Management and Systems Engineering EducationAbstractAs engineering system complexity has increased over the years, numerous complex systems pro-jects have failed due to the lack of an appropriate systemic perspective. Since the solution to thischallenge is itself a complex system, educating and training our current and future technicalleaders on these challenges, and providing suggested changes in their mind sets, is imperative.As an educational tool, case studies can be a platform through which the analysis, knowledgeapplication, and drawing of conclusions can occur to facilitate coping with the most complexsystems. Case study learning has proven successful in the training of business leaders with reallife examples of the
mind for our graduates: Page 11.1187.3 Table 1. USMA EM Program Outcomes for Graduates.Outcome Program OutcomeNumber 1 Identify and analyze a client's problem and manage the implementation of the solution. 2 Design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret input and output data. 3 Design or re-engineer a system, component, or process to meet the needs of the client. 4 Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering coupled with knowledge of contemporary issues to develop and implement
AC 2007-398: HUMAN BEHAVIOR SKILLS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRose Mary Cordova-Wentling, University of Illinois-Urbana ChampaignRaymond Price, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign Page 12.814.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 1 Human Behavior Skills in Engineering Education AbstractThis past decade has been characterized by a series of changes in engineering education,beginning with the recognition of the need to incorporate human behavior skills in engineeringeducation. Now, it is important
competitive advantage that any organization has is in the unique, unduplicated[diverse] intellectual capital of its people10. Diverse engineering teams harness differingperspectives and ideas that individuals bring to the workplace in a complementary fashion forinnovation and problem-solving success—two critical elements needed to survive in today’sglobal marketplace. Keep in mind that résumés only partially reflect potential and degree titlesshould not be the primary proxy for skill and competency. Hiring must be based on eachcandidate’s display of competence and ability to fulfill an organization’s current and futuretechnical needs.The differences in academic preparation and professional contributions of Engineers andEngineering Technologists are
Paper ID #8108The Development and Delivery of an Online Graduate Course: Lessons Learnedand Future DirectionDr. Garth V Crosby, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Dr. Garth V. Crosby is an assistant professor in the Technology Department at Southern Illinois Univer- sity Carbondale. He obtained his MS and PhD degrees from Florida International University in Computer Engineering and Electrical Engineering, respectively. Dr. Crosby’s primary interests of research are wire- less networks, wireless sensor networks, network security and active learning strategies for STEM. He has served as a reviewer for several
that organizations that embrace knowledge sharingenvironment are priming their employees to detect and attend to new environmental trends andopportunities. As a result, these organizations will gain an advantage. Thus, the organizationsmust develop a strong communication network. This in turn will translate into organizationaladoptability.Differing Organizational Cultures in the global economy It is important for today’s engineering managers to understand that in today’s globaloperational field, organizational culture must recognize cultural diversity. Engineering managersalso need to recognize the many types of cultures that exist within an organization [13]. Hence,engineering managers need to keep in mind that social norms of
AC 2009-137: HUMAN BEHAVIOR SKILLS AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCEIN ENGINEERINGRaymond Price, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignRose Mary Cordova-Wentling, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Page 14.677.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Human Behavior Skills and Emotional Intelligence in EngineeringAbstractThis past decade has been characterized by a series of changes in engineering education, including theincorporation of human behavior skills into the list of learning outcomes required for engineering programaccreditation. This paper describes the efforts of a college of engineering at a large university in the mid-west to improve
., Rugarcia, A. and Stice, J.E. , “ The Future of Engineering Education – Developing Critical Skills”, Chem. Engr. Education, 34(2), 108–117 (2000). 6. National Research Council, “How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school,” National Academy Press, Washington, DC. (1999). Page 26.507.20 197. Huitt, W., “Critical thinking: An overview,” Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University (1998). accessed March 9, 2015 http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/critthnk.html
financial, social and political implications of decisions taken’ 5.In short, engineering graduates were required to be business-minded for the first time.By 1988, the Engineering Council was becoming more outspoken, observing that ‘educationfor working life rather than first job should...be the aim’. The engineer in industry must be ‘anauthority on technology, a leader of others, a communicator’ and engineering courses must‘improve working habits’ 6. The council was itself beginning to warm to the theme ofintervention in the undergraduate curriculum, and would indeed be funding and influencingnew engineering degree courses using Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) finance. Thelinks to industry and the world of work were clearly being re
2006-302: ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT IN A COMPETITIVE GLOBALENVIRONMENTWilliam Loendorf, Eastern Washington University WILLIAM R. LOENDORF obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, and M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management. He holds a Professional Engineer certification and was previously an Engineering Manager at Motorola. His interests include engineering management, real-time embedded systems, and digital signal processing. Page 11.571.1© American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #14380Putting Engineering Management on the Executive TrackDr. Joseph J. Suter, Johns Hopkins University Dr. Suter is Chair of the Engineering Management and Technical Management graduate programs for the Johns Hopkins University’s Whiting School of Engineering. In addition, Dr. Suter is also a member of the JHU Whiting School of Engineering Graduate Committee. Dr. Suter has authored or coauthored more than 57 publications, which have been published in various publications, including IEEE Transactions, Cryogenics, the Journal of Physics D, the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, and the Journal of Applied
AC 2007-1510: WHAT MOTIVATES ENGINEERING STUDENTS TO WORK INTEAMS?Bianey Ruiz Ulloa, Universidad Nacional Experimental del Tachira She is currently a Full Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Tachira – Venezuela. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Nebraska –Lincoln in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering. She holds a M.S. degree in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and a M.B.A. and B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the National University of Tachira – Venezuela. Her research interests are teamwork, and organizational change. She worked for nine years for manufacturing and service industry as an
(eds.), 1999, How People Learn: Brain Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.18. Brown, A.L., and Campione, J.C., 1994, “Guided Discovery in a Community of Learners,” in Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice, pp. 229-270, K. McGilly, (ed.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.19. Kim, J., Kim, D.M., Consiglio, S., Severengiz, S., Seliger, G., Patil, L., and Dutta, D. 2006. “A Global Collaboration to Teach Global Product Development: Faculty Perspectives.” Advancing Scholarship in Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education.20. Tate, D., Ertas, A., Tanik, M.M., and Maxwell, T. 2006. “A Transdisciplinary Framework for Engineering Systems Research based on
Paper ID #30279Interleaving Lenses to Scale Our Units of Analysis for EngineeringEducation ImprovementMr. Nicholas Jon MonacelliDr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State Univer- sity, Mankato, where she is helping to build the Bell Engineering program, and the managing partner of Kaizen Academic
AC 2010-382: CREATION OF A GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGINEERINGMANAGEMENT: APPLICATION OF BASIC SIX SIGMA PRINCIPLES TOCURRICULUM DESIGNAnoop Desai, Georgia Southern University Dr. Anoop Desai received his BS degree in Production Engineering from the University of Bombay in 1999, and MS and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering from The University of Cincinnati in 2002 and 2006. His main research interests are in Product Lifecycle Management, Design for the Environment, Total Quality Management including tools for Six Sigma and Ergonomics.Jean-Claude Thomassian, State University of New York, Maritime College Dr. Jean-Claude Thomassian received his BS degrees in Electrical Engineering and Mechanical
AC 2012-5561: ASSESSMENT OF DISCOVERY APPROACHDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University Mysore Narayanan obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic, and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several ency- clopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national, and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized, and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a Senior Member of IEEE and is a member
Paper ID #11205Improving Undergrad Presentation SkillsDr. Gene Dixon, East Carolina University Gene Dixon is a tenured Associate Professor at East Carolina where he teaches aspiring engineers at the undergraduate level. Previously he has held positions with Union Carbide, Chicago Bridge & Iron, E.I. DuPont & deNemours, Westinghouse Electric, CBS, Viacom and Washington Group. His work expe- rience includes project engineer, program assessor, senior shift manager, TQM coach, and production reactor outage planner, remediation engineer. He gives presentations as a corporate trainer, a teacher, and a motivational
2006-146: MODERNIZING TEACHING METHODS IN THE CLASSROOM – DOESIT IMPACT STUDENT PERFORMANCE?Kathryn Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology Kate Abel serves as the Program Director for the Bachelor of Engineering in Engineering Management Program in the Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. She holds a Ph.D. in Technology Management and Applied Psychology. She teaches courses in Total Quality Management, Engineering Economy, Entrepreneurial Analysis of Engineering Design, Statistics for Engineering Managers, Engineering Management and Senior Design. Her research areas include knowledge engineering, as well as, knowledge and information management
AC 2010-92: A COMPARATIVE INVENTORY OF CORE COURSES IN SELECTGRADUATE EM PROGRAMSKathryn Abel, Stevens Institute of TechnologyAnirban Ganguly, Stevens Institute of Technology Page 15.16.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010A Comparative Inventory of Core Courses in Select Graduate EM ProgramsAbstract:All educational programs should grow and change with the times. To be stagnant and acceptingof the status quo will not move an educational program forward, and may end up leaving it waybehind the leaders. With this in mind, an investigation into the current state of EngineeringManagement (EM) graduate education was undertaken. The study was intended to answerquestions
2006-602: LEADERSHIP IN STUDENT DISTANCE EDUCATION TEAMSLeroy Cox, University of Missouri-Rolla LEROY R. COX is a postdoctoral fellow in the Engineering Management and Systems Engineering department at the University of Missouri – Rolla. He holds Bachelors degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Management (1999), a Masters degree in Systems Engineering (2002), and a Ph.D in Engineering Management (2005) all from UMR. He has industry experience in the areas of process improvement/reengineering and mechanical design. His research interests include organizational behavior, virtual teams, and managing people in organizations.Susan Murray, University of Missouri-RollaDavid Spurlock
civil/architectural engineeringcurriculums. As these topics are covered, it is helpful to keep in mind that questions wereframed in order to relate each topic to overall job satisfaction and inclination to remain part ofthe structural engineering work force.Pay and compensation The survey did not raise a concern for unequal pay for equal work for a majority ofsurvey respondents. Reference chart below. As can be seen, both men and women show equalpay upon entering the profession. As years of experience grow, the pay gap tends to widen, withmen earning more than women. However, survey evaluators found that at all levels except forPrincipal, the gap is not statistically significant and can be explained by secondary factors. Thereport gives
,Transforming Your STEM Career Through Leadership and Innovation, 1st Edition, 2012.Since this is both an undergraduate and a graduate course, the course needs to be mindful ofABET student outcomes, currently outcomes (a) through (k) in the engineering accreditationcriteria. The following ABET student outcomes for engineering program accreditation can beassessed for this course (ABET Engineering, 2017):(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(j) a knowledge of contemporary issuesThe following ABET student outcomes for engineering technology program accreditation can beassessed for this course (ABET Engineering Technology, 2017)(d) an
leading major, complexprojects who have had their own moments of “This is it. This is how I (or my project/career)end.” What can we as engineering educators do to best equip our students to prepare for thosemoments and challenges, and have the knowledge, resolve, and adaptability to solve enoughproblems to get their projects home?This paper explores that challenge and some related lessons that we, the authors, have learnedand which we seek to continue to explore with like-minded educators and practitioners. Our goalis to find how best to prepare project managers that have both the deep knowledge and honedadaptability to navigate their projects and teams through tough, challenging crises that they arecertain to experience. We don’t pretend to have
Paper ID #11716Experiences with Capstone Projects in a Master of Engineering ManagementProgram: A case studyDr. Ali Hilal-Alnaqbi , United Arab Emirates University Dr Ali is an Emirates by birth and a citizenship. He graduated with PhD as a biomedical Engineer from University of Strathclyde in Scotland. Ali is holds a Post-Doc certificate from Harvard. He is a fellow of the BWH in Boston. Ali started his career in 2006 in the UAEU as the assistant professor at the department of mechanical engineering where he is as now works as a department chair and acting assistant dean for research and graduate studies. Ali was promoted
through a standard door is arequirement that has become a limiting factor for some designs. Design forManufacturing is a philosophy and mind set aimed at designing parts and productsthat can be produced more easily and it is applied heavily at this stage.5.5 Detail DesignAt this stage the entire details including material and dimensions of parts are definedcompletely so that the product can be manufactured. Often a CAE software is used tomodel the parts and assembly at this stage. This contains all the details needed for anyanalysis. Engineering calculations would have been carried out earlier at part and sub-assembly levels but now the complete product is available for analysis. Normally allpossible analyses are not carried out. The worst-case
AC 2007-810: DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENGINEERING MASTERS DEGREE INENTERPRISE SYSTEMS INNOVATION & MANAGEMENTThomas Duening, Arizona State University Page 12.523.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007Development of an Engineering Masters Degree in“Enterprise Systems Innovation & Management” Page 12.523.2IntroductionThis short paper describes efforts within the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona StateUniversity to develop and deliver a trans-disciplinary engineering degree in Enterprise SystemsInnovation & Management. The degree program was created as a result of repeated requestsfrom a number of
AC 2008-1466: IT'S ALL THERE: TEACHING COMPLEX MANAGEMENTCONTENT USING FEATURE FILMSZbigniew Pasek, University of Windsor Zbigniew J. Pasek is an Associate Professor in the Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Department at the University of Windsor. His interests include industrial automation, informal engineering education and engineering applications in health care. Page 13.820.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 It’s All There: Teaching Complex Management Content Using Feature FilmsAbstractWe all learn in a number of different ways and the
AC 2009-936: USING ABET ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS AS A CATALYSTFOR CHANGE: ENHANCING AND STREAMLINING THE ENGINEERINGMANAGEMENT UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM AT MISSOURI S&TStephen Raper, Missouri University of Science and Technology Stephen A. Raper is an Associate Professor of Engineering Management and the Associate Chair of Undergraduates studies in the Engineering Management & Systems Engineering Department at the Missouri University of Science & Technology. He received the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Engineering Management from the department and focuses most of his efforts on teaching, advising and administrative activities related to the undergraduate program, and is also an incoming
AC 2009-1429: A CASE STUDY OF REENGNINEERINGGene Dixon, East Carolina University Page 14.8.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A CASE STUDY OF REENGNINEERING Gene Dixon East Carolina UniversityAbstractOrganizations undertake reengineering in a variety of ways and for a variety of reasons mostly centeredon improving productivity and profitability. Reengineering has been implemented on a variety of scalesincluding a department, a division, a company a business unit or a corporation typically with variedimpact and effectiveness. This paper presents a continuing
2006-629: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCYRobert Parden, Santa Clara University Chair and Professor Department of Engineering Management and Leadership Santa Clara University Page 11.975.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 2006-629: ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCYAbstractThe motivation of engineers, and other technical professionals, includes two significant factors:enhanced, personal career development, and, expanded responsibility in their firms. Leadershipof continuous improvement, in the search for productivity and organizational efficiency, cansupport these two ambitions. Organizational Efficiency is