68HC11. It is ableto access larger memory banks and additional peripherals yet remains code compatible withHC11's architecture and instruction set. It has become popular with users needing more speedand memory than the HC11 provides. The 68HC11/12 has gained momentum because of itssimple architecture and instruction set. A large selection of books, sample projects and freesoftware is available for this target. There are readily available kits that bring out all theresources of the HC11/12 as well as support hardware and prototype area.What the authors consider the best CISC architecture as an educational platform for its time wasthe Motorola 68000 family. It was one of the first 32-bit general purpose architectures thatcreated a paradigm in
PUSH BUTTONS OVERALL FACE VIEW BLOCK S 2'-4 1/2" 3 1/2" SCALE: 3" LEFT SIDE VIEW SCALE: 1-1/2" FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1-1/2" 2" 3 1/2
-high-wage-ohio/?agreed=1[2] A. Carrick, “Series (1 of 7): Rankings of States by Industrial Sub-Sector Jobs – Manufacturing:”,January 2019, [Online] Available:https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/economic/2019/01/series-1-7-rankings-statesindustrial-sub-sector-jobs-weight-concentration-maps-manufacturing )Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Departmentof Commerce. www.bea.gov[3] Program Insights, Burning Glass Technologies, January 2020, [Online] Available:(https://www.burning-glass.com)[4] K. S. Rawat and G. H. Massiha, "A hands-on laboratory-based approach to undergraduate roboticseducation," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04.2004, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2004, pp. 1370-1374 Vol.2.[5] M
technology to solve broadly defined engineering problems appropriate to thediscipline; and the ability to function effectively as a member as well as a leader on technicalteams. Assignments and Quizzes, and attendance and participation were found to be the mostcontributing factor for one of the student outcomes, whereas the Project was found to contributethe most to three student outcomes. Recommendations are given by the instructors and theymainly focus on ways that help overcome the project-related challenges as they are the dominantelement in all the comparisons and analysis performed in this study.References[1] B. Dutch, S. Groh, and D. Allen, The Power of Problem-Based Learning, Wiley, 2001.[2] Oliver, K. and Hannafin, M., "Developing and
in the instrumentation or devices courses butnot in a course primarily focused on the PLC. Not considering these courses for EECSstudents is a mistake.While the equipment of these labs is useful for the PLC courses, specific experimentsmay also have potential use in other courses including Automatic Controls. Theequipment has use in a number of different courses and can be given over to a multitudeof uses as need arises.While the courses described are difficult and time consuming for student and instructoralike, the enjoyment that the professor may have after teaching these courses should benoted. As the student moves through the course(s), they begin to enjoy the challenge ofthe next lab and what lies ahead while seeing the potential for
Page 12.26.11Class Topic(s) In class Out-of-class assignment assignment1 & 2 Introduction of Syllabus; Make an appointment My Career Planning Situation for a one-on-one Questionnaire; resume critique with Information for resume writing Career Services (course experiences, during the week of software/hardware experience); September 5 – 12; Companies who have hired BSEMET Resume must be
Peer Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 1999, pp. 40-43.3. Leah M. Akins and Ellena E. Reda, “Implementation of an Integrated Project for the Electrical Engineering Technology Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, Fall 1998, pp. 38-43.4. Glen, C Gerhard, “Teaching Design with Behavior Modification Techniques in a Pseudocorporate Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 42, No. 4, November 1999, pp. 255-260.5. Peter, J. Shull, “Collaborative Learning and Peer Assessment to Enhance Student Performance,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 22, No. 1, Spring 2005, pp. 10-15.6. Malgorzata, S. Zywno, “Using Collaborative Learning and Peer Assessment
Force, Computing Curricula 2001, Computer Science, December 2001. http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final/index.htm3. Schneider, S., “Developing an Introductory Software Programming Course for Engineering Students”, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2005.4. Loendorf, W., Brzoska, M., Koh, M., Rodriguez, E., “Implementing a Software Engineergin Technology Program within the Context of Experienced-Based Learning”, American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2004.5. William Stallings, “Operating Systems: Internals and Design Principles”, Fifth Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.6. Gary Nutt, “Operating System Projects using Windows NT”, Addison
Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.7. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.8. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American Society for EngineeringEducators, June, 2007.9. National Joint Apprenticeship Training Commission (2008), Course 42, International Brotherhood of ElectricalWorkers.10. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”.Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.11. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as Good A Teacher as You Think? Thought & Action, Vol. 14, Fall
predictionwith finite element analysis for turning processes. Submitting to Journal of Undergraduate Research, SouthDakota State University.12. National Science Foundation. (1998). Shaping the future. Volume II: Perspectives on undergraduateeducation in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Arlington, VA: NSF.http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1998/nsf98128/nsf98128.htm#pdf, 1998.13. Qian, L. (2005). Teaching multi-axis complex surface machining via simulation and projects. Proceedingsof the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. June 13-16,2005.Portland, OR.14. Lamancusa, J. S., Jorgensen, J., Zayas-Castro, J.L. (1996). Putting design and manufacturing back into theengineering curriculum. Proceedings of
instructor. When students know that the instructordemonstrates genuine interest in their learning on an ongoing basis, and they see that s/heis willing to spend the extra time to ensure that they fully understand the concepts taughtin class, they will be more motivated to learn, and are more likely to rate the instructorhighly in the course evaluations.For instructors interested in adopting this technique in their courses, the first step is todevelop a detailed listing of the course topics in the order they will be covered in thecourse. Use an easy-to--read textbook or provide a set of concise course notes so that thestudents can readily map the various course topics in the module surveys to appropriatesections in the textbook or course notes. The
students and we are not planning additional programs at this point intime. Two of RIT’s goals are to have no more than 10% attrition for freshman studentsfrom the freshman to sophomore year and a graduation rate of 74% in 2011 for enteringfreshman students. The ET departments would like to see increases in our studentsuccess rates so we can be active participants in achieving these goals.Bibliography 1. Gereffi, G., Wadhwa, V, (2006) Framing the Engineering Outsourcing Debate: Placing the United States on a Level Playing Field with China and India Retrieved 2/2006 from http://memp.duke.edu/outsourcing 2. Richardson, C., Gupta, S., Valentine, M., Merrill, R., Amuso, V., Multi-department Engineering and Engineering
. Alabama Department of Labor: http://www2.labor.alabama.gov/OES/Wage/wagesbygrouparea.aspx2. Bureau of Labor Statistics in the US Department of Labor: http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and- engineering/electrical-and-electronics-engineers.htm3. Cheshier, S. R. , A Modest Proposal Regarding the Future of Engineering Technology Education in America, Engineering Education, pp. 706-712, May 1985.4. Dudeck, K., and Grebski, W. (2008, June), A New Vision For Engineering Technology Programs To Strengthen Recruitment And Retention Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/32555. Gray, K. C. and Herr, E. L., Workforce Education: The Basics, Boston
del Hoyo, A. (2009). ‘Learning by doing’methodology applied to the practical teaching of electrical machines. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 46(2), 133- 149.Prince M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. J. of Engineering Education 2004; 93: 223-231.6. Fantozzi, F., Leccese, F., Salvadori, G., Spinelli, N., Moggio, M., Pedonese, C., ... & Baldanzi, V. (2018, April). Solar Decathlon ME18 competition as a" learning by doing" experience for students: The case of the team HAAB. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)(pp. 1865-1869). IEEE.7. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, and Wenderoth MP. Active learning increases
program the P8X32A and is available under the GNU license atno cost from Google. The touch sensing operates at +3.3V DC with no potential of harm. TheP8X32A has a built in VGA driver that can display about 25 columns by 24 rows in eight colors.Including the vgatext.h driver and using the dprint(vga, ”text here”); statement allows forcharacters to be displayed on the VGA screen. The video resolution is similar to the CommodoreVIC20, an 80’s computer. Replacing standard text with inverted or highlighted text, can be usedfor visual feedback to the user indicating cursor location. Switching between the two rapidlycould be used to indicate error or selection as well. The screen is cleared when no user is presentand has a welcome screen when a user
education research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., ed New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[14] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, "Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 259-278, 2008.[15] B. Xie and K. A. Shauman, Women in science career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.[16] E. E. Blair, R. B. Miller, M. Ong, and Y. V. Zastavker, "Undergraduate STEM instructors' teacher identities and discourses on student gender expression and equity," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, pp. 14-43, 2017.[17] H. Dryburgh, "Work hard, play hard
offering of the course. Overall, the experiencehas been very rewarding and challenging for the students as well as the instructor. Assessment-generated action items will be implemented for the next offering of the course, and additionalassessment data will be collected from future offerings as part of the program’s continuousimprovement plan.References1. J. D. Lang et al., “Industry expectations of new engineers: A survey to assist curriculum designers,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 43-51, Jan 1999.2. J. S. Dalton et al., “Mini-lab projects in the undergraduate classical controls course,” Proc. ASEE Annual Conf., 2003.3. B. Dutch et al., “The power of problem-based learning: A practical how-to for teaching undergraduate
) of the Department of Engineering Technology at Miami University of Ohio. Thetrainer is composed of 4 different stages, namely: flavor selection, filling, capping and labeling.Two automated conveyor belts and a turntable are used to transport bottle(s) between the stages.The process starts with selection of a flavor from the three available flavors (Cola, Dew andRed).Once a flavor is selected, an empty coke bottle proceeds to the filling station and waits forthe filling valve to be activated. The bottle is then filled with the selected flavor and it proceedsto the capping station. It then travels to on to the labeling and exits the system once it is labeled.The stages are deployed in a distributed fashion in order to demonstrate the
project ideas butnot knowing how to fulfill them. Therefore, we experimented including in this course theconcept of closed-loop control system with variety of sensors and actuators.II. Arduino UnoArduino Uno is the most popular Arduino platform in the family of the Arduino product line.The following table (Figure No. 1) compares the basic features of the various Arduinos andArduino Compatibles platforms presently available. The user has a choice among the manyArduino platforms with regard to 1) Processor and its speed, 2) Physical footprint, 3) Number ofI/O s, 4) Memory size, 5) Compatibility with the daughter boards (Shield in Arduinoterminology), etc. A very important consideration to note is that the user has a large list ofdaughter boards to
for Teaching and Learning, 1991(47), 63–69.https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219914708Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior:Perspectives in social psychology. New York: Plenum.Herrick, R. J., Buikema, S. C., & Runshe, D. D. (2016). A collaborative approach to courseredesign with student-centered learning just one click away. Presentation for OLC Innovate, NewOrleans, LA.IMPACT Management Team and IMPACT Assessment Team. (2015). Annual IMPACT report2015: A report by the IMPACT Data Collection and Analysis Team, parts 1 and 2. IMPACTReports, Paper 6. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/impactreps/6IMPACT Management Team and IMPACT Assessment Team. (2015). Annual IMPACT report2015: A
Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/131343. IDEC Corporation. https://www.idec.com/4. OPC Foundation. https://opcfoundation.org/5. Mahnke, W., Leitner, S.H., Damm, M.. OPC Unified Architecture. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.6. Gonzales, I., Calderon, A. J., Barragan, A. J., Andujar J. M., “Integration of Sensors, Controllers and Instruments Using a Novel OPC Architecture”, MDPI-Sensors, No. 17(7), 1512, DOI:10.3390/s17071512, 2017.7. Schleipen, M., Gilani, S., Bischoff, T., Pfrommer, J., "OPC UA Industrie 4.0 - Enabling Technology with High Diversity and Variability", Procedia CIRP, vol. 57, pp. 315-320, 2016.8. Vázquez, F.G. (2015, October), Test Platform for the Performance Evaluation of OPC-UA Servers
, and renewable energy storage systems.Dr. Patricia Mellodge, University of Hartford Patricia Mellodge is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Hartford. She received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Rhode Island. Her graduate work was completed at Virginia Tech where she received an M.S. in Mathematics and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering.Dr. Ying Yu, University of Hartford Dr. Ying Yu received her B.Eng. from Fudan University, Shanghai, China, in 2000. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Brown University, R.I., USA, in 2003 and 2007, respec- tively. Currently, she is teaching as an associate professor of the S
YYYYY, Campus A laboratory technician, and ZZZZ, CampusB undergraduate research student, were significant and very much appreciated.References1. Black, J.T., and Kohser, R. (2012). DeGarmo’s Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, 11th edition, John Wiliey & Sons, Incorporated.2. ASTM D638 – 14 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics3. Balani, K. Physical, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Polymers. (2015). onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118950623.app1/pdf4. McMaster-Carr Supply company, www.mcmaster.com/5. www. Matweb.com6. Sahin, S and Yayla, P. (2005). Effects of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of polypropylene random copolymer. Polymer Testing. 24 (1012-1021).7. “Coloring methods
seewhether the learning performance of the students can be improved by using the platform.References1. A. Malinowski and H. Yu, “Comparison of embedded system design for industrial applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. informatics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 244–254, 2011.2. Texas Instruments, Tiva™ C Series TM4C123G LaunchPad Evaluation Board, User’s Guide, 2013.3. LMS, January 30, 2018. [Online]. Available: http:// http://www.ucdistancetraining.org/moodle/4. S. Hsiung, J. Ritz, M, R. Jones, J. Eiland, “Design and Evaluation of a Microcontroller Training System for Hands-on Distance and Campus-Based Classes.” Journal of Industrial Technology 2010; 26(3): 2-8.5. Texas Instruments, Tiva Ware Peripheral Driver Library, User’s Guide, 2016.6 CCS, Texas
NS1expressing an interest in pursuing engineering and NS2 still considering options.What we have presented in our learning curriculum is what Lave and Wegner would characterizeas a situated opportunity, that provides the conditions for improvisation of practice, simulating realworld practices and concerns (Situated Learning). In such a simulation, this creates a space wherelearning is situated in s way that is grounded in real world expectations, in which case acting asmotivating element to focus on key aspects of practice. When there are asymmetrical relationshipsin this simulation in the form of the “master-apprentice” relations analagous to that of the ‘Juniors’and ‘Seniors’, it helps to both focus and ground practices in both Making and production
allocation to UE. The Service Gateway (S-GW) responsible for transferring all the IP traffic in the access network. The Mobility Management Entity (MME) responsible for the signaling between the UE and the EPC through the SCs. The Policy Control and Charging Rules Function (PCRF) responsible for policy control and Quality of Service (QoS) parameters. The Home Subscriber Server (HSS) responsible for user’s subscription and roaming between different SCs.A central Decision Support System (DSS) is proposed to aid in supporting the SON modules.The system uses the MapReduce tools to aggregate data from the distributed BDS and createglobal data sets. These data sets are then used by the analytics to calculate
low noise amplifier, 17-bit ADC and powerful DSP unit thus achieving high accuracy andresolution of the thermometer. The thermometer comes factory calibrated with a digital SMBusoutput giving full access to the measured temperature in the complete temperature range(s) witha resolution of 0.02°C. The user can configure the digital output to be PWM. As a standard, the10-bit PWM is configured to continuously transmit the measured temperature in range of -20°Cto 120°C, with an output resolution of 0.14°C. When NCTD measurements were compared tohigh end FLIR camera, the temperature differences were different. Therefore, the project teamdecided to use another infrared temperature sensor to determine if the measurements weredifferent because of the
from: http://www.ams.org/profession/leaders/workshops/Hodges.WorkloadIssues2012.pdf2. Cundy, V., Gibson, D. F., & Rabern, D. (2001). A Model to Assess and Balance Faculty Workload. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, June 24- 27, 2001.3. Houston, D., Meyer, L. H., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic Staff Workloads and Job Satisfaction: Expectations and Values in Academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28:1, 17-30.4. Megis, J. (2012). MikroTik Router OS Workshop Load Balancing Best Practice. Retrieved from: http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/PL12/Load_Balancing_workshop.pdf5. Soliman, I. & Soliman, H, (1997). Academic
, 2000.[7]. S. Zappe et al., "Flipping" the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course." ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Austin, TX. 2009.[8]. M. Cavalli, "Comparison of Student Performance and Perceptions across Multiple Course Delivery Modes." ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Indianapolis, IN. 2014.[9]. T. Swift et al, “A Partial Flip, a Whole Transformation: Redesigning Sophomore Circuits.” ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Indianapolis, IN. 2014.[10]. C. Chin and D.E. Brown, "Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches." Journal of research in science teaching, vol. 37 no. 2, 2000.[11]. L.W. Anderson et al, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing
2014 from: http://www.scieng.ed.ac.uk/ltstrategy/resources/Clicker_feedback_v0_7_incl_exec_summary.pdf 3. T. Pelton and all, “Clicker Lessons: Assessing and Addressing Student Response to Audience Response Systems”, CELT – Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, Vol. 1, 2008, pg. 85- 92. Retrieved November 2014 from http://celt.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/CELT/article/view/3184 4. W. Kappers and S. Cutler, “Polleverywhere! Even in the Classroom: An investigation into the impact of using Polleverywhere in a large-lecture classroom”, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN 5. Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). “Examining the benefits and challenges of using