Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth L. d'Entremont, University of Utah; Andrew S. Merryweather, University of Utah

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, sign-offs, and standards development) and reactive tasks (such as product investigations, safety recalls, and regulatory affairs) for all of their products worldwide.Dr. Andrew S Merryweather, University of Utah Andrew S. Merryweather is director of the Ergonomics and Safety Program at the University of Utah and Assistant Professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering where he teaches and directs research in the areas of biomechanics, human factors, musculoskeletal injury prevention and human modeling. Dr. Merryweather obtained his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah in 2008 as a NIOSH Trainee in Occupational Injury Prevention. Over the past 12 years Dr. Merryweather has managed

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Tech; Indhira María Hasbún, Virginia Tech; Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

current political system [17]. While locus of control has been studied extensively since the 1980’s, there is no generalconsensus as to the correlation between the locus of control and ethical decision-making. Studieshave shown no correlation between the two constructs, while others have reported that aninternal locus of control is positively correlated to ethical decision-making [10],[14]. An internallocus of control means that the individual feels they are in control of a given behavior [16].While not indicative of ethical behavior, the perception of being in control when faced with anethical dilemma may positively correlate to ethical decision-making and ethical awareness. Personality has been used to elucidate a variety of

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alireza Bolhari, Islamic Azad University, Tehran; Azadeh Bolhari P.E., Angelo State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

a four-component model. Mis Quarterly , 30 (1), 167-180.Peterson, D. K. (2002). Computer ethics: the influence of guidelines and universal moralbeliefs. Information Technology & People , 15 (4), 346-361.Phukan, S. (2005). Using Information Technology Ethically: New Dimensions in the Age ofthe Internet. The Business Review, Cambridge , 4 (1), 234-239.Renwick, J. S., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2013). A model of ethical decision making byinformation technology students. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges , 28 (5), 62-69.Riemenschneider, C. K., Leonard, L. N., & Manly, T. S. (2011). Students' Ethical Decision-Making in an Information Technology Context: A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach.Journal of Information Systems

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

ethics.” Proc. of the 36th Frontiers in Education Conference. NewYork: IEEE, 2006. [Online]. Available: doi: 10.1109/FIE.2006.322284.[6] M. Leistner, “The Times Beach story,” Synthesis/Regeneration, vol. 7-8, 1995. [Online]. Available:www.greens.org/s-r/078/07-09.html[7] “Business sideline puts oil dealer in the spotlight in Missouri’s dioxin case,” The New York Times. Jan. 24,1982. [Online]. Available: www.nytimes.com/1983/01/24/us/business-sideline-puts-oil-dealer-in-thespotlight-in-missouri-s-dioxin-case.html[8] “U.S. v. Bliss.” May 14, 2015. [Online]. Available: www.justice.gov/enrd/us-v-bliss[9] Committee to Review the Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides, Veterans and AgentOrange, Health effects of herbicides used

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Swetha Nittala, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tasha Zephirin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Shiloh James Howland, Brigham Young University; Dayoung Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Andrew Katz, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

that revolvedaround other people included: considering others’ perspectives; the importance of applyingempathy in understanding; the potential in each human being for good and evil; the necessity ofholding paramount the health, safety, and welfare of the public; and recognizing responsibilitiesto employer(s), coworkers, communities, and society writ large. Regarding ethical-decision-making, participants mentioned the importance of sustainability in decision-making; consideringthe prospect of unintended consequences; properly weighting cost and benefit analyses; making acommitment to principles and beliefs; having an understanding of specific ethical theories; thepotential role that culture can play in shaping ethical norms; and the role of

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grant A. Fore, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Brandon Sorge, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Mary F. Price, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Martin A. Coleman, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Thomas William Hahn, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis; Julie Adele Hatcher

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

research. Anemphasis on philosophical ethics will be integrated throughout each of these components.Table 1: Tentative Faculty Learning Community Meeting Schedule, Year 2 Date Meeting Topic Aug. 2018 Kick-off Meeting and Community-Engaged Service Project Sept. 2018 Reading(s) and Discussion on Community-Engaged Learning & Reflection Oct. 2018 Reading(s) and Discussion on Ethics Nov. 2018 Integrating Community-Engaged Learning & Ethical Reflection Jan. 2019 Community Partnerships Networking Session Feb. 2019 Course Development Workshop (e.g., Backwards Design, Syllabi) Mar. 2019 Course Development Workshop (e.g., Peer Review, Critiques) May 2019 Formal Presentations and Team-Building Activity Table 1

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Indira Nair, Carnegie Mellon University; William M. Bulleit, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

such anintegration of ethics into engineering education.Background and MotivationThe rules of professional practice in engineering until the early 1900’s were conditionedby the fact that engineers looked on themselves as loyal to a firm or a larger entity such asthe military or public works that employed them. Historically, engineering as a field –rather than a “profession” --and then as an academic discipline, originated from theseroots in the late 1740’s with the establishment of the first “civil” (as opposed to“military”) engineering department in France in the École Polytechnique in 1794 [1], [2].The American Society of Civil Engineers was founded in 1852 and is the oldestengineering society in the United States. The professional ethics of

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology; Wade Lee Robison

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

to lab) Safety Injury to team, injury to end user, damage to equipment Environmental Team must dispose of significant excess material, design requires hazardous materials, selecting a low-cost component that could lead to shorter life and the need for additional purchases, design requires purchase of consumable items for end user Social Design choices cause harm to a team member or end user based on social issues (e.g.: loss of confidentiality, contradicts local cultures and customs) Action taken – how will the team will address (or not) the risk Prevent Action will be taken to prevent the cause(s) from occurring in the first place. Reduce Action will be taken

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elisa Warford, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

. Pantazidou and I. Nair, “Ethic of Care: Guiding Principles for Engineering Teaching & Practice,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. , pp. 205-212, Apr. 1999[4] L. S. Shulman, L. S., Foreword, in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, & W. M. Sullivan, Eds. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[5] J. Tronto, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge, 1993.[6] L. Kohlberg, "Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach,” in Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues. T. Lickona, ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.[7] N. Haan, et al., “Family

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shiloh James Howland, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Randall Davies, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahsa Ghorbani, Colorado State University; Anthony A. Maciejewski, Colorado State University; Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University; Edwin K. P. Chong Ph.D., Colorado State University; Pinar Omur-Ozbek, Colorado State University; Rebecca A. Atadero, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, 2005.[6] K. M. Passino, “Teaching Professional and Ethical Aspects of Electrical Engineering to a LargeClass,’’ IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 273-28, 1998.[7] D. R. Haws, “Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta‐Analysis,’’ Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 223-229, 2001.[8] T. W. Chen, A. A. Maciejewski, B. M. Notaros, A. Pezeshki and M. D. Reese, “Mastering the CoreCompetencies of Electrical Engineering through Knowledge Integration,’’ in American Society ofEngineering Education Annual Conference, New Orleans, 2016.[9] A. A. Maciejewski, T. W. Chen, Z. S. Byrne, M. A. De Miranda, L. B. Sample Mcmeeking, B. M.Notaros and A. H. Rosales, “A Holistic Approach to Transforming

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

-relatedpositions [7]. Similarly, business ethics arose from philosophers’ interest in understanding whatconstitutes right and wrong behavior in the context of competitive financial transactions [8]. As aprogram of inquiry, some have dated the historical roots of business ethics to the mid 1970’s,when the first academic conference in business ethics was held [9]. Indeed, some of the samephilosophers interested in applied and practical ethics crossed contextual boundaries, applyingthe same structures of thought to several disciplinary realms. Bioethicist Tom Beauchamp is agood example of such cross-overs, having published one of the earliest anthologies in businessethics [10] just a few years after publishing his major work in bioethics.The same holds for

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia; Araba Dennis, University of Virginia; Kathleen Eggleson, Indiana University School of Medicine-South Bend; Anderson Sunda-Meya, Xavier University of Louisiana; Kathryn Haas, Saint Mary's College, Indiana

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

DiverseLearners in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM),” in ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017.[5] M. Smith, “The Virtual Laboratory: Technology Enhancement For Engineering Education,”ASEE Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, June 24-27, 2001.[6] M. Angolia, “An Active Learning Approach to Core Project Management Competencies” inASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-28, 2016.[7] D. Roy, P. Bermel, K. A. Douglas, H. A. Diefes-Dux, M. Richey, K. Madhavan and S. Shah,“Synthesis of clustering techniques in educational data mining,” in ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, USA, June 24-28, 2017.[8] J. Barbuto, “A Critique of the Myers

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Erwin; Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Colin Potts, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ellen Zegura, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Model (PSRDM) created by Canneyand Bielefeldt [4]. The model seeks to gauge “the development of personal andprofessional responsibility in [students]” and merges these two dimensions togetherfor the professional connectedness realm [4]. The personal social awareness piecerelates to the development of one’s feeling “a moral or social obligation to help1This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1635554. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. 1others” while

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Ann Gelles, Utah State University; Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University; Marialuisa Di Stefano, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; William M. Marcy PE, Texas Tech University; Lakshmojee Koduru, Texas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, 1991.[5] Vesilind, P. Aarne, and Alastair S. Gunn. Hold Paramount: The Engineer’s Responsibility toSociety. Nelson Education, 2015.[6] Holsapple, Matthew A., et al. "Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineeringethics education delivery." Journal of Engineering Education 101.2 (2012): 169-186.[7] Pantazidou, Marina, and Indira Nair. "Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineeringteaching & practice." Journal of Engineering Education 88.2 (1999): 205-212.[8] Hess, Justin L., Johannes Strobel, and Andrew O. Brightman. "The development of empathicperspective‐taking in an engineering ethics course." Journal of Engineering Education 106.4(2017): 534-563.[9] Finelli, Cynthia J., et al. "An assessment of engineering students

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Mitch Cieminski, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brendon Lumgair P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

increase in the engagementratings for each of the four different presentation formats associated with the percentage of livewebinars a had student participated in. That means an increase in webinar participation wasassociated with an increase in their engagement ratings. Framed in the negative perspective,there was a decrease in the engagement ratings associated with a decrease in the number ofwebinars a student participated in. This study cannot deduce a causative relationship betweenwhether a student was disengaged because they did not (or could not) participate in a livewebinar, or did whether they chose to not participate in a live webinar because they weregenerally a disengaged learner, or if it was due to some other causal factor(s) (Lumgair

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Corple, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David H. Torres, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Katharine E. Miller; Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech; Ingrid St. Omer, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 4, October 1996.[6] Educational Broadcasting Corporation, "Workshop: Constructivism as a Paradigm for Teaching and Learning," 2004. [Online]. Available: http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/. [Accessed 9 October 2016].[7] M. Baxter Magolda, "Evolution of a Constructivist Conceptualization of Epistemological Reflection," Educational Psychologist, pp. 31-42, 2004.[8] H.-F. Hsieh and S.E. Shannon, "Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis," Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277-1288, November 2005.[9] S. Elo and H. Kyngas, "Qualitative Content Analysis Process," Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107-115, 2008.[10] N. C.T. Van Tyne and M.E

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Nathan E. Canney

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] NAE – National Academy of Engineering. Overcoming Challenges to Infusing Ethics into the Development of Engineers. Proceedings of a Workshop. Jan. 10-12, 2017. https://www.nae.edu/Projects/CEES/57196/OvercomingChallenges/OvercomingChallenges Workshop.aspx Accessed Dec. 5, 2017.[2] K. Pretz, “What’s being done to improve ethics education at engineering schools,” The Institute – IEEE News Source. 18 May 2017. http://theinstitute.ieee.org/members/students/whats-being-done-to-improve-ethics- education-at-engineering-schools Accessed Dec. 5, 2017.[3] A.R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D