identifying the people and programs already bringing positive change around the world, we empower them to extend their reach, deepen their impact and fundamentally improve society.”8There are large efforts underway to systematically address the development of socialentrepreneurs, for example at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business, they present aconcept that indicates that the social entrepreneur is a development of the traditionalentrepreneur by identifying the difference: “We should build our understanding of social entrepreneurship on this strong tradition of entrepreneurship theory and research. Social entrepreneurs are one species in the genus entrepreneur. They are entrepreneurs with a social mission. However
Paper ID #9947The Innovation Competencies - Implications for Educating the Engineer ofthe FutureProf. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Dean of Innovation and Engagement and Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman. He joined Rose-Hulman in 2001 and his teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, design, quality, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, his industry experience includes roles as cofounder and Chief Operating Officer at Montronix and development manager at Kennametal. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois
) Page 23.379.7 • Best practices for preparing persuasive presentations 9,24 (Abrams, R. & Vallone, J) Standard techniques for assessing a new venture idea (market analysis, competitor analysis,people and production strategies, and financial analysis) are identified in all of the leading 22,23,25entrepreneurship texts in including those by Baringer, Kuratko, and Vesper and skillsincorporating this knowledge are cited as critical aspects of entrepreneurial behavior byMitchelmore, S. & Rowley’s and Fiet’s research 18,19.The understandings that are 'good to know' based upon prior entrepreneurship research by Vespercover the following: 15,26
Paper ID #18557Entrepreneurial Motivations for High-Interest StudentsMr. Benjamin James Call, Utah State University - Engineering Education Benjamin Call graduated with his Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2006 from Utah State University. After eight years with NAVAIR, he has returned to pursue a PhD in Engineering Education. He is funded by the Presidential Doctoral Research Fellowship. His research interests range from spatial ability to sophomore-level engineering curricula and from engineering internships to student entrepreneurship.Dr. Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge
Healthcare through Industry PartnershipsAbstractThis paper highlights the establishment of an on-campus center for biomedical engineeringdesign and innovation (BioInnovation and Design Lab) that partners with industry to applydesign thinking and entrepreneurial skills to solve 21st-century problems across biomedicalfields. The students, faculty, and research staff affiliated with the Lab leverage an authenticdesign process that sources real-world engineering problems and engages multidisciplinaryteams of engineers, scientists, and business professionals in an immersive and iterativeprototyping process. To scale and sustain the impact of the Lab, a three-way value propositionwas developed that aimed to deliver value to the students, faculty, and
SVP remote experiment shows in Figure 3. Smart materials in structuralapplications with a strong emphasis on vibration control was introduced to graduate students withthis course. To successfully develop the optimized remote SVP experiment application, there arefour parts need to be implemented. Figure 3: Block Diagram of the LabVIEW Program for SVP Remote Experiment• The SVP Device. The SVP as shown in Figure 4 (a), has a two-story flexible steel frame fixed on top of a plexi-glass box. In the plexi-glass box, there are electric circuit boards made to control the experiment. It is designed and built by students in the Smart Materials and Structures Laboratory at the University of Houston. Other than the flexible steel frame, the
EMpedagogies that are purposefully designed around best diversity and inclusion practices impactstudent motivation and self-efficacy? This work presents a summary of the interventions andassessments used, along with a narrative of the authors’ progress toward developing thisresearch. Preliminary data is presented; however, given the small sample size of data collected,the data are used to illustrate the appropriateness of the research methods at this stage of theresearch. Importantly, the authors share key insights into the specific pedagogical approaches,challenges in implementation of the interventions, and assessment strategies moving forward inthe project.3. Context of the ResearchThe authors have focused this work on two different active learning
developeda basic 6-step AHP-based creativity process, shown in Table 2, to teach design creativity toundergraduate engineering students. Table 2. The Proposed AHP-based Creativity ProcessStep 1. Knowledge CollectionThe mission requirements for the targeted design question will be introduced to the class. The reference materialsof the domain knowledge and technology should be made available to students.Step 2. Concept GenerationStudents are encouraged to discuss as a team and propose possible design concepts to fulfill the missionrequirements. Students are encouraged to record their discussions and make the sketches of the proposed designs.Step 3. Criteria GenerationPossible criteria used to weight and select the best design
Paper ID #12985Innovation to Entrepreneurship in the First Year Engineering ExperienceProf. Jose Antonio Riofrio, Western New England University Jos´e A Riofr´ıo received his B.S. in Engineering Physics from Elizabethtown College in 2003, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 2005 and 2008, respectively. At Vanderbilt, Jos´e focused his research in controls, mechatronics and mechanical design. After obtaining his Ph.D., Jos´e worked in the Fluid Power industry designing servo-pneumatic control systems for various motion-control applications, such as packaging, automation, and
Management, the Babson Entrepreneurship Research conference, and the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, and has several refereed publications and book chapters. Dr. Neck is the Faculty Coordinator of REFLECT, a reunion program for alumni of the Price-Babson Symposium for Entrepreneurship Educators and is currently designing a NSF-funded education program to help engineering educators infuse entrepreneurship into schools of engineering. At Babson, she teaches Entrepreneurship & New Venture Creation and the Foundation Management Experience, an introductory course that requires students to create, start, manage and liquidate a business.John Bourne, Olin
Academics in the Center for Entrepreneurship and was responsible for building the Program in Entrepreneurship for UM undergraduates, co-developing the masters level entrepreneur- ship program, and launching the biomedical engineering graduate design program. Aileen has received a number of awards for her teaching, including the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the UM ASEE Outstanding Professor Award and the Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award. Prior to joining the University of Michigan faculty, she worked in the private sector gaining experience in biotech, defense, and medical device testing at large companies and start-ups. Aileen’s current research areas include en- trepreneurship engineering education, impact
associated with Penn State and Virginia Tech. She earned her BA from Stanford University and an MBA from Northeastern University.Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluation and research consultant at SageFox Consulting Group. Thema worked as a researcher and evaluator in the areas of mental health, STEM education and commercializa- tion. She has taught in the K-12 environment, served as an instructor and invited guest lecturer for courses in leadership, statistics and cross-cultural psychology at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Thema completed her Master’s Degree in Developmental Psychology at Howard University and her PhD in Sci- ence, Technology and Innovation Policy at
Educational Objectives andProgram Student Outcomes. Understanding the role of these items in how they define a programis central to understanding the purpose of a program in how it is attempting to relate itscurriculum to the future of its graduates.ABET educational objectives and student outcomes can best be understood from a top-down perspective.[4] Which of these comes first is not at all a chicken-and-egg argument.Educational objectives come first. Then student outcomes can be properly understood andtake on a useful meaning. The educational objectives are defined in terms of the earlycareer paths the graduates of the engineering program are being prepared for andgenerally expected to follow. In other words, once the students leave the academic
graduate, having an entrepreneurial mindset will help thembecome creative and valuable engineers. “EML is not about start-ups, it is about thinkingcreatively and creating value for society” [2]. However, it is not easy for students to build upentrepreneurial skills within one course or a couple of courses in an already crowded engineeringprogram. The College of Engineering (CoE) at Colorado Technical University (CTU) decided toembed entrepreneurial skills in engineering learning activities for a number of coursesthroughout the program curriculum, requiring an efficient and integrated process. Byincorporating EML in different course sequences such as circuits, electronic design, andcommunication sequences, students will have the opportunity to
Paper ID #9605Deconstructing the Innovator’s DNAMr. Paul David Mathis, Engineering Education Paul Mathis is a PhD student in the school of Engineering Education and a council member for ASEE student chapter at Purdue University. He has a bachelors degree in Physical Science and a Masters in Education Curriculum. His areas of interest are design, innovation, creativity and improving skills of future engineers. pmathis@purdue.edu.Mr. Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nicholas D. Fila is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette. His research interests
, rather than developing the concept in depth or Deleted: ttackling the challenges of achieving the ideal in a curriculum. Nonetheless, there still appears to Deleted: edbe a significant amount of creative curriculum design and rigorous assessment aimed at makingthe T-shaped ideal a reality.How and Why Is the German Discourse Different?We began this research expecting to find more similarity than we ultimately did. This section ofthe paper offers a few possible explanations for how and why the German discourse is so Deleted: somedifferent. The discussion about T-shaped engineers appears only as a very thin thread because Deleted: offersthe German literature on this topic is rare and not
, wheregraduates take jobs in finance (10-17%), consulting (7-11%), law (12-17%), and medicine (12-16%), or go on to graduate school (8-9%)3. If our best and brightest inspire to attend eliteschools and upon graduation take jobs, rather than create businesses, one may ask if ourinstructional approach to teaching entrepreneurship is changing mindsets. Upon reflection, wemust ask ourselves, “Does an educational experience infused with entrepreneurship create moreentrepreneurial minded people?”, and more specifically, “How can we assess if a change inmindset is occurring on our campus?”There are two macroscale approaches to conducting research on the subject of entrepreneurship,with one focusing on the impact of entrepreneurship in the economy and how
for Engineering Education, 2007 The Ethics, Leadership, and Entrepreneurship Seminar: Helping Students to Become LeadersAbstractRecently, the Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering Technology (EET/TET)Programs at Texas A&M University have created a new undergraduate initiative in the area ofentrepreneurship. The goals of the Engineering Entrepreneurship Education Experience (E4) arethreefold: • Excite and motivate undergraduate students to take ownership of their education by giving them opportunities to develop and market their own intellectual property. • Retain the best and brightest undergraduate talent in the Brazos Valley region. • Use entrepreneurship to help
related to how students learn chemistry and how that guides the design of instructional materials and teaching strategies as well on efforts related to faculty development and the connection between chemistry education research and the practice of teaching. She is a PI for the Increase the Impact Project, which is developing resources for PIs to improve the propagation of their innovations, as well as a PI for the ELIPSS Project, which is developing resources for STEM instructors to assess professional skills in the classroom. Dr. Cole is also an associate editor for the Journal of Chemical Education.John Lovitt, Wichita State University and Missouri University of Science & Technology Retired Tech Industry
firsthand that colleges and universities have the ability and desire to helpimprove the job prospects of college graduates in Indiana, and we wanted to give them theresources to be even more strategic and ambitious,”12 This applies to even the small liberal artsschools.Over the last eight years at Taylor University, a primarily undergraduate liberal arts university,the Center for Research and Innovation (CR&I) acted as a change agent and showed that smallliberal arts schools can not only do research that impacts the world, but also leveraged thatresearch into value-add solutions. The mission of the CR&I was to amplify the God-given talentsand passions of students and faculty through innovative research, entrepreneurship andpartnerships
AC 2012-4902: WORKING COLLABORATIVELY AMONG UNIVERSI-TIES: A DENSE NETWORK APPROACHProf. Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University Cynthia C. Fry is a Senior Lecturer of computer science and Assistant Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science, Baylor University.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Sridhar Condoor is a professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department. He is also the Program Director for Mechanical Engineering, a KEEN fellow, a Coleman Fellow, and the Editor of the Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. Condoor teaches sustainability, product design, and entrepreneurship. His research interests are in the areas of design theory and methodology, technology
andlarge-scale engineering projects. Table 4 Modules and Contents of ACEE Curriculum Mathematical Modeling, Introduction to Engineering, Systems Science andEngineering Fundamentals Engineering, Principles of EngineeringEngineering Design Computer Graphics and Basic Data StructureEngineering Management Management, etc.Engineering Practice Wheeled Robot Technology, etc.3.1.2 A Professional Model for Engineering Education InnovationZhejiang Polytechnic Institute benefits from ZJU’s traditional strengths in multiple disciplines,engineering research and education, a well-developed framework for government-industry-universitycooperation, as well as a mature
design thinking. To clarify how the best answerscontains a conversational storytelling theme whether for an interview, discussing aresearch project, or teaching a new class, we begin by offering the methods of the coursethrough which planned prompts/questions are utilized as a tool to encourageconversational storytelling. Then the theory and practice of conversational storytelling inthe classroom setting contains an entrepreneurial parallel that is organized around adiscussion of four concerns. Finally, implications are considered.Method The mixed-methods of socio-cognitive psychology, design thinking, andprojective cues30 used in this work fulfill multiple purposes. Projective cues refer to thediagnostic imagination prompts directed at
AC 2010-745: A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF FACULTY BELIEFSRELATED TO ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATIONKirsten Hochstedt, Pennsylvania State University Kirsten Hochstedt is a Graduate Assistant at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education. She has received her Masters degree in Educational Psychology, with an emphasis in educational and psychological measurement, at Penn State and is a doctoral candidate in the same program. The primary focus of her research concerns assessing the response structure of test scores using item response theory methodology.Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Sarah E. Zappe, is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional
following research questions: ≠ How do students perceive their own leadership traits and skills? ≠ Are students’ self-perceptions demonstrating growth in confidence in their leadership abilities because of the experiences and education from each component of the curriculum? ≠ What impact do all the courses in the four-year leadership curriculum have on this perception? ≠ What modifications are necessary to the curriculum to adequately address the student learning outcomes?As implied by these research questions, the instrument will be used for both formative andsummative assessment, as well as a longitudinal study of the leadership growth of the students.Instrument development included conducting a focus group for
the other five components are inputs. Because entrepreneurship is a process,anyone can learn it12,17. Similarly, innovative thinking and teamwork skills are learnable2,18,19,20.Research and empirical findings have established the value of teamwork in industry andacademia in promoting improved quality performance, self-efficacy, and engagement4,5,21,22,23.These facts imply that one way to ensure that entrepreneurship, innovation, and teamworkeducation and practices are learnt is to teach them and subsequently assess for their learning.Some examples of engineering and computing courses that blend entrepreneurship, innovation,and professional skills education and training are the following: The University of Nevada at Reno developed two senior
papers, and provides faculty development workshops on effective teaching. In 2006, the Kern Family Foundation named Dr. Carpenter a Kern Fellow for Entrepreneurial Education recognizing his efforts to bring innovative team based problem solving into the engineering curriculum to promote the entrepreneurial mindset. In addition to his work on ethics and entrepreneurial skills, Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer. As founding Director of the Great Lakes Stormwater Management Institute, he conducts research on water management and routinely provides professional lectures/short courses on innovative stormwater treatment design and its role in Low Impact
Paper ID #23599Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Using the KEEN Framework for aDigital Communication System CourseProf. John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 16 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40 different graduate and undergraduate courses in electrical engineer- ing, systems engineering, physics
environment”. As part ofthe course, student teams are required to engage in a project involving companies,governmental agencies or individuals outside of the university. The team meets withtheir “client” and works to develop solutions for relevant problems. Student teams havedeveloped business plans, conducted market research and have engaged in impact studiesamong other projects. The teams are usually interdisciplinary and have in the pastincluded both M.B.A. students and Engineering Technology students. Recently, a team of business graduate students traveled to Germany to meet with thefounder of a firm that has acquired the license to produce products using an innovativenew material. Using a process developed by the Fraunhofer Institut
, students will be prepared topass the patent bar examination and become certified to practice patent law before the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. Hence, graduates of the ESIP-Project will have new career optionsincluding choices for becoming patent engineers and patent agents, in addition to traditionaltechnical career choices.This paper includes an overview of the three-course sequence, as well as evaluation results of theimplementation of the first course. A survey was designed by the investigators and implementedpre and post course. The survey included three constructs: Knowledge of IP Concepts, InnovativeProduct Design, and Careers in Patent Law. Following reliability testing procedures, studentresponses to these constructs were compared