teaching and learning methods to power engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 An Introductory Laboratory in Power Engineering Technology: A Systems Approach Matthew TurnerAbstractThis paper presents the design of a curriculum and the associated hardware for the laboratory componentof an introductory power engineering technology course for sophomore students. The content wasdeveloped to implement a systems approach that uses the modern electric power network as aninterconnected system to be designed, analyzed, and tested. The major hardware components of theelectrical power system are studied and analyzed in individual laboratory
manufacturing scheduling, systems control and automation, distributed control of holonic systems and integrated manufacturing, agile manufacturing, virtual reality and remote laboratory applications in edu- cation. He has authored or co-authored various journal and conference publications in these areas. Mert Bal is currently the Chair and Associate Professor at the Miami University, Department of Engineering Technology, Ohio, United States of America.Dr. Farnaz Pakdel, Miami University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integrating 3D Printing into Engineering Technology Curriculum1. IntroductionThree-dimensional (3-D) printing has witnessed
paradigm in education through an NSF sponsored program. Long experience in curriculum development. Extensive knowledge in academic programs, professional development programs and on the job training plans. Motivated, fluent in English with multi-lingual capability, internationally educated professional, with work experience in different countries and international organizations. Highly diversified, person- able and outreaching communication skills. Winner of 2012 faculty of the year award at Lawrence Tech- nological University. Nominated for Teaching Excellence and Using Technology in Classroom Awards.Mr. Jerry Cuper, Lawrence Technological University Jerry Cuper is a professor and advisor in the Department of Engineering
(written, oral, and graphical forms) (ABET SLO G, SLO K) 3. Function effectively on a team (ABET SLO E, SLO I)The Senior Design course draws upon all prior courses by exposing the student to an integrated,capstone design experience. The course is a critical component of the curriculum and providesthe student with a comprehensive opportunity to utilize the skills and abilities obtained throughthe MET program core material as well as the incorporated engineering design content. Inaddition, this course represents a major design experience and allows students to demonstratethat they have the ability to work in teams to design, develop, implement and improve integratedproducts and systems. Senior Design course is not a lecture-based course
addition, incorporatingundergraduate research into the sequence was supported by the Office of UndergraduateResearch through an award from the “Integrating Undergraduate Research into the Curriculum”program. There is considerable overlap between ETAC ABET student outcomes and the desiredstudent learning outcomes from undergraduate research experiences. The two-course sequenceleveraged this overlap [5].The design of the sequence was aligned with the ETAC ABET student outcomes and such a linkwas intentional in the design of the sequence. The mapping of desired skills and current ETACABET student outcomes are summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Relevance Between Course Skills and ETAC ABET Student Outcomes Desired Course Skills
technology application centerDr. Mileta Tomovic, Old Dominion University Dr. Tomovic received BS in Mechanical Engineering from University of Belgrade, MS in Mechanical En- gineering from MIT, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from University of Michigan. Dr. Tomovic is Professor and Director of Advanced Manufacturing Institute, F. Batten College of Engineering and Tech- nology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA . Prior to joining ODU Dr. Tomovic had seventeen years of teaching and research experience at Purdue University, with emphasis on development and delivery of manufacturing curriculum, conducting applied research, and engagement with Indiana industry. While at Purdue University, Dr. Tomovic served as W. C
for a process control course in electricalengineering technology. In general, this course provides an overview of process controlprinciples and practices. Topics include analog and digital signal conditioning, temperaturesensors, mechanical sensors, optical sensors, final control, discrete-state process control, andproportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers. We devote more time to the study of the PIDcontroller in particular because there are so many applications in various industries. For example,power plants need a PID controller to obtain desired control performances. However, teachingmere theoretical concepts to students is often challenging because such concepts require teachingadvanced mathematics that is difficult to
) Meeting with Industry Focus-Group, (2) Survey potentialstudents and industry sponsors, (3) and feedback from current programs’ Industry AdvisoryBoards, (4) database research on potential job markets, and (5) Industry Letters of Support.The objective of the meeting with an industry focus-group was to determine the skills required forfuture technical managers and identify the skill-gaps in the current workforce; this informationserved as the basis to design the program-level learning objectives (PLO) and curriculum of theproposed METM program. In addition, a large survey was conducted presenting the proposedcurriculum to the potential students and potential sponsors with the objectives of validating thecurriculum and PLO’s. Furthermore, job market
curriculumhave integrated lab experiments that use equipment from well-known academic and industrialuse [16,17]. One of the main objectives of this project was to choose community colleges thathave an AS degree in a closely related curriculum to the Robotics area so that the developedcurriculum can easily be integrated. Based on these reasons, John Tylor and South Side Virginiacommunity colleges were chosen for this project [18,19].Project Approach and MethodologyA multifaceted approach was designed to develop a relevant education and workforcedevelopment program. final curriculum was developed based on inputs from industrypartnership, industry survey, and curricular survey. These activities were the most relevant sinceit informed the curricular
Paper ID #20421Project-Based Learning Integrating Engineering Technology and Engineer-ingDr. Wesley L. Stone, Western Carolina University Dr. Wes Stone is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, NC. He earned his bachelors degree from the University of Texas at Austin, masters degree from Penn State, and PhD from Georgia Tech, all in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include manufacturing processes and quality techniques. He also serves as the program director for Engineering Technology at WCU.Dr. Hugh Jack P.E., Western Carolina
Paper ID #34267Graduate Curriculum in Mechatronics and Robotics: Development andImplementation Challenges for Engineering TechnologyDr. Avimanyu Sahoo, Oklahoma State University Avimanyu Sahoo received his Ph.D. and Masters degree in Electrical Engineering from Missouri Univer- sity of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, and Indian Institute of Technology, Varanasi, India, in 2015 and 2011, respectively. He is currently working as an Assistant Professor at the Division of Engineering Technology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. His teaching interests include mechatron- ics, control systems, electrical
Paper ID #22055Assessment of Discrete Concept Knowledge, Integrated Understanding, andCreative Problem Solving in Introductory Networking CoursesProf. Mark J. Indelicato, Rochester Institute of Technology Mark J. Indelicato is an associate professor in the College of Applied Science and Technology (CAST) in the department of Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology since 1990. Previously, he was a Large Business Systems Communications En- gineer for NEC America, specializing in large scale deployment of voice and data network switching equipment. He teaches in
need to be in Excel? o Very proficient; able to manipulate, analyze, summarize, and interpret large amounts of data o Use databases from which to analyze dataThe engineers at one of the manufacturing firms outlined three essential skills thatgraduates should have include: critical thinking - to be able to adapt to every changingenvironment; the ability to communicate - when to use an email versus text versus faceto face; and flexibility, as technology changes every two years.The faculty team then were engaged in a short curriculum design camp to outline goalsand outcomes of new courses that would fit an engineering technology focus, with anoverarching purpose to integrate coursework in math, physics and engineering as
-centered research anddevelopment activities sponsored by the local industry.In this paper, we mainly focus on the curriculum, laboratory modules and other student-centricactivities for training on robotics and integrated manufacturing systems. We will also present anddiscuss the challenges and opportunities learned during the development of the new program.2. Impact and Learning OutcomesEducation and workforce development focusing on industrial robotics and automation willtransform the way that Engineering Technology courses are delivered, maximizing hands-on andexperiential learning and providing students with a high-tech, industry-based skill set [4]. TheRET program initiative described in this paper is uniquely positioned to engage with the
according to theacademic calendar. There are multiple software applications integrated into the synchronousvirtual meeting. Microsoft PowerPoints was used to present slides; Microsoft OneNote wasused as a whiteboard to solve examples and derive formulas in real-time with a writing tablet'sassistance; MATLAB was used to do simulation and demonstration in class. Other featuresfrom Zoom, such as reactions, whiteboard, chat room, and poll, were used during the class tofacilitate the discussion and communicate with students. Another significant advantage ofZoom is that it has an option to record a meeting on a password-protected cloud environment.This feature is beneficial because students can review these materials any time after the class
in different context and at different levels. As aresult some of the acquired knowledge may be forgotten by the time student graduates or it maynot be placed in the context of the overall program outcomes, thus material presented may notseem to have relevance to student’s career. An effective method to address this issue is arequired capstone course that combines a number of different disciplines into a singlecomprehensive experience. In addition to required capstone experience, authors havecollaborated in development of an elective course on modeling and simulation of mechatronicsystems. The course introduces modern computer tools and techniques which integrates numberof different areas including statics, strength of materials, dynamics
computer-based imaging or imageprocessing aspects were used on as-needed basis for senior capstone projects.With the approval of the curriculum committee, an undergraduate course with thetitle “Applied Computer Vision for Sensing and Automation” was approved to beoffered as an experimental course at 4xxx (senior) level. The course was designedas a three-credit hour course in a sixteen–week semester based system. Thecourse consisted of two lecture classes (each for 50 minutes) and one two-hourlaboratory component. This course initially required prior experience withcomputer programming and prerequisite of a sophomore level mathematics class.This course was offered as a technical elective.This course was initially offered in Fall 2014. It has been
Paper ID #12619Incorporating Training In Research & Research Methods into the Under-graduate Curriculum in Engineering and Engineering Technology-(E&ET).Dr. Cyril B OKHIO, Kennesaw State University Cyril B. Okhio is a Faculty at the Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering & Engineering Tech- nology, Kennesaw State University and an Adjunct Professor at Clark Atlanta University’s Dual Degree Engineering Program. He earned his B.S. (Engineering) and Ph.D. (Mechanical Engineering) degrees from, and was an (Science and Engineering Research Council) SERC Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the University of London
. Czekanski et al. studiedthe challenges in engineering education from both educators' and industrials points of view. Theyproposed a vertical and lateral method based on incorporating the strength of existingeducational systems and integrating them with fundamental engineering core courses. From theirstudy, they found that the use of this proposed vertical and lateral learning method can narrowthe gap between academic, industrial, and students' expectations. Their study was based on afour-year curriculum though and it did not zoom on the challenges of the individual courses [16].The question remains how to deliver an educational environment where engineering studentsgraduate with a good comprehension of general engineering design skills, practical
align curriculum goals to the courses using a beginning level, andintermediate, and advanced level skill assessment [6]. With substantial help and guidance from auniversity center dedicated to curriculum design, a full analysis of the proposed BSET program’slearning goals, outcomes, and proficiencies was completed and mapped to the proposed coursesusing UCAT’s curriculum design process. A signature part of the BSET degree is thedevelopment of an integrated set of courses that combines applied physics, math and engineeringwhich will be developed in the near future for delivery in Autumn 2020.The proposed BSET is designed to meet the program educational outcomes for accreditationby ABET from the Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission
Prov-ost’s Office to find the areas where we could extend deadlines – we received an additional monthto complete new course and new program proposals – and where we needed permission to bendrules or do things out of order, such as admitting students into programs that did not yet officiallyexist. Opening a dialog with the ACC, Registrar’s Office, and Provost’s Office early and workingwith them to find the places where there was flexibility in the system allowed us to stay on trackand maintain the President’s goal of having engineering graduates in spring 2016.The final important part of the curricular planning and implementation was to support the peoplewho had to do the work of the full curriculum development to allow us to teach the courses
Paper ID #19053Implementing Hands-on Experiments in an Engineering Technology Intro-ductory CourseDr. Carmen Cioc, The University of ToledoDr. Sorin Cioc, The University of ToledoZachary Linkous, University of Toledo c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Implementing Hands-On Experiments to an Engineering Technology Introductory CourseAbstractThe mechanical engineering technology (MET) students at the University of Toledo start theircurriculum with a three-credit hour course entitled “Computers for Engineering Technology”.Over the years, this class was subject to many changes with
American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Restructuring Digital Design Courses in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Programs, Preparing the Engineer of 2020AbstractAs the complexity of microelectronic systems is steadily increasing, universities must updatetheir curriculum to cope with the increased demands of the industry. New technologies and toolsare frequently introduced into the engineering workplace, and educational programs must find away to integrate many of these into their offerings. In the areas of digital system design, theindustrial use of programmable logic devices (FPGA, CPLD), associated EDA tools and HDLlanguages is increasing rapidly and consequently the demand for highly qualified engineers withthis
three times as difficult to fill in the nextthree years.The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley has undertaken an initiative to address the skills gapin this very important area of manufacturing. This paper presents the details on the developmentof an integrated senior design and internship program that has helped to mitigate the difficult-to-fill workforce needs for the partnering industry in metrology and advanced manufacturingthrough the university and industry partnership. Many more programs of this nature are requiredto address the problem of the skills gap prevailing in the advanced manufacturing sector.The senior design project and internship are integrated with the engineering technologycurriculum to address this challenging problem
paper describes an effort to replicate best practices at Sam Houston State University in theimplementation of a cross-disciplinary course designed to provide students from diversedemographics with a more effective ramp into undergraduate research. The specific aim of thecourse was to provide students from diverse backgrounds with a curriculum designed to buildcommunity, introduce students to research faculty, and to counteract a perceived lack of researchreadiness. The student learning goals for the course included providing opportunities for studentsto: study key historical examples of excellent research; interact with faculty researchers whoperform projects across the STEM disciplines; and to explore the similarities and differencesbetween
– Creating a community of practice of SEEFs, instructors,administrators, student employees and other teaching-focused roles is a key part of creatinglasting organizational change through the SEEF program, due to the limited terms of the SEEFroles. Linking SEEFs into existing communities focused on teaching within an organization,such as within Stanford University’s CTL organization, also helps connect and create lastingarchives and resources for teaching and learning.Supporting long-term impact – SEEFs creating impact, including integrating active learning intothe undergraduate curriculums in their respective discipline, is dependent on both the continuedpresence of a SEEF role and the support from faculty and administrators to support
Paper ID #15424Time and Cost Analysis of Implementing a Mechatronic Experience in an En-gineering Technology CourseMr. John R Haughery, Iowa State University John Haughery is currently a graduate fellow in the department of Agriculture and Biosystems Engineer- ing at Iowa State University, where he is pursuing a PhD in Industrial and Agricultural Technology. His technical experience and interests include electrical energy systems, industrial controls, and mechatron- ics. Currently he is researching the integration of mechatronic-based projects into freshman engineering and technology curricula with the intent of
that resulted in the 2014 report, STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. He was the study director for the project that resulted in publication of Standards for K-12 Engineering Education? (2010) and Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects (2009), an analysis of efforts to teach engineering to U.S. school children. He oversaw the NSF-funded project that resulted in the 2013 publication of Messaging for Engineering: From Research to Action and the 2008 publication of Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering and was co-editor of the reports Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing
. Our community college willcollaborate with our Industry Advisory Board (IAB), CWD, and educational partners to (a) integrate an innovativeteaching model for technician education that includes a formalized shadowing and internship program and connectsstudents to opportunities in business and entrepreneurship. (b) require students to take a manufacturing laboratorycourse to introduce hands-on industry-related experiences; (c) include certifications that award digital badges, creditfor military training, and industry experience in our engineering technology program. It is our intention that this modelfor an enhanced educational experience designed to increase workforce readiness of students will become a blueprintfor other programs and
is especially true for an engineering technologycurriculum that requires graduates to be familiar with the modern tools used in industry,but is common in engineering curriculum as well. The unique topics examined in thispaper are the methods used to teach FEA to develop skills for accurate analysis andreporting of results in a format required by industry professionals.Common modeling errors are discussed in this paper, such as element selection whichcan greatly affect the outcome of the analysis. Too often, a new analyst will apply meshesto the model without understanding why proper element selection is important. With FEsoftware being easier to use, more and more people will use default elements withoutunderstanding how the elements behave