in various leadership roles in disciplines related to Career and Technical Education. Dr. Clark is recognized as a Distinguished Technology Educator by the International Technology Engineering Education Association. He currently consults to a variety of businesses, educational agencies and organizations. Page 24.1095.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Spatial Ability Measurement in an Introductory Graphic Communications CourseAbstractResearch on spatial ability indicates that many spatial test(s) have been used in research
creative genius. CUP Archive, 1990.[10] C. Kamii, “Teaching for thinking and creativity: a Piagetian point of view,” Lawson AE Ed, pp. 29–58, 1980.[11] G.-A. Amoussou, E. Cashman, and S. Steinberg, “Ways to Learn and Teach Creativity and Design in Computing Science,” in Proceedings of the 2007 Symposium on Science of Design, New York, NY, USA, 2007, pp. 12–13.[12] Z. C. Qian, S. Visser, and Y. V. Chen, “Integrating user experience research into industrial design education: interaction design program in Purdue,” in Open Catalyzing Innovation, Washington, D.C., 2011.[13] C. Lorenz and T. J. Peters, The Design Dimension: the new competitive weapon for product strategy and global marketing. Blackwell, 1990.[14] M
support, and customer service management. His interests include solid modeling applications, virtual and augmented reality, visualization techniques, innovative teaching methods, and distance learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Information Visualization for Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) DataAbstractEnabling users to explore the vast volumes of data from different groups is one of productlifecycle management (PLM)’s goals. PLM must solve such problems as isolated “Islands ofData” and “Island of Automation”; the massive data flow of distanced collaborative design,manufacturing, and management; and the incapability of interpreting and
facilitate the transferability of successfulpractices to other institutions that want to increase student’s spatial visualization skills.1. Carter, C.S., Larussa, M.A., and Bodner, G.M. (1987). A Study of Two Measures of SpatialAbility as Predictors of Success in Different Levels of General Chemistry. Journal of Researchin Science Teaching, 24(7), 645-657.2. Maloney, E.A., Waechter, S., Risko, E.F., and Fugelsand, J.A. (2012). Reducing the SexDifference in Math Anxiety: The Role of Spatial Processing Ability. Learning and IndividualDifferences. 22, 380-384.3. Sorby, S., Casey, B., Veurink, N., and Dulaney, A. (2012). The Role of Spatial Training inImproving Spatial and Calculus Performance in Engineering Students. Learning and IndividualDifferences
ith sketched feature FE = number of edge features S = number of edge feature sets Nij = number of selected edges for the jth edge feature set within the ith edge feature FH = number of (individual) hole features Ci = hole complexity factor for ith hole (simple holes = 1, countersunk or counterbored = 2) FM = number of mirror features -1 FP = number of pattern features -1 CIi = Complexity index of features patterned or mirrored in the ith pattern or mirror featureThe proposed algorithm has been applied to parts utilized by various researchers in their studiesthat have been modeled using alternative modeling strategies. Kirstukas25 uses a simple platewith hole features and standoffs, shown in Figure 1. Johnson17 uses a
conception should aid in highlighting some of the underlying variables of causation.References1. Seery, N., D. Lane, and D. Canty, A Comparative Study Exploring the Impact of Assessment Criteria on Eliciting Graphical Capability, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2012: San Antonio, Texas.2. Sorby, S., Educational Research in Developing 3-D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students. International Journal of Science Education, 2009. 31(3): p. 459-480.3. Delahunty, T., N. Seery, R. Lynch, and D. Lane, Investigating Student Teachers' Approach to Solving Applied Analytical Graphical Problems. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 2013. 77(1): p. 5-22.4. Delahunty, T., N. Seery, and R. Lynch
Philip Weber (Qualcomm Institute) for program oversight, studyguidance and software development; Susan Metz and Sheryl Sorby (ENGAGE) for overallguidance in the study; and Christina Nilles, Daneesha Kenyon, Alvin Chak, and Kane McKinnis(UCSD Students) for providing assistance in the development of the SVT digital curriculum andfor serving as teaching assistants during the pilot studiesReferences:1. Smith, I.M. (1964). Spatial Ability: Its Educational and Social Significance, University of London Press.2. “Why so Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics”. Published by AAUW, ISBN: 978-1-879922-40-2, 2010.3. Sorby, S. A., & Veurink, N. (2010). Long-term Results from Spatial Skills Intervention among First-Year
shown in Table 7, and by ethnicity in Table 8. Since fourstudents did not pass the intervention course with an “S”, these four students are identified inTables 7 and 8 as “U” for “Unsatisfactory” and are omitted from any further analyses. Inaddition, the seven students who failed to take the post-PSVT:R are identified in Tables 7 and 8as “No Post.”The calculated composite ACT for both TG and CG further broken down by post-PSVT:R scoresfor the TG are shown in Table 9. The CG did not take a second PSVT:R. A t-test between thecalculated composite ACT of the TG and CG indicate a significant difference (p = 0.013)between the two groups suggesting a self-selection bias to opt out of the intervention coursebased on ACT score. Table 10 shows the
Nepal: A Case Study of Effectiveness, Cultural Considerations and Student Attitudes at a South Asian University,” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.10. Wren, S. J. (2012). “Engineering Thermodynamics in the 21st Century – Active Learning by Human Body Thermodynamics,” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX.11. Sun, L. and Grant, C. (2013) “Inquiry-Guided Learning (IGL) in Graphical Communications Course,” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.12. Raymond, B.L. (2013). “Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career,” Discovery Press.13. Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Prince, M., Henderson, C
). Curriculum planning for the development of graphicacy. Design and Technology Education, 18(2), 32-49.3. Fry E. (1981). Graphical literacy, Journal Of Reading, 24(5), 383-390.4. Grignon, M. 2000. Deux brouillons : le croquis et la maquette. In: BIASI, P., LEGAULT, R. (ed.) Genesis No. 14: Architecture.5. Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352-402.6. Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates?. Learning & Individual Differences, 26141-152.7. Marunic, G., & Glazar, V. (2013
years 1924-25-26, 1926, Deapartment of Education: Dublin.11. Trant, A., J. Branson, and C. Frangos, Reconciling liberal and vocational education1999, Dublin: CDVEC Curriculum Development Unit.12. Logan, J., Teachers' union: the TUI and its forerunners in Irish education, 1899-19941999, Dublin: A. & A. Farmar.13. Raftery, A.E. and M. Hout, Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921-75. Sociology of Education, 1993. 66(1): p. 41-62.14. Harford, J., The emergence of a national policy on teacher education in Ireland. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 2009. 41(1): p. 45-56.15. McGuiness, S., L. Corcoran, and F. O'Regan, An evaluation of the