Displaying all 4 results
- Conference Session
- Technology in the Physics Classroom
- Collection
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sabina Jeschke, University of Stuttgart; Olivier Pfeiffer, Technische Universitat Berlin; Thomas Richter, Technische Universitat Berlin; Harald Scheel, Technische Universitat Berlin; Christian Thomsen
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Physics & Physics
of Technology, Atlanta). In May 2007, Prof. Dr. Sabina Jeschke took over a full professorship for "Information Technology Services" at the Universität Stuttgart. Additionally, she acts as scientific and executive director (CEO) of the "Center of Information Technologies" of the Universität Stuttgart. The research of S. Jeschke is aimed at developing new concepts of service-oriented architectures for eLearning and eScience in particular in the fields of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering. She focuses on development and networking of interactive mathematical objects and remote/virtual experiments, on mechanisms for the creation, modification and storage of data in cooperative
- Conference Session
- Technology in the Physics Classroom
- Collection
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gerald Rothberg, Stevens Institute of Technology; Pavel Boytchev, Sofia University
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Physics & Physics
also included, and otherreal substances important in engineering, such as refrigerants, will be added. Water Temp vs Time 160 140 120 100 Temperature (deg C) 80 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 -20 Time (s)Figure 2. Temperature versus time on heating water from ice to vapor phases. The next figure shows a
- Conference Session
- Programmatic Issues in Engineering Physics
- Collection
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Denise Martinez, Tarleton State University
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Physics & Physics
evidence of achievement of theprogram outcomes. EPOC and EPAB jointly agreed the outcomes to be defined as ABETCriteria 3a-k plus an additional criterion related to the multidisciplinary nature of the programstating “a depth and breadth of knowledge in engineering and physics necessary to work in amultidisciplinary environment”.This data cannot exclusively be graded student work. Data are collected from faculty using avariety of tools. • Course Evaluation Form: At the conclusion of each semester, this form is completed by the instructor of each course in the curriculum offered that semester. This tool surveys the faculty opinion and proposed modifications to the text(s), facilities, equipment, content, student preparation, or
- Conference Session
- Innovations in Teaching Physics
- Collection
- 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Robert Ross, University of Detroit Mercy; Eswara Venugopal
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Physics & Physics
., Parker, G.W., and Beichner, R.J., “Can one lab make a difference?”, Phys. Educ. Res., Am. J. Phys., 68 (7), July 2000, pp. S60.3. Arons, A.B., Teaching Introductory Physics, John Wiley & Sons, 1997.4. McDermott, L.C., Shaffer, P.S., and the Physics Education Group, Tutorials in Introductory Physics, Prentice Hall, 1998.5. McDermott, L.C., et.al., Physics by Inquiry, John Wiley & Sons, 1996.6. Ross, R.A., “Inquiry-Based Experiments in the Introductory Physics Laboratory”, Proceedings of the 2000 Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City MO, (2000).7. Ross, R.A., Langrill, M., and Tomlinson, S., “Directed inquiry in the introductory physics laboratory”, Proceedings of the 1998 North Central Section Spring Conference of the