Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isaac W Wait, Marshall University; Sameh M. El-Sayegh, American University of Sharjah; Salwa Mamoun Beheiry, The American University of Sharjah

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

there is less than a 95% probability that the two groups are actually different.The significance of differences in overall student score for the questions of the pre- and post-testwere determined using a one-tailed t-test (Equation 4). x  0 t (Equation 4) s/ nWhere: ̅ = Mean score on concept inventory, end-of-semester = Mean score on concept inventory, beginning-of-semester s = Standard deviation, end-of-semester n = Number of students, end-of-semesterThe internal consistency of the concept inventory was evaluated with the Kuder-RichardsonFormula 20 approach (Equation 5). k   j 1 p j q j  k

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Tech Session 2, IE-ing the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dia St. John, University of Arkansas; Eric Specking, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering

Libraries’ Efforts in Inclusion and Outreach Activities Using Social Media,” LIBRI, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2015.[11] B. M. Moskal, C. Skokan, L. Kosbar, A. Dean, C. Westland, H. Barker, Q. N. Nguyen, and J. Tafoya, “K-12 Outreach: Identifying the Broader Impacts of Four Outreach Projects,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 173–189, 2007.[12] M. Borrego, “Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2007.[13] E. Specking and R. Almaian, “An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Engineering Outreach Decisions,” in IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings, 2013, p. 1078.[14] S. H