online instruction for preparing technology education teachers and engineers. Along with teaching courses in introductory engineering graphics, computer-aided design, descriptive geometry, and instructional design, he has conducted CAD and geometric dimensioning & tolerancing workshops for both high school teachers and local industry.Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University ERIC N. WIEBE, Ph.D. Dr. Wiebe is an Associate Professor in the Graphic Communications Program at NC State University. He has authored or co-authored four texts on technical graphics and has been involved in Computer-Aided Design (CAD)/3-D modeling development and use since 1986. He has also worked on the integration of scientific
AC 2011-638: TEACHING DESIGN AND TECHNICAL GRAPHICS IN AGREEN ENVIRONMENTV. William DeLuca, North Carolina State University Dr. DeLuca is an Associate Professor of Technology Education at North Carolina State University. He has been a technology education teacher at the middle school, high school, undergraduate and graduate levels for over 30 years, and has extensive teaching, research, and curriculum development experience. His research includes the study of thinking processes, teaching methods, and activities that improve techno- logical problem-solving performance and creativity. He has expertise in developing technology education curriculum that integrates science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM
usually measured in miles or kilometers. Would it not seem ridiculous to ask for that same distance in units of inches or centimeters? 2. Should you create a new part template? Do you have to?Multiple Perspectives:Ask students to create puzzle part shapes from snap cubes first. They can then create a sub-assembly of each puzzle piece using their snap cube part drawn earlier.Possible questions: Page 22.470.15 1. What type of tolerance fit is between each snap cube? The snap-cubes have an Interference Fit between the mating surfaces. This question is meant to reinforce the regular EG curriculum with a
AC 2011-1189: GRAPHICAL COMMUNICATIONS: A CONCEPT INVEN-TORYHeidi M Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Assistant Professor of Freshmen Engineering at Embry Riddle Aeronautical University. Have Introduc- tory Graphics for the last 10 years in addtion to developing several upper level advanced 3D modeling courses. Areas of reserach interest: development of student visualization skills, effective integration of 3D modeling into graphics communication courses, and women’s retention in engineering. Co-Advisor of only all-women’s baja SAE team in the world and Director of summer engineering camp for middle school girls
. Moreland,J. & Jones, A.:(2000), „Emerging Assessment Practices in an Emergent Curriculum: Implications for Technology‟, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10(3). 3. Moreland,J. & Jones, A.:(1999), „Case Studies of Classroom Practice in Technology‟,Working Paper 523, Research in Assessment of Primary Technology Project, Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato. 4. Kinbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., Kelly, V.,(1991) „The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology‟, School Examinations and Assessment Couoncil/Central Office of Information, London. 5. Mioducer, D & Dagan, O. (2007) „The effect of
/EDGJ/article/view/8/7 (Drafting the Basics by Lamb and Kurtanich)• /index.php/EDGJ/article/view/145/141 (Spatial Visualization Measurement: A Modification of the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test - Visualization of Rotations by Branoff)• /index.php/EDGJ/article/view/17/16 (Cam Design Projects in an Advanced CAD Course for Mechanical Engineers by Ault)The five EDGJ articles that ranked highest with respect to Avg. Time on Page were as follows:• /index.php/EDGJ/article/view/30/29 (Techniques for Creating Animations for Technical Presentation by Lieu)• /index.php/EDGJ/article/view/24/23 (Teaching Integrated Design and Manufacturing, Course Structure and Assessment by Higley)• /index.php/EDGJ/article/view/43/42 (Assessment
collaboration, 3D data interoperability, and engineering design graphics standards and documentation. Nathan has taught graduate courses in the foundations of graphics in technology and instrumentation and measurement in research design. He has worked for a variety of companies in using and integrating PLM tools in the engineering design process through the development of custom training applications and materials. Nathan holds a Bachelor of Science in Technical Graphics and a Master of Science in Technology from Purdue University, and a doctorate in Technology Education from North Carolina State University.Mitchell L Springer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Mitchell L. Springer, PMP, SPHR Dr. Springer is an
AC 2011-1894: HOW TO DESIGN A DESIGN PROJECT: GUIDANCE FORNEW INSTRUCTORS IN FIRST AND SECOND YEAR ENGINEERINGCOURSESAndrew Trivett, University of Prince Edward IslandProf. Stephen Champion, University of Prince Edward Island Current chair of the UPEI Engineering Department and facilitator of Project Based Design courses at the University of Prince Edward Island. Page 22.787.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 How To Design a Design Project: Guidance for New Instructors in First and Second Year Engineering CoursesIntroductionThis paper is not an attempt to
the approach taken and experiences in teaching a junior level surfacemodeling course at ET-WWU designed to expose CAD/CAM technologists to this importantCAD domain. It will start by motivating the value of surface modeling in developing key skills Page 22.1403.2that have been identified as essential to the education of a CAD/CAM specialist. This will befollowed by an overview of the CAD/CAM curriculum taught highlighting the role that thesurface modeling class plays in supporting other junior and senior level core requirements.Details of the course will then be given. Here some attention will be given to techniques thatstudents are introduced
says nothing of theneed for skill in using fabrication processes to make a prototype. Both an understanding of fitsand exposure to manufacturing processes may not be covered until after CAD instruction in atechnology program.Off-the-shelf instructional materials typically do not place a high emphasis on integrating DFMand DFA considerations into CAD modeling. It is typically open ended projects that provide thebest format for encouraging students to integrate manufacturing considerations into theirmodeling as part of generating a physical prototype. For this purpose, CAD instruction may becombined with some exposure to CAM and CNC programming that allows students to by-passmanual fabrication. However, this leads to a very heavy course content
for Graphics Education: Results from a Five Year follow-up Survey. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 70 (2), 23-30.12. Barr, RE, TJ Krueger, and TA Aanstoos (2004), Assessing Student Outcomes in an Engineering Design and Graphics Course, The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 68(1), 22-36.13. Hartman, N. (2005) Integrating Surface Modeling into the Engineering Design Graphics Curriculum. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 70 (1), 16-22.14. Spence, A. and T. Doyle (2008) Product Centric CAD Education. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 5(1-4), 381-390.15. Bhatt, R. et al. (2009) A Case for Scaffolded Virtual Prototyping Tutorial Case Studies in Engineering Education. Intl. Journal of
AC 2011-2120: LINKING CAD AND METROLOGY TO EXPLAIN, DEMON-STRATE, AND TEACH GD&TMr. Kyle Patrick HewerdineJames M Leake, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign James M. Leake joined the Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems (formerly General) Engineer- ing in August 1999. His educational background includes an MS in Mechanical Engineering (1993) from the University of Washington, a BS in Ocean Engineering (1980) from Florida Atlantic University, and a BA in Art History (1974) from Indiana University. His current research interests include engineering education, integration of CAD/CAE software in the engineering curriculum, building information mod- eling, spatial visualization, and reverse
teachers and local industry.Eric N. Wiebe, North Carolina State University ERIC N. WIEBE, Ph.D. Dr. Wiebe is an Associate Professor in the Graphic Communications Program at NC State University. He has authored or co-authored four texts on technical graphics and has been involved in Computer-Aided Design (CAD)/3-D modeling development and use since 1986. He has also worked on the integration of scientific visualization concepts and techniques into both secondary and post-secondary education. Dr. Wiebe is past editor of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal and has been a member of the EDG Division of ASEE since 1989.Jeremy V Ernst, North Carolina State University Jeremy V. Ernst is an Assistant Professor in the