Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samantha Hoang, Seattle University; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Shardul Panwar, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)

questionwill be compared by comparing the syllabi of the courses. Then, a thematic analysis ofreflections provided by the four faculty involved in teaching and developing the courses will bepresented. The analysis will compare the experiences of each faculty member and how thediffering implementation of the courses may have affected those experiences. The combinationof these experiences and reflections will give insight into the variety of ways that mastery-basedgrading and project-based learning can be implemented. The insights provided in the facultyreflections highlight important considerations for those implementing mastery-based grading andproject-based learning in engineering graphics courses.IntroductionDesign classes are an important part of

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nandita Biswas, Washington State University; Emily Larsen, Washington State University; Jonathan Steffens, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)

engineering drawings with appropriateclearances to make their parts fit snugly together. Then all models were 3D printed using PLA,and students tested the 3D printed parts for ‘fit’. For puzzles that did not fit together or were tooloose, students did a reflection on their design problem. The team size was 2. The size limit foreach piece is 1” x 1” x ½”, not including the connector geometry. The blocks can be connectedin various ways. The connector pieces that link the blocks together must all have uniquelydifferent geometry. One must be round or elliptical, one must be triangular, and the other(s) thatthey choose, must be different. The project outcome was assessed, and some improvements wereincorporated in Fall 2024. For Fall ‘24, students were

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Travis J. Fuerst, Purdue University; Jorge D. Camba, Purdue University; Angshuman Mazumdar, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); John Koellisch, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)

the coursestructure. Partnering with the Institute of Process Excellence (IpX), concepts, processes andtechnology have been structured reflect those used by some of the top engineering companieswithin industry. The CM2 standard provides the framework for the software tools and processesutilized in the course which reinforce concepts, assignments, and projects. The course leveragesSiemens Teamcenter as the repository for all student work leveraging a modified CM2 closedloop change process for all student submissions providing students with invaluable experience inan enterprise PDM system. Siemens NX and Autodesk Fusion 360 are used within theestablished framework to teach product design practices and demonstrate CAD interoperabilitybetween CAD

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

BURCU OZDEN, Pennsylvania State University; Sabahattin Gokhan Ozden, Penn State Abington

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)

drawing course. Interviews were recorded and transcribed using Zoom™Video Conferencing Software’s AI transcription feature. Transcripts were reviewed for clarity,with minor edits to correct transcription errors and remove non-verbal filler words.The qualitative analysis followed an inductive, theme-based approach. Transcripts were readmultiple times to identify recurring patterns, observations, and reflections related to toolusability, skill development, and integration into the learning process. Key segments weremanually grouped into thematic categories, including usability and interface, spatial skilldevelopment, transition to CAD tools, and learning experience integration. These themesemerged organically through close reading, comparison of

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyler Carter Kreipke CSC, University of Portland; Chris James Hainley Jr, University of Portland; Joshua Gargac, Ohio Northern University; Craig M. Goehler, University of Notre Dame; Lynn Dudash, University of Mount Union; Michael Foster, George Fox University; Kayt Frisch, George Fox University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)

the course.This will be a mixed-methods study that collects data over the course of three semesters fromfive different institutions: two small private universities in the Pacific northwest, two smallprivate midwestern universities, and one mid-sized private midwestern university. Studentsenrolled in the CAD courses at these universities will be asked to complete a questionnaire at thebeginning of the semester measuring their interest in learning CAD, anticipated motivation tolearn CAD, and prior exposure to CAD. A similar questionnaire will be administered at the endof the semester that will also ask them to reflect on how the course goals affected theirengagement with the course. It is anticipated that industry-based certification will lead

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Selvakumar Raja, Greenville University; Natalie Schleper, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)

, revealing their existing knowledge structure. Portfolio A compilation of collection of a student’s work, demonstrating their skills and knowledge development over time. Presentations or Performance Evaluate a students’ ability to demonstrate their understanding through presentations, projects, or performances. Rubrics Use scoring rubrics to provide a structured and objective way to evaluate student work and performance.Table 2: Indirect Measurement Methodologies Self-Reports A student’s reflection report on their prior learning experiences and

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Asefeh Kardgar, Texas A&M University; Anne M Lucietto, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD)

based on a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 indicates the highest performance. Data reflect aggregated results from audience feedback and social media engagement metrics.Figure 1 underscores a nuanced dynamic between static and animated infographics in healthcommunication. Specifically, animated infographics scored an average of 8 in engagement leveland 9 in memorability, slightly higher than static infographics, which scored 7 in both categories.This suggests that the dynamic elements of animated infographics may more effectively captureand retain audience attention. Conversely, static infographics scored higher in providing detail(9) compared to animated ones (7), indicating their potential advantage in conveying