- Conference Session
- Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve, University of Toronto
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Leadership Development Division
academicengagement among engineering students at four American universities and found that while therewas no significant relationship between student involvement and academic engagement for thesample as a whole, the relationship did reach statistical significance when they paid attention tostudent self-efficacy levels and co-curricular activity types 28. Academic activities (designcompetitions, faculty led groups, informal study groups and professional engineering societymembership) made more of a positive difference for engineering students with high levels ofacademic self-efficacy, while non-academic activities (music, social networks, religiousactivities, fraternities, sports, student government and international student groups) made more ofa positive
- Conference Session
- Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership
- Collection
- 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Leadership Development Division
competencies. Reviewing research on self-confidence and self-efficacy may provide further insights into building confidence in engineeringleaders that can be easily demonstrated during a career fair event 34.Study Limitations The qualitative design of this study focused on generating themes from the perspective ofrecruiters regarding behaviors during a career fair that demonstrate the potential for engineeringleadership. The recruiters selected for this study were chosen based on their involvement inhiring engineers for entry-level positions and included large public companies. Collecting fromthis sample allowed for a greater diversity of engineering disciplines, but did not account for theneeds of smaller organizations. The data collection