on gene expression. He has a keen interest in new educational models especially in the area of innovation, experiential learning, and project-based learning. He currently serves as program director for the University of North Dakota’s Biomedical Engineering program and is actively developing an Innovation Based Learning methodology.Ryan Striker, University of North Dakota Ryan Striker is a life-long learner. Ryan has two decades of professional experience designing embedded electronic hardware for industrial, military, medical, and automotive applications. Ryan earned his BS and PhD in Electrical Engineering and his MS in Systems Engineering. He now teaches Biomedical Engineering at the University of North Dakota
, students who had an interest in graduate programs were alsoencouraged to take an M-CURE that focused on writing peer reviewed papers and transition to graduateprograms [3,5].The last element of the CURE experiences was tied to development of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM).EM for this project is defined as a set of attitudes, dispositions, habits, and behaviors that shape a uniqueapproach to problem-solving, innovation, and value creation. In the context of research, we are focused onhelping students connect research with value creation. We have defined a research mindset as a broaderidea that includes many facets of an entrepreneurial mindset. These factors in turn are connected to theidea of student-centered research [6].All of the CUREs in the
Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri- Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University Liping Liu is an associate professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence
engineeringfundamentals.IntroductionMore than ever, the world needs innovative products, services and organizations to help societymove forward. Those who will design these advances often seek opportunities in college to bothdevelop and test new ways to solve problems in ever-growing ecosystems and new engineeringapplications. Though engineering programs often excel at teaching technical capabilities,communication, leadership, teamwork and project-based learning activities gain less attention. Inaddition, engineering programs typically lack a structured method to apply entrepreneurialthinking to their studies, where questions of financial viability, social usefulness and potentialdemand for their engineering solutions are integrated into their coursework. Therefore, co
]. 2. Sustainability and climate change (S/CC) topics. S/CC problems have recently been coming to the forefront as problems that need to be urgently addressed. Given the important role engineers play in transportation, manufacturing, design, and other areas relevant to S/CC, it is important for engineering students to be exposed to these topics throughout their studies. o Within S/CC topics, the concept of circularity (as in the circular economy) is discussed and included as a requirement for student projects. In this course and in this paper, circularity is referred to as Cradle to Cradle (C2C), based on the book by McDonough and Braungart [3]. The C2C approach promotes a
training in active learning methodologies at the three campuses of the School of Engineering (Santiago, Vi˜na del Mar and Concepci´on, Chile). She authored several manuscripts in the science education area, joined several research projects, participated in international conferences with oral presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Relationship Among Entrepreneurial Intention and Entrepreneurial Competency Development: A Study on Perceptions Through Engineering Students.AbstractEntrepreneurial intention and entrepreneurial competencies are two
Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University Liping Liu serves as the Associate Dean of Graduate
encourage both new and experienced faculty to embrace EML and to see the benefit ofincluding undergraduates in research programs. Seeing some of the examples of successfullyintegrating undergraduates in research that will be presented in the workshops should encourageall faculty and motivate them to include more undergraduates in their programs.Project DescriptionThe desire of this initial project was to expose undergraduate students to research early in theiracademic career. KEEN first sponsored a workshop entitled “EML through Research” in thefall of 2019. The workshop helped to explore the connection between research and EML. Thisworkshop has been offered several more times since then. The results of these workshops weredeveloped into
significant.In a previous study, the innovation self-efficacy of undergraduate students enrolled in two juniorand senior level environmental engineering courses was found to increase after studentscompleted an activity on designing K-12 STEM projects related to the course outcomes (See fullinstrument in Bolhari and Tillema, 2022). In a follow-on study, it was of interest to evaluate theimpacts of the addition of mentors into the curriculum design activity. Previous research foundthat various forms of mentoring might increase innovation self-efficacy. In co-curricularactivities with communities via the group Design for America (DFA), student teams receivedbrief weekly coaching sessions with professional designers, and interviews identified these
Paper ID #46967Development of Entrepreneurial Competencies in Engineering Students: AComparative Analysis between In-Person and Online EducationProf. Barbara Munoz-Vallejos, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile B´arbara Estefan´ıa Mu˜noz Vallejos, M.Sc., is an Assistant Professor and faculty member at the School of Engineering, Universidad Andr´es Bello (UNAB), Chile. She holds a degree in Psychology and a Bachelor’s in Psychology from Universidad del Desarrollo (2008). Additionally, she earned a Master’s degree in Curriculum Development and Educational Projects from Universidad Andr´es Bello (2019–2021). She has also
Paper ID #43559Developing Engineering Identity Through StoryDr. Michelle Marincel Payne, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Michelle Marincel Payne is an Associate Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She earned her Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, her M.S. in Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is leading a project to use story to help
Through an Alumni Seminar Series and Alumni-Led Jigsaw ActivitiesAbstractThe development of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM) is critical for engineering students as theyprepare to navigate complex, real-world challenges. This project aimed to enhance students' EMby connecting them with early-career professionals through a seminar series and in-class jigsawactivities. In the spring semester of 2024, four alumni, representing diverse career paths inconsulting, water treatment, enzyme manufacturing, and data science, participated in a monthlyseminar series open to all engineering students. Following each seminar, the alumni collaboratedwith the course instructor to design and present a jigsaw activity related to their
systems, dynamic obstacle avoidance algorithms for unmanned aerial vehi- cles, improving software engineering pedagogy, and et ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Undergraduate Research as a Tool for Building Entrepreneurial Mindset inEngineering StudentsAbstractEntrepreneurial Mindset (EM) has become a widespread classroom practice in many universities in recentyears. Our research project is focused on how EM may be infused into undergraduate researchexperiences for engineering students. For several years, we have offered a workshop to help facultydevelop methods to build EM into research practice. This includes research in traditional lab groups andalso building course-based undergraduate research
suitablecandidates for a curriculum focused on technological innovation. Undergraduate innovationprograms should create programs that cater to the student’s individual needs. In addition, Someinnovation programs require more resources and support to help students turn their ideas intoviable enterprises or businesses, which is another reason why many undergraduate programs needto be more effective and sustainable [1]. For example, a program might provide financial supportfor student projects but without mentoring, business development assistance, or networkingopportunities. It may be challenging for undergraduate students in some programs to continuedeveloping and building their ideas once the program is done. Hence, it requires committedleadership
strategies that may work well to understandentrepreneurial mindset (EM) in engineering students.Our team is also working to help those new to the topic to find tools quickly that may align withthe EM project or research questions they are working on. The research group includes experts inassessment from the fields of education, psychology, and engineering - a composition that allowsus to evaluate different tools from the perspective of validity and the educator. While we cannotyet answer each research question below, this paper presents our current work-in-progress onseveral research questions: 1. What tools and best practices have been developed for the assessment of EM? 2. What are the best descriptors of assessment for
Paper ID #49179BOARD #153: Work in Progress: Designing a Role Playing Game for anAstrobiology CourseProf. Steven McAlpine, University of Maryland Baltimore County Steven McAlpine is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Entrepreneurship, Engineering, and Individualized Study programs at UMBC. He has been teaching role playing game design and leading campus wide RPG events for the past ten years. He also leads the multidisciplinary sustainable design course entitled INDS 430: The Kinetic Sculpture Project, which won the grand prize in the 2015 Baltimore Kinetic Sculpture race. ©American Society
Communications course. EML is a pedagogy that aims to inculcate the entrepreneurialmindset (EM) in students, specifically the 3C framework of the EM: curiosity, connections, andcreating value. EML techniques aim to increase student curiosity, improve the student’s ability tomake connections between disparate sources of information, and ultimately equip them to createvalue for themselves and society. Thus, EML is closely related to inquiry-based learning, problem-based learning, and project-based learning. The distinction between EML and these otherpedagogical approaches is the focus on a value-creation mindset.EML is integrated into this course primarily through three frameworks: (1) DevelopingConnections, which employs risk factor consideration when
bootcamp. Some studieshave suggested the I-Corps model has several potential benefits within undergraduate education,but more research is needed to elucidate the features of I-Corps that are most valuable at theundergraduate level.In this study, we developed a new Entrepreneurial Bioengineering elective course for junior andsenior undergraduate engineering students that models various aspects of the I-Corps program.The course introduces entrepreneurship, business model canvas, and lean start-up principles tothe students with a focus on medical device customer discovery and technologycommercialization. Students work in teams to form project ideas, interview customers, testbusiness model hypotheses, and present their discoveries. The goal of this
uncertain future that lies ahead. Evidence suggests thatproficiency in innovation, critical thinking, complex problem-solving, and effectivecommunication positions students for success in sustainable engineering careers [2-4]. However,a prevalent culture of risk aversion among students stifles exploration into unchartedtechnological territories, thereby limiting their comprehensive academic growth [5].In response to these challenges, this paper presents an evaluative study of an inventive, multi-disciplinary, project-based course known as "Innovation Through Making." This course isdesigned to blend the foundational Engineering Sciences (ES) curriculum with anEntrepreneurial Mindset, thereby endowing students with critical knowledge and
Paper ID #41551MBL (Mastery-Based Learning) Supports a Normalization of Failure as anEssential Part of LearningDr. Kurt M. Degoede, Elizabethtown College Professor of Engineering and Physics, Elizabethtown College. His research interests in biomechanics include developing clinical instruments for rehabilitation and human performance. Dr. DeGoede teaches upper-level undergraduate mechanical engineering using mastery-based assessment models and project-based learning, design courses, and first-year multidisciplinary courses.Dr. Brenda Read-Daily, Elizabethtown College Dr. Brenda Read-Daily is an Associate Professor of
ofinterdisciplinarity and stakeholder engagement. We will close with both a section on “lessonslearned” throughout this process, as well as a section on the “deliverables” that have emergedfrom this process thus far. These ‘deliverables’ tie to benefits that, we believe, will enhancecareer preparation for students.theories of interdisciplinaritySeveral theories could have supported our work on developing a program in SocialEntrepreneurship. We are aware of the literature suggesting that theories of community-engagement (Tekic et al., 2022; Wallerstein et al. 2020), and even collaborative building () couldhave been used to guide this project. However, the development of this project was madepossible by a grant from funders who have a particular interest in
project examining how math and science motivational beliefs influence STEM students’ major choice in college. Her recent work focuses on exploring STEM students’ metacognition, entrepreneurial mindset, self-regulated learning strategies, and learning achievement.Dr. David K Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte David Pugalee is a full Professor and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. Dr. Pugalee has published works on STEM teaching and learning and on the NSF project Developing a Systemic, Scalable Model to Broaden Participation in Middle School Computer Science that focuses on computational thinking in science and mathematics. He
, INSPIRES, and two annual Project Showcases. Magda is the Principal Investigator of the Texas A&M University I-Corps Site grant and has been active in promoting entrepreneurship both at the local and national level. Member, Institute for Engineering Education & Innovation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: The missing link in I-Corps Entrepreneurship Engineering Education at a Southwestern InstitutionAbstractEntrepreneurship education has made its way at most engineering institutions. Lean methods andthe I-Corps culture have gained notoriety and momentum across the United States. At aSouthwestern institution, designated as an I-Corps
fields [4], [5], [6].In recent years, course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been gainingpopularity as a way to engage undergraduate students in authentic scientific inquiry on a largescale [7]. While CUREs have many similarities to traditional laboratory courses or courseresearch projects, the work students do as part of a CURE is framed in a fundamentally differentway. Research projects within CUREs ideally have direct and indirect impact on the broaderscientific community and offer students the opportunity to share study findings with externalstakeholders [8]. Consequently, CUREs represent an overlap between the triumvirate of studentlearning, stakeholder impact, and promotion of a faculty’s research program.In this work
Paper ID #37871Work in Progress: Examining the KEEN 3Cs Framework Using ContentAnalysis and Expert ReviewMr. Sanjeev M. Kavale, Arizona State University Sanjeev Kavale is currently a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education Systems and Design (EESD) at Arizona State University (ASU). His research interests are mindsets and their applicability in engineering, outcomes-based education, and problem / project-based learning. He is having a teaching experience of 11 years and an industry experience of 2 years prior to joining PhD.Ms. Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University Alexandra Jackson is a second year PhD student at
TechnologyDr. Bahar Memarian, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Bahar Memarian is an interdisciplinary researcher and educator with more than 10 years of research and teaching experience at the intersection of applied and social sciences. She has designed and executed research projects as both a team leader and a member. She has also developed and delivered learning modules and courses in the areas of STEM, design, and engineering education at the secondary and undergraduate levels. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Examining The Differences In Grade Point Average ForEngineering Students Enrolled In Entrepreneurial Education Programs
effectiveness of COIL, as previous studies have shown it to promoteintercultural competency but noted its dependence upon adequate pre-training to contextualizethe cross-cultural experience [2], [9], [10].Herein, we describe the initiation and initial stages of our cross-institutional project to answer: 1)How do international experiences influence undergraduate science and engineering students’EM, and 2) How does the international experience modality (i.e., study abroad or COIL) impactdevelopment of EM?Team formation:Team members initially met during the Networking, Ideation, and Collaboration (NIC) workshop[11] offered by APA-ENG (March 29-31, 2023). The NIC workshop is an intensive, nine hourworkshop that provides participants with foundational
Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Syharat is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and a Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects. As the Program Manager of a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) project titled, ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”, she has co-facilitated a range of Neuroinclusive Teaching Institutes and workshops for STEM instructors and Teaching Assistants. As a graduate researcher, she conducts qualitative research related to the experiences of neurodiverse graduate students in STEM fields through an Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) project titled
aligns with the grand challenges themes of security, sustainability, health, and joy of living, linking experiential learning, disciplinary knowledge, multicultural awareness, and EM development. Previous studies suggest that short-term international experiences can be highly motivating, transformative, and effective in fostering students' cultural awareness. A strong connection to place may enhance first-year engineering (FYE) students’ approach to their end-of-year design projects. Each team of four students creates, develops, and tests their assigned design project at their respective international location. This research study explores the impact of international
seetheir mission in response to economic pressures, funding constraints, and the evolvingexpectations of higher education.The Bayh Dole Act passed in 1980, is the legislation that allowed US universities to own patentsemerging from federally-funded research (Mowery et al., 2001). Before the Act, the federalgovernment owned inventions emerging from government-funded projects. Granting universitiesownership and management of their patent portfolios was viewed as a way to promotetechnology transfer, research commercialization, and collaboration between academia andindustry. Universities could demonstrate research's societal and economic impact by developingnew technologies, products, and services. They could also benefit from licensing agreementswith