- Conference Session
- Ethical Reasoning and Responsibility
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Teresa J. Ryan, East Carolina University ; Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University; William E. Howard, East Carolina University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
response,the effort has evolved to include more thorough education on what constitutes plagiarism duringthe first weeks of the course. As a result, in the subsequent semesters, the culture of a higherstandard is developing and the more rigorous expectation is generally known through the studentpopulation. The second focus of this work grew as natural questions from the effort to bringrigor to technical writing in the department. What is the perception of academic integrity issuesamong undergraduate students and faculty in the department and does it shift during a student’scareer? Where on the spectrum of “unacceptable” do various actions fall? Is it “more OK” tocopy a homework assignment from a peer than it is to scour the internet for a solutions
- Conference Session
- Ethical Reasoning and Responsibility
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lorraine G. Kisselburgh, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
, reading andresponding to peers’ posts; (b) the reflectivity component includes writing that requires studentsto structure their thinking and reflect in a formalized manner; and (c) the scaffolding componentincludes directions on materials, structured assignments, quizzes, and instructor feedback.We first developed a set of questions designed to probe each construct, asking students toindicate the strength of their agreement with the statement, using a 5-point Likert scale. We usedCronbach’s scale reliability tests to assess internal consistency for each scale. Seven variableswere combined to form a single scale that measured scaffolding (α = .89), two variables wereASSESSING SIRA FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPING ETHICAL REASONINGcombined to form a scale
- Conference Session
- Case and Scenario in Engineering Ethics Instruction
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University; John R Luchini
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
Paper ID #15197What is the Length of a Toilet Paper Tube? A Hands-On, Team-Based Lessonin the Ethics of Data CollectionDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and
- Conference Session
- Case and Scenario in Engineering Ethics Instruction
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Justin L Hess, IUPUI, Indianapolis
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
balancing of four core anduniversal ethical principles: beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and respect for autonomy,9through an ethical reasoning process that Beever and Brightman described as reflexiveprinciplism.10 Our focus is on the range of stakeholders impacted, the allocation of risk whennovel technologies emerge, and the specification and balancing of core ethical principles in lightof numerous, diverse, and sometimes conflicting stakeholder perspectives. As a final goal for thiscase study, students collaborate on a group case report to reason through the ethicality of deeperand riskier oil drilling within the Gulf of Mexico. In writing their group case report, students mayjustify their responses by referring to issues not directly
- Conference Session
- Innovative Approaches to Ethics Instruction
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Shawn Bowers, Gonzaga University; Ellen M. Maccarone, Gonzaga University; George D. Ricco, Gonzaga University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
optimization for domain ranking improvement ● A web app for supporting student peer evaluations of work within academic courses ● A mobile app to reduce medical waste in hospitals by providing a mechanism to resale unused medical devices among hospitals ● A mobile app for a ski resort that allows users to track their vertical feet skied and other skiing statistics, a leaderboard that ranks skiers on their statistics, a social share feature (via Facebook) to post and comment on accomplishments, and a pushnotification service ● A novel distributed hashtable implementation for secure file sharing (designed to support distributed certificate authorities) ● A web app that monitors energy and water
- Conference Session
- Ethics Instruction in Context: Civil and Construction Engineering and Engineering Technology
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Ethics
minds of local citizens and their level of trust and confidence inengineering and engineering-dominated organizations such as the Army Corps of Engineers.26Different opinions were voiced in class, including why rebuild at all in areas below sea level?However, about half of the students were silent and did not engage in these discussions. Thestudents were perhaps uncomfortable with uncertainty and the lack of clear, correct answers; oruncomfortable sharing their personal opinions when they were uncertain if their peers agreed ordisagreed. Some students voiced open skepticism, wondering why we were even looking at amap of residency disaggregated by race and in reference to sea level in New Orleans.In-class Discussion: Social JusticeA full class