Paper ID #14663Integrating Compassion into an Engineering Ethics CourseDr. George D. Catalano, Binghamton University Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University Previously member of the faculty at U.S. Military Academy and Louisiana State University. Two time Fullbright Scholar – Italy and Germany. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Integrating a Compassion Practicum into a Biomedical Engineering Ethics CourseAbstractA required undergraduate course in the ethics of biomedical engineering has been developed andtaught. Students are required to design
engineering design context,2 meaning that ethics is implicit throughout design processes.While recognition of major issues is important in an engineering education context, this view ofethics does not allow for an integrated understanding of the way ethics is implicated in themicro-level everyday decisions and reasoning associated with design.1 This more nuancedunderstanding would “provide a firmer basis for thinking about ethics in the engineering designprocess” (p. 514) and might encourage more incorporation of ethical thinking into the entiredesign process. Nuanced micropolitics are interwoven throughout the technical and otherdecisions that comprise the design process, and all decisions and agreements that emerge throughthis process could result
influence of societal and individual worldviews on decision-making; assessing STEM students’ learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability; and exploring the impact of pre-engineering curriculum on students’ abilities and career trajectories. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: An Ethics Case Study in Environmental EngineeringAbstractThe April 20, 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion was an engineering and environmentaltragedy that led to the loss of 11 human lives and has had far-reaching environmental andeconomic impacts, the full extent of which is difficult if not impossible to calculate. In 2015
Paper ID #15871On the Integration of Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues into a Computer Sci-ence Senior Design Capstone ProgramDr. Shawn Bowers, Gonzaga University Dr. Bowers is the Chair and an Associate Professor of Computer Science within the School of Engineering and Applied Science at Gonzaga University. He graduated with a PhD in Computer Science from the OGI School of Science and Engineering at OHSU. He was a postdoctoral researcher at the San Diego Supercomputer Center at UCSD and an Associate Project Scientist at the UC Davis Genome Center prior to joining the faculty at Gonzaga. His research interests are in the
2015, the College of Engineering decided tocontinue the workshops for incoming graduate students. Current activity includes updating thecontent of future workshops based on continuing assessment of student learning and thecontent of participant questions for the panelists.IntroductionIncorporating ethics teaching within the graduate curriculum has been a topic of continuingand active studies since society has an extremely high level of expectations from practicingengineers. In 2015, one of the revisions of the criteria for accreditation of engineeringprograms in U.S. academic institutions proposed by Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) included a change from the earlier, "understanding of professional andethical
case study exercise. The full text of the casestudy is included as an appendix.IntroductionSince ABET’s 2000 requirement for an ethics component in engineering education,1 instructionin ethics is now commonplace in engineering curricula. The 2015 Volkswagen diesel scandal,however, has sparked calls for moving away from “this compliance mindset” in ABET accreditedschools to one in which ethics instruction is integrated more effectively and thoroughly into theengineering curricula.2 There is considerable debate about the most effective way to incorporateethics instruction in the classroom, whether as a stand-alone course or as incorporated throughoutthe engineering curriculum (or both). There have also been calls for greater emphasis on
theemployers and clients, the Professional Engineers shall act in professional manners as faithfulagents or trustees for each employer or client. However, in this practice, the engineers areexpected to exhibit the highest standards of honesty, integrity, fairness and impartiality inprotecting the public health and safety in delivering professional services. To that end, engineersmust perform their professional duties in compliance with the highest principles of ethicalconduct. The Civil Engineering graduates, through their careers, will be involved in working inteams or managing projects where decision making will often be an inevitable part of theirresponsibilities. Therefore, there is an emerging need within the engineering education curriculaacross
University of Michigan-Flint. He finished his gradua- tion in Computer Science Major. His research is on Student Satisfaction and Ethics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Perception of Ethics in Bangladesh, India and USAAbstract: Ethics is an important attribute that students must develop to succeed in theiracademic career and profession. To improve the ethics perception in students, it is essentialto integrate ethics in the curriculum. A survey questionnaire was used to investigate thestudents’ perception of ethics in three different countries. The objective was to evaluatestudents’ perception of ethics using 5 factors: 1) the impact of education and faculty onethics; 2
Paper ID #14934Instructional Strategies for Incorporating Empathy in Transdisciplinary Tech-nology EducationDr. Colin M. Gray, Purdue University, West Lafayette Colin M. Gray is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University in the Department of Computer Graphics Technology and a Faculty Fellow in the Educational Research and Development Incubator. He holds a PhD in Instructional Systems Technology from Indiana University Bloomington, a MEd in Educational Technology from University of South Carolina, and a MA in Graphic Design from Savannah College of Art & Design. His research focuses on the role of student experience
for leveraging sustainable change in undergraduate STEM programs and makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research efforts.Dr. Thomas M. Philip, University of California, Los Angeles Thomas M. Philip is an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Education & Information Studies at the University of California Los Angeles. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 On perspective-taking by engineering students in discussions of socio-technical issuesIntroductionIn their work engineers often need to work in teams that include some combination of otherengineers, marketing and business executives, sales representatives, clients
lack of a consistent and coherent ethical reasoning approach that is suitablefor responding to ethical issues that pervade engineering practice. We argue that reflexiveprinciplism (RP) as an applicable ethical reasoning approach, a view we have elucidated inearlier work8. Furthermore, we posit that in order for this principlist approach to becomereflexive for engineers, engineering educators need an integrated and facile pedagogicalframework that can be engaged repeatedly at various locations in an engineering curriculum. Inthis paper, we describe the characteristics and the efficacy of such an integrated model forenhancing the ethical reasoning of engineers: the SIRA framework. The core elements of thisinnovative approach are discussed
Idaho, and worked as an engineer in design offices and at construction sites.Dr. Michael B. Kelley P.E. P.E., Norwich University B.S.C.E., 1974, Norwich University M.S.C.E., 1976, (Environmental Engineering), Purdue University P.E., Commonwealth of Virginia, 1979 to present. Ph.D., 1996, (Environmental Engineering), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Colonel, US Army (Retired) 15 years of undergraduate teaching experience at the US Military Academy and Norwich University. Currently an Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, David Crawford School of Engineering, Norwich University.Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State University Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov is an adjunct associate professor
more than two decades. This paper describes thedevelopment of the curriculum; lessons learned from the classroom; and an analysis of studentartifacts from the most recent offering as part of an engineering undergraduate research programat Michigan State University. The lesson materials are provided in appendices, in order to allowother educators to adapt these materials for their own classrooms.Background: Ethical Practices in ResearchKenneth D. Pimple summarized the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as the search for“truth, fairness and wisdom.”1 This search for truth means considering whether the data aregathered and presented in a manner that is consistent with the physical world. Fairness considersthe accompanying social relationships
broad sense of professional responsibility… and engineering ethics is not usually taughtwith this kind of scope.” 13 p. 330Case study: Professional Issues CourseThe ASCE Body of Knowledge (BOK) presents aspirational vision for the education of civilengineering students.4 It articulates 24 outcomes and levels of achievement for each, detailingwhich should be achieved as part of an accredited civil engineering Bachelor’s degree. The civilengineering curriculum at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) was lacking in some of theseBOK areas, such as sustainability and historical issues. Further, some members of the curriculumcommittee felt that robust direct assessment evidence of students’ knowledge of current eventsand contemporary issues (ABET
of a “reduce, reuse and recycle”philosophy in construction and constructed facilities are clear imperatives. Our contention is thatconstruction management students must be fully cognizant of these imperatives. However ethicseducation for most construction management students currently lacks global and sustainabilitycomponents, and, further, curricula only require “micro-inserts” of ethics teaching without anysystematic or standalone course for professional education. This is contrast to engineeringprograms, such as civil, environmental, and computer engineering. This paper discusses thenature of the construction industry, globalized trends, sustainable development and confirms thenecessity for integrating ethics education into the curriculum
students and professors. However, to integrate ethicsmodules more thoroughly across the engineering curriculum a systematic approach is requiredwith proper accounting of teaching load for ethics/philosophy faculty who lecture in multiplecourses. For efficiency, an ethics case-study database with assignment and discussion questionsshould be maintained, and an online module could be explored with in-class facilitateddiscussion.Introduction With the rapid advancement of technology and integration within all aspects of our society,the ethical implications of our engineering decisions are growing in importance. Engineeringprofessionals have a duty to design and manufacture products that are used to improve the livesof others. In the workplace
actually presenting enough distinct processing options as well as providing enoughopportunity to actual practice making decisions. Current options for ethics training arenoticeably limited in these areas.Approaches to Ethics InstructionThere are multiple methods of ethics training currently in use. When determining what should beincluded in ethics training, there are aspects of both the delivery and the content to consider.Delivery methods are often separated based on whether instruction is disseminated as part ofstand-alone ethics course focused on either general or more field specific ethics or if it isdelivered in an ethics-across-the-curriculum method which is essentially an integration of ethicscontent in otherwise technical skills courses. 4
contributing to narrow perceptions of ethicsamong students.22 For example, educational reforms aiming to introduce more social and ethicalrequirements into curricula can be perceived by students as “constraints” and “discreterequirements” rather than integral to both their education and future professional practice.Related research has additionally questioned whether engineering education has measurableimpacts on the ethical capabilities and moral development of engineering students. For instance,Shuman et al. coded student responses to an open-ended ethical dilemma, and found littleevidence of growth in ethical reasoning from the freshman year to senior year, althoughrelatively few of these students had taken formal ethics courses.23 Similarly, Wu et