AC 2010-2357: INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OFNANOTECHNOLOGY IN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (STS)COURSESAhmed Khan, DeVry University Dr. Ahmed S. Khan is a senior Professor in the EET dept., College of Engineering & Information Sciences, at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management., and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Outcomes Assessment, Application of Telecommunications Technologies in Distance Education, and Social
: Microethics, macroethics and the role ofprofessional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3). 403–414.9. Bocong, L. (2012) From a Micro-Macro Framework to a Micro-Meso-Macro Framework. In Christensen,S., Mitcham, C., Li B., & An, Y. (Eds.). Engineering, Development, and Philosophy: American, Chinese, andEuropean Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.10. Van De Poel, I., Fahlquist, J., Doorn, N., Zwart, S., Royakkers, L. (2012). The Problem of Many Hands:Climate Change as an Example. Science and Engineering Ethics 18. 49-67.11. Van de Poel, I., Royakkers, L., and Zwart, S. (2015). Moral Responsibility and the Problem of ManyHands. New York: Routledge.12. Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. Leaning, J. & Guha-Sapir, D. Natural Disasters, Armed Conflict, and Public Health. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1836–1842 (2013).2. Garriga, E. & Melé, D. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J. Bus. Ethics 53, 51–71 (2004).3. National Society of Professional Engineers. NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. (2007).4. Herkert, J. R. in Social, ethical, and policy implications of engineering: selected readings 45–73 (IEEE Press, 2000).5. Hess, J. L. et al. Empathy and caring as conceptualized inside and outside of engineering: Extensive literature review and faculty focus group analyses. in
research. Anemphasis on philosophical ethics will be integrated throughout each of these components.Table 1: Tentative Faculty Learning Community Meeting Schedule, Year 2 Date Meeting Topic Aug. 2018 Kick-off Meeting and Community-Engaged Service Project Sept. 2018 Reading(s) and Discussion on Community-Engaged Learning & Reflection Oct. 2018 Reading(s) and Discussion on Ethics Nov. 2018 Integrating Community-Engaged Learning & Ethical Reflection Jan. 2019 Community Partnerships Networking Session Feb. 2019 Course Development Workshop (e.g., Backwards Design, Syllabi) Mar. 2019 Course Development Workshop (e.g., Peer Review, Critiques) May 2019 Formal Presentations and Team-Building Activity Table 1
Education?,” Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305.[5] 1615 L. St NW, Suite 800Washington, and D. 20036USA202-419-4300 | M.-857-8562 | F.- 419-4372 | M. Inquiries, “Diversity in the STEM workforce varies widely across jobs,” Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project, Jan. 09, 2018. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/09/diversity-in-the-stem-workforce- varies-widely-across-jobs/ (accessed Apr. 19, 2021).[6] A. True-Funk, C. Poleacovschi, G. Jones-Johnson, S. Feinstein, K. Smith, and S. Luster- Teasley, “Intersectional Engineers: Diversity of Gender and Race Microaggressions and Their Effects in Engineering Education,” J. Manag. Eng
willinclude the development of instruction as proposed above and assessments will be conductedbefore and after the intervention. The ultimate goal is to prepare engineering students toencounter nanotechnology education across science, technology, social sciences and humanitiesto be better equipped to participate in debates about how societies ought to be transformed.References: 1. Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2. National Science and Technology Council. (2000). 2000 Annual Report. Washington D.C. 3. Roco, M. C. (2003). Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5(3), 181--189. 4. Roco, M
. 16References[1] T. F. Budinger and M. D. Budinger, Ethics of Emerging Technologies: Scientific Facts and Moral Challenges. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2006.[2] G. C. Andrews, P. Shaw, and J. McPhee, Canadian Professional Engineering and Geoscience Practice and Ethics. Nelson College Indigenous, 2018.[3] A. Jamison and M. Heymann, “Historical Tensions in Engineering Education: European Perspectives,” in Engineering, Development and Philosophy, H. S. Christensen, C. Mitcham, B. Li, and Y. An, Eds. 2012, pp. 183–196.[4] J. C. Lucena, “Flexible engineers: History, challenges, and opportunities for engineering education,” Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 419–435, 2003.[5] U. Jørgensen, “Tensions in
January 8, 2019].[16] S. Gibbons, “A Brief History of How Plastic Straws Took over the World,” National Geographic, January 2, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/07/news-plastic- drinking-straw-history-ban/. [Accessed January 8, 2019].[17] J. Bird, “What a Waste: Online Retail’s Big Packaging Problem,” Forbes, July 29, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonbird1/2018/07/29/what-a-waste-online-retails-big-packaging- problem/#277f6bca371d. [Accessed January 8, 2019].[18] EPA, “Facts and Figures about Materials, Waste and Recycling,” July 19, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/plastics
such anintegration of ethics into engineering education.Background and MotivationThe rules of professional practice in engineering until the early 1900’s were conditionedby the fact that engineers looked on themselves as loyal to a firm or a larger entity such asthe military or public works that employed them. Historically, engineering as a field –rather than a “profession” --and then as an academic discipline, originated from theseroots in the late 1740’s with the establishment of the first “civil” (as opposed to“military”) engineering department in France in the École Polytechnique in 1794 [1], [2].The American Society of Civil Engineers was founded in 1852 and is the oldestengineering society in the United States. The professional ethics of
question also asked to what degree ethical issues factored into their decision to leavetheir job. There were also 12 items to assess attitudes toward professional social responsibility,selected from among the fifty Likert-items on the Engineering Professional ResponsibilityAssessment (EPRA) survey.28 The selected items focused in the professional connectedness (6items), costs/benefits (3 items), and analyze dimensions (3 items) of the Professional SocialResponsibility Development Model (PSRDM).29 The survey ended with demographic itemsincluding discipline(s) of their undergraduate and graduate degrees, and gender. The precisesurvey questions relevant to the current study are provided in the Appendix.An email invitation to participate in the survey
size does not make modern cruise ships impregnable. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jan/15/costa-concordia- not-impregnable-size8. Ministry of Infrastructures and Transports, Marine Causalities Investigative Body. (2013, May). Report on the safety technical investigation. Retrieved from http://cf.gcaptain.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Costa_ Concordia_-_Full_Investigation_Report.pdf9. Carnival Corporation. (2015). Mission & history. Retrieved from http://phx.corporater.net/phoenix.zhtml? c=200767 &p=irol-history10. Gabel, S. (n.d.). What is included in a Carnival cruise? USA Today. Retrieved from http://traveltips.usatoday. com/included-carnival-cruise-107048.html11. Dake
million practicingengineers are actively employed in the United States, representing approximately 1.1% ofthe overall workforce. Over 3 million citizens have engineering degrees. Table 1. General Population and Employment Data Number Normalized by Normalized by Category (1000’s) US Population Total Employed US Population (2006 est.) [37] 299,398 100.0 Degree-aged (2006 est.) [37] 212,354 70.9 College Degreed Individuals (2003) [39] 40,621 13.6 US Workforce* (2006 est.) [36] 132,605
organizations often tend to amplify the moral and political values that are lacking and need to be further enhanced in developing contexts. They view technologies as instruments for well-being rather than profits.As engineering educators who are interested in preparing future engineers for the increasinglyglobalized future, we need to be careful about what kind(s) of “global engineers” we are training.Emphasizing one or two approaches to engineering ethics over others represents an incompleteapproach that fails to project an appropriately comprehensive view of global engineering practice.Obviously, we are not training every student to become a professional engineer working in amultinational business company, nor do we expect that
), non-technical constraints (C),stakeholder considerations (S), broader considerations about cultural ecosystems (BC). We thencame to consensus on how we rated each consideration.Based on our analysis, the students of the CTSS class made a distinctive shift how theyprioritized design considerations for the energy-conversion playground design, as demonstratedin Figure 1. Notably, the aggregate number of considerations that centered on socioculturalconsiderations increased from 7 (10.3% of total responses) to 29 in the second iteration (41.4%of total responses). Moreover, the aggregate frequency of technical centered responses reducedfrom 26 in the first iteration (38.2% of total responses) to 4 in the second iteration (5.1% of totalresponses
College of Engineering and Technology East Carolina University Greenville, North Carolina, USA John S. Buckeridge School of Engineering RMIT University Melbourne, Victoria, Australia AbstractEthical decision-making is central to the practice of construction management. This is no moreevident than in the twenty-first century, when the construction industry must function in verydiverse organizational contexts. While construction companies pursue projects in internationalmarkets, many investors are
, J. G. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. K. Britton & S. M. Glynn (Eds.) Executive control processes in reading. Hilsdale, NJ.12. McKnight, C., Dillon, A. & Richardson, J. (1996) User centered design of hypertext and hypermedia for education, in Jonassen, David H., Eds. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pages pp. 622-633. New York: Macmillan.13. Jacobson, M. J. & Spiro, R. D. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of educational Computing Research, 12 (4), p. 301-333.14. Jonassen, D. (1997
from inside academia and especially from many professors who seem not to thinktwice about their commitment to this philosophy. This argument coincides with deeper cuts inuniversities‟ budgets. Universities are trying to compensate these cuts by increasing fundingfrom private groups willing to “help academia to achieve its goals” being the private sector,claiming an “ad-hoc” education. The loud calls to align industry and businesses with academia seem to be reasonablebased on economic constraints on both sides and the fact that “our students will benefit from it.”Another strong argument in favor of the social benefit of the alignment of business‟s needs, andcollege curriculum is the fact that our worldwide competitiveness will improve
Engineering Classroom," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, pp. 29-45, 2009.5. M. Borrego and S. Cutler, "Constructive Alignment of Interdisciplinary Graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Science: An Analysis of Successful IGERT Proposals," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, pp. 355-369, 2010.6. M. Borrego and L. K. Newswander, "Definitions of Interdisciplinary Research: Toward Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Learning Outcomes," Review of Higher Education, vol. 34, pp. 61-84, 2010.7. G. L. Downey, The machine in me: an anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York: Routledge, 1998.8. G. Kunda, Engineering culture: control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple
. Ethics. (24) pp. 551-583. 2018.[4] N. Bekir, V. Cable, I. Hashimoto, and S. Katz, “Teaching Engineering Ethics: A NewApproach,” in Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV,USA, October 10-13, 2001. Available:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=963938.[5] W.C. Carpenter, “Teaching Engineering Ethics with The Engineering Ethics Challenge Game,”in Proceedings of the 113th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, USA, June 12-15, 2005, pp. 10.1203.1-10.1203.13. Available: https://peer.asee.org/15157.[6] P. Lloyd and I. van de Poel, “Designing Games to Teach Ethics,” Science and EngineeringEthics, vol. 14, pp. 433-447, 2008.[7
practices in which stakeholder concernschanged actual engineering decisions and practices as exemplary CSR activities, rather thanthose that simply redistributed some of the economics earnings of industry to a broader array ofpeople. In so doing, we drew inspiration of Auld et al.’s distinction between “old” and “new”CSR, in which “old” CSR encompasses philanthropy (such as volunteering and charitabledonations like scholarships) and “new” CSR refers to activities that change core businesspractices to create social, economic, and environmental value for stakeholders as well ascompanies [4]. The question asking students to evaluate CSR practices as being excellent, okay,or not CSR therefore included a range of activities on the old to new scale, from
other words, the experience of relationality and ethical concern are ontologically priorto defining engineering’s role in a given moment. Returning to one of our recent publications [1],I would argue that we first feel and experience what is going on before we can reflectively thinkabout such experience. We feel and experience relationships with all that we encounter in a givenevent, and we are affected by those encounters. Responsibilities, obligations, and valuations arisetherefrom. In being affected by the multiplicity within an encounter, there is significant potentialfor conflict and difficulties associated with assigning/identifying value(s). Once the experienceoccurs, we objectify it, mine it for information, and seek to address it
. Contardi, R. Cingolani, I. S. Bayer, A. Heredia, and A. Athanassiou, “All‐natural sustainable packaging materials inspired by plant cuticles,” Adv. Sustain. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1-2, Jan. 5, 2017.[5] N. Norbisimi and S. Selke, “Social aspect of sustainable packaging,” Packag., Technol., and Sci., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 317-326, Oct. 2010.[6] W. T. Lynch and R. Kline, Engineering practice and engineering ethics, Sci., Technol., and Human Values, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 195-225, 2000.[7] P. F. Bone and R. J. Corey, “Packaging ethics: Perceptual differences among packaging professionals, brand managers and ethically-interested consumers,” J. of Bus. Ethics, vol. 24, pp. 199-213, 2000.[8] Advancing Sustainable Materials Management
to lab) Safety Injury to team, injury to end user, damage to equipment Environmental Team must dispose of significant excess material, design requires hazardous materials, selecting a low-cost component that could lead to shorter life and the need for additional purchases, design requires purchase of consumable items for end user Social Design choices cause harm to a team member or end user based on social issues (e.g.: loss of confidentiality, contradicts local cultures and customs) Action taken – how will the team will address (or not) the risk Prevent Action will be taken to prevent the cause(s) from occurring in the first place. Reduce Action will be taken
textbooks. Researchers have plagiarized reports,articles, and book chapters.” Most people may not be aware that the late civil rightsleader, Martin Luther King Jr., was believed to have plagiarized5 his doctoral dissertationin theology, completed at Boston University. In his dissertation he used information fromBoston University graduate, Jack S. Boozer’s dissertation without proper citation. Eventhough this came to light in 1991, nearly 35 years following King’s death, it tends toportray one of the greatest American leaders in a bad perspective. Even though theinquiry committee at Boston University acknowledged that he had indeed committedplagiarism, his degree was not withdrawn and the case was declared closed6.An article written by Australian
4to resign. Siemaszko declined to resign. Being concerned that quitting might indicate that hewas guilty of misconduct, Siemaszko chose to be fired.16 Shortly after being fired Siemaszko filed a whistle-blower lawsuit against FENOC withthe Occupational Safety and Health Administration claiming that he was fired for his efforts toraise concerns about safety at Davis-Besse. FENOC defended itself by claiming that: “Siemaszko failed to follow the Boric Acid Corrosion Control procedure and inaccurately recorded the results of his 2000 … inspection and cleaning activities”, and “Siemaszko was a key technical contributor to the Company’s response(s) to NRC Bulletin 2001-01… which contained inaccurate and/or
is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Rowan University. His research primar- ily concerns multi-scale geomaterial behavior under coupled processes across various time scales, with emphasis placed on microstructure characterization, constitutive model formulation, and computational geomechanics, for applications in geological storage and energy geotechnics. Prior to joining the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Rowan, he worked in the Bureau of Economic Geology at the University of Texas at Austin. At Rowan, he teaches courses in geotechnical engineering and ge- omechanics. He is a recipient of James S. Lai Outstanding Graduate Award from the geosystems group at Georgia Tech
. References1. Bloodgood, J., Turnley, W., and Mudrack, P. (2010). Ethics Instruction and the Perceived Acceptability of Cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 23-37.2. Williams, S. D. and T. Dewett: 2005, ‘Yes You Can Teach Business Ethics: A Review and Research Agenda’, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 12(2), 109–120.3. Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2015). Retrieved on October 1, 2015. http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/ethics.4. Harris, C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S. and Rabins, M. J. (1996), Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When? Journal of Engineering Education, 85: 93–96. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830. 1996.tb00216.x5. Desplaces, D., Beauvais, L., Melchar, D., and Bosco, S
of the historical case studiespresented in class as well as to apply the risk assessment tools developed during the seminar.Final papers were judged using the same rubric as the initial writing assignment. On averagestudents’ understanding of ethical concepts more than doubled to 4.3 out of 5 as did their abilityto apply risk assessment tools to ethical problems (4.1 out of 5).AcknowledgmentsThe development of this seminar was partially supported by the John J. and Dorothy Byrne FirstYear Seminar Program Endowment at Rutgers University.References1 Haws, D.R. (2001). Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta-Analysis. ASEE Journal ofEngineering Education, 90:2, 223-229.2 Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L