- Conference Session
- Engineering Leadership Development Division Technical Session
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Kirsten S. Hochstedt, Penn State University ; Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University; Richard John Schuhmann, Gordon–MIT Engineering Leadership Program
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Leadership Development Division
assessment then becomes a part of the learning experience instead of simplyan exogenous metric.As mentioned earlier in this paper, a literature review revealed a paucity of investigation intoassessment linking student course expectations to instructor expectations; therefore, it is difficultto interpret the specific results of this work within the context of the current literature. Within thecontext of assessing student self-efficacy, various facets of this assessment instrument touchedon the students’ self-measure of ability to accomplish specific tasks (e.g. Judgment, Item 3, “Ican apply different ethical frameworks to analyze an ethical problem.”) and reach specific goals(e.g. Confidence, Item 10, “I feel I can do something when I hear about bad