through the materials that were alignedwith core concepts by following predetermined procedures. Students in the experimental grouplearned through inquiry-based lab materials that required them to work in teams by integratingcore concepts together to find a solution and while following one of potentially manyapproaches. To maximize the online lab
Course Learning Outcome Assessment Tool Outcomes Have experience with writing proposals and doing proper 1 Project proposal 3 literature reviews. Have experience with conducting market and customer needs Customer needs analysis 3 2 analysis and Ethnographic study Formulate design requirements for potential solutions, including technical and non-technical specifications, while Final report 3
Stanford website were also examined [8]. Seeking to tailor the work to agraduate student population, the lead author also met virtually with Dr. Laura Schram, Directorof Professional Development & Engagement in the Rackham Graduate School at the Universityof Michigan (UM), who developed a 6-session optional, non-credit bearing course for doctoralstudents and postdoctoral scholars in any discipline at the UM [9]. Dr. Schram was instrumentalin selecting exercises from the DYL book, leading to pre-work and in-class activities for a 90-minute studio offering.Following a peer-to-peer approach, new instructors observed a more experienced instructor fortwo studios. New instructors may also engage in micro-teaching, where they teach one of thephases
the camera module to outputimages in the proper format and configuring the WiFi module to accept images over SPI. Then,the WiFi module is instructed to connect to the internet, and the program waits until theconnection is complete. After a connection is made, the firmware waits until a user connects tothe webcam streaming website (i.e. a client opens a websocket connection to the server). Oncethat happens, the firmware grabs images from the camera module, writes them to the WiFimodule, and streams them to the website.While all of these operations are looping, there is an asynchronous button that allows the camerato be provisioned to a new WiFi network. The firmware must detect this press at any time and putthe WiFi module into provisioning
Framework Development with Successive Capstone Projects1. IntroductionThe undergraduate program at the Portland State University Department of Electrical andComputer Engineering (PSU ECE) includes a three-quarter capstone design sequence typicallytaken during the student's senior year. For the last three years, and a fourth currently ongoing attime of writing, a capstone project has been sponsored by the author's Wireless EnvironmentalSensing Technology (WEST) Lab. The purpose of these sponsored capstones are as follows: 1. In the short term, design a wireless sensor to solve a specific problem. 2. In the long term, converge at a more general-purpose hardware and software solution set with which to design future wireless
had experiences in the “real world” upon which to draw – whether work or interest related –were very engaged in class discussions, more confident in speaking out, eager to share with theirpeers and often did well in this course. Such students were particularly valuable in groupdiscussions assignments and were often paired with more traditional students who also had giftsto share that were helpful in return. Enhanced faculty and student peer interactions brought moreexperienced or practical-minded students into Discrete Linear Systems first and often produced afeeling of confidence and motivation to succeed that was then helpful in Continuous LinearSystems and other follow-on courses.To help provide just-in-time mathematics, the Analog Circuit
studentcohort model (for each incoming group of students) and also providing supports to buildcommunity across cohorts as well as including students’ families in their college experiences,our program aimed to increase student satisfaction and academic success. We recruited twocohorts of nine incoming students each across two years, 2019 and 2020; 69% of participantswere from underrepresented racial or minority groups and 33% were women. Each participantwas awarded an annual scholarship and given co-curricular support including peer and facultymentoring, a dedicated cohort space for studying and gathering, monthly co-curricular activities,enhanced tutoring, and summer bridge and orientation programs. Students’ families were alsoincluded in the
holds an M.S. in Astronomy and Astrophysics and a B.S. in Astronomy and Meteorology from Kyungpook National University, South Korea. Her work centers on elementary, secondary, and postsecondary engineering education research as a psychometrician, data analyst, and program evaluator with research interests in spatial ability, STEAM education, workplace climate, and research synthesis with a particular focus on meta-analysis. She has developed, validated, revised, and copyrighted several instruments beneficial for STEM education research and practice. Dr. Yoon has authored more than 80 peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings and served as a journal reviewer in engineering education, STEM education
modules underwent weekly formative assessment practices.Following the completion of each module, students were requested to complete self-assessedlearning skill assessments, observation forms, and participated in several semi-structuredinterviews. In the context of this study, the responses obtained from students in modules that didnot include formative assessments were used as a point of reference, i.e., a control group.Out of three/four modules, at least two modules underwent extensive formative assessmentpractices such as active class activities in group, class quizzes and polls, homework assignments,lab activities, peer assessment. When students are required to write reports or design circuits,instructors provide formative feedback on early
report on the initial design of a new subject within ourcoursework master’s program that teaches the techniques of hardware acceleration [5][6] to aninterdisciplinary cohort of engineering (electrical and mechatronics) and computing (softwareengineering and information technology) students. Much of the conceptual material sits squarelywithin the discipline of computer engineering, but recent trends in computer architecture [5][6]and limited exposure to the topic within both our engineering and computing curricula creates anopportunity to develop interdisciplinary competencies. Ideally, through formal teaching andlearning activities and associated peer interactions, students will be able to apply methods andapproaches from their peers’ discipline
Paper ID #39084Revisiting classroom environment and activities: Reexamination ofmistakes and learning cyclesWei Shen Theh, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Wei Shen Theh completed his BS in Electrical Engineering at Iowa State University and is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical Engineering. His interest includes collaborative engineering work and trans- formation of engineering education for the 21st century. He has served with the peer mentor team for freshman electrical engineering students and as guest speakers for incoming students. As a Teaching As- sistant, he has valuable experience working
-confidence, and personalinitiative. Finally, it provides opportunities for professional development through networkingwith peers and mentors, and publication of their work [2]. In addition, such research experienceslead to increased retention in STEM fields and a greater likelihood of pursuing a graduatedegree. Noteworthy as well is that undergraduate research experiences are beneficial to studentsat risk of underachieving [4].To ensure a student has an impactful undergraduate research experience, it is important toprovide appropriate projects. Students are highly motivated when they know that they arecontributing to an authentic research question. At the same time the project must be tailored tothe knowledge and capabilities of the student so that
class time and the high number of students make it challenging to thoroughlydiscuss each group’s methods and provide detailed, positive feedback.Furthermore, over the years, we have observed that many students struggle to embraceconstructive criticism during class presentations. A significant number hesitate to engage inmeaningful discussions to address the feedback provided by their peers or the instructor. As aresult, numerous issues related to their projects remain unresolved, negatively affecting theirapproach to the prototyping phase.To address these challenges, we have developed an AI-based tool, called Capstone GuideChatbot (CAPCHAT). In the next two sections, we first review existing AI tools and baseline
, we developed the Plug -n- Play approach, a flexiblepedagogical approach which ensures instructors have a fixed core structure, flexibility inleveraging their own teaching style, and a mechanism for constant reflection which allows foradaptations to the course structure over time. The PNP approach focuses course design around thestudent experience, while acknowledging and supporting individual teaching styles and teachingmethods.To assess PNP, a classroom observation protocol was developed to evaluate student engagement,as well as examination of sixteen sections worth of grades and student evaluations. The resultsshow that students are highly engaged with the course material, peers in the class, and theinstructors. Finally, the PNP approach
with guidance and feedback from theirproject sponsor, faculty advisor, and the capstone instructor. At the end of the spring term,project teams present their results, write a report, and participate in a poster session. B. CornerstoneAs discussed in the introduction, students frequently were unprepared for this complex teamproject, having had little to no team project experience. For this reason, we introduced thecornerstone project in 2018 to provide intermediate project experience before their senior year[2],[3]. The cornerstone sequence consists of two classes (ECE 211 and 212), preferably takenfall and winter terms of the sophomore year, but also offered in compressed form in summerterm for transfer students. These classes have two
critical thinking skills. Gradually, the student will be able to apply the concepts learned processing from basic to complex skills through activities like laboratories with specific feedback with the sole intention for improvement. The application of the knowledge might also then lead to analysis by exploring connections and organizing information into meaningful domains similar to writing a report. This also might include discussing discrepancies in cases and the student might explore other personal variables through their increased critical thinking [17].The taxonomy introduces a new dimension, highlighting four types of knowledge—factual,conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive—aimed at addressing diverse
Senior Undergraduate Aerospace Engineering StudentParker D. Landon, Boston University I completed two Bachelor’s degrees in Computer Engineering and Space Physics at Embry-Riddle Aero- nautical University in May 2022 and co-authored 4 peer-reviewed publications during my undergraduate career. I plan to complete a Ph.D. at Boston University in Physics, focusing on Accelerator Physics. I am a recipient of the Clare Boothe Luce and Fermilab ASPIRE Fellowships. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 (Work in Progress) Implementing the QFT to Incite Curiosity and Connections in an Introductory Electrical Circuits Course for non-EE MajorsAbstractIt
dynamics, enhancing understanding through sharedideas. Martin-Gutierrez et al. [12] implemented augmented reality in an electrical engineeringcourse. However, the study primarily evaluated immediate student feedback, not exploringlong-term educational impact. Hadfield-Menell et al. [14] focused on theoretical aspects oncooperative inverse reinforcement learning without real-world validation. Vliet et al. [15]investigated the impact of flipped-class pedagogy on student motivation and learning strategies,finding enhanced critical thinking and peer learning. However, these effects were not long-lasting,indicating a need for repeated use.Jo et al. [16] observed increased student participation and interest in flipped classrooms withgaming elements
soldering equipment. • A full week was given to complete each laboratory assignment. • At least 20 staffed laboratory hours were provided each week (split between teaching assistants and peer mentors).For each laboratory assignment, the desired outcome is first and foremost to create something.Therefore, less emphasis was placed on the laboratory report than on the building process. Thelaboratory report contained mostly photographs and brief explanations of the various steps in theproject. Additionally, students were asked to reflect on the entire experience for each assignment,which allowed students to exercise some metacognition, and also gave the course staff an idea ofwhere the main challenges lie. Finally, for each assignment
, now commands on the order of two or three class periods in introductorycircuits courses. In today’s circumstances, it would more often than not be a disservice to ourundergraduate students to demand they write machine code to access registers, learn to designwith tube amplifiers, wind all their own inductors, or reinvent the wheel for common operationsin scikit-learn, pandas, or OpenCV. All these skills are still relevant for certain professional rolesor applications, but the modern undergraduate curriculum prioritizes learning how to learn andbecoming a resourceful problem-solver over accumulating the maximal set of discrete technicalskills. If the latter were the case, becoming an electronics engineer would entail little more thanmemorizing
peers while people in industry juststrive to survive [19]. Another important factor is that industry thinks in terms of short-rangegoals whereas academia has a long-range perspective [24]. The gap also existed as some studentshave limited vision about their role and dream jobs upon finishing their high school degree [25].Another critical reason that plays a significant role in increasing the gap between academia andindustry is the lack of engineering students seeing the classroom as something that can help themimprove their overall skills and abilities [16], [19].3. MethodsThe authors distributed a closed-ended survey to ECE professional engineers and ECEdepartment heads to examine how differently each of the group looks at the demanded
Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She received her B.Eng. and Ph.D in Computer Engineering and Informatics from the Polytechnic School, University of Patras, Greece. She has extensive experience on building data management and database solutions for large-scale systems in collaboration with industrial and governmental agencies, and academic partners. She has published her work in peer-reviewed international conferences and journals. Her current research interests include data management, data valuation and AI and engineering education. Her teaching/mentoring activities focus on developing and offering classes in project-based learning environments as well as, advising and
material through lectures and readings, and then they are evaluatedindividually [5]. The traditional approach has been especially difficult to sustain in engineeringeducation, as students frequently struggle with complex concepts that require deepcomprehension [5]. Furthermore, conventional lectures may not sufficiently prepare students toeffectively utilize their knowledge and skills in practical situations [5]. The constraints of thisapproach have sparked a significant increase in enthusiasm for collaborative learning strategiesin engineering education, in part aiming to tackle these difficulties and shortcomings [6][7].Collaborative learning represents a pedagogical shift that encourages students to actively engagewith their peers, working
to add to the repertoire of the study strategies they plan to use, but that they aresomewhat indiscriminate about what they plan to add, whereas those who did as expected or didbetter seem to focus their intended strategies on ‘close to course content’ strategies.Based on these findings, we are creating a peer-to-peer web based intervention for fall 2025. ECEstudents will be coached through naming the coping strategies they have used, and they willrecord a brief 2-5 minute testimonial for current students to watch and learn about effectivelycoping with perceived failure and perceived success. Participating fall 2025 students will write abrief reflection on each video they watch. Extent of engagement with videos will be used topredict
. She has published several papers in top-tier conferences and journals in her field and has presented her research at numerous international conferences. In addition to her research, Dr. Mansouri is passionate about teaching and mentoring the next generation of computer and electrical engineers. She has designed and taught many courses in computer engineering, has supervised several undergraduate and graduate research projects, and served as the thesis advisor to several M.S. and Ph.D. students. Dr. Mansouri was the recipient of the ”Excellence in Graduate Education” from Syracuse University in 2008. In her free time, Dr. Mansouri enjoys exploring nature, photography, and writing short stories. She is also
experience to develop the specific tooling infrastructure setup andmethodology described in this paper. As part of their fabrication runs, Efabless also provides awrapper template that includes a RISC-V microcontroller with an exposed memory bus,general-purpose input/output (GPIO) pin interface, and a core management area to interact withthe user’s design. This template allowed the senior design projects to begin writing design codequickly without worrying about the specifics of the fabrication technology node or becomingoverwhelmed by the complex tooling abstracted by the template project.Efabless ChipIgnite ShuttlesAs useful as the OpenMPW fabrication was to starting ChipForge, Efabless has not providedOpenMPW shuttle submissions since MPW-8 in