Asee peer logo
Displaying all 4 results
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Monday June 26, 3:15 - 4:45
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shreya Kumar, University of Notre Dame; Megan Levis, University of Notre Dame
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
undergraduatecomputing students worked in teams to sketch and create ethics based decision making scenariosusing paper or blackboard. This scenario creation activity model was later refined and employedin different Ethics in Engineering courses as a means to increase engagement through gameplayand role playing.In 2022, this work was expanded by joining forces with engineering faculty from the Virtues andVocations initiative and the Ethics at Work project which included other computing faculty,faculty from Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, and faculty from Philosophy, where thegoal was to capture an engineering wide faculty and undergraduate student sentiment about ethicscontent in engineering. A multidisciplinary team of undergraduates, led by advising
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 9:15 - 10:45
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tori Wagner, University of Connecticut; Landon Bassett, University of Connecticut; Jennifer Pascal, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
dimensions of their work and to be ethical actors. While one approach to the ethicseducation of engineers involves separate courses in philosophy of ethical decision making, wecontend a better way to teach ethics to first-year engineering students might be to situate it in theeveryday decisions of engineers as they do their work in realistic scenarios while considering thepersonal and social consequences of their decisions by role-playing.Richly contextualized cases have been used to supplement the more purely philosophicalapproaches to engineering ethics education, but are often presented as third-person narrativesrather than as active first-person role-playing scenarios. Educational games have been shown tobe an effective teaching tool for complex
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session_Tuesday June 27, 1:30 - 3:00
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University; Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University; Adetoun Yeaman, Wake Forest University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Character Development in the Engineering Classroom: An Exploratory, Mixed-Methods Investigation of Student PerspectivesI. IntroductionEthics education is an undisputedly essential part of engineering education. Society, industry,universities, and accreditation demand that engineering students be better educated to handle themany ethical situations that professional practice will require of our graduates. Whileengineering educators continue to explore how to most effectively prepare students for complexand nuanced ethical decision-making in their professional careers [1] – [8], traditionalapproaches to engineering ethics education have been largely limited to ethical reasoning guidedby
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _Monday June 26, 11:00 - 12:30
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia; William J Davis, University of Virginia; Kent A. Wayland, University of Virginia; Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia; Caroline Crockett, University of Virginia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
forindividual engineers to prepare for their professional careers. The approachable writing style andreflective nature of the content make this text ideal for any level of engineering student, but it isparticularly salient for first- or second-year students.Giving Voice to Values (GVV)The GVV curriculum was pioneered by Mary Gentile, former professor with the University ofVirginia School of Business, for application in business. GVV takes an “action-orientedapproach” to values-driven leadership.11 We selected GVV for the Engineering Ethics coursebecause many graduating engineering students will one day step into leadership roles in businessorganizations. A significant body of GVV content is delivered by Gentile as pre-recordedmodules, developed for a