in the early2000’s Kansas was the epicenter for renewed evolution debates related to K-12 curriculumchanges. Science standards were changed to reflect “Intelligent Design” for 2 years before beingrescinded in 2005).The 2009 Transportation Conference survey results showed that contact with local (county andcity) officials (30%) was double that with state officials. However, consistent with statepercentages, fewer than 10% of the respondents had contact with local school board officials.In June 2010, the authors co-presented to the KSPE Annual Meeting using similar content to the2006 ASEE Midwest Section presentation. However, the entire morning of the conference wasfocused on legislative issues and the final presentation of the morning was
Department of States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2015. 4. J. S. Nye, Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1990. 5. N. J. Cull, Public diplomacy before Gullion: The evolution of a phrase. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. London, England: Routledge, 2008. 6. V. C. Turekian, P. D. Gluckman, T. Kishi, and R. W. Grimes, “Science diplomacy: A pragmatic perspective from the inside,” Science & Diplomacy, vol. 6, no. 5., 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspective. [Accessed April 12, 2021].7. D. B. Oerther, “The Fulbright program at 70 years old,” Environmental Engineer and Scientist, vol. 52, no
the Implementation of Grand Challenge Scholars Program”. Research in Educational Development 23, 63-68.[2] Ministry of Education. (2010). “The Ministry of Education Start to Implement A Plan for Educating and Training Outstanding Engineers —— for the Industry, the World and the Future, the Culture of Excellence Talented Engineer”. China University Teaching 07, 4-5.[3] Zuo, J. (2014).“The Study on Enforcing Route of‘The Outstanding Plan’Based on the Angle of University-Enterprise Collaboration”.China Higher Education Research 02, 70-73.[4] Zhang, W., Liu, S., Hao, X., Duan, Z. (2013). “Enterprises Ambassador Model: a New Idea to Enhance University-Enterprise cooperation”.Research in Higher Education of
likely to be intense?4. How should engineering research be enriched to integrate these socio-political aspects with the purely technical engineering research subjects? Bibliography & ResourcesBaillie, C., Pawley, A. and Riley, D.M., eds. (2012). Engineering and Social Justice: In the university and beyond. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Banfield, J. & Tripathi, S. (2006). Conflict-sensitive business practices: Engineering contractors and their clients. Page 26.1216.8 London, UK: International Alert. Retrieved from http://www.international- alert.org/resources/publications/csbp-engineering
, anonymous survey stage. 1. How many SFTP conferences have you attended and when? How did you attend them (in person or through distance education)? 2. What is your background (education, professional)? 3. What did you expect to get out of the conference(s)? Were your expectations met? 4. Was the conference an efficient use of your time? Would there be any way to make it more efficient? 5. How relevant was the conference to your education at CU and to your anticipated career? How well did the conferences tie into your coursework? Page 11.575.4 6. Is the conference format effective? What might make it more effective
Grassroots level policy movements, professional associations and lobbying 10 1&2 Final Project PresentationReading Response Papers (3) – Short essays (minimum 2 pages double-spaced). May includereadings from textbook or from outside sources.Framing the Problem Papers (1) – Short essay (minimum 2 pages – Max 4 pages double-spaced) about an Engineering and Public Policy issue that you have been approved to writeabout. May include readings from textbook or from outside sources.Positional Papers (2) – Short arguments (minimum 3 pages double-spaced) For Positional Paper1, identify a situation, determine applicable decision-making framework(s), and argue oneposition for or against. For the second Positional Paper, write
, W., Lv, X., Fan, H. (2010). “A New Strategy for Outstanding Engineering Talents Training in the USA: A Review on the Implementation of Grand Challenge Scholars Program”. Research in Educational Development 23, 63-68.[2] Ministry of Education. (2010). “The Ministry of Education Start to Implement A 19 Plan for Educating and Training Outstanding Engineers —— for the Industry, the World and the Future, the Culture of Excellence Talented Engineer”. China University Teaching 07, 4-5.[3] Zuo, J. (2014). “The Study on Enforcing Route of ‘The Outstanding Plan’ Based on the Angle of University-Enterprise Collaboration” . China Higher Education Research 02, 70-73.[4] Zhang, W., Liu, S., Hao, X
to attempt this project allowed theproject to proceed.Bibliography1. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” Nov. 2006, p.2. Page 12.1405.132. Wheeler, E. and McDonald, R.L., ”Writing in Engineering Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89, no. 4, 2000, pp. 481-486.3. Taylor, W.L., “Using Drafts in History 231: American Economic Development,” Writing Across the Curriculum, vol. 8, August 1997, pp. 10-12.4. Manuel-Dupont, S., “Writing-Across-the-Curriculum in an Engineering Program,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 1, 1996, pp. 35-40.5. Fitzpatrick