- Conference Session
- Student Success in ET
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Gretchen Dietz, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Jordan C Bullington-Miller
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
belonging. We aim to interview 10 participants chosen at randomfrom Phase 1’s survey data. We are not targeting any specific students or experiences because wewant to know about all experiences, not just the exemplary, in order to understand variousaspects of first-generation students’ experiences in engineering technology. Participants will begiven $50 Amazon gift cards for their time.Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews, in person and virtuallyover Zoom. We anticipate that interviews will last about an hour, and participants will becompensated for their time with gift cards. The first half of the interviews will be used to buildrapport and gain an understanding of their backgrounds and decisions thus far for their
- Conference Session
- Experiential Learning in ET Programs II
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University ; Dyane Roesel, Purdue University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
interests, it cultivates a positivelearning atmosphere, promoting intrinsic motivation and a desire to excel academically [7]. Thesymbiotic relationship between student motivation and the faculty's ability to engage creates anenvironment conducive to meaningful and impactful learning experiences.Cultural Sensitivity: Students often bring a rich tapestry of artistic and personal beliefs to thelearning environment, shaping their perspectives and influencing their approach to education.Recognizing and understanding these diverse beliefs is crucial for faculty to foster an inclusivelearning environment. Cultural and personal backgrounds can significantly impact a student'slearning style, preferences, and expectations [8]. Faculty members who take the
- Conference Session
- Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Poster Session
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Vassilios Tzouanas, University of Houston; Lisa Deane Morano, University of Houston
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
were evaluated through surveys at the start, mid-pointand end of the program by an external program evaluator. Through these numerous surveys wedocumented student self-assessment of their change in knowledge and skills. After a year in theprogram most students (usually seven out of eight or eight out of eight) reported the programinfluenced their career area and their level of confidence pursuing a career area. Students as acohort dramatically increased their confidence in how to prepare an academic poster, participatein a professional meeting, plan a controlled experiment, engage in an effective mentoringrelationship, find an internship that matched their interests and explore graduate degrees thatinterest them. At the start of the program
- Conference Session
- Assessment and Continuous Improvement
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
John W Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
cameout that some faculty members were already allowing students to use these calculators. Afterdiscussion, the faculty voted to move forward with this proposal.Next, the department sought input from other constituent groups: industrial employers throughthe department’s Industrial Advisory Board, alumni, and current students.As representatives of companies in the region who hire our students and graduates, thedepartment sought input from our Industrial Advisory Board (IAB). With the IAB, thedepartment used surveys as well as discussions in IAB meetings.The proposal was presented and discussed at an IAB meeting on April 30th, 2021. A separate setof minutes covered this part of the meeting. The question put to the IAB members was this:would
- Conference Session
- Engineering Technology Division Curriculum Development
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Mohamed Gharib, Texas A&M University; Michael A. de Miranda, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
- time, given the rapidly changing landscape of technology and industry needs. • Stakeholder Involvement: Involving various stakeholders, including industry professionals, alumni, and students, in the decision-making process is crucial. Balancing the diverse interests and expectations of these groups can be a challenge. • Interdisciplinary Integration: With the increasing importance of interdisciplinary skills in engineering, incorporating diverse subjects into the curriculum can be challenging. Coordinating efforts across different departments or schools within an institution can be complex. A positive engineering and education faculty collaboration is essential to bringing about real change in the
- Conference Session
- Assessment and Continuous Improvement
- Collection
- 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Orlando M Ayala, Old Dominion University; Kristie Gutierrez, Old Dominion University; Isaac Koduah Kumi, Old Dominion University; Francisco Cima; Stacie I Ringleb, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University; Danielle Marie Rhemer, Old Dominion University; Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University; Jennifer Jill Kidd, Old Dominion University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
factors that negatively affected it and consider how your motivation may have changed over time. 5. How did teaching an online lesson rather than an in-person lesson change the way this project affected you? For example, do you think you learned more or less as a result? Did you learn different knowledge or skills than you would have learned by preparing for and teaching a face-to-face lesson? Please explain your response. 6. What did you learn from working with the education students? Please explain. 7. How did this project affect your vision of teaching careers? 8. How has your understanding of fluid mechanics changed as a result of this project? As explained in detail in a previous publication [18], when analyzing