Paper ID #43244Exploring the Influence of Identity Development on Public Policy CareerPathways for EngineersMiss Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Bailey is a student at Virginia Tech in the Engineering Education doctoral program. She has her bachelor’s in physics from Canisius University and bachelor’s in Industrial Engineering from St. Mary’s University. Her research interests are in workforce development, continued education for engineering practitioners, alternative engineering career pathways, and engineering ethics.Dr. Dayoung Kim, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
Paper ID #41710Early-Career Engineers’ Stories of Ethics and Equity in the Workplace: AThematic AnalysisDr. Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of New Mexico Amir Hedayati is an Assistant Professor at Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program at College of University Libraries & Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico. He received a Ph.D. in Human Resource Development from University of IllinChika Winnifred Agha, Colorado State University Chika Winnifred Agha is a graduate student in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Colorado State University, working towards her master’s
Paper ID #43424Exploration of Career and Ethical Challenges of Analytics and GenerativeArtificial Intelligence in an Engineering Leadership CourseDr. B. Michael Aucoin P.E., Texas A&M University B. Michael Aucoin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Technology & Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University, an Adjunct Instructor in the School of Leadership Studies at Gonzaga University, and President of Electrical Expert, Inc.Zhendi Zhang, Texas A&M UniversityMiles O. Dodd, Texas A&M University Miles Dodd is currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering Technology at Texas A&
indicates that engineering leaders and social science andhumanities scholars can benefit from dialogues like this one. Engineering leaders grapple withethical quandaries at all stages of their career: depending on their level of authority andresponsibility, they may be willing to engage differently with ethical concepts and theimplications of ethical decision-making. Social scientists and humanities scholars can learndirectly from the lived experience of engineers and project managers and better understand therationale for their decisions when in direct conversation. The interest in engaging on thesetopics, and deeper study on the ways in which practicing engineers engage on these topics, maybe a valuable point of study for future engineering
on well-known engineering failuresand crises, such as the space shuttle Challenger disaster, the Ford Pinto fuel tank issue, and theHyatt Regency Hotel walkway collapse. Although intended as an improvement over the theorytheory-based approach because it seems to provide students with tools and procedures, they canuse to work through moral decisions they may face in their careers [7], this approach still hasseveral limitations. Firstly, many of the cases used are several decades old, potentially leadingstudents to view them as irrelevant to modern engineering challenges [2]. Additionally, thesenarratives often present key figures as heroic whistleblowers rather than portraying them asregular engineers who are simply fulfilling their
. Agreeableness involvespositive interactions with people. Finally, openness to ideas allows for an individual to seek outcreative solutions to helping others and the inclusion of groups that are often overlooked.This study uses longitudinal interviews with engineering students and early-career engineers atthree timepoints over seven years to characterize the moral exemplars selected by participantsand, in turn, to use these moral exemplars as a tool for assessing the ethical perceptions of theinterviewees. This study is part of a series of ongoing longitudinal projects focused onengineering students’ and early-career professionals’ views of engineering ethics and socialresponsibility [13], [14].MethodsThis study is part of a longitudinal research
face in thearray of organizations they will be a part of, the diversity of teams they will be part of, and thediverse roles they will play in work environments. “Leadership, creativity, communication,management, professionalism, ethics, agility, resilience and flexibility are some examples ofskills that go beyond the technical competence and which give professionals more ability to takeownership of their own career and deal with the current market’s demands” (de Campos et al.,2020).Educating the Whole Engineer implicates learning and competencies that go beyond the deeptechnical engineering knowledge that fill-up most engineering curricula. Whole engineereducation involves competencies like communication skills, ethics, leadership
sediment control, construction management, etc. She has a M.S. degree in Construction Engineering and Management from the Ohio State University and a B.S. in Landscape Architecture from Beijing Forestry University. She is certified as PMP and LEED AP BD+C.Mr. Michael P McMeekin Mr. Mike McMeekin, PE, ENV-SP, co-founder of Engineering Change Lab-USA (ECL-USA), was selected as the first President / Executive Director of ECL-USA in the Fall of 2019. Mike has over 45 years of engineering experience. He spent most of his career in leadership roles at Omaha-based Lamp Rynearson. During his career at Lamp Rynearson, he played a leadership role in numerous signature projects in the Omaha area. Mike is a graduate of the
Washington. Dr. Edwards is currently a University Distinguished Professor, and teaches courses on engineering ethics and applied aquatic chemistry. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Ethics and the Public: Impact of a Graduate-Level Course on Students' Personal and Career Priorities and Values (2010-20)AbstractA graduate level three-credit elective course entitled “Engineering Ethics and the Public” has beenoffered by the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Virginia Tech since 2010. Thecourse draws on high profile case studies, both past and unfolding, to examine real-world ethicaldilemmas that confront engineers and scientists in research, policy, and practice. Course
society 2. The ease or difficulty of being an ethical aerospace engineer 3. Technical determinism and aerospace career pathways 4. Macroethics discussions within aerospace coursework 5. The ability of faculty to facilitate conversations on the macroethics of aerospaceThese five factors provide a new basis upon which we will generate additional survey items inthe future. Through this process, we will develop a survey that can effectively measure students’beliefs and experiences in regards to the macroethical implications of the field of aerospaceengineering.IntroductionThe impact of aerospace systems on society is regularly featured as part of the global news cycle.Recent topics have included protests against aerospace companies
Paper ID #42120Navigating the Mystery: An Approach for Integrating Experiential Learningin Ethics into an Engineering Leadership ProgramDr. James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian is a Sr. Lecturer with the Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.John M. Feiler, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyLeo McGonagle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Leo McGonagle
chemicalengineer, revealed what he knew about PFOA toxicity and corporate document shredding. Aself-described “company man,” Evers was responsible at DuPont for developing new uses forfood packaging coatings, earning $250 million for the company over the course of his career. Hiscomments were delivered at a press briefing arranged by the Environmental Working Group(EWG) and were accompanied by internal documents from DuPont; EWG later released them tothe EPA, the FDA, and the inspector general of HHS [38]. Although Evers worked for DuPontfor 22 years, he was no longer able to maintain silence: “my personal convictions do not allowme to not tell what I know. I've thought and prayed hard about this” [39]. Like manywhistleblowers, Evers waited until he left
forindividual engineers to prepare for their professional careers. The approachable writing style andreflective nature of the content make this text ideal for any level of engineering student, but it isparticularly salient for first- or second-year students.Giving Voice to Values (GVV)The GVV curriculum was pioneered by Mary Gentile, former professor with the University ofVirginia School of Business, for application in business. GVV takes an “action-orientedapproach” to values-driven leadership.11 We selected GVV for the Engineering Ethics coursebecause many graduating engineering students will one day step into leadership roles in businessorganizations. A significant body of GVV content is delivered by Gentile as pre-recordedmodules, developed for a
case studies,especially when combined with other often quantitative data, can uncover patterns that thequantitative data alone do not reveal (Achinstein et al., 2004). Case studies can also helpinterpret longitudinal data, making it a valuable method for studying educational trajectoriesof students (Lucas & Roth, 1996) or career trajectories of teachers (Johnson & Birkeland,2003). Case studies also allow researchers to make causal or explanatory inferences within aparticular case study or draw more generalized conclusions or comparisons between cases.This can be especially useful in educational contexts for evaluating programs or educationalreforms (Martin & Hand, 2009). Our research study aims to understand the relative
social dynamics among the players may also shape their experiences andmotivations.Additionally, Mars! was designed to provide students with the opportunity to role-play a morecentral position in an engineering community, managing teams and directing centers that arebeyond the reach of first-year college student. The EERI often uses scenarios in which studentsmust decide whether or not to report a situation to a professor or team-lead. They take on a roleat the periphery of the engineering profession. Students, interns or other early-career engineersare more likely to only need to report ethics issues up the chain of command. By placing players’in the shoes of a head engineer in Mars!, they take a central role that requires them to beresponsible
, creating training that helps students learn how to best support each other when they make mistakes, creating training on respecting and appreciating differences among team members, and encouraging them to ask for help when needed. RHIT – At RHIT, opportunities include creating a learning experience to improve how teams handle mistakes, talk about tough issues, and take small risks. There are certainly opportunities for students to develop these skills because the students surveyed here were freshman design students—they will receive additional training and practice opportunities as they progress through their college careers. CPP – At CPP, opportunities include creating learning experiences
communities by studying the role of professional development in shaping organizational cultures. As an education practitioner, she also looks at evidence-based practices to incorporate social responsibility skills and collaborative and inclusive teams into the curriculum. Dr. Rivera-Jim´enez graduated from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She earned an NSF RIEF award recognizing her effort in transitioning from a meaningful ten-year teaching faculty career into engineering education research. Before her current role, she taught STEM courses at diverse institutions such as HSI, community college, and R1 public university.Dr. Katie Cadwell, Syracuse University
totransfer their developing ethical reasoning skills to situations outside the classroom and into theirengineering careers [14]. The inclusion of reflective elements, such as prompts for introspectionand feedback mechanisms, would further enhance this learning process. Participants would beencouraged to articulate and reflect on their decision-making rationale, offering valuable insightsinto their thought processes and ethical perspectives. Additionally, the digital infrastructure ofthis game-based tool would allow for the collection of detailed data on student interactions,decisions, and reasoning processes within the game. This data could include metrics such asdecision times, choice patterns, and pathways taken through the game’s narrative
ability to flexibly handle difficult decision-makingproblems in engineering activities. In the University’s training objectives, it is explicitlystipulated that students majoring in science and engineering not only need to master scientificknowledge such as mathematics and chemistry, as well as basic engineering techniques, butalso need to understand the development trends of modern engineering [7]. To ensure that theyhave moral integrity and a sense of responsibility in their future careers, and can consciouslyprotect the environment and achieve sustainable development while considering economic andsocial benefits. The University also provides technical ethics and personal value orientationeducation to engineering students, requiring future
responses were primarily derived from weekly submissions ofstudents throughout the course that correlated with the themes discussed during each week of thecourse. The final reflective essay encouraged students to reflect on the course and their learningin the form of a 1500–2500-word essay addressing a series of prompts about (i) the engineering profession (e.g. - ‘In light of upcoming challenges to humankind and biodiversity, do you think that the role of engineering, or the meaning of "engineer" or "professional", should change in the future?’); (ii) their ethical positionality (e.g. - ‘How do you see equity, diversity, and inclusion intersecting with engineering, both in general, and in your personal life/career
improvement, personnel turnover reduction, cost reduction, and profit improvement, as well as intangible outcome change, such as customer satisfaction improvement and employee morale growth. When applied to higher education, the evaluation of the Result Level refers to the career success of graduates, the admission rate of higher level learning, the service society, the social reputation of colleges and universities, etc., which can be explicitly realized through the questionnaire of graduates, the evaluation of employing departments, the recognition degree of services, etc. According to the definition of the Result Level in the Kirkpatrick's evaluation model, the evaluation of the Result Level of engineering ethics education should be expressed as
Paper ID #44216Application of African Indigenous Knowledge Systems to AI Ethics Researchand Education: A Conceptual OverviewKerrie Danielle Hooper, Florida International University Kerrie Hooper is currently an Engineering and Computing Education Ph.D. student at Florida International University. She obtained her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the University of Guyana in 2019 and then worked for two years in the industry as a Data Analyst & Systems Administrator, before pursuing her doctoral degree. Her research interests are in AI ethics, responsible technology in education, women’s careers in computing
: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics. [Accessed 19 January 2024].[26] American Society of Civil Engineers, "Code of Ethics," 26 October 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.asce.org/career-growth/ethics/code-of-ethics. [Accessed 19 January 2024].[27] The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, "Code of Ethics of Engineers," 6 October 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.asme.org/getmedia/3e165b2b-f7e7-4106-a772- 5f0586d2268e/p-15-7-ethics.pdf. [Accessed 19 January 2024].
in Japan and Malaysia and found that greaterethics integration in engineering curriculum correlated more positively to students attitudetowards ethics and their educational objectives for ethics being attained. We observed similaradvantages to having greater ethics exposure in our curriculum.Students found that the access to engineering-related ethics education within the engineeringcurriculum was limited, and the existing philosophy and ethics courses were interesting andexposed them to thought-provoking material. Still, students struggled to relate their philosophyand theology education to their careers in the engineering industry. In our work, we have foundthat dialogue drives expanding of the mind. A lot of the discussion, even on
aprofessional engineer. It’s first fundamental canon to “Hold paramount the safety, health, andwelfare of the public” (NSPE, n. d.) informed their decision making when navigating anunethical directive or request. Rather than serving merely as a symbol of good engineering practice, the NSPE Code ofEthics and other written standards provide the raw material necessary for professional engineersto form an identity, often coming to life through application to case studies. Participants sharedmemories of case studies they had learned about early in their career that helped them determinehow they wanted to be perceived as a professional engineer. In reference to the ChallengerDisaster, which was among a few frequently-cited case studies, Zac shared
diversity and inclusivity as not an“added-on” soft skill requirement with limited relevance to their career goals, but as an essentialconsideration in real-world problems engineers must solve. In light of these considerations, wehave approached this challenge by restructuring an existing course which already had beensuccessfully structured to address engineering ethics concepts central to the nature and causes ofengineering failure, by expanding the course via the logical integration of case studies and otheractivities focused on the impact of diversity and inclusivity (or rather the lack thereof) on failuresin development, deployment and use of technology.Effective design or redesign of a course is not a simple matter – in fact, redesign of an
perspective of Utilitarianism [21], unacknowledged use of an AI tool such asChatGPT to write essays, answer exam questions, write discussion board posts, or to completemany existing types of assignments, is cheating. From the perspective of individualUtilitarianism, students are cheating themselves because use of these tools may prevent studentsfrom learning the skills they need to succeed in their careers. From the perspective of universalUtilitarianism, society is being cheated out of having experts with the technical skills societyneeds to address many critical future issues and problems. Additional ethical implications ofcheating in assignments for credit may include harmful impacts on honest students who maycompete for grade-point-average (GPA
, the training extends beyond this course alone.) 5. How? A question that is in my experience universally not addressed is how to negotiate the workplace and advocate for ethical behavior. This is particularly critical for early career professionals who may not have the power in the workplace to be able to speak up for or effectuate ethical behavior. This part also explicitly brings in professional codes, ex: ACM [8].THE QUESTION DIRECTED TEACHING AND LEARNING MODEL: THE WHY, WHO, WHAT, WHERE, HOW, AND WHEN OF TECH ETHICS 1. WHY care and worry about ethics a. Why do ethics matter? b. Why do you care about ethics? Do you? c. Impact of Technology on Society: Personal, Political, Environmental, Economic
applications,” (No Title), 1996.15. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, M. R. Gover, and S. K. Nijjer, “Cognitive assessment of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy: A thought-listing analysis,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–46, 1996.16. E. Yun, “Introducing the thought-listing technique to measure affective factors influencing attitudes toward science,” Univ. J. Educ. Res, vol. 8, pp. 2245–2250, 2020.17. J. W. Creswell, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating. W. Ross MacDonald School Resource Services Library, 2013.
Ethics Narrative Game [Research Paper] Knowing what's right doesn't mean much unless you do what's right. -Theodore RooseveltFostering ethical decision-making skills in undergraduate engineering students is central toABET accreditation and crucial to student engineers’ success in future careers [1]. This ongoingresearch focuses on the development of a narrative game called Mars: An Ethical Expedition(Mars) [2]. The game draws on the contemporary learning theory of situated cognition to providestudents with a situated, contextualized, and playful platform for using and reflecting on theirethical reasoning abilities [3, 4]. The game aims to be an engaging and