- Conference Session
- Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Katherine Agnew Trevey, Marquette University; Andrea L. Gorman, Marquette University; Kristina M. Ropella, Marquette University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Leadership Development Division
first course. Results of thisqualitative assessment were analyzed using a rubric developed to measure growth in perceptionsand attitudes. In addition, students wrote reflection papers about practical leadershipexperiences during their industry internships, using the guiding principles and themes of theprogram to illustrate what they learned. Students also synthesized their observations of industryleaders after shadowing each of two C-Level leaders.Early results from assessments conducted after the first year in the program indicate students aredeveloping significant self-awareness, building life-long skills and habits that will serve themwell as they assume greater leadership responsibility. Early results also indicate the necessity ofcreating
- Conference Session
- Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto, ILead; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Leadership Development Division
experienced than engineers in the country with a slightover-representation of chemical and mechanical engineers. The gender split reflects that ofCanadian engineering graduates over the past two decades. Please see Table 2 below for asummary of our demographic data. T ABLE 2 : S AMPLE C HARACTERISTICS Category Sub-Categories % of SampleSex Male 74 Female 26Age 20-29 43 30-39 33 40-49
- Conference Session
- Interactive Panel on Perspectives and Practical Skills for Men as Advocates for Gender Equity
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lawrence J. Genalo, Iowa State University; Roger A. Green, North Dakota State University; Beth M Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Archie L Holmes Jr., University of Virginia; Brian P Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Lopresti, Lehigh University; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Leadership Development Division, Minorities in Engineering, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering, Women in Engineering
country, but it is a major barrier at my institution.I otherwise believe that advocacy needs to be a formalized institution-level mission and goal, andit must be genuine. If it is not for the right reasons (such as public relations), then thoseindividuals within the institution will see through it and potentially lose confidence and morale.It cannot simply be words or data; there has to be action, and institutions cannot fake this. I alsobelieve that it is a barrier if the leaders of the institution do not speak and act consistentlybetween their public and internal personas. These leaders cannot speak of how important equityis and then internally emphasize efforts that do not reflect this
- Conference Session
- Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas, El Paso; Richard T. Schoephoerster, University of Texas, El Paso; Jessica Townsend, Olin College of Engineering
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Leadership Development Division
courses depends on minor.) • A focused area of study such as Pre-med, Pre-law, or preparation towards a Peace Corp assignment. Page 26.635.3 Figure 1: Track Options for the Bachelor of Science in Engineering LeadershipUTEP is uniquely poised to craft the first undergraduate program around this new discipline.With a motto of “Access and Excellence”, UTEP strives to attract a student demographic notwell represented in engineering today and arm them with the skills, mindset, and experience thatallows them to make a positive impact in the communities in which they live and work. UTEP’sstudent population is 80% hispanic and reflects
- Conference Session
- Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel; Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Leadership Development Division
, engineering marketing, business development and proposal submittal. 6. Understanding of ethical and legal aspects of engineering. 7. Demonstration of management techniques, decision economics, engineering organization, and business accounting methods. 8. Understanding of value engineering and total quality management concepts.Eight CIVL 411 course goals are mapped to CEE Department outcomes and shown withaccompanying levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy as indicated in Table 7. The focus of the class isgenerally on lower levels of Bloom’s, even though this is a senior course. Higher levels ofBloom’s Taxonomy are used for course instruction and student assignments, even thoughassessment mapping has not been adjusted to reflect this more rigorous