Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico, and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

whoparticipated in a STEM competition. The review of the information gathered with these studentsis particularly critical in our main project since these students have a strong orientation towardSTEM. Students had a choice to participate in up to two subjects out of five available: physics,mathematics, biology, chemistry and computer science. We administered a science andtechnology questionnaire and 657 students out of 721 who participated in the competitionresponded. The survey included 13 questions in a Likert scale regarding self-efficacy andperception of the importance of the subjects presented. In the first section of the questionnaire,students responded to queries that assess physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics and computerscience self

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey and Universidad Andres Bello; Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey and Universidad Andres Bello

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

-efficacy and the students’ interests wereadapted from [3]. The remaining items were adapted for middle school students from a surveythat had been previously used to assess engineering students’ perceptions towards physics andmathematics [4, 5]. Each item asked the students to rank their perceptions of each of the STEMdisciplines that they encountered in middle school (mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology,and computer science). This paper presents only the results of the students’ perceptions ofphysics. Table III details the 13 items that the students answered. TABLE III 13-ITEM TEST OF SELF-EFFICACY, INTEREST, AND PERCEIVED RELEVANCE OF PHYSICS # Statement about physics 1 I am very good at physics. 2

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Calvin S. Kalman, Concordia University; Franco La Braca, Concordia University; Mandana Sobhanzadeh, Mount Royal University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

following research question and sub-questions: How does the experience of learning differ between labatorials and traditional labs? a. How do social interactions in the lab impact the student learning experience? b. What elements of labs play a role in providing a satisfying learning experience? c. In what ways do labatorials affect student perspectives on physics? d. In what ways does students’ self-efficacy evolve through physics labs? e. In what ways do labatorials and traditional labs differ in promoting the development of conceptual understanding? The mixed methods design involves concurrent qualitative and quantitative datacollection, which was integrated at the data interpretation phase of the research