”Intellectual Property Law for Engineers and Scientists,” IEEE and John Wiley & Sons, Publishers (2004) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Online Course on Intellectual Property for Undergraduates and Graduate Engineers and ScientistsIntroduction It can be said with a very high degree of confidence that all of the engineers and scientistsin our technology University classrooms at some point in their professional careers, will comeinto direct contact with the Intellectual Property Laws of this or other countries, and these lawswill have an impact on their extant projects. Whether using these Intellectual Property Laws toobtain exclusive rights covering their
entrepreneurship education to examine: (a)the extent and nature of faculty involvement in undergraduate IP; (b) issues confronting facultyas they relate to undergraduate IP; (c) indicators of success; (d) future changes for promotingstudent involvement in IP generation; and (e) best practices. Most faculty members indicated thatunclear policies, a lack of information, and questions around ownership of inventions were themost significant obstacles when guiding and teaching students. This research contributes to bestpractices for undergraduate IP generation to minimize challenges for faculty, students, andacademic institutions.Running Head: FACULTY VIEWS OF UNDERGRADUATE IP POLICIES Faculty Views of Undergraduate Intellectual Property Policies and
the next year [26]. Similarly, one reviewer’s comment on the draft manuscript for thispaper pointed to one aspect of the broader impact of the research contained herein: “thatentrepreneurial outcomes can be achieved in existing engineering curricula through revisiting theexisting outcomes or minor modifications.” The research contained within this paper hasdemonstrated a connection between entrepreneurial mindset and the ABET Student Outcomes.An appropriate selection of performance indicators can thus be used to help focus attention onthe entrepreneurial mindset aspects of one’s program. Subsequent course-level tweaks made tohelp students attain the outcomes associated with these indicators, such as through the adoptionof various educational
she conducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastruc- ture Research Group (IRG). In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil En- gineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed
deliverables:(1) a “research sequence” consisting of a rhetorical analysis, an annotated bibliography, and aliterature review, (2) a humanities assignment in which students explore the impact oftechnology on societal needs, and (3) laboratory and design reports stemming from the projects.In many cases, there are two grades associated with a design project- one for the report and onefor the “technical merit” of the design itself. For example, when a project on wind turbine design[6] was introduced into the course, 20% of the course grade was based upon how muchelectricity a student team’s turbine generated, and another 20% was based upon the final designreport associated with the project. (The other 60% was primarily based upon other major
Paper ID #30063To Start or Not: Impact of Engineering Students’ Engagement inEntrepreneurship Competitive Activities on their EntrepreneurialIntentionsMiss Yaxin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Yaxin Huang received a Bachelor’s degree in English language and literature from Hohai University of China (2018), and is studying for a Master’s degree in higher education at SJTU. Her research interest includes engineering students’ international learning experiences, innovation and entrepreneurship edu- cation.Prof. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of
specific courses; therefore, the technical assignments to which the contextual activities are linked differ significantly. However, the module-related tasks students are asked to complete are similar. The students typically complete a personality test to determine what role is best suited to each team member and prepare a team charter. They also write a reflection paper discussing the behaviors and emotions observed at each stage of their team’s development period, any conflicts experienced during the project life cycle, and the approach used to resolve conflicts.Relating Assessment Outcomes to KSOs The AOs are different for each e-learning module. However, all of the e-learning moduleswere designed to
through and learn fromfailure” was found to be a competency that the study participants felt was important for creativityand value creation. A survey of engineering capstone faculty asking how they incorporateentrepreneurial practices into their capstone courses indicated just over half encouraged the useof failure or fail forward in the design iteration process (Matthew et al., 2014).Researchers at the University of New Haven (Li, et al., 2016; Li, et al., 2018; Li, et al., 2019)developed an instrument intended to measure entrepreneurial mindset. This instrument containsseveral items relating to failure, which they conceptualize as being a part of the entrepreneurialmindset. Again, while these studies and the instrument are not focused on
to measure students’ self-evaluation of their participation and potential distractions during the learning activity.Since 2017, the StRIP instrument has been completed by more than 1,000 students in US universityengineering programs. Seventeen engineering faculty have also been interviewed by researchers[14]. While many students embrace active learning and report positive learning experiences [15-17], the evidence-based results have also revealed a few reasons for their resistance. One of themajor concerns was lack of motivation. In other words, some students would not see the value inthe new learning techniques. Additionally, distraction coming from the internet or social mediasometimes negatively impacts their learning efficiency. It
are as important as motivation that enable creative, constructive, and proactivepractice or emotions. In practice, young graduate engineers who want to create the future in-stead of staying in a comfortable and predictable world of natural sciences, need to navigateand negotiate their way in complex and constantly changing environments that have both nat-ural sciences based and more human centered challenges. Engineering education research haswidely acknowledged this and it is a common baseline for curricula and teaching methods indesign and in engineering education yet pragmatic solutions tend to be context driven and fo-cused on areas that are measurable quantitatively. There is a need for facilitated understand-ing of motivation and
the curriculum, computer engineering-related electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for engineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around them. He spends a great deal of time looking for ways to break out of the traditional engineering mold and to make engineering more broadly accessible to students. His research interest is the application of mobile computing to interesting, human-focused problems. He holds three degrees in computer engineering including graduate degrees from Virginia Tech and an undergraduate degree from NC State University. c
. However, these very traits oftenlead to problems when building large scale software systems. As has been reported by Felder[2], most engineering students tend to be introverted and sensing in their nature. This makes itdifficult for students to interact with others and can lead to problems when building complexsoftware systems. Software engineers often fail to understand the human aspects of the systemsthey design, yielding non-optimum results when finished.We know from the research that appropriate requirements gathering, and elicitation are critical tothe success of software engineering projects. Efforts in effectively defining requirements pay offin both faster deliveries and more successful projects [3]. Thus, it is essential that a
Paper ID #30805Integrating Innovation Curriculum: Measuring Student Innovation toAssess Course and Program EffectivenessDr. Karl D. Schubert FIET, University of Arkansas Dr. Karl D. Schubert is a Professor of Practice and Director of Research for Innovation and Data Science Initiatives for the College of Engineering and the Sam M. Walton College of Business in the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. His academic research focuses on providing Innovation programs for STEM education; and, student, faculty and industry innovation engagement. Schubert also serves as a consultant specializing in innovation
Projects. This course lays the foundation for EM development within thecurriculum. EGE 1001 is a multidisciplinary course that serves to introduce first year students tothe role of the engineer in society and the engineering design process by engaging in multipleshort-term projects within one semester. The projects introduce basic engineering conceptswhile instilling EM attributes and behaviors such as: effective communication, teamwork, ethicsand ethical decision-making, customer awareness, innovation, time management, criticalthinking, global awareness, self-directed research, life-long learning, learning through failure,tolerance for ambiguity, and estimation [4].Sophomore Year - Most EM-focused programs employ the first year and seniorcapstone
solutions that generate and strengthen career plans of students, as well as improve retention, graduation rates, and speed to graduation. He is recognized within education circles as standing at the vanguard of the progressive technological movement. He has taught students, trained corporate salespeople and career coaches, and advised entrepreneurs. His energy, passion, positivity, and attention to detail have served him well in bringing out the best in others.Dr. Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Kishore Pochiraju is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education and a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Stevens Institute of Technology. He recently
University of Arkansas in May 2017. At Arkansas Tech University, Matthew is focused on establishing research experiences in photovoltaics for undergraduate and graduate students and investigating new methods to enhance engineering education in the classroom. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: Adopting the Entrepreneurial Mindset in an Upper Level Engineering Electromagnetics CourseIntroductionThis work in progress paper provides details about the current status of transforming a junior-level undergraduate engineering electromagnetics course by adding entrepreneurially mindedlearning (EML) activities to the course. The EML