T. L. O’kuma, E & M TIPERs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2006.[28] G. Zavala, “The Design of Activities Based on Cognitive Scaffolding to Teach Physics,” in Upgrading Physics Education to Meet the Needs of Society, M. Pietrocola, Ed. Switzerland AG: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 169–179.[29] S. B. McKagan et al., “Developing and Researching PhET simulations for Teaching Quantum Mechanics,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 76, no. 4, p. 406, 2008.[30] R. J. Beichner et al., “The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project BT - Research-Based Reform of University Physics, Reviews in PER,” in Research-Based Reform of University Physics
Paper ID #23104Pilot Study on Experience of Engineering Students in Multimedia-enhancedIntroductory Physics LabsDr. Kosta Popovic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Popovic has expertise in design and development of multimodal medical imaging systems for surgi- cal guidance and diagnostics. He enjoys working with undergraduate students on independent research projects, and has supervised students’ work on topics ranging from materials selection for x-ray imaging system characterization phantoms, to development of algorithms for lung tumor nodule classification. Dr. Popovic takes great delight in guiding students to
Paper ID #34774Understanding the Impact of Inequity on Student Learning ExperiencesDuring a Time of Multiple CrisesDr. Geraldine L. Cochran, Rutgers University Dr. Geraldine Cochran is an Assistant Professor of Professional Practice in the School of Arts and Sci- ences and the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Rutgers University. She is a physics education researcher and teaches the large enrollment, introductory physics courses for engineering students. She supports STEM education research and outreach projects, and diversity, inclusion, equity, and social jus- tice efforts in physics and STEM.Bryce Troncone
. Sharma, A. Mendez, I. M. Sefton, and J. Khachan, “Student evaluation of research projects in a first-year physics laboratory,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 025004, 2014.4. P. Aceituno, J. Hernández-Aceituno, and A. Hernández-Cabrera, “Simulation of General Physics laboratory exercise,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 574, p. 012068, 2015.5. V. Otero and D. Meltzer, “The past and future of physics education reform,” Physics Today, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 50-56, 2017. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3555.6. D. R. Sokoloff, P. W. Laws, and R. K. Thornton, “RealTime Physics: active learning labs transforming the introductory laboratory,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 28
]. AIP report, Equipping Physics Majors for the STEM Workforce, https://www.aip.org/statistics/reports/equipping-physics-majors; https://www.aip.org/commentary/aip- career-pathways-project-equipping-physics-majors-stem-workforce [5]. Haridas Kumarakuru, Naomi Ridge and James G. O′ Brien “An Analysis of Students’ Reflections on Engineering Physics II (Electricity and Magnetism), With a View to Improving Student Experience and Outcomes.” Proceedings of 2017 ASEE Northeast Section Conference. [6]. Bala Maheswaran “A New Teaching Approach for Ancient Engineering Physics: Master Physics via Mastering Physics! A Study and Survey” American Society for Engineering Education, Paper ID #8735, June 15-18, 2014
. Short, informal free-writing activities can serve as one type offormative assessment that allows students to have this important opportunity to improve andenhance their learning.References[1] Angel, T. A. and Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, CA.[2] Connolly, P. and Vilardi, T. (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. New York: Teachers College Press.[3] Enns, C., Cho, M., and Karimidorabati, S. (2014). Using writing as a learning tool in engineering courses. Teaching Innovation Projects, 4(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/tips/article/ view/3678.[4] Elliott, L. A., Jaxon, K. and
connectionbetween parts one and two.The quantum dot data collection went very smoothly, and all three students were able tobuild a spreadsheet with their data and results without issues. It is possible that afreshman or sophomore may experience more difficulties when reading the theory andcollecting data due to less experience in a laboratory setting.6 AcknowledgementsThis project is supported by the National Science Foundation through the ATE program,Award No. ATE 1700695. Any opinions, findings, and recommendations expressed in thispaper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References [1] Klaus D. Sattler, Ed., Handbook of Nanophysics: Nanoparticles and Quantum Dots - Google Books. Boca