- Conference Session
- Aspects of Public Policy in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Charles Pringle, Central Washington University; William Bender, Central Washington University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering and Public Policy
WorkUnfortunately this work did not adequately address the impacts to student learning by changingfrom a five to four day weeks. A complete analysis that measures outcomes of the same classesoffered five or four days a week would provide data to form an analysis on the impact to studentlearning. Page 15.438.13ReferencesBibliography1. Durst, S. L. (1999). Assessing the effect of family-friendly programs on public organizations. Review of PublicPersonnel Administration 19(3).2. Facer, R. L., Arbon, C. A., Wadsworth, L.L. (2009). Cities Leading the Way: The Use of Alternative WorkSchedules. Investment Management Consultants Association Publication. www.imca.org3
- Conference Session
- Aspects of Public Policy in Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Todd Myers, Ohio University; Ben Stuart, Ohio University-Athens
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering and Public Policy
Grassroots level policy movements, professional associations and lobbying 10 1&2 Final Project PresentationReading Response Papers (3) – Short essays (minimum 2 pages double-spaced). May includereadings from textbook or from outside sources.Framing the Problem Papers (1) – Short essay (minimum 2 pages – Max 4 pages double-spaced) about an Engineering and Public Policy issue that you have been approved to writeabout. May include readings from textbook or from outside sources.Positional Papers (2) – Short arguments (minimum 3 pages double-spaced) For Positional Paper1, identify a situation, determine applicable decision-making framework(s), and argue oneposition for or against. For the second Positional Paper, write