Conference Session

Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom A. Eppes, University of Hartford; Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford; Frederick Sweitzer, University of Hartford

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

documents seemed veryuseful to evaluate any of the 3 skill areas for a pilot. However, an interesting idea surfacedregarding the team status meetings with the instructor in which an interview Q&A style could beused to gather sufficient evidence.A pilot was conducted in spring 2010 involving the capstone for Electrical Engineering as wellas Computer Engineering majors. The face-to-face meetings with the teams provided anexcellent opportunity to evaluate the skill levels. The instructor reported that each teamemployed all 3 skills at one or more point(s) during the semester. The results are shown in Table5 for all 6 teams. Good performance was observed in 2-3 teams for each skill; however, the bestteams were not always the same. No team

Conference Session

Ethical Issues II: Academic Integrity and Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy L. Miller, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown; Jerry W. Samples, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

AnnualASEE Conference and Exposition, Chicago, Il. June 20063. Alenskis, Brian, “Integrating Ethics into an Engineering TechnologyCourse: An Interspersed Component Approach,” Proceeding of the 1997 AnnualASEE Conference and Exposition, Milwaukee, WI. June 19974. Mindek, R. B., Keyser, T. K., Musiak, R. E., Schreiner, S., Vollaro, M.B.,“Integration of Engineering Ethics Into The Curriculum: Student Performance andFeedback,” Proceeding of the 2003 Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition,Nashville, TN. June 20035. Durfee, J., Loendorf, W., “Using the National Society of ProfessionalEngineer’ (NSPE) Ethics Examination as an Assessment Tool in the EngineeringTechnology Curriculum,” Proceeding of the 2008 Annual ASEE Conference andExposition

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division - Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trevor Scott Harding, California Polytechnic State University; Donald D. Carpenter P.E., Lawrence Technological University; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

# 0647460, 0647532, and0647929). The views expressed represent those of the authors and are not necessarily those of theNational Science Foundation.References1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (2012) Program Criteria 3. Student Outcomes. http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3149. Accessed 20 December, 2012.2. National Academy of Engineering (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.3. Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., and Sullivan, W. (2009). Educating engineers. Design for the future of the Field. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.4. Herkert, J.R. (2000). Engineering

Conference Session

Non-Canonical Canons of Engineering Ethics

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna M Riley, Virginia Tech; Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Joseph R. Herkert, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

memberships.” The boundaries being drawn here are quite clear:politics do not belong in the IEEE, and LGBTQ individuals are ontologically political. It isinteresting that the latter two posters assumed the proposer(s) of the new language were LGBTQ(must be outsiders!), when in fact there was an organized response from the few out LGBTQIEEE members to alter the proposed wording before adoption of the proposed changes, as theproposed language was not truly inclusive of the LGBTQ community.Sexual orientation is private/doesn’t belong in the workplace: A slightly different (thoughrelated) boundary was drawn between professional and private spheres when frequentcommenter Luke Burgess (relation to Barry Burgess unknown) suggested that sexual

Conference Session

Engaging Ethics in Teams and Communities

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Torres, Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Danielle Corple, Purdue University; Katharine E. Miller, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

a coherent grouping of similar ways of experiencing thephenomenon among (typically) more than one individual.For Zoltowski et al.’s study, analysis of the data yielded seven qualitatively different ways inwhich the students experienced human-centered design (categories) within the context of“designing for others”. An overview of the categories of description is given in Table 1. Table 1. Categories of Description of Students' Experience of Human-Centered Design10 Category of Description (Human-Centered Design Summary is...) Design is not human-centered, but technology-centered design. The focus of the design is on the technology and solving the technical

Conference Session

Socio-Technical Issues in Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park; Thomas M. Philip, University of California, Los Angeles

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan C. Campbell, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

work explores engineering ethics empirically in a “developing world” context through aframework of care ethics. Care ethics, a.k.a., the ethic(s) of care, is particularly suitable for the“developing world” context because it helps draw attention to imbalances of power (e.g.,inequality, differential opportunity, and limitations on autonomy) that are often neglected byother ethical frameworks. In this work, we selected one element of care ethics (responsibility)and operationalized it in several ways: the language of responsibility; notions of paternalism; andawareness of key, influencing stakeholders. These lenses were developed and refined iterativelyby employing them in case study analyses of two design project reports written by teams

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Ann Gelles, Utah State University; Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University; Marialuisa Di Stefano, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Graduate Ethics Education & Professional Codes

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech; William Joseph Rhoads, Virginia Tech; Siddhartha Roy, Virginia Tech; Erin Heaney, Clean Air: Organizing for Health and Justice; Glenn Andrew Ratajczak, Clean Air Coalition of Western New York; Jennifer Holly Ratajczak, Clean Air Coalition of Western New York

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Teaching Approaches for Ethics

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory A. Rulifson, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Whitney Thomas, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Challenges16-19. Whileethics instruction is common in first year engineering courses20-25, this instruction may notinclude social responsibility as a macroethical imperative. Some curricula with an ethics threadeducate students about macroethical issues in later years, such as a third-year course with ethicsintegration at Drexel26. Another way that engineering students may come to appreciate theimportance of social responsibility is via service-learning (S-L) courses, which is the basis forsome first year projects / design courses27-32.An emphasis on social responsibility within engineering may be significant beyond its intrinsicimportance to individuals and society. There may be important implications of SR for the

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session: Neuroethics and Secondary STEM Classrooms

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington ; Sara Goering, University of Washington; Eric H. Chudler, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Approaches for Neuroscience, Ethics, and Society, vol. 1, May 2014. [Online]. Available https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/node/3543.html.[2] P. R. Wolpe, “Neuroethics,” in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd ed., vol. 4, S. G. Post, Ed. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2003, pp. 1894–1898.[3] A. Roskies, “Neuroethics,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2016 ed., E. N. Zalta, Ed. [Online]. Available https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/neuroethics/.[4] O. Müller and S. Rotter, “Neurotechnology: Current developments and ethical issues,” Front Syst Neurosci., vol 11, no. 93, December 13 2017. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00093.[5] R. Yuste et al., “Four ethical priorities for

Conference Session

Moral Development, Engineering Pedagogy and Ethics Instruction

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kirsty Mills, University of New Mexico

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

% ‘nanohistory’, as well as pointing Not at all 2 3 4 Familiar out the presence of nanoparticles Figure 1: How familiar are you with nanotechnology? and nanostructures in nature and (The figures in this article are drawn from a survey throughout human history, delved given to the students before and at the end of the into the political background of course. Please note that the number of students t h e emergence of enrolled in the class (9) is such that the survey results nanotechnology, and the ongoing given in this article are not statistically significant, and s c h i s m s within the are

Conference Session

Interactive Approaches to Ethics

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leslie Dodson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; David DiBiasio, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Paula Quinn, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; John Bergendahl, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Glenn Gaudette, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; John M. Sullivan Jr, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Curtis Abel, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

about how we will pay for it, who will build it, how will it affect life in the city. (Student response) A(s a) resident for Worcester and a part owner for Atlanta Mill in Millbury, Mr. Harrington (has) concerns about Worcester’s current sewage system for both moral and economic reasons. (Student response) I, Robert C. Booth, resident and owner of a medical practice in Millbury, found it hard to convince some people of the issue with dumping untreated sewage into the Blackstone River. Whether they are too concerned with their own businesses, time

Conference Session

New Areas of Ethical Inquiry

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joseph Benin, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; William Randall, U.S. Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

ethics," in Proceedings. Eleventh International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, Miami, FL, 2002.[8] S. Lingafelt, "The History and Development of a “Cyber Security” Program Criteria," ABET, 11 November 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/the-history-and-development-of-a- cyber-security-program-criteria/. [Accessed 27 January 2020].[9] N. A. Barghouthi and H. Said, "Critical structure of ethics behind offensive cyber warfare," in 2013 International Conference on Current Trends in Information Technology, Dubai, 2013.[10] N. M. Cal, "Crossing the rubicon: identifying and responding to an armed cyber-attack," in 2016 International Conference on Cyber Conflict, Washington, D.C., 2016.[11] E. Sobiesk, J

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bill D Carroll P.E., University of Texas, Arlington; Bob P. Weems, University of Texas, Arlington; Bahram Khalili, University of Texas, Arlington

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

in Section 10, and supporting materials are provided in the Appendix.3. Motivation & BackgroundThe professional practices course was developed to address difficulties with soft topic coveragein the degree plan used for many years, along with increased needs that arose from broadeningthe available degree programs and heightened expectations for computing curricula. Throughoutthe 80's and 90's, the CSE department offered a single undergraduate degree in ComputerScience and Engineering. The first year of the program included a one-hour college-levelcommon course (1104) Introduction to Engineering to provide exposure to the diversity ofchallenges in engineering, along with another one-hour departmental course (1105) Introductionto

Conference Session

Case and Scenario in Engineering Ethics Instruction

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University; John R Luchini

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

instructions were left vague on purpose to foster avariety of results and encourage later discussion. This approach succeeded, as some teamsaccepted the task as an engineering challenge and worked hard to calculate error ranges anddegrees of precision, while other teams were satisfied to find an answer online and submit theirreport quickly. Table 2: Summary of student teams' project reports. AVERAGE MEASUREMENT # DATA TEAM # MEMBERS # TUBES LENGTH METHOD(S) POINTS

Conference Session

Engineering Practice for a Moral World

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Rossler, Oklahoma State University; Martin High, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

2006-1810: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS: WHAT CANTHE ETHICS OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION TEACH ENGINEERS?Martin High, Oklahoma State University MARTIN S. HIGH founded and co-directs the Legal Studies in Engineering Program at Oklahoma State University and is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. Professor High earned his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Penn State, and a J.D. from the University of Tulsa. He is licensed as an attorney in Oklahoma, registered as a Patent Attorney to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and licensed as a professional engineer in Pennsylvania.Paul Rossler, Oklahoma State

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David K. Ware; David J. Ahlgren, Trinity College; Harvey F. Silverman, Brown University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Program SolicitationNSF 11-514, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2011/nsf11514/nsf11514.htm.2. W. A. Wulf. Editorial “Engineering Ethics”. The Bridge 32 (3), Fall, 2002, p. 3.3. J. R Herkert. “Continuing and Emerging Issues in Engineering Ethics Education”. The Bridge 32 (3), Fall, 2002,pp 8–13.4. J. R Herkert. “Collaborative Learning in Engineering Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 4, 1997, pp447-462.5. C. E. Harris, Jr., M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, M. J. Rabins. “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? AndWhen?”. Journal of Engineering Education, April 1996, pp 93-96.6. A. Colby and W. Sullivan. “Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education”. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 2008, 97, 3, pp 327-3387. Bryant University first-year program

Conference Session

Contemporary Issues in Engineering Ethics

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seamus Freyne, Manhattan College; J.Patrick Abulencia, Manhattan College; Powell Draper, Manhattan College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

toucheseveryone and to think critically about what they do on the job.Bibliography                                                                                                                1 Harris, Jr., C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 4/19962 Abraham, S., Knies, A. D., Kukral, K. L., and Willis, T. E., “Experiences in Discussing Ethics with Undergraduate Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 10/19973 Freyne, S. F. and Hale, W. M., “A Preliminary Survey of Engineering Ethics Courses Nationwide,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20094 Hole, L. D., Radebaugh, D. W., and Soschinske, K. A

Conference Session

Sustainability and Humanitarian Engineering

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seamus F. Freyne, Mississippi State University; James P Abulencia, Manhattan College; Powell Draper, Manhattan College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

                                                                                                               1 Harris, Jr., C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 4/19962 Abraham, S., Knies, A. D., Kukral, K. L., and Willis, T. E., “Experiences in Discussing Ethics with Undergraduate Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE, 10/19973 Freyne, S. F. and Hale, W. M., “A Preliminary Survey of Engineering Ethics Courses Nationwide,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20094 Hole, L. D., Radebaugh, D. W., and Soschinske, K. A., “Strategies for Industry and University Cooperation in Engineering Ethics Education,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 20055 Davis, M. and

Conference Session

Moral Development and Ethics Assessment in Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University; Loretta Driskel, Clarkson University; Erin Blauvelt, Clarkson University; Laura Perry, Clarkson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. Registered Professional Engineer (Ohio). Robinson’s ethics teaching style comes from an amalgam of academic, industrial (Bell Labs), governmen- tal (VA) and clinical experiences, plus an interest in ethics from his undergraduate days.Ms. Loretta Driskel, Clarkson University Since the late 1990’s Loretta’s passion has been to create engaging, diverse teaching and learning ex- periences for students and faculty. As the senior instructional designer at Clarkson University, she has presented at conferences such as the Online Learning Consortium and over the past two decades, she has also presented at a wide variety of other venues including ADEIL; Sloan-C

Conference Session

Cross-cultural Sensitivity, Moral Imagination, and Diversity in Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yousef Jalali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Christian Matheis, Guilford College; Marc Edwards, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Industrial, Professional, and Practical Contexts of Engineering Ethics

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael C. Loui, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign; Chuck Huff

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

ethics education,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition. 2019.[3] D. Kim, “Promoting professional socialization: A synthesis of Durkheim, Kohlberg, Hoffman,and Haidt for professional ethics education,” Bus. Prof. Ethics J., to appear.[4] D. Kim, “Investigating individual engineers’ moral personality: Socialization and judgment,”in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2019.[5] D. P. McAdams & J. L. Pals, “A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative scienceof personality,” Am. Psychol., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 204-217, 2006.[6] K. S. Cameron & R. E. Quinn, Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on theCompeting Values Framework. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Conference Session

Engineering and Sustainability

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brock Barry, Purdue University; Aman Yadav, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4- 14.2. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(4), 367-427.3. Garvin, D.A. (2003). Making the case: Professional education for the world of practice. Harvard Magazine, 106(1), 56-65.4. Borden, S.L. (1998). Avoiding the pitfalls of case studies. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 13(1), 5-13.5. Lundeberg, M. A. (1999). Discovering teaching and learning through cases. In Lundeberg, M. A., Levin, B. B. & Harrington, H. (Eds.). Who learns what from cases and how: The research base for teaching and learning

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics and Global Issues

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roobik Gharabagi, St. Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

important teaching tool. Students’ achievementlevel may be evaluated using ethic’s tests, case studies, legal reviews, exit interview, anda comprehensive survey. The uses of direct and indirect tools presented in this paper arefew of many available tools in achieving desired performance levels for program/ABEToutcomes “c” and “f”.Bibliography1. The Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science at Case Western Reserve, onlineethics.org.2. National Institute for Engineering Ethics, Texas Tech University, www.murdough.ttu.edu.3. National Society for Professional Engineers, www.nspe.org.4. Ethics in Engineering, www.matscieng.sunysb.edu/ethics/.5. Law of Engineering and Other Design Professions, www.engineeringlaw.net.6. Pritchard, Michael S

Conference Session

Innovating Ethics Curriculum and Instruction

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology; Wade L. Robison, Rochester Institute of Technology; Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Construction Engineering and Management,” Proc. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[4] Maryam Tabibzadeh and S. Jimmy Gandhi, “Comprehensive analysis of current engineering risk management curriculum,” Proc. 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[5] W. Robison, Ethics Within Engineering. NY, USA: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.[6] ASME Policies, Section 15.7 Ethics[7] IEEE Policies, Section 7.8 IEEE Code of Ethics[8] https://riskinnovation.org/think-differently/orphan-risks/[9] S. Hearn, “Outcome Mapping”, http://www.theoryofchange.org/wp-content/uploads/ toco_library/pdf/2001-Hearn-Presentation-Outcome-Mapping-Building-Learning.pdf (accessed August 6, 2019).[10] E. DeBartolo

Conference Session

Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne P.E., Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/utilitarianism. [Accessed: 02-Feb-2020].[5] P. M. King and K. S. Kitchener, Developing reflective judgement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1994.[6] J. Moon, “Resources for Reflective Learning,” in A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning, London: Routedge Falmer, 2004.[7] D. Kember, J. McKay, K. Sinclair, and F. K. Y. Wong, “A four‐category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 369–379, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1080/02602930701293355.[8] D. R. Krathwohl, “Chapter 8: sampling, representation and external generality,” in

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics Decision-Making

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

. Pollack. “Why are There Still So Few Women in Science?” The New York Time Magazine, 2013.[8] J. Haidt. The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage, 2012.[9] J. Graham, J.Haidt, S. Koleva, M. Motyl, R. Iyer, S.P. Wojcik, P.H. Ditto. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Prgamatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 55-130.[10] J. Haidt, J Graham. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize.” Social Justice Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 98-116.[11] J.L. Napier and J.B. Luguri. “Moral Mind-Sets: Abstract Thinking Increases a Preference for “Individualizing” over “binding” Moral Foundations.” Social

Conference Session

Teaching Ethics II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Freeman, Valparaiso University; Peter Johnson, Valparaiso University; Kenneth Leitch, Valparaiso University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

301 Spring 2006 Ethics Paper Assignment Engineering Ethics Paper Due Wednesday, April 12, 2006Each person has been randomly assigned to a group. Each group has been assigned onecase. The group is to review the case, using the NCEES Model Rules of ProfessionalConduct, and at least one engineering society’s Codes of Ethics to form an opinion.The group will act as a Board of Ethical Review and develop an opinion (ruling) on theengineer’s behavior. The group will write a three to five page paper (12 pt, doublespaced, 1 inch margins) briefly describing the case, stating and answering the majorquestion(s), highlighting any additional ethical questions that may appear in the case, andstating

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics III

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Godfrey, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Todd Taylor, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Corinna Fleischmann, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Daniel Pickles, U.S. Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

discussions began and their format. The paper will also review the advantages ofthese lunches, including reduced workload for instructors and the integration of ethicsinto the curriculum without displacing discipline-specific engineering topics. Finally,possible applications of USCGA’s experience to other programs are discussed. Page 13.1161.3BackgroundThe USCGA is one of four federal service academies and as such is focused on theacademic, military and physical development of young men and women as leaders inservice to our nation. USCGA provides the U. S. Coast Guard (USCG) withapproximately 190 new Coast Guard officers each year. Upon graduation from