the students. These case studieswill be improved to create complex scenarios for ethical education and training of students incivil and environmental engineering curricula. 105. References[1] Martin, M.W. & Schinzinger, R. Ethics in Engineering. New York: McGraw Hill (1996).[2] Houston, B. (2006, June), Ethics A Tough Choice Paper presented at 2006 AnnualConference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/793[3] Poor, C. J., & Chase, A., & Inan, M. (2019, March), Integrating Ethics Across the CivilEngineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2019 ASEE PNW Section Conference, Corvallis,Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/31883[4] Carpenter, W. (2004, June), Teaching Ethics To
from theimmediately relatable and incrementally to the future self an instructor can increase the studentawareness of different perspectives, widen the inter-relations of stakeholders being consideredand incrementally provide situations that are further removed from the student’s personalexperience. Students were then asked to interview non-engineers to get feedback on theperception of engineering decisions accounting for end user perspectives. This was followed upwith a final assignment in which students reflected on watching portions of an ASEE sessionpanel of activists giving their experiences around specific engineering crisis (CommunityEngagement Panel, 2019). The voices of stakeholders in these last two assignments are intendedto move
engineering faculty found problem-solving, akin to criticalthinking, to be the single most important competency for engineers [39]. Critical thinking isassociated with many aspects of ABET Student Outcomes. Not only does it address problemsolving and analysis, but the process of argumentation cultivates communication skills that areessential to collaboration. Being self-critical keeps one open-minded to learn and solve problemsboth alone and in groups. Lastly, the process and spirit of inquiry is a necessary driver in self-directed, lifelong learning [19]. Despite its accepted importance, engineering graduatesconsistently fall short in critical thinking skills according to employers [29], [39], [40].According to a 2019 literature review, established
evaluate the effectiveness of the inquiry learning strategy outlined above, we conductedPost-Course Surveys and in-depth interviews in 2017, 2018, and 2019. This paper focuses on the 5findings from our surveys. The survey was conducted online through a secure platform providedby the institution (Office of Research Ethics), completed outside the class time. The researchassistant (Racette) made the announcements in class and on the learning management system, andwas the only person with access to the raw data. There was a bonus mark of 1% for completion ofeach survey, and the research assistant (Racette) directly arranged with the course TAs to applythe bonus marks to the final grades. The anonymized
informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace and industrial applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing an Online Engineering Ethics Teaching Module from Experiential Learning Perspective AbstractToday, engineers play a crucial role in the direction of technology, research, social wellbeing, and economicgrowth, thus the lives of people. An engineer’s professional responsibility for complying with ethicalstandards and conduct is
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021I. AbstractThis paper builds on the ethical aspects of an introductory engineering course — BR200 — anIntroduction to Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering. Various details of this course havebeen presented at ASEE Conferences in 2011, 2019 and here in 20211,2,3 and elsewhere.4 Thecourse structure was described in 2011; one ethical innovation (story-writing) in 2019; and herein 2021 the didactic changes needed to adapt to a partial or full online presence as the result ofthe COVID pandemic. This present paper focuses on the impact of the COVID-19 on theteaching strategy used to introduce and discuss medical engineering ethical issues within theclass as it
leadership team of the Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. In her role as CIMER Investigator, she is leading a project as a part of the APS’s NSF INCLUDES Inclusive Graduate Education Network (IGEN). From 2014-2019 she also served as Co-Director of the NIH-supported National Research Men- toring Network’s Master Facilitator Initiative. From 2008-2012, McDaniels served as Director of Michi- gan State University’s NSF ADVANCE Grant where she spearheaded the institution’s efforts to diversify the faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. In this role she was responsible for the development and implementation of MSU’s new
2019. Second co-author of the paper ”Educating Civil Engineering Students about Ethics and Societal Impacts via Cocurricular Activities”, published in the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Ed- ucation and Practice and recognized as an Editor’s Choice. Currently involved with research regarding ethics in engineering education with Dr. Angela Bielefeldt. Preparing to submit three papers regarding ethics in education for the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Dr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. She completed her B.S. in environmental engineering, M.S. in civil
, and all course instruction takes place in English.Although the English-language skills of participants in this study were not assessed, in 2017, theUM-SJTU JI conducted a survey of undergraduate students who took the TOEFL, finding themean score was 102.45 (N = 186; SD = 6.19). Of undergraduate students who take the TOEFL,this score falls in approximately the 85th percentile.[61] As a result, all participants in this samplehave high-level English-language proficiency. The average TOEFL score of test takers fromChina is 79.[61]The inclusion of responses in this study was voluntary and non-incentivized. Students were givenclass time at the beginning and end of the Fall 2019 semester, in two sections of the course“Global Engineering Ethics,” to
) Site on interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering at VT since 2007. This site has 95 alumni to date. He also leads an NSF/Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) site on interdisciplinary water research and have 10 alumni. He also leads an NSF-funded cybersecurity education project and serves as a co-PI on two International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) projects funded by the NSF. He has published over 90 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Ethics Instruction and the Role of Liberatory Praxis and Theory1. IntroductionWithin the past few decades, engineering educators have placed increased emphasis on
other issues). In spring 2019 whileteaching capstone design, there was the greatest prevalence of severe health issues that I haveexperienced. Within a class of 58 students, two had severe concussions (and were unable to dowork for at least 2 weeks), another was hospitalized more than 1 week. As seniors, these studentsknew to reach out and let me know. Among first-year students I would often not find out aboutissues – the students would simply stop coming to class and not respond to emails. I would laterfind out a severe issue had occurred when the Dean’s office would retroactively withdraw thestudent from all courses, etc. Even more troubling: three suicides (at least) among engineeringstudents (college wide) in one academic year. So, all
andethics primarily from relatives and co-workers who are engineers, and rarely from technicalengineering courses. Our survey findings may support the idea that for the curriculum to beeffective students must have more practical experience, social interaction, and exposure to theengineering practice. This may be gained firsthand through internships and contact withengineering practitioners and being exposed to formal and informal expectations as well aseveryday practice.References[1] Rabb, R. and Greenburg, D. Meeting Industry Needs for Professional and TechnicalSkills With New Graduate Degrees, ASEE Conference Proceedings 2019[2] Bairaktarova, D., & Woodcock, A. (2017). Engineering student's ethical awareness andbehavior: A new motivational
semiclassical asymptotics, scattering theory and Maslov operator theory, as well as academic integrity in international engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Moral Foundations of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary InvestigationAbstractTechnology-related disasters and scandals have resulted in concerns regarding the safety and ethicsof Chinese companies and practitioners. Although China now graduates and employs more science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors than any other country in the world,ethics is not yet a central component of engineering education. Simply importing foreign curricula,however, would be
joining UVA. she was a research fellow at National Institutes of Health, and worked for Drexel University as assistant research professor.Ms. Xiafei Yang, University of Virginia B.S of Electrical Engineering and B.A of Physics, 2018 Graduate Student in Civil EngineeringMs. Sitong Wang, Chongqing University Sitong Wang is an undergraduate student in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Chongqing Uni- versity, Chongqing, China. She was a visiting intern at University of Virginia from August to December in 2018. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 When Eagle and Dragon Learn Together: Engineering Ethics Education in the Era of US-China Trade
within the Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) within the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Gregg received his PhD in Educational Leadership and Higher Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln with a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufacturing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young Univer- sity. Gregg also provides consulting in leadership development and project management working with Strategy Execution and Duke Corporate Education where he provides training for fortune 500 companies throughout the world.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of
his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is the 2020 program chair for the ASEE LEES division.Dr. Andrew Katz, Virginia Tech Andrew Katz is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Ethics in Engineering or Engineering in Ethics?AbstractThis paper explores how the relationship between ethics and engineering has been and could beframed. Specifically, two distinct framings will be conceptualized and explored: ethics inengineering and engineering in ethics
., vol. 37, no. 3, p. 04021002, May 2021, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000889.[7] Y. Yang and D. W. Carroll, “Gendered Microaggressions in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” p. 18.[8] M. J. Lee, J. D. Collins, S. A. Harwood, R. Mendenhall, and M. B. Huntt, “‘If you aren’t White, Asian or Indian, you aren’t an engineer’: racial microaggressions in STEM education,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 48, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020- 00241-4.[9] C. Poleacovschi, S. Feinstein, S. Luster-Teasley, and M. Berger, “An Intersectional Perspective to Studying Microaggressions in Engineering Programs,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., Jun. 2019, Accessed: Mar. 08, 2021. [Online]. Available: https
En- gineering Design. Dr. McCullough has over 30 years’ experience in engineering practice and education, including industrial experience at the Tennessee Valley Authority and the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command. Her research interests include Image and Data Fusion, Automatic Target Recogni- tion, and Bioinformatics. She is a former member of the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, and is the delegate of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE to the Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.Dr. Svetlana Chesser, Auburn University Svetlana Chesser is an Assistant Clinical Professor of Educational Psychology at Auburn University. She earned her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from Auburn
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-in-Progress: Emotion and Intuition in Engineering Students’ Ethical Decision-making and Implications for Engineering Ethics EducationAbstractRecent research in moral psychology suggests that people often rely on emotion and intuition tomake moral judgments, rather than reasoning, which engineering ethics education has mainlyfocused on. In parallel with such findings, studies in the scholarship of engineering ethics haveemphasized the importance of emotional capacities of engineers and considered how toincorporate emotional factors into the ethics education of engineering students. Despite growinginterest in the importance of emotional aspects of engineering ethics education, however
, C. B. Zoltowski, L. Kisselburgh, and A. O. Brightman, “Enhancing engineering students’ ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 82–102, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20249.[17] J. Borenstein, M. J. Drake, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann, “The engineering and science Issues Test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 387–407, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z.[18] M. J. Drake, P. M. Griffin, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann, “Engineering ethical curricula: Assessment and comparison of two approaches,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, pp. 223–231, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005
education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of K-12, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties include assessment, team development, outreach and education research for DC Col- orado’s hands-on initiatives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student Views on their Role in Society as an Engineer and Relevant Ethical IssuesAbstractIt is important that engineering and computing students are educated to understand the ethicalexpectations of the profession and to consider the broader impacts of their work (termed ethicsand societal issues, ESI). However
four of these seven students reported that theirinternship experiences expanded their views of social responsibility [12].MethodThe results presented in this paper are from a larger mixed-methods, longitudinal research study.In Fall 2015, 757 undergraduate engineering students at four universities were recruited as partof our initial data collection efforts. The four universities included one private, religiousuniversity (Brigham Young University) and three public universities (Arizona State University,Colorado School of Mines, and Purdue University). Of those 757 students, 111 were selected forsemi-structured interviews in Spring 2016. In our final phase of data collection in Spring 2019,we interviewed 33 of the 111 interviewees again using a
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Hess’s research interests include exploring empathy’s functional role in engineering; advancing the state of the art of engineering ethics instruction; and evaluating learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability. Justin received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is the 2020 program chair for the ASEE LEES division.Dr. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University Nicholas D. Fila is an assistant research professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in
, and E. H. Chudler, “'Helped me feel relevant again in the classroom': Longitudinal evaluation of a Research Experience for Teachers program in neural engineering (Evaluation),” Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2018. [Online]. Available https://peer.asee.org/helped-me-feel-relevant-again-in-the-classroom-longitudinal- evaluation-of-a-research-experience-for-a-teachers-program-in-neural-engineering- evaluation[18] “Neuroethics Case Studies,” Center for Neurotechnology, October 2014. [Online]. Available http://centerforneurotech.org/sites/default/files/CSNE%20Neuroethics%20Cases_for%20 distribution.pdf.[19] J. T. Chowning, “Socratic
. She is an Associate Editor for the ”Journal of American Indian Education” and has authored or edited three books and numerous articles in peer reviewed national and international journals. Her most recent edited volume was published in 2019 and is called ”The Price of Nice: How Good Intentions Maintain Educa- tional Inequity.”Dr. Ricky Camplain Ricky Camplain, PhD is an assistant professor of Health Sciences and the Center for Health Equity Re- search at Northern Arizona University. Dr. Camplain is a Comanche scholar who was trained in epidemio- logic methods at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health where I received a Master of Science in Public Health (MSPH