the cultures of the organizations in whichengineers work. This understanding will provide engineering ethics educators with better insightson how to prepare engineering students for ethical engineering practice.AcknowledgementsWe thank Louis Tay and Ruth Streveler for their advice on this research project. This work issupported in part by the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professorship in Engineering Education at PurdueUniversity.References[1] R. E. McGinn, “‘Mind the gaps’: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997-2001,”Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 517–542, 2003, doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0048-3.[2] D. Kim, “Work-in-progress: Emotion and intuition in engineering students’ ethical decision-making and its implications for engineering
Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules,” in The Innate Mind, Vol. 3, P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich, Eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 367–391.[19] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[20] M. Martin and R. Schinzinger, Introduction to Engineering Ethics, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.[21] R. J. Baum, “Ethics and Engineering Curricula,” Hastings on the Hudson, 1980.[22] B. Stappenbelt, “Ethics in engineering: Student perceptions and their professional identity development,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–93, 2013, doi: 10.3926/jotse.51.[23] J
. Dr. Edwards is currently a University Distinguished professor of Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech, where he teaches courses in environmental engineering ethics and applied aquatic chemistry. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Graduate-Level Engineering Ethics Course: An Initial Attempt to Provoke Moral Imagination1. IntroductionMost Western, Euro-centric educational systems under the dominant discourses of idealism havefostered a belief in ourselves as ethereal minds/souls who exist with the unfortunatecircumstance that we are stuck with earthly bodies and that our true essential condition is to existfree of any pain
. Educ., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 169–186, 2013, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00047.x.[7] B. A. Burt et al., “Out-of-Classroom Experiences: Bridging the Disconnect between the Classroom, the Engineering Workforce, and Ethical Development,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 714–725, 2013.[8] F. Falcone, E. Glynn, M. Graham, and M. Doorley, “Engineering Ethics Survey for Faculty : An Assessment Tool Engineering Ethics Survey for Faculty : An Assessment Tool,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013.[9] R. E. McGinn, “‘Mind the Gaps’: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997- 2001,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 517–542, 2003, doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0048- 3.[10] D. D. Carpenter, T. S
Paper ID #32615Piloting an Ethics Choose-Your-Own Adventure Activity in EarlyEngineering EducationProf. Jennifer Fiegel, University of Iowa Dr. Jennifer Fiegel is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering at the University of Iowa. She earned her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst and her PhD in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from Johns Hopkins University. Current research in her lab focuses on the design of drug delivery systems for the treatment of infections of the lungs and skin. She has a long
. This themerelated to the affective aspect of socialization to capture the values and attitudes of theprofession. A student from the religiously affiliated institution commented, As a biomedical engineer, everything that you do is going to affect people… If you don’t have the safety and wellbeing at the forefront of your mind, then you missed the ethical ideal.A student in Capstone Design also noted the disciplinary effect of this sense of responsibility:“being Envs [environmental engineers], we always think about being ethical and helpingsociety”This theme suggested that students recognized and internalized the role of ESI in engineering.One approach to facilitate this development in Ethics and Professional Issues at the
Paper ID #35003Examining Faculty Barriers and Challenges in Adopting Ethical Pedagogiesin Online EnvironmentsMr. Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Sam Snyder is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received his Bachelors of Science in Materials Science and Engineering in 2017 from Virginia Tech. His current research interests are in engineering ethics education and exploring the relationship between empathy and ethical decision-making.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Diana Bairaktarova is an
Paper ID #34973Sustainable and Ethical Packaging: Designing for Environmental andSocial JusticeMs. Irini Spyridakis, University of Washington Irini Spyridakis is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & En- gineering at the University of Washington. Her research and teaching concern ethics and sustainable design in engineering, human computer interaction, smart cities, resource constrained communities, tech- nology for social good, and STEM outreach. She has close to 20 years of teaching experience and is an experienced UX researcher and designer. American
Paper ID #33863Let’s Play! Gamifying Engineering Ethics Education Through theDevelopment of Competitive and Collaborative ActivitiesProf. Michael F. Young, University of Connecticut Dr. Young (http://myoung.education.uconn.edu/) received his PhD from Vanderbilt University in Cogni- tive Psychology and directs UConn’s 2 Summers in Learning Technology program. He is the author of nine chapters on an ecological psychology approach to instructional design and has authored more than two dozen peer reviewed research papers. His work has appeared in many major journals including the Journal of Educational Computing Research
Paper ID #32744High School STEM Teacher Perspectives on the Importance and Obstacles toIntegrating Engineering Ethical Issues in Their CoursesJake Walker Lewis, Graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder with a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineering and a master’s degree in civil engineering. Was involved with undergraduate research regarding ethics in engineering education, presented work in the form of a poster at the 2018 Zone IV ASEE Conference. Defended and published master’s thesis examining if/how ethics are being introducted in K12 STEM education in November 2019. Co-authored paper entitled ”Educating
engineering curricula make it no less of aworthy effort. It is important to include ethics in engineering education because engineers shapethe built and digital world as we know it. Unlike many formula-driven, technical courses, ethicalthought and action require evaluating issues whose importance may change with context [4] [8].Disappointing performance on the Ethics section of the Fundamental Engineering examdemonstrates the failure of some current engineering programs to inculcate ethical thinking inthe minds of engineering students [9]. In this section, we offer a very brief overview of someimportant works and trends in the field.When engineering courses feature ethics, they typically rely on strictly philosophical orprofessional approaches to
Paper ID #34187Class Exercises Involving Ethical Issues Reinforce the Importance andReach of Biomedical Engineering (and the Impact of the Coronavirus onTeaching Strategy and Measures of Assessment)Dr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University IEEE Life Fellow, AIMBE Founding Fellow, U.N.E.S.C.O. Academician. Director, Center for Rehabilita- tion Engineering, Science, and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. (Retired) Senior Rehab Research Career Scientist, VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and
engineering-related to be relevant to their professional ethical development. None of the descriptions ofethical development during their extracurricular activities seemed very well scaffolded,presenting an opportunity to faculty mentors and advisors of these activities. This can range fromdirecting particular activities (e.g., bringing in a guest speaker to talk about ethical issues at aprofessional society meeting) to more informal facilitation of reflection via discussion. Helpingstudents to be focus their attention (perception) and be mindful (processing) may be particularlyhelpful in leveraging extracurricular experiences into rich opportunities for ethical development.While the alumni shared stories of extracurricular settings that they