technology. Students enrolledin the minor of industrial robot courses were required to participate in real-world projects.Sixteen students participated in this project, six of the students are seniors, and ten weresophomores. All the students participated in the project but only fourteen of them submitted thecompleted photovoice metacognitive reflection assignments [16].3.3 Data Collection Instrument(s)The data collected from the participating students through the implementation of the newapproach through students’ reflections promotes. The open-ended survey questions were given tothe students to reflect on their perspectives during the project implementations. The open-endedsurvey questions are provided here [17]. 1. Explain how participating in
were given the option of selecting their project team members.Two students worked individually, and six worked in groups of two. Participants’ gender andrace were not collected or used for the purpose of this study. The university IRB approved theresearch, and all participants were informed that the project would be used for research.3.3 Data Collection Instrument(s)All students in the class were required to complete a photovoice reflection assignment as part oftheir four milestone submissions [17]. Photovoice is a qualitative learning assessment tooldeveloped in the mid-1990s as a participatory methodology [18]. The tool has been modified andadapted in pedagogical research to observe students learning and study their engagement inlearning
). All comparisons between pre- and post- responses for each question were statistically significant (p < 0.0001).We analyzed the open-ended responses to uncover themes related to professional skills andempathetic design. When asked the question in the post-survey “What was/were the mostbeneficial aspect(s) of the course to you?” the overwhelming response by 50 of the 52 totalresponses mentioned that the customer interviews, which were a requirement for the businessmodel reports, were the most beneficial. Several other students mentioned that they will utilizecustomers’ perspectives when working in the future: “The most beneficial aspects [of the course] were definitely from the insights and connections
Quality of Life in the Late Life at Day Care Centers of Shiraz, Iran: A Randomized Controlled Trial," International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 136-145, 2018.[9] R. Charon, "Narrative Medicine: A Model for Empathy, Reflection, Profession, and Trust," JAMA, vol. 186, no. 15, pp. 1897-1902, 2001.[10] L. G. Perks and J. S. Turner, "Podcasts and productivity: A Qualitative Uses and Gratifications Study," Masss Communication and Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 96-116, 2019.[11] S. Lemeround and L. Camacho Rourkes, Digital Voices: Podcasting in the Creative Writing Classroom, Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.[12] S. Tobin and R. Guadagno, "Why People Listen: MOtivations and Outcomes of
(NAPE) Foundation and theDavid Okai Okantey Foundation. Any opinions, findings & conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofNAPE Foundation or the David Okai Okantey Foundation.References[1] “History,” Palm Institute. https://palm.edu.gh/about-us/history (accessed Jan. 18, 2023).[2] “Palm Institute adopts Honour System,” Citinewsroom - Comprehensive News in Ghana, May 13, 2021. https://citinewsroom.com/2021/05/palm-institute-adopts-honour-system/ (accessed Feb. 09, 2023).[3] “Palm Institute adopts the Honour System,” Palm Institute. https://palm.edu.gh/about-us/honour-system/ (accessed Feb. 09, 2023).[4] M. Nager, C. Nelsen, and F. Nouyrigat
student success," 2013.[5] D. Henriksen, M. Henderson, E. Creely, A. A. Carvalho, M. Cernochova, D. Dash, T. Davisand P. Mishra, "Creativity and risk-taking in teaching and learning settings: Insights from sixinternational narratives," International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.1-11, 2021.[6] N.R. Kuncel, S. Hezlett, and D. Ones, "Academic performance, career potential, creativity,and job performance: Can one construct predict them all?," J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 102, no. 3, pp.599-616, Aug. 2010.[7] P. C. Wankat, R. M. Felder, K. A. Smith and F. S. Oreovicz, "The scholarship of teaching andlearning in engineering," in Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning:Exploring Common Ground, vol. 1
: “Being motivated to do better after facing failure repeatedly, to bounce back and do better in the future.” “A healthy mindset towards failure is recognizing that failure is possible and always a risk of attempting something new.” “It is being able to fail but not being discouraged but rather thinking ’I’m about to learn something.’ It’s being glad you failed, finding your hiccup(s), and then moving forward with your new knowledge.” “Being open to trying hard things without knowing the outcome.”Despite occasional negative moments or challenges, most students concluded that the overallimpact on their mindset has been positive. Students reflected on their positive adaptations
Paper ID #37514Undergraduate students are the ”secret sauce” to help research programsbe successfulDr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University KEN VAN TREUREN is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor Univer- sity and serves as the Associate Dean in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in 1977 and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in 1978. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom in 1994. He then taught at the USAF Academy until his military
-endedproblem-solving is because of the limited guidance or literature on how to effectively integratewicked, real-world problems into engineering courses at the level of technical core.1.1 Current Approaches: Capstone Design and Co-op/InternshipIt is known that capstone experiences instituted in various formats do provide an effectiveculminating opportunity to engineering students for gaining a real-world experience with theengineering design process. However, since capstone projects come at the very last semester(s)and since each project cannot cover the whole range of technical areas that students are expectedto learn in their degree program, this approach cannot be the only solution for creating learningexperiences that support the growth of
evenjust awareness of the secondary and tertiary curricula could help both levels. However, it is stillrare to have this kind of pipeline. In the next section, we will focus on a case of a high schoolprogram and its connections to a university program that might offer some lessons for how thecreation of a pipeline might be supported.connection between college and high school programs An intrapreneurship training program for electrical and computer engineering studentswas implemented through an NSF S-STEM grant at an R1 university. The intrapreneurshipprogram was designed to teach students how to be innovative and entrepreneurial within anexisting company, since the vast majority of students will not be interested in starting their
@uce.edu.ecAbstractThis study focuses on testing a pedagogical model designed to foster collaborativeentrepreneurship competencies in students pursuing technical careers. Entrepreneurship as a keycompetence for the economic and social progress of the country. However, the current training intechnical careers does not adequately cover the collaborative skills associated withentrepreneurship. The general objective was to test Moscoso´s pedagogical model that integratesspecific competencies, such as leadership, team communication, and team mediation, within thecurriculum of technical careers. The specific objectives focused on designing and proposing apedagogical model for the development of each of these competencies, comparing responses to aquestionnaire applied
and Non- Cognitive Skills,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., pp. 363–379, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.18404/ijemst.440339.[5] M. S. Griggs, S. E. Rimm-Kaufman, E. G. Merritt, and C. L. Patton, “The Responsive Classroom approach and fifth grade students’ math and science anxiety and self-efficacy,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 360–373, 2013, doi: 10.1037/spq0000026.[6] G. Ramirez, H. Chang, E. A. Maloney, S. C. Levine, and S. L. Beilock, “On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies,” J. Exp. Child Psychol., vol. 141, pp. 83–100, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.014.[7] ChangeMaker Consulting LLC, “Camp Invention Evaluation
discussion activity in the workshop investigated in thisstudy is like the AUT, but two major differences: (1) the participants were given physical objectsthat they can explore by their senses and (2) the participants were asked to determine the object’sbasic function(s) along with its societal functions and metaphorical connotations. By giving theparticipants physical object by asking the participants to think of the societal function of anobject, the workshop facilitator invited participants to expand their thinking to include thesocietal context beyond one’s individual experience. Furthermore, by asking the participants tothink of metaphorical connotations, the workshop facilitator invited participants to furtherexpand their thinking and dig
Vanderbilt University.Dr. Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University KEN VAN TREUREN is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor Univer- sity and serves as the Associate Dean in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in 1977 and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in 1978. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom in 1994. He then taught at the USAF Academy until his military retirement. At Baylor University since 1998, he teaches courses in fluid mechanics, energy systems, propulsion sys- tems, heat transfer, and aeronautics. Research interests include
] S. von Stumm, B. Hell, and T. Chamorro-Premuzic, “The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 6, pp. 574–588, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1745691611421204. [6] C. A. Berg and R. J. Sternberg, “Response to novelty: continuity versus discontinuity in the developmental course of intelligence,” Adv Child Dev Behav, vol. 19, pp. 1–47, 1985, doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60387-0. [7] P. J. Silvia, “Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity,” Cognition and Emotion, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 94–113, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1080/02699930701298481. [8] W. F. Massy, T.A. Sullivan, and C. Mackie, “Improving measurement
entrepreneurship.However, no organization or program aims to integrate entrepreneurship and STEAM withsustainability simultaneously. For instance, KEEN (The Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork) partners with more than 50 colleges and universities across the United States. KEENfocuses on teaching undergraduate students the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) so they can createpersonal, economic, and social value through a lifetime of meaningful work.Also, in sustainability and specifically in the AEC industry, there are many governmentprograms and non-profit organizations at the local, national, and global levels, such as U.S.Green Building Council, Engineers Without Borders (Designing Sustainable Solutions), andWorld Green Council.Moreover, since the early 1990’s
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 2023 ASEE Conference[2] https://www.canada.ca/en/innovation-science-economic-development/services/small-businesses.html[3] Schumpeter, Joseph A., and Archibald J. Nichol. "Robinson's economics of imperfectcompetition." Journal of political economy 42, no. 2 (1934): 249-259.[4] Lerner, Josh, and Antoinette Schoar. "Does legal enforcement affect financial transactions?The contractual channel in private equity." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, no. 1(2005): 223-246.[5] Kelley, D. J., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2015). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2014global report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.[6] Audretsch, D. B. (2015). Everything
Holistic REU Program,” in2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun.2019. [2] O. Qaqish, C. Hincher, T. Nguyen, and N. Goodwin, “The Grand Challenges Scholars Program Research Experience: A Great Opportunity to Cultivate Belonging in a Community of Practice,” in2019 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2023. [3] S. D. Ivie, “Ausubel’s Learning Theory: An Approach to Teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills,”High Sch. J., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 35–42,1998. [4] J. Novak and A. Cañas
Education, 3(2), 137-146. 7. Nordin, N. M., Abdullah, R., & Sipon, S. M. (2018). Developing entrepreneurship skills through project-based learning in manufacturing engineering education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 10(1), 1-10. 8. Sánchez-Gálvez, V., Ordoñez, J. J., & Ríos, J. A. (2020). Entrepreneurship education in engineering: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(9), 3583. 9. Arvanitis, L., & Athanasopoulos, E. (2019). Entrepreneurship education and manufacturing innovation: A case study. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(3), 23-44. 10. Jukola, S., Kujala, J., & Käpylä, J. (2017). Implementing entrepreneurial mindset in engineering
project,” J. Eng. Entrep., vol. 7, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Feb. 2017, Accessed: Feb. 03, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.jeenonline.org/Jeen_Vol7_Num3.html[2] D. Grzybowski, E. Park, A. Leonard, J. DeLano, and D. Tang, “Review of Entrepreneurial Mindset Instruments & Surveys for Assessment,” Engineering Unleashed, 572, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/572[3] K. Morgan and J. M. LeDoux, “Annotated Bibliography: Learning Sciences Constructs for Entrepreneurial Mindset.” Georgia Institute of Technology.[4] C. A. Bodnar, S. Jadeja, and E. Barrella, “Creating a master entrepreneurial mindset concept map,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for
Dr. Najmus Saqib is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Marian University. He has been teaching in his field since 2017. Saqib is passionate about student learning. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado School of Mines, focusing on ”Optical Diagnostics of Lithium-Sulfur and Lithium-Ion Battery Electrolytes using Attenuated Total Reflection Infrared Spectroscopy”. At Mines Saqib was a member of the MODES Lab, led by Dr. Jason M. Porter. His work on Li-S batteries was the first of its kind to use quantitative infrared spectroscopy for operando polysulfide measurements. He has also applied operando spectroscopy to improve the understanding of electrolyte decomposition mechanisms
participants are very valuable and will be incorporatedinto the project and its implementation in the future.Individual Reflections ResultsThe individual reflections from the 112 participants were analyzed following the process forthematic analysis described by Braun and Clark [13]. Two researchers independently reviewedthe data to become familiar with it and then identified themes based on the literature to use as theframework for the thematic analysis to measure student motivation, curiosity, connections, andmaking skills. The two researchers then independently coded the data by labeling excerpt(s) fromeach reflection that reflected a theme and recording it in a spreadsheet. The analysis results fromboth researchers were compared and any
throughoutits 2,600 years history. In particular, there are many earthquakes because of geologicalfeatures given Japan’s location at the marginal point of 4 major continental plates. There are111 active volcanoes in the Japan islands area, which is nearly 7.4% of the total for the entireplanet. In January 2020, the Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport andTourism disclosed a 70-80% probability of magnitude 8-9 class earthquake(s) within 30years. Even smaller scale but still impactful earthquakes are happening every year andcausing deadly damage. Considering the worldwide data that earthquakes accounted for moredeaths than all other natural hazards combined, causing nearly 56% of total global disastermortality between 1996 and 2015 [12
., D. Moore, M. Natishan, L. Schmidt, Shirley Vining Brown, C. Lathan, I. Goswami, and S. Mouring. 1999. “Faculty and Student Views on Engineering Student Team Effectiveness.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 5 (4). https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v5.i4.50.Morin, Megan, and Richard Goldberg. 2022. “Work in Progress: Creating Micromoments to Develop a Student’s Entrepreneurial Mindset.” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--41445.Motejlek, Jiri, and Esat Alpay. 2023. “The Retention of Information in Virtual Reality Based Engineering Simulations.” European Journal of Engineering Education, January, 1– 20. https
. M., & Radharamanan, R. (2012, June), Proposed KEEN Initiative Framework for Entrepreneurial Mindedness in Engineering Education Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.[5] Estell, J. K. (2020, June), “EMbedding” the KEEN Framework: An Assessment Plan for Measuring ABET Student Outcomes and Entrepreneurial Mindset Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference.[6] Keeley, L., Pikkel, R., Quinn, B., & Walters, H. (2013). Ten types of innovation: The discipline of building breakthroughs. Wiley.[7] Jahnke, K., & Lindgren, S. (2021, July), You Teach Us: Peer Teaching in the Engineering Classroom Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual
and example of sections that were repeated for each class period. Figure 2. Examples of open-ended sections of workbook.The Impact Portfolio included four distinct sections, three of which explicitly connected to theKEEN 3Cs. The curiosity section asked students to find a video and article that connected withtheir professional interests and provide a summary of main takeaways and connection to theiroverall interests and goals. A section emphasizing connections required students to identify onesustaining and one disruptive innovation in their field of interest, the innovation process thecreator(s) took to implement, and the impact the innovation has had on the specific field andsociety. The creating value section asked students
studies. Then, wewill delve into the discussion section, where we will interpret the results within the context ofexisting literature and theory. This section will also explore the practical implications of ourfindings for educational institutions. Finally, we will conclude by offering a reflective summaryof the significance of the study and its contributions to entrepreneurial education research.MethodologySurveyA Cronbach's Alpha of 0.890 was attained during the survey validation process for theEntrepreneurial Competencies dimension and 0.876 for the Entrepreneurial Intention dimension.Table 1 shows the corresponding Cronbach´s Alpha reliability analysis by dimensions.Descriptive statistics were used in sample characterization for data analysis
“Entrepreneurship – New Insights”, Eds. M. Mohiuddin et. al., Intech Open, September 2023[5] Dziobczenski, P. R. N., Kähkönen, E., & Mits, H. (2023). “Shaping A Sustainable Future Through Integra�ng Sustainability, Crea�vity and Entrepreneurship In Engineering Educa�on At Aalto University”, European Society for Engineering Educa�on (SEFI). DOI: 10.21427/BW39-Y819[6] A.A. de Bronstein, S. Lampe, and J. Halberstadt, “Fostering future engineers as transformational agents: integrating sustainability and entrepreneurship in engineering education”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 219 pp. 957-962 (2023)[7] Braga, M. [et al.]. “How do students transform good solu�ons from an educa�onal challenge in a startup? A case study to entrepreneurship
Engineering Ethics, vol. 25, pp.911-937, 2018.[22] D. Ifenthaler, Z. Siddique, and F. Mistree, "Designing for open innovation: Change ofattitudes, self-concept, and team dynamics in engineering education," in Emerging Technologiesfor STEAM Education: Full STEAM Ahead, 2015.[23] E. Pluskwik, E. Leung, and A. Lillesve, "Growing Entrepreneurial Mindset inInterdisciplinary Student Engineers: Experiences of a Project-Based Engineering Program,"ASEE, 2018.[24] E. Seymour, D. Wiese, A.-B. Hunter, and S. Daffinrud, "Creating a Better Mousetrap: On-line Student Assessment of Their Learning Gains," 2000.[25] S.R. Brunhaver, J.M. Bekki, A.R. Carberry, J.S. London, and A.F. McKenna, "Developmentof the Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment (ESEMA