Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tammy Mackenzie, The Aula Fellowship; Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida; Rubaina Khan, University of Toronto; Victoria Kuketz; Leslie Salgado, University of Calgary; Branislav Radeljić, Aula Fellowship for AI Science, Tech, and Policy; Peer Herholz, Northwestern University; Awa Samaké; Sylvie T. Leduc, York University; Sreyoshi Bhaduri, Private Corporation

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

progress, this is also in-tended as a call to action inviting collaboration, feedback, and shared learning among peers,researchers, and engineering educators who are similarly committed to driving meaningfulchange in this area. By fostering a network of engaged contributors, we hope to build astronger, more resilient foundation for long-term impact.References [1] The Aula Fellowship, “The aula fellowship,” 2025, accessed: 2025-05-01. [Online]. Available: https://theaulafellowship.org/ [2] D. C. North, “Institutions, institutional change and economic performance,” Cambridge University, 1990. [3] J. P. Olsen, “Institutional design in democratic contexts,” Journal of Political Philoso- phy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 203–229, 1997. [4] C. R

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monika Tomar, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Mario Ventresca, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

developing and assessing Professional Development programs for these students.Mario Ventresca, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Game Theoretic Course Policy Design for Fair Grading in Team-Based Collaborative AssignmentsAbstractTeam-based projects are widely adopted because collaborative learning improves teamwork andprofessional skills while enhancing student engagement and academic achievement. However,free-riding, uneven effort distribution and misreporting remain endemic in group assignments,undermining fairness in grading and learning outcomes. Traditional peer-evaluation andcalibration meetings are vulnerable to bias

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard J. Puerzer, Hofstra University; David M. Rooney, Hofstra University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

not appear to weigh it as an absolute sine qua non for a favorable tenure decision.Another takeaway is that many schools may still be evolving their criteria, as several suggest thatthere are no specific written guidelines, and yet a predominant culture of what constitutessufficient scholarly productivity exists.Herewith their comments:Schools not requiring grant activity: 1) I typically can give up to ~$25K in start up funding (from Academic Affairs), and can also help acquire specialized equipment that is necessary for their research that does not count against their start up (from School of Engineering funds). . . Grant writing is strongly encouraged, but not required for us. . . For tenure, they must be excellent

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trina L. Fletcher, Florida International University; Simone Nicholson, Florida International University; Christopher Alexander Carr, George Mason University; Tina Fletcher; Brittany Boyd

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

enhance their research administration, grant writing, andmanagement capabilities and foster a culture that values research excellence, thus making themmore competitive and poised to achieve Research 1 status (Gasman & Commodore, 2014).These recommendations underscore the necessity of a comprehensive approach to bolsterHBCUs in their quest for research preeminence. By addressing funding inequities, encouragingstrategic partnerships, and enhancing internal research capabilities, policymakers can cultivate anecosystem wherein HBCUs can compete and be positioned to excel as premier researchinstitutions.Implications for HBCUsOur study evaluates the necessity of increasing opportunities for HBCUs to speak to broaderphilanthropic, industry, research