learning experiences harnessing Elsevier’s information solutions.Mr. Jay J. Bhatt, Drexel University Jay Bhatt is responsible for building library collections in engineering subject areas, outreach to fac- ulty and students, and teaching information and research skills to faculty and students in Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and related subject areas. He provides individual and small group consultations to students, instructional sessions to specific classes, online research support in both face to face and dis- tance learning programs, and conducts workshops for specialized research areas. Jay is actively involved with the Engineering Libraries Division of the American Society for Engineering EducationDr
recording of protocols and progress has been done via paper labnotebooks. With the popularity of the internet, many have been turning to electronicmeans to record their study data, though this does not imply that paper lab notebookshave been completely abandoned. In the beginning, many were making use of tools notnecessarily created for the sole use in laboratories, such as Microsoft Word, Evernote,Google Docs, or other means of recording notes online and/or via a computer.However, there proved to be a market for products used especially by those doingresearch on scientific fields and thus the electronic lab notebook was born. New YorkUniversity Abu Dhabi has a growing faculty specializing in STEM fields. As with anyother university, the STEM
would be “incredibly helpful”.AE scholars also use a wide variety of tools and platforms for sharing research data. Manyfaculty think of the published thesis or journal article as the public sharing of data. However,internally, data is shared through local tools like emails and shared laboratory disc drives. Datathat is not sensitive is shared through document sharing platforms like Microsoft OneDrive,Dropbox, and Google Drive. Services like QNAP's Network Attached Storage (NAS) are alsoused for backup, storage, and transferring large data. Although sharing data internally wasgenerally not considered a challenge by most respondents, getting large amounts of simulationdata from one place to another was a problem. At least one faculty member
digital scholarship, scholarly communications, research data and documentation management. She is also part of the Institutional Digital Repository Committee and teaches courses in information literacy.Dr. Cristina D. Pomales-Garcia, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Dr. Cristina Pomales is Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez. She holds a Bachelors in Psychology from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Operations Engineering from the University of Michigan. Her research areas of interest are the study of Work Systems Design in Agriculture, Engineering Education, and Project Assessment and Evaluation. She is currently internal evaluator
aninformation literacy quiz-tutorial online.10 The college is in the process of improving this aspectof the first-year information literacy program to ensure a larger number of students receive thispreliminary learning opportunity in information literacy. This paper focuses on the second-semester first year course that builds on these preliminary skills and provides a basis for moreadvanced learning within the major. Later courses address other aspects of information literacyin the context of laboratories, design, and engineering analysis in a variety of areas. Thecapstone design course utilizes information literacy skills on a real-world design project for a
-Principal Investigator) Associate Professor and Head of Assessment, J. Murrey Atkins Library The authors are grateful for the collaborative support of UNC Charlotte’s William States LeeCollege of Engineering Office of Student Development and Success instructors: Don Blackmon,Chris McDaniel, Gwen Gill, Meg Harkins, Dan Latta, Kevin Lindsay, Bill Lindsey, and Sherman Mumford. This work was supported by funds provided by the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. 1 AbstractThis study
correspond mainly to gathering backgroundinformation. General sources of information, such as encyclopedias, trade magazines, orhandbooks, can give an overview of the major technologies being used to solve the problem.Codes and regulations will provide guidance on legal constraints. When teaching theinformational component of this phase, focusing on the Initiation stage of the Information SearchProcess is the most important. This is the phase when the student will need to determine whatinformation they know and what information they still need to find. Often with novices, ‘theydon’t know what they don’t know,’ so they have difficulty articulating the need for information.Providing students with some structure for asking questions can facilitate them
Mellon University. Prior to this position, he was Head of the Science Libraries at Carnegie Mellon University from 2006 through 2014. He has also served as the Physics and Math Librarian at Carnegie Mellon from 1999 through 2006. Earlier in his career, he served as the Library Team Leader for the National Energy Technology Laboratory Library in Morgantown, West Virginia and as an Assistant Science Librarian at the University of South Carolina. He also served in the United States Navy as a surface ship nuclear propulsion plant operator aboard the USS Mississippi. He is currently a United States representative on the Governing Council of the Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics (SCOAP3
laboratories – BuildingResearch (BRE), Road Research (now TRL) , Water Pollution Research (Now WRc). Thelatter bodies had considerably more resources than ICE. A little later the Ministry of PublicBuildings and Works, later the Property Services Agency (PSA), introduced ConstructionReferences. All of the above services developed online versions – INSPEC, BRIX, IRRD,Aqualine. BRE and PSA later briefly contributed to ICONDA. ICE briefly entered the frayagain with ICE Abstracts in the 1970s. The competition remained stiff and poor financialreturns led to its sale. It survives as International civil engineering abstracts published byEmerald.The Library also came under internal pressure within ICE. As other functions expanded itsspace was challenged. The
; ≠ Homework assignment and test problem from a first-year course15 directed toward students’ abilities to access and evaluate information in the libraries and on the World Wide Web. ≠ Reports from a variety of design projects, laboratories, or research-based analyses in which students cite data in developing an argument. These types of assignments provide measures of the abilities to access and evaluate information, cite information ethically and in proper format, and utilize information to accomplish a particular purpose. As students progress through the curriculum, they are exposed to a greater variety and greater complexity of data, including data presented in tabular and graphical formats. In
social impact for the funding he had received from the National Science Foundationfor research into digital fabrication. It is the extension arm of the CBA that is responsible foreducational outreach. Even though the originator of the FabLab concept had not envisioned anyconnection between digital fabrication and education, this connection has definitely now beenintegrated into its function.9 Page 26.882.4Among other things, FabLabs are a knowledge-sharing global network of labs that enableinvention by providing access to tools for fabrication. They are a “distributed laboratory forresearch and invention” that offer their members a place to “play
and pursued a career as aprofessor, teaching at the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Joliet Junior College, and DePaulUniversity, and as a visiting professor in Turkey the 1970s and China in the 1980s. He retired in1989 and died in 1998 at the age of 72.[15] Karen Takle was the youngest of the four engineering librarians. A native of Wisconsin, she graduated with a BS degree in zoology from the University of Wisconsin in 1958. After completing a summer institute at the University of Norway in Oslo, she went on to study library science at Rutgers University, graduating with an MLIS
LibGuides were maintained at each institution; next, specific electrical ormechanical engineering LibGuide links were determined. Any institutional website with specificsubject LibGuides (electrical or mechanical) were further examined to determine the graduatelevel offerings; those that have at least a Master's degree offering were selected. Randomsamples were used to make the sample more manageable, and the geographical location waslimited to United States institutions.The methods for the assessment of the LibGuides was done by following the approach presentedin two chapters of the book published by Dobbs, Sittler, and Cook.12 In this work, Bielat, Befus,and Arnold13 discussed the integration of LibGuides into the teaching and learning process
checklist. Carefully document the decision to remove items and retain all items removed for later review. 3. Review the active checklist to determine if it is representative of the publications of the user community and provides appropriate items to complete the evaluation. Questions that may be asked: Are the items in the checklist published in venues used by and on topics of interest to target group? For example, if the checklist includes articles on the education of elementary students and the main target group is research scientists in national laboratories, it may be appropriate to remove these items
often work in laboratory settings –there are significant differences in the nature of their work and education. Pinelli explains thesedifferences in the work of engineers vs. scientists in great detail,3 but for our purposes whatmatters is how this plays out in terms of library use. As users, engineers behave differently thantheir peers in other disciplines. Many of them simply don’t use the library, physically orvirtually, and are unaware of library resources and services. Neither group is known to askreference questions in the traditional sense or request mediated searching. Tenopir states, “Evenwhen they do use a library, engineers like to search for information themselves rather than gothrough a librarian or other intermediary.”4
ofEngineering built a new library space in the E-Quad, the building housing all the engineeringdepartments, but by the mid-1990s, the need for laboratory space became very acute. WhenUniversity Trustee Dennis Keller ’63 made the generous gift to the School of Engineering for anew building, the library received a new home in the Friend Center for Engineering Education.Designed by internationally acclaimed architect Henry Cobb of Pei, Cobb, Freed and Partners,Friend Center opened its doors in September 2001. The building houses high-tech classroomsand computer clusters, videoconferencing facilities, a spacious convocation hall, a 250-seatauditorium, along with the Engineering Library, for a total of 70,500 square feet. The libraryoccupies 40% of the
gained by merging them into one building. SeeFigure 14.19Cornell University Announcements described various college buildings, including the library inthe yearly publication. A description from 1930 describes the origins and size of two bookendowments, Kuichling for hydraulic and municipal engineering (civil) and Gray for electrical.See Figure 15. BUIL IN S AN E UIPMENT 5 plete commercial radio broadcasting e uipment Laboratory stand ards of inductance, capacity and fre uency are available for
theMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Radiation Laboratory, and many other researchinstitutions. In the mid-1940s, the library was also designated as a depository for the Army MapServices. In 1950, the Georgia Tech Library was made a Depository for the Atomic EnergyCommission (AEC), together with fifty or so other research libraries. Reports from AEC weremade available to engineers, scientists, industrialist and others to help foster scientific researchand industrial development in Georgia and the southeast region. Under Crosland’s direction, theLibrary also added reports from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), theOffice of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD), which was superseded by the NationalDefense Research