class, did not have any work experience.These numbers are important to show why it is essential to design the class with a focus onpractical applications, and structure the assignments with this focus, which we will discuss inmore detail below. Table 1 Learning Outcomes Covered by Each Assignment/Activity Targeted Learning Assignment/Activity Description Outcome(s) Case studies, quantitative problems, conceptual short Homework
26.620.6thinking in terms of groups rather than of individuals.” By understanding and implementing theoutcomes, framework, and tools for actively teaching engineering economics, future engineerscan continue evolving as problem solvers and innovators.References1. Lavelle , J., K. Needy, H. Umphred .”Engineering Economy: A Follow-up Analysis of Current Teaching Practices.” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1997, Session 1239.2. Johnson, D., R. Johnson, and K. Smith , “Maximizing Instruction Through Cooperative Learning,” ASEE Prism, February 1998, pp. 24-29.3. O’Conner, John. Turning Average Instruction Into Great Instruction. R&L Publication, 2009.4. Bloom, B. S.; Engelhard, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. Taxonomy
work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate ResearchFellowship Program under Grant No. 1651272. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesAmbrose, S. A. (2010). How learning works : seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Ammar, S., & Wright, R. (1999). Experiential learning activities in Operations Management. International Transactions in Operational Research, 6(2), 183.Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public. Educational
positively contributeto the education of engineering majors who will be making critical life-cycle decisions forprojects in the near future.Acknowledgment and DisclaimerThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1504912. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. We would like to thank the regular instructor and the teaching assistant, Dr. MikeHelwig and Mr. Fikri Kucuksayacigil, respectively, for their cooperation and contributions suchas accommodation, advice, and a decision-tree based guest lecture. We also would like to thankthe Department of Industrial
, learning activities, assessments, and student learning styles resulted in a moderate-to-strong positive correlation between students’ self perception and direct assessments of the learning objectives. Based on the results of our study and studies done in literature by Felder, we highly recommendthat any educators teaching summer courses should consider using our approach as a modelwhen designing their own courses.Bibliography1. Ressler, S.J., Welch, R.W., and Meyer, K..F., “Organizing and Delivering Classroom Instruction,” Teaching Lessons Learned. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE 130 (3), pp. 103-120,July 2004.2. Estes, A. C., Welch, R. W., and Ressler, S. J., “Teaching
with the students the more standard sensitivityanalysis: change in price of goods, change in price of key raw material(s), change in price ofutilities, change in price of labor. These are the ones sometimes discussed in design textbooks.Ask students if that is all there is to a Financial Operational Model? See what the students answerhere. Get them to understand the sheer power of having the engineering design melded to theeconomics. What does that truly mean? Start to get them to see other types of sensitivities that arenot simply linear changes in slope but can have actual minimum or maximum optimal values.Examples include key design specifications to the product, parameter uncertainty in the modelsfor a piece of equipment such as extent of
examples is a way to cement students’ knowledge through memorable context.• Using case studies supports the rich complexity and interdisciplinary skills needed by future engineers.• Using campus based case studies is physically convenient for students because they can see the application without the time, expense, and coordination required to go off campus.Support for Case Studies as a Method for Teaching & Learning: Significant research has beendone showing the effectiveness of case studies as a teaching method. In 1999, the Journal ofEngineering Education published an interesting research paper entitled, Teaching Real-WorldIssues through Case Studies, by P.K. Raju and Chetan S. Shankar. In this paper, they chronicledthe benefits
Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012. 7. Lamancusa, J., Jorgensen, J., Zayas-Castro, J., Ratner, J., “THE LEARNING FACTORY – A new approach to integrating design and manufacturing into engineering curricula,” Proceedings of the 1995 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 1995. 8. Lynch, P.C., Wilck, J.H., Bober, C., Mines, J.L., “A New Look at Involving Undergraduate Students, Real Life Applications, and Active Learning Activities in the Industrial Engineering Undergraduate Course Delivery Process,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014. 9. Sawhney, R.S., Maleki, S., Wilck, J.H., Hashemian, P., “Center for Productivity Innovation's Student
placed inthe Dropbox. Each item to be submitted is placed as a unique item in the Dropbox and isreleased to the students on a pre-specified date and time. The completed file must be submittedby the student at another time on the same date or any other date. The testing/instruction file(s)to be released are posted in the Dropbox and, upon completion of the item, the students submit itback to the Dropbox. I use this feature for two different types of evaluations. During thesemester, I give three one-question quizzes (20 minutes each) and three four-question exams (50minutes each). Since my class meets in a room equipped with computer workstations, thesequizzes and exams are taken during the class meeting. Upon completion, I upload all the
Conference Proceedings, 2010. 3. Merino, “Impact of ABET 2000 on Teaching Engineering Economics: What Subjects Define Economic Literacy for Engineers?,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2000. 4. Rogers, K. J., Sattler, M. L., “”Life Cycle Sustainability Economics” Module”, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2012. 5. Hartman, J. C., “Testing the “Art” of Engineering Economic Decision-Making,” ASEE Annual Conference, 2006. 6. Walter, S., “A Systems Approach to Engineering “Economics”,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2008. 7. Bursic, K. M., “Applying Engineering Economic Analysis to Contemporary Problems with Global and Societal Implications,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2006. 8. Brach, P
: Understanding the Student Learning Experience," Journal of Education for Business, pp. 325-332, 2012.[5] S. J. Burian and P. Romero, "Engineering Study Abroad Program on Sustainable Infrastructure," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2012.[6] V. Maldonado, L. Castillo, G. Carbajal and P. Hajela, "Building international experiences into an engineering curriculum - a design project-based approach," European Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 377-390, 2014.[7] R. F. Vaz, "Designing the Liberally Educated Engineer," Peer Review, 2012.[8] L. H. Mills, D. Deviney and B. Ball, "Short-Term Study Abroad Programs: A Diversity of Options," The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 2010.
sources. Most students were able to identify potential moral or ethicalproblems and were also able to draw appropriate connections between personal morals, the Codeof Ethics for Engineers, and the situations described in the cases. Not surprisingly, studentsoften took strong positions surrounding the central issue(s) in the cases. The main difficultystudents had with was articulating a counter perspective when they perceived a clear ethicalproblem.The papers were evaluated using a scoring rubric in which points were awarded for addressingthe guiding questions (10 points), quality of writing (5 points), and how well they justified theirfinal position on the case (5 points). The summary from Part 1 was evaluated against the guidingquestions and