approval from twelve countries [4].This highlightsthe need for global engineering leadership competencies that can enable graduate engineers tocollaborate with diverse stakeholders across disciplines, geographical locations and cultures towork on complex global problems. Hence, engineering accreditation and research fundingorganizations have mandated that futures graduates develop global engineering leadershipcompetencies including global perspectives, multidisciplinary teamwork, and complexcollaboration skills that can enhance employability [5][6].Conventional pedagogical approaches by engineering institutions for incorporating engineeringleadership education comprise of experiential service-learning projects, problem-based learning
competency development via education and training; interactions between humans and technology; and conceptualization of leadership in engineering. Supported by more than $7.5M in federal funding and with results disseminated across more than 100 refereed publications, her research aims to develop and sustain an effective engineering workforce with specific emphasis on inclusion. She has over ten years of construction and civil engineering experience working for energy companies and as a project management consultant; nearly 20 years of experience in academia; and extensive experience leading and conducting multi-institutional, workforce-related research and outreach. She holds civil engi- neering degrees (BS, MS, PhD
Paper ID #43553Benchmarking a Foundation for Improving Psychological Safety in TeamsDr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Michelle Marincel Payne is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She earned her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is leading a project
my leadership skills and my commitment to excellence, I have achieved outstanding results in projects and work teams. I am an enthusiastic collaborator and committed to continuous improvement, which has allowed me to successfully adapt to new environments and face challenges effectively.Prof. Maria Elena Truyol, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Mar´ıa Elena Truyol, Ph.D., is full professor and researcher of the Universidad Andr´es Bello (UNAB). She graduated as physics teacher (for middle and high school), physics (M.Sc.) and Ph.D. in Physics at Universidad Nacional de C´ordoba, Argentina. In 2013 she obtained a three-year postdoctoral position at the Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Her focus is set on
completed a project named "Aristotle" to find the components of aneffective team. The internal report concluded that psychological safety is the foundation ofeffective teamwork [7]. The report continued that after psychological safety is present otherattributes (team dependability, team structure & role clarity, work meaning/sense of purpose, andimpact of the work) begin to impact team effectiveness significantly [8]. However, teams needpsychological safety first.Other researchers correlated psychological safety with leadership through individualscollectively experiencing situations with shared expectations to create value. Psychologicalsafety measures team members' ability to take small risks when working with others [9]. A studyby Schaubroeck
,diverse, and equitable engineering leaders, educators, and researchers and to help bridge the gapbetween traditional academic graduate studies and the workforce demand for practical and appliedleadership skills.LEAD Division strategy priority: Inform.Key project objective: To assess the effectiveness of an innovative engineering-specificleadership group for graduate students. 1Project context: A study by the National Academy of Engineering identified technicalcompetence, business acumen, communication skills, leadership ability, and a global perspectiveas key skills for engineering leaders [1]. The development of graduate students’ leadership abilitiesthrough a
financial aid, working with the faculty and administration of two major public university systems and their urban and flagship campuses. He has published well over a hundred technical papers, and received 7 patents, supported by over $12 million in external grants from NASA, NIH, NSF, Rolls-Royce, and others. He pioneered research in novel pressure-gain combustion systems. He also pioneered project-enhanced active learning in gateway STEM education, with federal grants for pedagogic research and student training. He previously led research and development at two small companies, and he founded a new start-up to commercialize his research. He is an Associate Fellow of AIAA, and he has served overseas as Fulbright Scholar
Paper ID #39056Work in Progress: Developing a Leadership Community of Practice TowardaHealthy Educational EcosystemChristina Restrepo NazarDr. Lizabeth L. Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 22 years and has continued to develop innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading. Through the SUSTAINDr. Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles Corin (Corey) Bowen is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education, housed in the Department
-year anniversary retrospective survey to former students in2019 to inquire about the value of the course for their academic and professional careers. Now,we are embarking on a project to formally evaluate the course content and its direct impact oncurrent students, particularly their leadership skills with regards to DEI in engineering, to informour next course redesign process. As part of the long-term goals for our project, we want toevaluate the impact the redesigned course has on students’ leadership development, both in theirremaining academic careers and their future professional careers.This work-in-progress practice paper presents the preliminary results of the first phase of ourcurrent project. In this first phase, we evaluate the
coverage is included in programs’ cores, how is the learning operationalized toreinforce it as being integral to engineering leadership practice? Proposals for embedding ethicsinstruction more integrally within engineering coursework have included increasing the emphasison human-centric approaches to design on engineering team projects [10, 17], mitigating orreducing the isolation of ethics instruction from other aspects of courses and projects [8, 13], andincreasing the use of experiential learning approaches for ethics instruction [12, 17 - 20], among 18 19others. As this paper’s central focus, we illustrate how an ethical reasoning challenge can
, students must demonstrate a variety of skills, competencies, and attitudesto meet course outcomes, enabling a truly multidimensional learning experience.Learning is supported through lectures, guest speakers, case study discussions and activities, butalso through a major project in which student develop a system map of a complex problem.Examples of problems explored include responsible lithium mining in Chile, the transition toautomation in manufacturing, or improving transit access to underserved communities. Theemphasis is on problem definition rather than solution, giving students the opportunity to explorethe problem space in depth. Over the course of a semester, students work in teams to developsystems maps that incorporate both the technical
and behaviors, there is aquestion about how these programs impact the long-term, deep perspective changes needed forsuccess in the profession [2] [3]. To add to this uncertainty, the empirical evidencedemonstrating leadership program effectiveness is mixed [4-6]. Identity has emerged as apotentially effective approach to leader development in both the leadership studies andengineering leadership fields, as it addresses the complex, dynamic, and long-term aspects ofleader development.This project leverages identity — how one sees oneself, and is seen by others, in society [e.g., 7,8]— to understand and support the leader development process. Using preliminary research oninstructional features of an identity-based approach (reflexive
construction and civil engineering experience working for energy companies and as aproject management consultant; nearly 20 years of experience in academia; and extensiveexperience leading and conducting multi-institutional, workforce-related research and outreach.She holds civil engineering degrees (BS, MS, PhD) from Clemson University and is a registeredProfessional Engineer (PE), ASEE Fellow, Project Management Professional (PMP), andLeadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED-AP).Division: Engineering LeadershipAbstractEngineers, predominantly visual thinkers, have historically encountered engineering workspacesdesigned by men, for men. This trend continues, evident in the underrepresentation of women inthe
, then, goes beyondjob satisfaction. Other factors that contribute to happiness at work in any field includeorganizational commitment, job involvement, engagement, thriving and vigor, flow and intrinsicmotivation, and affect at work [6]. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, three of the top 10 occupations with thehighest projected percentage growth of employment between 2022 and 2032 are in theengineering field (wind turbine service technicians, data scientists, and software developers) [7].However, my research identified only 10 peer-reviewed journal papers related to happiness inengineers published since 2014, and no literature reviews that surveyed the research landscapeon the topic. As the field of engineering continues to grow
- driven, community-wide shared experience. Storytelling served as the connecting theme across the celebrations. 2. Catalyst Meetings for Curiosity, Discovery, and Exploration – Three-per-semester, one-hour-long gatherings of the cohort to explore topics related to personal and professional growth. During the year-long project, catalyst meetings were led by external facilitators, members of the organizing team, and members of the cohort. 3. EML Community Circle Meetings for Value Creation – Every-other-week, 90-minute- long Circle Meetings happened across a range of professional development, personal growth, and work-life interaction issues. The cohort was divided into two circles, and through the first
because (…) I'm the Black guy leftover at the meeting. Who am I going to talk to?"He goes on to explain that this same level of only-ness in the discipline-based organizationreflects the attitudes he experienced from his peers in the classroom. He described, "In classes, I already have to do all these projects with all these people that just don't want to work with me. Why would I do that outside of classes? (…) Like, I'm open to working with them, but like, you know, racism, so like, they already have their opinions of me before they even know me." For Killua and the other Study Leaders, many of their struggles in their engineeringleadership journey also include a layer related to their personal identity