Paper ID #41595AI’s Visual Representation Gap: Redefining Civil Engineering Workspacesfor Early-Career WomenMiss Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida Elizabeth Volpe, EIT, LEED-GA, is a Ph.D. candidate in the Simmons Research Lab located in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research interests include inclusive engineering, leadership, the experiences of early-career women in engineering, and improving sustainability, diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. Elizabeth
Paper ID #46521Which undergraduate student activities develop specific career and leadershipskills for Black vs non-Black engineering graduatesD’Andre Jermaine Wilson-Ihejirika, University of Toronto D’Andre Wilson-Ihejirika is currently a PhD candidate at the University of Toronto within the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Practice (ISTEP). Prior to that she worked for many years as an engineer and project manager in the Oil & Gas industry. She is originally from Nassau, Bahamas, and completed her B.Eng in Chemical Engineering at McGill University and her MASc. from the Centre
participants well exceeds their representation in targeted majorswhen compared with the general population in the college and with national metrics.IntroductionThis work-in-progress paper reports on a leadership and innovation skills development programsupported by an ongoing 3-year grant from the US Office of Naval Research (ONR). The papershares both practice and research. The program aims to have a significant impact on the successand careers of 60-70 students at a non-military urban engineering college, especially women andunderrepresented students. The college, the Purdue School of Engineering & Technology inIndianapolis, has historically had a substantial number of recent engineering graduates employedby a nearby DoD base, the Naval Surface
Intern for the Journal of En- gineering Education. Her research interests include broadening participation in engineering, engineering leadership, and marginalized student experiences in engineering. Her dissertation explored the experi- ences of early-career Black engineers in leadership. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her M.S. in Human Systems Engineering from Arizona State University. Before starting her graduate studies, she worked in the tech industry in the operations field. Katreena is committed to justice, equity, diversity, and inclusivity and hopes that her work will impact the culture and environment of the engineering education ecosystem.Dr. Brooke
Paper ID #36707Building a Leadership Toolkit: Underrepresented Students’ Development ofLeadership-Enabling Competencies through a Summer Research Experiencefor Undergraduates (REU) in Engineering EducationMs. Elizabeth Volpe, University of Florida Elizabeth is a doctoral student at the University of Florida. She is pursuing a Masters and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering as well as a certificate in engineering leadership. Her research interests involve leadership, the experiences of early career women in engineering and improving diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice within engineering education and the engineering workforce. She
Paper ID #48883FACE to FACE with Leadership: A Work in ProgressStephanie Becerra, Arizona State UniversityJennifer Chen Wen Wong, Arizona State UniversityMs. Tami Coronella, Arizona State University Tami Coronella is the Director of Academic Services for the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. She has worked in advising and advising administration since 2000. Her academic career has been focused at Arizona State University, where she earned a B.S ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 FACE to FACE with Leadership: A Work in ProgressIntroductionAccording to the Bureau of Labor
. Increasing happiness at work, and measuring its impact, has been the subject of numerousstudies across different cultures and industries. Research shows that it correlates with positiveoccupational outcomes. Specifically, happier employees exhibit higher levels of engagement,improved productivity, greater levels of career satisfaction, and a greater sense of well-being intheir lives [1] – [4]. Singh, Saxenda, and Mahendru find that there is no widely-agreed upon definition ofhappiness in the literature, but they describe it as “a harmonious state where the individual’sphysiological and psychological needs are satisfied in the past, present, and future, leading themto live a meaningful and contented life” [5]. To experience happiness at work
community created.1 Introduction“I'm mid-career, I'm seen as someone who knows things, who should be doing, officialmentoring, that type of thing. And I [think to myself], "Oh, please don't make me do this”… I'mpositioned as somebody who knows things or somebody who could be supportive or somebodywho can... I want to be those things. But if it's seen as more of a professional capacity, [I feel],‘My life is a lesson of what not to do’.”We see in this quote, someone who struggles with the complexities of navigating a mid-careerprofessional academic journey; a journey that can be fraught with dead ends, wrong turns, andhard-earned lessons. Irrespective of the challenges, formal mentoring for academics at this stageof their career can be sparse
introductoryengineering courses. Similarly, Samsuri et al. [6] utilized the How People Learn framework todesign an effective introduction to engineering courses. In addition, Nguyen et al. [7] investigatedproject-based learning strategies to improve the learning outcomes of diverse students enrolled inintroductory engineering courses. As such, introductory engineering courses have played a crucialrole in engineering education to motivate, prepare, and support the career decision-making of first-year students at a college level.Impact of Peer MentoringSeveral studies have shown that peer mentoring positively impacts university students' academicperformance and social integration. Eddy and Hogan [8] highlighted the impact of peer mentoringon improved academic
. Zhu is a member of the Board of Directors for the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics (APPE). His research explores how culture influences the cultivation of globally competent and socially responsible engineers, as well as the ethical development and deployment of AI and robotics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Shattering the Bamboo Ceiling: Asian American Student Perceptions of Engineering LeadershipIntroductionWhile engineering is often perceived as a highly technical field, “non-technical” professionalskills, such as leadership, have become central to preparing undergraduate engineering studentsfor careers in industry [1]. As more engineers
the leadership,communication, and cultural competencies increasingly required of today's high-tech workforce.The John Lof Leadership Academy (JLLA) is an innovative leadership program for engineeringgraduate students that was founded at the University of Connecticut in 2018 to create culturallycompetent visionaries in the field of engineering. John Lof Scholars develop their leadershipabilities through focused training, specialized workshops and seminars, and active learning. Runby graduate students from various departments based on a “for us, by us” program philosophy, theJLLA empowers its members to develop as leaders in their fields by aiming leadership trainingthrough the lens of each individual’s career and personal goals. Academy
came from various majors, includingConstruction Management (47%), Civil Engineering (34%), Environmental Engineering (16%),and other disciplines (3%).The survey revealed that students rated the importance of equity in their future careers at anaverage of 3.81 out of 5, indicating moderate to high awareness of its significance. In contrast,the industry’s performance in implementing equity was perceived as only moderate, with anaverage rating of 3.27 out of 5. This highlights a gap between the perceived importance of equityand its practical integration within the industry.Students showed the greatest interest in learning about the relationship between equity andsustainability (52%) and equity in sustainability rating systems (51%). Other topics
Paper ID #42120Navigating the Mystery: An Approach for Integrating Experiential Learningin Ethics into an Engineering Leadership ProgramDr. James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian is a Sr. Lecturer with the Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.John M. Feiler, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyLeo McGonagle, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Leo McGonagle
looking for technically skilled professionals andindividuals with strong leadership abilities. Leadership in engineering is the ability to guide,motivate, and influence a team of professionals toward achieving goals and objectives. TheEngineering School of a University in Chile needs to understand the self-perceived skills of itsstudents, especially those in the final years of their engineering programs. This will help thefaculty prepare future professionals for team management, decision-making, and otheressential skills required in their careers. The School can align their graduation standards withthe career profiles of the students to ensure they are well-equipped to succeed in theirprofession.Numerous studies have suggested that there is a
-year anniversary retrospective survey to former students in2019 to inquire about the value of the course for their academic and professional careers. Now,we are embarking on a project to formally evaluate the course content and its direct impact oncurrent students, particularly their leadership skills with regards to DEI in engineering, to informour next course redesign process. As part of the long-term goals for our project, we want toevaluate the impact the redesigned course has on students’ leadership development, both in theirremaining academic careers and their future professional careers.This work-in-progress practice paper presents the preliminary results of the first phase of ourcurrent project. In this first phase, we evaluate the
whichwere institutionalized in the college at the end of the funding period [14]. The Chevron Center’smission thus grew to encompass a wider range of student success initiatives with the overarchinggoal of increasing engineering student retention and developing career-ready engineers upongraduation.Current Operations and Future DirectionsToday, the Chevron Center for Engineering Education continues to grow. Becausecommunication is a foundational element for many institutional priorities, such as teamwork,leadership, ethics, and entrepreneurship, it offers resources and programs that address thesetopics. The studio supports study abroad programs, tutoring services, workshops, and studentorganizations, providing a wide range of opportunities for
engineering and product design.Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration from Seattle University, and a B.S. in general engineering from Gonzaga University.William J. Schell William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering aˆ C” Engineering
courses pertaining to topics for first-year engineer- ing, materials science and engineering, engineering design, systems thinking and engineering leadership development. He has a PhD in Polymer, Fiber Science from Clemson University. His research back- ground is in the synthesis of polymer nanocomposites and engineering education. He was trained as a Manufacturing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven-year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development.Mr. Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he
, creating training that helps students learn how to best support each other when they make mistakes, creating training on respecting and appreciating differences among team members, and encouraging them to ask for help when needed. RHIT – At RHIT, opportunities include creating a learning experience to improve how teams handle mistakes, talk about tough issues, and take small risks. There are certainly opportunities for students to develop these skills because the students surveyed here were freshman design students—they will receive additional training and practice opportunities as they progress through their college careers. CPP – At CPP, opportunities include creating learning experiences
. (1970). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: The Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership. 2. McClellan, Jeffrey L. (2013). Contributing to the development of student leadership through academic advising. Journal of Leadership Education, 12(1), 207-233. 3. Darroch, B. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on student engagement in STEM disciplines: A critical analysis. Journal of Higher Education, 94(1), 112-138. 4. Douglas, H. M., Settles, I. H., Cech, E. A., Montgomery, G. M., Nadolsky, L. R., Hawkins, A. K., Ma, G., Davis, T. M., Elliott, K. C., Cheruvelil, K. S., & Grundy, Q. (2022). Disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 on marginalized and minoritized early- career academic scientists. PloS One, 17(9
, however processesfor effective team management are also critical. As other disciplines are brought into theconversation, this importance of consultative communication – listening and incorporatingvarious perspectives to build a shared mental model – will be even more challenging. Creating asafe and engaging classroom environment, where students can ask questions, float ideas, makemistakes, and give and accept feedback, is important, given the iterative and collaborative natureof systems mappingFuture WorkMany students expressed a desire to see the introduction of systems thinking/mapping toolsearlier in their undergraduate careers, particularly in design courses where students are quick toconverge on a given understanding of the problem. Given
of Toronto. She leads research and teaches on topics such as how engineers lead and learn to lead both as students and in practice. She has published on engineering leadership, equity in engineering, and incorporating systems thinking into complex decision making. Emily was appointed as Director of ILead in October, 2018 after more than twenty years in industry. Emily started her career at the Xerox Research Centre of Canada scaling up new materials and processes from the lab to manufacturing. In her 11 years at Xerox, Emily learned a great deal about leading teams and developing new products, becoming a manager and Principal Engineer. Emily then spent 10 years at Hatch, a global engineering firm serving the