Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 5 results

Copyright: Infringement, Remedies, and Defenses in a Pandemic Environment

Conference Session
Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Salvatore Marsico, Pennsylvania State University, Wilkes-Barre Campus
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy
distance learning faculty in whichthe work is developed specifically for the online asynchronous delivery copyright ownershipwill likely vest in the university as a “work for hire”. As the pandemic marches on these linesmay blur and the university may modify their copyright policy to include all work preparedfor the purpose of delivering course content in any format and/or any platform includinglearning management systems.b. Bayh-Dole Act: Federal Sponsored ContractsIntellectual property (IP), specifically patents, generally vests in the creator(s) when notwithin their scope of work; i.e., “work for hire”. The Bayh-Dole Act [18] provides thatinventions arising from government sponsored research are to be used to promote theirutilization as well as
Relevance Score: 0.009334552

Research on the Diffusion of Innovation Within Higher Education: Case of Double First-rate Initiative in the Chinese Mainland

Conference Session
Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ming Li, Beijing Foreign Studies University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy
strategic decision made by the Central Commit-tee of CPC and the State Council of PRC. Over the past four years, it has shown unique characteris-tics different from previous higher educational policies. The Diffusion of Innovation Theory, tosome extent, can be introduced.2.2 Analysis model of the diffusion of “Double First-rate” InitiativeFrances S. Berry and William D. Berry (1990) integrated the internal decision-making model andexternal diffusion model, and proposed an integrated diffusion of innovation model. The modelhas become a mainstream model of diffusion of innovation in the West for a long time. This re-search revises the Berry’s diffusion of innovation model, expands the connotation of influencingfactors and mechanism factors, and tries
Relevance Score: 0.00808396

Impacts of Governmental Policy Actions on University Faculty and Students in Wisconsin

Conference Session
Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
John R. Reisel P.E., University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy
/politics/2019/05/28/gop-lawmakers-extending- university-wisconsin-tuition-freeze/1227519001/ (accessed December 2020).[8] University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents. https://www.wisconsin.edu/regents/meetingmaterials/ (accessed December 2020). Note: the annual data for the previous year typically appears in the December meeting material for the Business and Finance Committee.[9] ASEE online profiles of Colleges. https://www.asee.org/papers-and- publications/publications/college-profiles#Online_Profiles (accessed December 2020).[10] University of Wisconsin-Madison Student Enrollment. https://uwmadison.app.box.com/s/d7901sp12wp0zxclyc9hpm2wrspfxf99/file/639595697 808 (accessed December 2020).[11
Relevance Score: 0.008002711

Incorporating Contemporary Policy Issues in Science and Engineering Curricula

Conference Session
Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Amro El Badawy, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Marie Yeung, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; James L. Hanson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Nazli Yesiller, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy
assisted with laboratory experiments essential for accomplishing the curricularintervention described in this study.References[1] C. J. King, “Restructuring Engineering Education: Why, How And When?,” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Jan. 2012.[2] J. Mendoza-Garcia, I. B. Ngambeki, L. J. Behbehani, D. Evangelou, S. C. Rao, and M. F.Cox, “Defining the Knowledge and Skills that Enable Engineers to Participate in Public Policy,”in Proceedings of the 119th American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio TX, USA, June 10-13, Paper ID 4262, 2012.[3] N. Yesiller, J. L. Hanson, A. Sohn, S. Tjan, “Emissions of Trace Gases from Landfills,” inProceedings of the 19th International
Relevance Score: 0.008002711

Workshop Result: Teaching Science Diplomacy to Environmental Engineering Researchers

Conference Session
Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science and Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy
Department of States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2015. 4. J. S. Nye, Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1990. 5. N. J. Cull, Public diplomacy before Gullion: The evolution of a phrase. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. London, England: Routledge, 2008. 6. V. C. Turekian, P. D. Gluckman, T. Kishi, and R. W. Grimes, “Science diplomacy: A pragmatic perspective from the inside,” Science & Diplomacy, vol. 6, no. 5., 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspective. [Accessed April 12, 2021].7. D. B. Oerther, “The Fulbright program at 70 years old,” Environmental Engineer and Scientist, vol. 52, no
Relevance Score: 0.004667276