meet at least 3-4 times over thecourse of the three-month semester, and had the option of continuing meeting if deemedmutually beneficial by both the coach and the participant. The students or graduates (hereafter“participants”) in the coaching program were all highly successful students or graduates, and allhad been selected for a highly-competitive leadership development program for engineeringstudents. The meetings between coaches and participants were allowed to develop organically,according to coaching best practices. [3] Participants were allowed to pick the areas they wantedto develop. Coaches then guided participants towards creating a vision and setting goals byasking questions, reflecting back observations, and facilitating
groups with noviceengineers. Career history interviews of experienced engineering leaders, interspersed with guidedreflection, provided us with an interesting way to access implicit leadership learning over thecourse of participants’ three-to-four decade career histories [9, 54, 55]. It allowed us to askquestions about career transitions—something most engineers have a relatively easy timerecalling—with follow up reflection questions about the leadership insights they gained along theway—something many of us struggle to define, particularly busy, task-oriented professionalsfacing pressure to complete projects in time and on budget.When we asked direct questions about how participants learned to lead, most of them said one oftwo things; either
—engineeringfaculty, leadership faculty, and industry practitioners—brought their respective experiencetogether to determine the learning outcomes. The practitioners then developed teaching materialsusing their experience designing curriculum to help new college hires and interns succeed in theworkplace.This content was delivered by the practitioners, who were paid as adjunct instructors, in Fall2018 and Spring 2019. There were seven modules, described below, each of which consisted of atwo-hour lesson scheduled during the regular senior capstone lab period. Each module consistedof mini-lectures, applied learning activities, discussion and written reflection. During this year-long course, the 16 students were assigned to applied project teams and thus had
, phone call), appreciating the differences amonggenerations. The conversation then turned to key attributes for leaders, and this groups stated,keywords such as consistent (stable), fair, open-minded, willing to question everything, and tocorrect errors early (which requires courage & trust), and recognize mistakes. This groupsuggested that to teach these attributes, the team needs to meet often and debrief after a project –take time to reflect on the process and make suggestions for improvements. Instructors couldcomplete this process through role-playing at the undergraduate level.A partner at a construction firm quickly mentioned the importance of self-awareness and socialawareness as key attributes of new hires as well as seasoned
paths were: 1) technical analyst!supervisor! senior leader and 2) technical analyst!supervisor! project manager. Jobperformance records suggest that engineers who struggled with supervision tended to move intoproject management rather than senior leadership roles. While Roberts and Biddle’s studyincludes valuable insights about engineers’ long-term career paths, they conducted it in aparticular era at a single organization and thus their findings may not reflect the experiences ofthe engineering profession as a whole.More recently, Tremblay and his colleagues surveyed 900 engineers in Quebec, Canada andfound that their career paths were multiple and divergent, not homogenous or linear as might beexpected by a dual (technical/managerial) career
organizations across campus: “People use it as a springboard more often thannot. Most of our mentors are a part of multiple clubs, both within engineering and outside… I’malso a part of clubs for chemical engineering, so I’m also in leadership in one of our science peerorganizations on campus that’s not associated with the College of Engineering.” Another benefit most often noted by the peer mentors was improved communicationskills. Amber reflected: “Public speaking and putting presentations together and learning how topresent myself in a meeting or interview, over the phone, I guess, just presenting in front of agroup of people and to speak loudly and be well versed.” Paul discussed how this benefit wasmore than a matter of being an
(includingcommunicating, persuading others, setting goals, and problem solving), and suggest that futureresearch also evaluate cognitive and affective outcomes, as these have been shown to beimportant in shaping behaviors (Kahle & Berman, 1979). Their review also indicated that mostprograms used approaches to program implementation that were convenient and inexpensive andsuggest that programs should include more practice, such as reflective activities, role-play, goalsetting, and games. Given that the majority of programs used self-report assessments, Reyes etal. also suggest that researchers consider best practices for program evaluation, in particular, toavoid endogeneity concerns within the evaluation data. Through their meta-analysis, theyidentified
majors. In the beginning, the program’s seminar-basedworkshop curriculum primarily enlisted the help of faculty from the College ofBusiness, and students received a $1,000 stipend upon completion of thesemester. Student participants attended lectures, discussed leadership topics withmentors from a variety of industries, and composed either a reflection essay orposter to conclude their participation.Chevron Leadership Academy redesignedSettling on specific goals and methods for creating a new leadership program isoften an iterative process, with a good deal of trial-and-error in the beginning [5].Voice-of-the-customer techniques determined in fall of 2017 that the program wasnot meeting corporate sponsor goals, nor was it effective in assessing
with delegation and Focus on wellbeing)Core incorporates the “Leader as Teacher” culture at Micron. Mid to senior level leaders areinvited to be a sponsor for each cohort training group. This includes participation in modules 1and 7 where they as sponsor share personal examples of how Micron’s core values andleadership attributes have made a difference in their life and helped them improve theirleadership capabilities. It also includes an open forum allowing participants to ask questions ofthese leaders.Amplifier (Empowering Leadership Practices)Amplifier is an immersive leadership development experience that merges theory and practicalskill development with personal reflection and a deep dive into the systems and processes thatdrive the
/false/unsure). This measure reflects pilot studyfeedback about the measure’s validity and reliability: students were likely to know, with greaterconfidence, whether or not they would carry some substantive amount of student debt comparedto knowing about their exact student loan value or about specifics of their family’s wealth. Thequestion on athletics asks: “have you participated in a collegiate varsity athletics program?”(yes/no), and, “if yes, how many seasons will you have participated before graduating?” We thenconstructed a dichotomous variable of varsity athletics participation based upon 2 or moreseasons of participation. The Greek Life participation question asks: “as an undergraduate, wereyou a member of a fraternity or a sorority
experiences are similar, or the participant used knowledge from capstone in the workplaceCapstone Advice The participant is providing advice for the capstone course (e.g., to better align it with work)Figure 2 shows the process of data analysis for this study starting from the interview data to theresults. One of the sub-codes from the coding scheme was “leadership” which was defined as anactivity where the participant described ‘acting as a leader or an action that reflected aleadership behavior’ while working in a team. For this study in particular, we used the dataexcerpts which were coded under ‘leadership’ and analyzed the data using the four leadershipprofiles of the
leadership identity that could be further tested using structural equationmodeling.Significant results were also observed among engineering fields and institutional characteristics.Students in computer engineering and electrical/electronics engineering scored significantly loweron the leadership construct than mechanical engineering students. Students who attendedinstitutions where women comprise a higher percentage of engineering students scored higher onthe leadership construct. It does make sense that some differences among engineering fields mightbe observed, reflecting cultural differences among engineering fields. In terms of the latter finding,it’s encouraging that attending a program with higher gender diversity might indirectly
publics • Engineering incorporates many domains beyond technical • Engineers impact the worldColes [12] described his view of professional practice with 10 lessons for practice: • professionals engage on society’s behalf, with people who present them with complex, indeterminate problems • professionals work with high levels of uncertainty • professional practice fundamentally involves making judgement • professional judgement is based on ‘practical wisdom • professional judgement is acquired through experience and conversations with respected peers • the learning process that underpins this is the critical reconstruction of practice • this involves ‘deliberation,’ which is more than ‘reflection • deliberation
experientiallearning opportunities, including coaching other students and participating in an internship.Finally, they will learn the basic tools of project management. The following steps describe thedetermined flow of the curriculum: Building self-awareness through assessments and personal reflection Developing self-mastery through improved personal behavior modification to prioritize activities and set personal goals as well as building supportive communication skills Growing followership and teamwork skills by working in small teams Growing larger team leadership, innovation and organizational skills Developing a sound understanding of the principles and practices of project
expressedhere are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Stevens, R., A. Johri, and K. O’Connor, Professional engineering work, in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B.M. Olds, Editors. 2014, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 119-138.2. Dannels, D.P., Learning to be professional technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2000. 14(1): p. 5-37.3. Faulkner, W., Nuts and Bolts and People'Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities. Social studies of science, 2007. 37(3): p. 331-356.4. Noble, D.F., Technology and the
) 6 b. Each of the concepts were compared and contrasted, similar concepts were combined (ex. positive environment and open input from everyone were combined to be safe, positive, and open environment). c. Each definition’s assignment of codes into concepts was reviewed again to ensure changes in the concepts were reflected. d. Any concepts with less than five codes were reviewed and combined (ex. encourage and empower were combined together)Finally, the last step of the analysis is abstraction, where similar concepts themes are groupedtogether into higher order headings. For example, mentor, set example, and trustworthy /authentic were grouped
, an alumnus who had beenCEO of several companies, for the purpose of helping them improve their team dynamics andoverall pitch quality. It is important to note that this alumnus also participated in earlier coachingdirected by the faculty and local mentors. Individual Leadership DevelopmentThe program was established to help engineering undergraduate students develop leadershipcapabilities in an experiential framework of a capstone effort. The engineering students wereassessed and graded on numerous activities showing the progress of their project and inindividual leadership reflections and essays. This placed an additional level of accountability forthe engineering students not entirely matched by the business students and scholars from
applied in both academic and non-academic settings.For example, the rubric development presentation covers how rubrics can be used to as-sess exams, homework, and quizzes as well as to conduct an employee’s annual review. Adean from the college of engineering gives instruction on enforcing academic integrity, andour research park and alumni network has provided panelists for panel discussions wherequestions about professional ethics are deliberated.Perhaps the single best practice that we employed was holding a weekly meeting to conductlecture reflection and planning. In these meetings we perform regular checks on our lecturecontent to ensure that we do not lose sight of the integrative approach. The culture of theteam is one that allows
engineering students acrossdemographic and academic variables, we do not know the extent to which our data and therebyfindings are representative of the total population. Second, the findings should also be taken withcaution because of the potential social desirability issue. Some respondents may have rated theimportance of the 11 skills and their confidence in them in ways that do not reflect their truevalues and ability beliefs about these skills. We did not have any means to triangulate thecollected data. Lastly, given that the leadership ability item was loosely defined in the survey, itis not immediately clear what the survey respondents thought of leadership when completing thesurvey, which may have influenced their importance and confidence