- October 23, 2019, Hannover, Germany, 2020, pp. 13–19. [Online]. Available: http://greyguide.isti.cnr.it/index.php/greyguideportal/document-share/gl-proceedings-1993.[5] N. Waters, E. Kasuto, and F. McNaughton, “Partnership between engineering libraries: Identifying information literacy skills for a successful transition from student to professional,” Sci. Technol. Libr., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 124–132, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2012.648104.[6] C. Leachman and J. W. Leachman, “If the engineering literature fits, use it! Student application of grey literature and engineering standards,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, pp. 26.881.1-26.881.10. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org
. Q., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 172–190, 2011.[19] S. Wellings and B. Casselden, “An exploration into the information-seeking behaviours of engineers and scientists,” J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 789–800, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0961000617742466.[20] D. Ellis and M. Haugan, “Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment,” J. Doc., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 384–403, 1997.[21] K. Mercer, K. Weaver, and A. Stables-Kennedy, “Understanding undergraduate engineering student information access and needs: Results from a scoping review,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 33485. doi
ormeasuring the impact in makerspace curriculum [16]. To address this gap, the University ofTexas, Arlington assembled an ad-hoc taskforce from various universities to develop a nationalstandard of maker-based competencies to enhance student learning outcomes to impactundergraduate students [17]. Among the taskforce was the University of Nevada, Reno. In 2017and 2019, the group received two National Leadership grants from the Institute of Museum andLibrary Services (IMLS).To form their framework, the grant team used the competencies-based education model, whichincludes the assessment of learning outcomes and learning that is personalized, measurable, andtransferable [16]. Ten maker competencies were developed, addressing various transferable
number ofcitations per report with aggregate data. Mean Citations per Report Year Number of Reports Number of Citations Report 2019 21 208 9.9 2020 25 228 9.1 2021 24 249 10.4 2022 14 133 9.5 2023 17 172 10
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[9] T. Anderson and C. Leachman, “Strategies for Supporting OER Adoption through Faculty and Instructor Use of a Federated Search Tool,” J. Librariansh. Sch. Commun., vol. 7, no. 1, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.7710/2162-3309.2279.[10] C. Leachman and T. Anderson, “Open Educational Engineering Resources: Adoption and Development by Faculty and Instructors,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017, p. 28725. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28725.[11] C. D. Czajka and D. McConnell, “The adoption of student-centered teaching materials as a professional development experience for college faculty,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 41, no. 5
Paper ID #43714Board 103: Developing a User Experience Study (Work in Progress)James M. Cox, The University of Iowa James M. Cox has been a member of the University of Iowa Lichtenberger Engineering Library Staff since August 2014. In his current role as the Public Services and Emerging Technologies Librarian, since 2019, he oversees a team of 12 student employees at the Service Desk. Additionally, James manages the library’s technology resources, including the prototyping equipment available in the Creative Space/Makerspace and the extensive Tool Library containing over 275 pieces of equipment. James is interested in
making connections and helping students and faculty” [8, p. 150]. In 2019,Corrall and Jolly describe this shift as “the social turn in library innovation”, where librariansfocus more on “community-oriented service models” rather than strictly collections [9, p. 122].In this community-oriented approach, librarians take a holistic view of the student experienceand aim to support students beyond the classroom [9]. In 2020, the Association of College andResearch Libraries (ACRL) identified “supporting well-being on campuses” as one of the toptrends in academic libraries [9, p.4], [10]. And while the end goal may be the same - to helpstudents find and access information [6] - librarians are increasingly doing so by supporting non-academic campus
needs and experiences of undergraduate students and practicing engineers,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 39–49, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.12.004.[3] M. Phillips, D. Zwicky, and J. Lu, “Initial study of information literacy content in engineering and technology job postings,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2020, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274195.[4] J. Jeffryes and M. Lafferty, “Gauging workplace readiness: Assessing the information needs of engineering co-op students,” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, vol. 69, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.5062/F4X34VDR.[5] N. Waters, E. Kasuto, and F. McNaughton, “Partnership between engineering libraries
Authors:The first task in surveying OER authors in engineering was to compile a list of contacts to reachout to. Locating OER has thankfully become easier as lists and databases of these resources havebecome more common, but this also presented our first choice as there are multiple lists of OERin engineering, some with more than a hundred resources. Because we were submitting the paperto the ASEE Libraries Division, we decided it would be appropriate to use the ASEE EngineeringLibraries Division Open Textbooks for Engineering list [12] as our central resource foridentifying authors. This list contains over a hundred resources and is consistently updated toinclude the most recently published OER. In addition to this database, the authors added a
Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 45-76, 2014.[5] A. Henry and L. Stieglitz, "An Examination of Systematic Reviews in the Engineering Literature," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[6] M. Phillips, J. B. Reed, D. Zwicky, and A. S. Van Epps, "A scoping review of engineering education systematic reviews," Journal of Engineering Education, 2023.[7] K. Kolaski, L. R. Logan, and J. P. A. Ioannidis, "Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews," Systematic Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 96, 2023/06/08 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9.[8] N. R. Haddaway, M. J. Grainger, and C. T. Gray, "Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation
. 454-471, 07// 2017, doi: 10.1108/RSR-10-2016-0077.[6] P. McMonigle, "Engaging Engineering Students with Mobile Learning Technologies," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[7] Association of College and Research Libraries. "Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education." https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed February 1, 2024).[8] L. Romero Rodríguez, "Using Nearpod for Reviewing Lessons to Increase Motivation and Academic Performance: A Case Study with Engineering Students," in International Conference in Methodologies and intelligent Systems for Techhnology Enhanced Learning, 2023: Springer, pp. 199-206.[9] K. S. Grigg and J. Dale
,” Ithaka S+R, Jan. 2019. doi: 10.18665/sr.310885.[11] S. Parker, “Research Data Sharing in Engineering: A Report on Faculty Practices and Preferences Prior to the Tri-Agency Policy,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Baltimore, Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023, p. 44112. doi: 10.18260/1-2--44112.[12] C. Tenopir et al., “Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide,” PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 8, p. e0134826, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826.[13] B. Suhr, J. Dungl, and A. Stocker, “Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering—A qualitative interview study,” PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 9, p
notstandardized, taught, or easily described. This challenge makes researching technical standardseducation tough. Technical standards challenges and their viewed importance change across thelifetime of an engineer, by putting numbers and names to these challenges and importancecategories through coding the engineering community and academic community has access toanother tool to make a change.AcknowledgmentsFinancial assistance for travel to the 2024 ASEE conference was provided by the TennesseeValley Society of Fire Protection Engineers and the University of Tennessee – Knoxville. 15References[1] M. Phillips, "Standards Collections: Considerations for the