Education department. He has graduated with a bachelors degree in mechanical engineering from Rowan University. Josh is very passionate about education as well as the social issues in both the engineering and education systems. He hopes to further his understanding in both of these fields. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Let’s Play! Gamifying Engineering Ethics Education Through the Development of Competitive and Collaborative Activities Through both success and failure, many engineering projects have a profound impact onindividuals and society. Thus, ensuring future engineers consider these impacts and reflect on theethical
literacy; student life; learning communities; and professional development. She has worked on projects whose funding sources have included the National Science Foundation, the Institute of Education Sciences, and the U.S. Department of Education.Prof. John Bergendahl, Worcester Polytechnic Institute John Bergendahl is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He has six years experience as a practicing engineer in industry, and holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering, an M.S. in environmental engineering, and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering; all from the University of Connecticut. His recent research efforts are primarily directed at investigating
Paper ID #31340Health Stress and Support System Narratives of Engineering StudentsDr. Greg Rulifson PE, USAID Greg is currently a Science and Technology Policy Fellow at USAID. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success. He earned his master’s degree in Structural Engineering and Risk Analysis from Stanford University. His PhD work at CU Boulder focused on how student’s connections of social responsibility and engineering change
engineering.Jean S. DeClerck, Michigan Technological University Jean Straw DeClerck has supported two National Science Foundation (NSF) grants through the design, facilitation, and ongoing improvement of ethics education instruction to science and engineering students. She is an Engaged Learning and Integrated Technology Specialist at Michigan Technological University’s Van Pelt and Opie Library. Her undergraduate studies included technical communication and mechanical engineering coursework, and she will complete her master’s of science degree in rhetorical and tech- nical communications at Michigan Tech in early 2012. Her current interests include engaged learning environments, mentorship, and the rhetorical aspects of
Paper ID #11425The Impact of Faculty Development Workshop on Students’ Understandingof Academic IntegrityMs. Kirsten S Hochstedt, Penn State University Kirsten Hochstedt is a graduate assistant at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Edu- cation. She received her M.S. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in educational and psycholog- ical measurement at Penn State University and is currently a doctoral candidate in the same program. The primary focus of her research concerns assessing the response structure of test scores using item response theory methodology.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State
hold paramount the safety, health, and welfareof the identified integral community” (emphasis ours) [24]. Though this canon only addresses theprofessional dimensions of engineering ethics, attention to ethics that emphasize the health andwelfare of others—and the social good more generally—in the personal and social spherespromises to be a fruitful approach to integrating the microethics of the day-to-day with themacroethics associated with institutions and broad social systems [25].Attending to Educational Culture and Not Just Student KnowledgeFinally, we find that if engineering educators desire to change how students develop and practiceethics, attention must be given not only to students’ demonstrated ethical knowledge, but also tothe
, the Transforming Lives Building Global Commu- nities (TLBGC) team in Ghana through EPICS, and individual engineering ethical development and team ethical climate scales as well as everyday negotiations of ethics in design through NSF funding as Co-PI. [Email: buzzanel@purdue.edu]David H. Torres, Purdue University David is a second year doctoral student in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue University pursuing a PhD in Organizational Communication with a minor in data analysis and research methodol- ogy. His research interests reside at the intersection of organizational communication, organizational ethics, social network analysis, identity and identification, and leadership development
every engineering graduate will work foran international development or other NGO.Instead, we propose that educators should strive to prepare students for a wide variety ofpersonal and professional pathways, yet with the goal of enabling them to become truly globalengineers capable of navigating ethical issues in diverse job roles and national/cultural contexts.Thus, engineering educators from the four different approaches to engineering ethics in theglobal context need more communication, collaboration, and coordination among themselves, ashow to educate a globally professional and responsible engineer is a very real and daunting issuethat has received much less attention than other topics in the field of engineering education.References 1
Education, American Evaluation Association, International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, and Academy of Human Resource Development.Jordan Orion James, University of New Mexico Jordan O. James is a Native American Ph.D. student in the Organization, Information, and Learning Sci- ences (OILS) program as well as a lecturer at the University of New Mexico’s School of Architecture and Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assis- tant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing
outside of engineering, or 3) a dedicatedcourse for ethics instruction, the latter of which is used at WTAMU and the focus of this paper.The ECS Department is geared toward primarily undergraduate engineering instruction. Few engineeringinstructors and professors have specific training in soft skills such as ethics instruction and technicalcommunications. However, the ECS departmental outreach coordinator and Communications Departmentinstructor, Rhonda Diffurth, holds a master’s degree in communications from WTAMU. Civil Engineering assistantprofessor Dr. Kenneth Leitch holds an MBA with an emphasis in Corporate Training which incorporates graduate-level education coursework, ethics instruction, and business principles. The authors are able to
the department of Information Sciences & Technology. Dr. Johri studies the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for learning and knowledge sharing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He also examine the role of ICT in supporting distributed work among globally dispersed workers and in furthering social development in emerging economies. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical
competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Encountering Engineering Ethics in the Workplace: Stories From the TrenchesWhile formal coursework remains one of the most common strategies for developing ethicsknowledge and competence among
,” TheBridge, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 8-13, 2002.[12] J. L. Hess and G. A. Fore, “A systematic literature review of US engineering ethicsinterventions,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551-583, 2018.[13] M. C. Loui, “Ethics and Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005.[14] E. A. Clancy, Quinn, P., and Miller, J. E., “Assessment of a case study laboratory toincrease awareness of ethical issues in engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48,pp. 313-317, 2005.[15] L. J. Shuman., M. F. Sindelar, M. Besterfield-Sacre, H. Wolfe, R. L. Pinkus, R. L. Miller, B.M. Olds, and C. Mitcham, “Can our Students Recognize and Resolve Ethical Dilemmas
. Becausethe team aimed for interdisciplinarity, it was trying to develop its own community of practice buthad not yet achieved this because the students’ backgrounds and training (e.g. core coursework)were more aligned to traditional disciplines than the project at hand.Participants included six doctoral students, two post-doctoral research assistants who recentlygraduated from the same PhD program, and two faculty members who also held administrativepositions in the interdisciplinary unit. The six doctoral students (three men and three women) hadbackgrounds and were located in departments of engineering, computer science, media arts andsciences, and music. They were in their first, second, third, and fourth years of graduate school atthe University
recently, Cechidentified a pervasive “culture of disengagement” in her pioneering study of four engineeringdegree programs, with student concerns and commitments related to public welfare decliningconsiderably during their years of undergraduate education.13Another strand of the literature has reported on efforts to measure how educational interventionsfocused on social and ethical responsibility specifically impact students. As Colby and Sullivannote, formal coursework/curricula and community-based learning are among the leadingstrategies used to teach engineering ethics and related topics.16 Regarding the former, a study byLoui reported modest increases in DIT-2 scores after engineering students were exposed to avideo-based case study of on an
Tasha Zephirin is a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is an Executive Assistant for the National Association of Multicultural Program Advocates (NAMEPA) Inc. and also serves as the Graduate Student Representative on the Purdue Engineering Advisory Council. Her research interests include exploring the role of noncurricular engineering education initiatives in the engineering experience, especially within and across cultural boundaries. Through this research, she aims to inform the development and evaluation of these initiatives in a variety of contexts.Ms. Shiloh M. James Howland, Brigham Young University Shiloh M. James Howland is a doctoral student at Brigham Young