,” TheBridge, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 8-13, 2002.[12] J. L. Hess and G. A. Fore, “A systematic literature review of US engineering ethicsinterventions,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551-583, 2018.[13] M. C. Loui, “Ethics and Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005.[14] E. A. Clancy, Quinn, P., and Miller, J. E., “Assessment of a case study laboratory toincrease awareness of ethical issues in engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48,pp. 313-317, 2005.[15] L. J. Shuman., M. F. Sindelar, M. Besterfield-Sacre, H. Wolfe, R. L. Pinkus, R. L. Miller, B.M. Olds, and C. Mitcham, “Can our Students Recognize and Resolve Ethical Dilemmas
Business: A Summary of the Research Sponsored by the Ethics in Business Research Fund. Charlottesville, VA. Available at http://www.aicpa.org/download/ethics/Ethics_Business_Research_Fund-12.pdf4. Ethics Resource Center. 2007 National Business Ethics Survey. http://www.ethics.org/nbes2003/2003nbes_summary.html5. IEEE Spectrum, December 20026. Clancy, E. A., Quinn, P., and Miller, J.E. 2005. Assessment of a Case Study Laboratory to Increase Awareness of Ethical Issues in Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education. Vol. 48, No. 2. Page 14.720.9 “Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering
and technology-in-use as a reflection on, and an influence on social morals and social ethics.Mr. Lynn Catlin P.E., Boise State UniversityDr. Harold Ackler, Boise State University Dr. Harold Ackler is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Micron School of Materials Science and En- gineering at Boise State University. He teaches advanced undergraduate laboratory courses and manages the senior capstone program in the Micron School. He received BS and MS degrees from the University of California at Berkeley and his PhD degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1997), all in Materials Science and Engineering. He has over 13 years of experience working in industry where he learned how important hands-on
added as an extradimension?Pragmatism is an overall way of thinking, one that Dewey used effectively in spelling outhow education and democracy work together, and for taking action in education. Dewey’spragmatism produced concrete results such as the laboratory schools, which pioneered theprogressive early education movement, and emphasizes teaching principles in contextthrough practice.Pragmatism and the ethic of care can be translated into engineering practice, and includedin the way we teach engineering and science in the early part of the curriculum forexample. Students should be made aware that science is dynamic, and that knowledgechanges. We do not normally convey this when teaching science. The pragmatic waywould say that rather than
member of the SPE Health,Safety, Security, Environment, and Social Responsibility (HSSE-SR) Advisory Committee. Inthe course, phase behavior, density, viscosity, interfacial tension, and composition of oil, gas,and brine systems are discussed. Course curriculum includes laboratory measurements,interpretation of lab data for engineering applications, flash calculations with k-values andequation of state and an introduction to fluid property software. CSR had previously not beentaught in the course, as it focused on the technical curriculum. In Fall 2016, CSR was introducedto the class through one assignment in which students watched a video about Chevron’s AlderGas Field Project and answered questions about Chevron’s Health, Safety, Security
socialimplications in terms of diversity (an overly used, minimalist justification) or some form ofdissemination into K-12. Yet they rarely find a way to connect course content with socialproblems, particularly those related to SJ. For example, and existing REU Site grant titled “FluidMechanics with Analysis using Computations and Experiments” is aimed at mentoringundergraduate students in “the current need for basic and applied research in fluid mechanicsacross a range of engineering disciplines as well as the training of undergraduate students instate-of-the-art laboratory environments.” And in traditional fashion, the grant justifies meetingCriterion 2 “by enhancing and diversifying the pool of students considering a research career inengineering