,” Alexandria, VA, 2024. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics[7] W. Sinnott-Armstrong, “Consequentialism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA, p. 12, Oct. 04, 2023. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism[8] M. Mallinger, “Decisive decision making: an exercise using ethical frameworks,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 411–417, 1997.[9] J. C. Flanagan, “The critical incident technique,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 327–358, 1954.[10] K. FitzGerald, N. S. Seale, C. A. Kerins, and R. McElvaney, “The critical
administered by states,regulating products beyond state borders may pose a regulatory dilemma. Third, traditionalengineering expertise has matured over many years, ensuring basic safety standards. However,the adoption of cutting-edge technology in the mobility engineering industry is on the rise,presenting a distinct characteristic where ethics in regulating rapidly evolving technologybecomes crucial.Reflect on the initiation of the mechanism of engineering licensure, triggered by publicizedconstruction failures with fatalities in the late 1900’s and early 1900’s [2]. Similarly, casualtiesin traffic accidents involving autonomous vehicles call for urgent regulatory solutions in themobility engineering industry. According to the National Highway
play a good role in thecomprehensive questionnaire design.Example 1: The engineering professional code requires that ( ) be given priority.A. Operational standards of the project B. Economic benefits of the projectC. Public safety, health and well-being D. Technological innovations in engineeringExample 2: In the following types,which is/are engineering ethical responsibility(ies): ( ).A. Professional ethical responsibility B. Social ethical responsibilityC. Environmental ethical responsibility D. Corporate ethical responsibilityExample 3: The basic principle(s) for dealing with engineering ethics is/are ( ).A. Humanitarianism -- the basic principle of dealing with the relationship between engineeringand peopleB. Social justice
. 347-380, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1177/016224391985088516 G. Ottinger, Refining Expertise: How Responsible Engineers Subvert Environmental JusticeChallenges. New York: New York University Press, 2013.17 S. Suryanarayanan, D.L. Kleinman, C. Gratton, A. Toth, C. Guédot, R. Groves, J. Piechowskiet al., "Collaboration Matters: Honey Bee Health as a Transdisciplinary Model forUnderstanding Real-World Complexity," BioScience, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 990-995, 2018.[Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/90026611.18 D.L. Kleinman, M. Powell, J. Grice, J. Adrian, and C. Lobes, "A Toolkit for DemocratizingScience and Technology Policy: The Practical Mechanics of Organizing a ConsensusConference," Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society
Ethics in the IT Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 51-61, 1999.[6] M. S. Tooley and E. E. Umphress, "Work in progress - the ethics of diversity: Addressing diversity issues in undergraduate engineering ethics education," in 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct 18-21, 2009, pp. 1-3.[7] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. Knight, C. Swan, and N. Canney, "Intersections between Engineering Ethics and Diversity Issues in Engineering Education," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 144, no. 2, 2018.[8] J. L. Hess, A. Whitehead, B. K. Jesiek, A. Katz, and D. Riley, "WIP: Intersections Between Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI
Professional Engineer in Nevada with experience working on a variety of water, stormwater, and wastewater system projects. He is also the Faculty Director of the Student Innovation Idea Labs at Cal Poly Pomona, which oversees the campus startup programming and maker spaces.Mr. Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. Heˆa C™s earned ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Benchmarking a foundation for improving psychological safety in
mechanical engineering professor andchair of a “Joint Committee on Ethics of American Engineering Societies” put forth a proposalfor a common code of professional ethics that included (in the sexist language of the era) thefollowing precept: He will interest himself in the public welfare, in behalf of which he will be ready to apply his special knowledge, skill, and training for the use and benefit of mankind [2].Another participant in the Joint Committee stated in an accompanying paper that “[a]s theprogress of the world, the comforts of man, and his ability to produce are so very largely due tothe work of the engineer, his work is of the very greatest importance; he therefore naturallyinterests himself also in the public welfare [3
impact the users’ dignity, empowerment and sense of security,” Des. Sci., vol.5, p. e21, 2019, doi: 10.1017/dsj.2019.18.[2] S. Sprecher and B. Fehr, “Compassionate love for close others and humanity,” J. Soc.Pers. Relatsh., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 629–651, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0265407505056439.[3] P. Gilbert et al., “The development of compassionate engagement and action scales forself and others,” J. Compassionate Health Care, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 4, Dec. 2017, doi:10.1186/s40639-017-0033-3.[4] A. Jonsson and G. Svingby, “The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity andeducational consequences,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 130–144, Jan. 2007, doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.[5] R. C. Campbell, “How can engineering
improve things can be invaluable training todemonstrate to students that: 1. The solution(s) presented are not the only possible solutions. 2. Ethically better solutions are possible, and, can be outlined by professionals-in-training such as themselves. 3. In some cases, the ethically poorer solutions are also technically less challenging and it is kind of fun to develop the more challenging solution. The above are starkly apparent in the case of the case study involving voice assistant devices suchas Alexa and the choice to stream data back to a central location. In fact, students reach the conclusionthat not only is constantly streaming data back to a central location unnecessary to meet theapplication needs but also may be a
process forestablishing the transformation and value induced in a target group(s) by specific actionsundertaken, and feeds into a continuous improvement process that can guide future actions.As a works-in-progress paper, we report here on the completion of phases 1 through 3(purpose setting, scoping, data collection and analysis), and our initial work on phase 4(impact value). The process has so far included in-depth interviews with Toolkit users toelicit information about their use of the resources and their value, and a metadata analysisusing external metrics such as geographical reach and frequency of toolkit access as a proxyfor user engagement. Through this study the authors will also reflect on the co-creation ofnew resources as the toolbox
Entrepreneurial Engineering Network) award titled “Educating the WholeEngineer” granted to Wake Forest Engineering under the leadership of co-author Pierrakos andthe remarkable work of wonderful colleagues and affiliates of Wake Forest Engineering. Theperspectives in this paper do not represent the views of the Kern Family Foundation or KEEN.REFERENCESalZahir S., and Kombo
engineering programs, 2022-2023”. ABET. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineeri ng-programs-2022-2023/ [accessed Jan. 3, 2023].[2] T. Wagner, L. Bassett, M. F. Young, D. D. Burkey, S. Streiner, and J. Pascal. “The Power of Playful Learning – Ethical Decision Making in a Narrative-Driven, Fictional, Choose-Your-Own Adventure”, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 2023, work-in-progress paper.[3] J.S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, “Situated cognition and the culture of learning.” Educational Researcher, 1989, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32-42.[4] J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation
ethical and societal considerations in engineering education.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos.1540348, 1540341, 1540308, and 1755390. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research andinnovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 945380.I also thank my collaborators on this project: Drs. Angela Bielefeldt, Daniel Knight, Chris Swan,and Nathan Canney.References[1] A. K. Bragg, “The Socialization Process in Higher Education
interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.). 10. Fuller, S. (2017). The military-industrial route to interdisciplinarity. In: R. Frodeman (ed.) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.). 11. Herkert, J.R. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3): 373-385. 12. Hess, J. I. & Fore, G. (2018). A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24: 551-583. 13. Holley, K. (2017). Administering interdisciplinary programs.. In: R. Frodeman (ed.) The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.), 530-543. 14. Interagency Working Group on Convergence. (2022, November
. 10.18260/1-2--23130[7] J. R. Rest, D. Narvaez, S. J. Thoma, and M. J. Bebeau. “DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment.” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 644–659, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.644.[8] L. Kohlberg, The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row, 1984.[9] M. H. Bazerman and A. E. Tenbrunsel, Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do about It. Princeton University Press, 2011.[10] P. Lloyd, and I. van de Poel, (2008). “Designing games to teach ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 14, pp. 433–447, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948
/services/consulting/business-transformation/workforce-transformation.html. [Accessed January 2024].[5] N. Guenole, J. Ferrar and S. Feinzig, The power of people: Learn how successful organizations use workforce analytics to improve business performance, Pearson FT Press, 2017.[6] Amazon Web Services, "What is generative AI?," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aws.amazon.com/what- is/generative-ai/]. [Accessed January 2024].[7] C. Anderson, Creating a data-driven organization: Practical advice from the trenches, Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, 2015.[8] Deloitte University Press, "Global human capital trends 2017: Rewriting the rules for the digital age," 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www2.deloitte.com. [Accessed January
gives workers the power to collectively negotiate with and pushback against capitalist corporate owners and the industries they extract profit through [3].NSPE and their Anti-Union Roots“The concept of Unionism in engineering was one of [the] real reasons for NSPE’s creation and amovement that D.B. Steinman [‘Father’ of NSPE] wanted to prevent with engineers. This topic iscovered frequently as early as the late 1930’s in [NSPE publication] The American Engineer.” -from The Complete PEI History of NSPE [19]“The [National] Society [of Professional Engineers] throughout its history has maintained aconsistent stance opposing collective bargaining for engineers.” - Paul H. Robbins, firstExecutive Director of NSPE [20]The National Society of
: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.(2006)[11] Kirkpatrick, D.L.; Kirkpatrick, J.D. “Evaluating: Part of a ten-step process”. In: Evaluating Training Programs; Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA, (2009), pp. 3–20[12] Praslova L . “Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education”. In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (2010), 22(3), pp.215-225[13] Yardley S , Dornan T . “Kirkpatrick’s levels and education ‘evidence’”. In: Medical Education (2012), 46(1), pp. 97-106[14] Praslova L . “Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning
completes tasks like welding that could be dangerous to bystanders. Similar to the interlocked barrier guard, a fixed barrier guard will physically restrict accessto an area from all directions [11]. However, fixed guards require tools to remove. A fixed guardacts as a shield between the robot and the operators(s) or bystanders. They are a permanent part ofthe machine. For this reason, they are constructed of materials that can withstand the impacts ofprolonged usage. It is the simplest type of guard, but the least flexible. They do not allow for quickmodifications to the robotic technology and greatly limit collaboration prospects, so they arereserved for the most dangerous robotic operations. The last type of physical guard is the