AC 2008-2031: "...A GOOD IMAGINATION AND A PILE OF JUNK"Shawn Jordan, Purdue Univeristy SHAWN JORDAN is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, where he is studying geographically distributed design teams. He has appeared on many television shows with Rube Goldberg machines, including Jimmy Kimmel LIVE and Master of Champions on ABC, and has won two National Rube Goldberg Machine Contest championships.Robin Adams, Purdue University Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She also led the Institute for Scholarship on Engineering Education (ISEE) as part of the Center for the
flounder. It is also necessary to identify a faculty champion to leadthese efforts.Table 5: Example of a Team of Champions at KEEN I Program School*Dimensional Level Profile Department/School ImpactAdministrative President, Executive Offices, Becomes one of four Provost, Board of Trustee(s) with core strategic pillars Trustees entrepreneurial of university, funding industry experience to seed and support effortsLead Champion Endowed/Chaire
Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview, 1997.[2] Felder, R. M., and R. Brent, “Understanding Student Differences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, 57-72, January 2005.[3] Herrmann, N., The Creative Brain, The Ned Herrmann Group: Brain Books, 1995.[4] Tobias, S., They’re Not dumb, They’re Different, Research Corporation, 1990.[5] Lumsdaine, E. and M. Lumsdaine, Creative Problem Solving: Thinking Skills for a Changing World, 2nd ed., 1993.[6] Perry, W. G., Jr., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1970.[7] King, P. M. and K. S. Kitchener, Developing Reflective Judgment, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1994.[8
staffing/human resources RG, MY leadership delegation Legal business/tax legal structure S,C,sole,LLC,LLP,LTD nonprofit: 501c3, etc. Intellectual property Copyrights Trademarks Page 13.1360.13 trade secrets utility and design patents RG, MY provisional patentsTopic
. Page 13.698.72. Crittenden, K., IMPaCT: Innovation through Multidisciplinary Projects and Collaborative Teams. Proceedings of the American society for Engineering Education National Conference 2007.3. Benedict, B.; Napper, S. A.; Guice, L. K., Restructuring for Strategic Outcomes. Journal of Engineering Education 2000, 89, (2), 237-246.4. Guice, L. K.; Napper, S. A.; Nelson, J. D., Interdisciplinary Administration Supports Interdisciplinary Education and Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education 2003, 2003- 216.5. Shalley, C. Effects of Coaction, Expected Evaluation, and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38, (2), 483-503.6. Amabile
to plan a crossing strategy o Discussion is allowed during this phase o No stepping on maze during this phase Action phase: o Absolutely no talking o Body movements are allowed Page 13.750.7 o No objects, no computing/communication devices, no paper, no writing, etc. o Each team must send an explorer first, i.e., a team member that explores a non-beeping “clear” path. A clear path must include all rows. No row skipping (but path may include horizontal movement (left/right) o After the explorer crosses, the team must cross. The team (or member(s) of) may follow the same
in cosmetics, protective coatings, drug delivery, and stain-resistant clothingOngoing research and development at a large number of educational institutions andresearch laboratories should enlarge the set of commercial applications of nonotechnologyin the near future. Two educational institutions engaged in these efforts are highlighted inthis presentation.Nanotechnology ApplicationsDespite the fact that the concept underlying nanotechnology was first discussed by RichardFeynman almost 50 years ago, it was not until 1980 that the term “nanotechnology” wasdefined in the context of its application by Dr. K.E. Dexter. (1) Two developments in1980’s, the formalization of cluster science, and the invention of the Scanning TunnelingMicroscope (STM
technology ventures. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 2004. 46(4): p. 125-131.13. McGrath, R.N., S. Fedorovich, and A.W. Bonney. US educational programs integrating technology management and entrepreneurship. 2004. Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331, United States.14. Clark, W.A., et al. Establishing a technology-based business incubator at a regional university: A conceptual framework and case-study. 2005. Portland, OR, United States: American Society for Engineering Education, Chantilly, VA 20153, United States.15. Ports, K., et al. Senior design project commercialization and entrepreneurship. 2005. Portland, OR, United States: American Society
subsequently decides to not pursue commercialization of the Intellectual Property it may be reassigned to the creator(s), upon request. The return to the university for a reassignment of ownership will be ten percent (10%) of the net revenue generated by the intellectual property.An “Innovation” committee was formed to advise the university about which intellectual property is worthprotecting and licensing. The committee is made up of faculty and administrators. The committee is chairedby the executive director of the West Michigan Science & Technology Initiative (WMSTI), an organizationdedicated to developing intellectual property from its member organizations in the region.Student InvolvementThe faculty supported the policy
. During the first three clue hunts, each team member had the chance to be a leader for thefirst time. Upon completion of the solution report, each team member including the leaderassessed the leader’s strengths and weakness without necessarily knowing what exactlyconstitutes a good leader. This served as a learning experience where each student decided whats/he wanted to see from a leader or what s/he should work on as a leader. For the last three cluehunts, each student was required to serve as leader one more time, but this time a more formalleadership assessment was performed. Various leadership skills were stated on a form and eachstatement was rated with a 5 point scale. The leader was given the completed forms, whichincluded a self
enterprise students, graduate students, andfaculty and staff from the early 1990s has been replaced with an agreement that offers realincentives to inventors: Michigan Tech in short order choose either to claim rights to subjecttechnology or to release it entirely to the inventor. If it claims the rights, it will finance theattempt to secure patent protection, and if the successful technology generates royalty income,Michigan Tech will recover its costs and then share the proceeds with the inventor(s). MichiganTechnological University now has one of the highest percentages of undergraduate studentsnamed on invention disclosures in the nation (20 students in the last three years)16: FY05: 50 disclosures, 18% had undergraduates on them
government entities.Cone points out that universities are focal points of learning communities that form thefoundations of entrepreneurship, especially with respect to technology. She also citedPeter Drucker’s observation in the 1980’s that there was a need for more knowledge to doentrepreneurship and that it was time to develop the “principles, the practice and thediscipline.”Economists view the supply of entrepreneurship as subject to the same forces as otherresource behavior. That is, it depends upon the perceived benefits and opportunity costsof the decision to pursue the entrepreneurial path. For example, the explosion ofentrepreneurship in India and China can be traced to expanded awareness and lowering ofobstacles to initiating new