Paper ID #14568Curiosity, Connection, Creating Value: Improving Service Learning by Ap-plying the Entrepreneurial MindsetDr. John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University John K. Estell is a Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science at Ohio Northern Uni- versity. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and his B.S.C.S.E. degree in computer science and engineering from The University of Toledo. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process through use of per- formance vectors and evaluation heuristics, first-year
Paper ID #17315Teaching Students How to Create Innovative Design Solutions Within a Prod-uct Development ContextDr. Darren C. Olson, Central Washington University Dr. Olson teaches at Central Washington University, where he is the coordinator of the M.S. program in Engineering Technology. He earned a Ph.D. in Technology Management from Indiana State University, specializing in Quality Systems. He also earned an M.Ed. from Bowling Green State University in Career and Technology Education, and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. His interests are related to innovative problem solving, technology
at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), where he has been involved in educational research on massive open online courses. His research interests lie at the intersection of psychology, sociology, business, and law. He will soon begin a joint degree program at UIUC, pursuing both a Master of Business Administration and a Master of Human Resources and Industrial Relations.Dr. Lalit Patil, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Patil is the principal researcher on the Educate to Innovate Project. Previously, he was the principal re- searcher on the Lifelong Learning Imperative project. He is a postdoctoral research fellow with Mechan- ical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at
Paper ID #11727Innovative Confidence: what engineering educators can do and say to gradu-ate more effective innovators and intrapreneursDr. Leo E. Hanifin, University of Detroit Mercy After engineering positions in the computer, aerospace and automotive industries, Dr. Hanifin led a re- search center focused on manufacturing technology at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute for eleven years. He then served as Dean of the College of Engineering and Science at the University of Detroit Mercy for twenty-one years. He is now retired from full-time academic responsibilities, but continues to consult in higher education, study
2006-2056: CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR TECHNOPOLIS CREATIONCarmo D'Cruz, Florida Tech Dr. Carmo A. D’Cruz is Associate Professor in the Engineering Systems Department at Florida Tech. A twenty-year veteran of the semiconductor industry, Dr. D’Cruz has studied and taught at Engineering and Business schools. His experience ranges from R&D and engineering to manufacturing, operations, marketing and Business Development. His research areas include Technopolis Creation and Engineering Entrepreneurship. He has developed pioneering courses in Systems Engineering Entrepreneurship, Technical Marketing, High Tech Product Strategy and Technology Commercialization Strategies. He has a BSEE from the
AC 2012-5569: CRITICAL IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEUR-SHIP EXEMPLIFIED IN SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECTSDr. Noel E. Bormann P.E., Gonzaga University Noel E. Bormann, P.E., Ph.D., professor and Chair, Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Gonzaga University, 502 E. Boone Ave., Spokane, WA 99258-0026.Dr. Mara London, Gonzaga UniversityMr. Spencer Joseph FryMr. Andrew Douglas Matsumoto, Gonzaga University School of EngineeringMs. Melanie Ruth Walter Page 25.366.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Critical importance of social
Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Quantitative Assessment of All-Class Project-based Undergraduate Course on Graduates Career Dr. Emil H Salib, Eric Walisko Integrated Science & Technology Department, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA salibeh@jmu.edu, waliskev@dukes.jmu.eduAbstractThe process of creating innovative technology applications is shifting to smaller developmentteams of entrepreneurial minded individuals who use a dynamic landscape of tools and muchcreativity. This new work environment calls for novel methods to best prepare its work force. Inthis paper we describe an All-Class Project-based
Paper ID #19060Institutionalizing Campus Innovation and Entrepreneurship Programmingby Optimizing a Faculty Grantmaking Process: A Case StudyVictoria Matthew, VentureWell Victoria Matthew is Senior Program Officer for Faculty Development at VentureWell, where she plays a lead role in the Pathways to Innovation Program, Epicenter’s faculty development and engagement strategy. She designs in-person and online convenings, engages experts, and curates content that fosters the Pathways faculty goals of integrating entrepreneurship and innovation into undergraduate engineering. Prior to joining VentureWell, Victoria worked for
Paper ID #31189A Summer Program Focused on Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset intheContext of the NAE Grand Challenges for EngineeringDr. Jared Schoepf, Arizona State University Jared Schoepf is the Director of Operations for Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) at Arizona State University. Jared received his PhD in Chemical Engineering at ASU, developing a tiered approach to rapidly detect nanomaterials in the environment and consumer products. Jared has been a lecturer of EPICS for 6 years, mentoring over 300 teams. Currently he teaches introduction to engineering, EPICS, and chemical engineering courses
.” things Hands on Take things apart, build things “I also got involved with the robotics team and had always had a knack for using tools and building things.” Things work How/why things work “By going into engineering, we must be curious about how things work.” Negative Curiosity as a distraction, lacking “I think my curiosity and constant Curiosity in certain contexts wondering, causes my mind to wander a lot when I am in class.” Future
by having the students answer the survey items with onecourse in mind, which could be the least active part of the program’s overall curricula. Thesefindings may not be generalizable to other engineering programs, since our sample was rathersmall (n=49).Recommended action steps for other programs1. For a successful implementation of active learning, the instructor should clearly explain (or have the students create) the learning goals and outcomes for students in the course.2. Instructors should take steps to build a positive learning community and mentor students in person when class sizes allow. This reduces resistance and fear when students are in an unfamiliar learning environment.3. Grading plays an essential role in students