Paper ID #38245[Full Research Paper, Ethical Engineering in Industry and AppliedContexts] Responsibility and Accountability: Faculty Leaders, EthicsFrameworks, and Disciplinary EnculturationDr. Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida Laurie A. Pinkert is an Associate Professor of Writing and Rhetoric and Director of Writing Across the Curriculum at the University of Central Florida. Her research examines the role of communication practices and writing infrastructures in disciplinary development within fields such as engineering.Prof. Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida Jonathan Beever is Associate Professor
. As indicated by the first theme, ethics is an espousedvalue, but that value is not always reflected in the curriculum. With ethics only visible in selectengineering courses, the importance of ethics to engineering education and practice might not becommunicated to students. One implication of this finding is aligning purported values withcurricular requirements. Given social-technical dualism within engineering culture and thepriority of technical subjects [26], the limited visibility of ethics or its separation from technicalcourses can continue to reinforce this false dichotomy. Another tension arises when ethics isnarrowly constrained to academic integrity. Although an important component of emphasizingethical behavior, academic integrity
Peking University.References[1] Lin J, Yi FQ. “Future-oriented Engineering Ethics Education”. In: Research in Higher Education of Engineering (2021), pp. 1-11[2] J. R. Herkert, “Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education and research: integrating microethics and macroethics”, In: IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004., Denver, CO, USA[3] Herkert J R. “Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum”. In: European Journal of Engineering Education (2000), pp. 303-313[4] Robert E. McGinn. “ ‘Mind the gaps’: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997- 2001”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics(2003), pp. 517-542[5] Steve Roach, Jules Simon. “Teaching and assessing
Engineering Network) award titled ”Educating the Whole Engineer” to integrate important competencies such as virtues, character, entrepreneurial mindset, and leadership across the Wake Forest Engineering curriculum. She has led Wake Forest Engineering with a focus on inclusive innovation and excellence, curricular and pedagogical innovation, and creative partnerships across the humanities, social sciences, industry, entrepreneurs, etc. in order to rethink and reimagine engineering education. All this has led to Wake Forest Engineering achieving unprecedented student diversity (42% women, 25% racial and ethnic minorities) and faculty diversity (50% women, 25% racial and ethnic diversity). Olga is an engineering education
by some toexpand the established boundaries of life as defined include technological creations.Also, a topic of more recent interest: laboratory grown meat [29]. Although STS andother academic fields have begun to take an interest in non-human animals, the topic isthinly addressed in engineering ethics literature. And yet, as the primary source oflearning and training for aspiring engineers, engineering education has a responsibility toinclude in its curriculum ethical considerations of animal welfare in the development anddeployment of new engineered systems, and in existing engineering systems.Resources for a new engineering ethicsA good place to introduce engineering students to the idea of engineering with a focus onethics and animals
opportunity for the agency to gather insightsfrom experts in an array of fields, and it also challenged NASA participants to consider how theymight introduce the ideas shared to colleagues who could benefit from and apply these insightsdirectly. Some of these challenges have been long discussed by the engineering ethicscommunity: at what level are engineers responsible for their products? How can projectmanagers and engineers effectively integrate societal considerations in workaday efforts? Otherswere more unique to the Artemis mission, including space sustainability, balancing access tolocations on the moon, and sharing the benefits of space activities. 3. Workshop Concepts in Dialogue with Engineering Education and Ethics ResearchAs stated
practical ethics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, pp. 767-787.2015.[14] I. M. Goldin, K. Ashley, R. L. Pinkus, “Validity and reliability of an instrument forassessing case analyses in bioengineering ethics education,” Science and Engineering Ethics,vol. 21, pp. 789-807. 2015.[15] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, & A. D. Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. 2014.[16] P. W. Odom, & C. B. Zoltowski, “Statistical analysis and report on scale validation resultsfor the Engineering Ethical
traditions, folklore, and historical narratives. For instance,an AI-driven platform could transcribe and translate indigenous stories into written form. Long-term ethical education can also serve as a perennial concept. Rather than a one-time ethicsworkshop, integrate ongoing ethics education into AI courses. For instance, students could explorecase studies related to indigenous knowledge and AI.Furthermore, collaboration should be achieved with local communities, linguists, and educators toensure that AI systems are culturally sensitive. Regularly update algorithms to reflect evolvingcultural norms. Moreover, AI tools that facilitate the documentation and dissemination ofindigenous knowledge should be developed. In addition, involving community
and counting. • Ethics at work has also created a YouTube channel 16 with a series of videos for courses on work and the good life, ethical and professional issues in computer science, technology self and society, and the archaeology of hacking. These short 2-10 minute explainer videos can be used as preparatory material for courses.IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEM SPACE THROUGH INTERVIEWS AND SURVEYSIn this section, we describe some details of our multi-step approach towards determiningsentiment and challenges to integrating ethics-based content in an engineering curriculum asperceived by both faculty and undergraduates. We were intentional in engaging undergraduatestudents to conduct this work, as the design and articulation of the
American Council of Engineering Companies’ Senior Executives Institute, an advanced management, leadership, and public policy training program for current and emerging leaders of engineering and architectural firms. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Developing a Team-Based Regulatory Framework for Mobility Engineering ProfessionalsAbstractTransportation mobility has gained burgeoning attention in the past decades driven by theadvancement of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) and ubiquitous InternetCommunication Technologies (ICT). As the innovation of CAVs progresses towards an upperlevel of automation, safety concerns induced by advanced autonomous vehicle
understanding, students must critically examine the importance ofengineering in their field [20]. Ethics should be reconceptualized “as an integrative force ratherthan a discrete requirement” [22]. Students should actively participate in their ethics education,and it should not be separate from their engineering education. It must be relocated “from theperiphery of the curriculum to its core by empowering students to investigate ethics in the waysthat are most meaningful to them” [20]. A proven methodology for doing so is a “modified versionof the Critical Incident Technique (CIT), which asks students to locate an ethical problem in afilm, text, or TV program, and then briefly to describe the problem, analyze its ethical dimensions,and indicate
, MA from Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, and BA from Fordham University.Dr. Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott Streiner is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department, teaches in the First-Year Engineering Program and works in the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. Scott has received funding through NSF to conduct research on the impact of game-based learning on the development of first-year students’ ethical reason- ing, as well as research on the development of culturally responsive ethics education in global contexts. He is an active member of the Kern Engineering Entrepreneurship Network (KEEN
and better communicate to students how all engineering decisions should be madewithin the broader moral landscape, as opposed to a select few decisions. An engineeringeducation integrated with ethics as a way to make longer-lasting systemic change [13], [12].Incorporating experiences such as community outreach and guest speakers helps, in part, toframe an education in the ethical issues beyond the workplace [16]; however, this is just anextension, albeit a very valuable one, of the current education strategy. More recent papershave proposed game-based learning experiences, or ‘playful learning’ as a way for students toimmerse themselves in ethical issues and consider them from new perspectives [9], [8]. Thesestrategies provide an alternative